Comments by "Ikenga Spirit" (@ikengaspirit3063) on "The Craziest Thieves in History" video.

They should all be in Mecca, bound together by silver bonds.
3
@Jupiter__001_ 1. That's not communism, at best its proto-communism (which is an abstraction that never really existed). 2. From Acts, literally only the Jerusalemite Church acted similar to that and even then, people had private property, they just commonly allowed others to use it. For example, the story of Ananias and Sapphira best exemplifies this as they and others that donated property and money had full rights over their properties until they gave it over to the Church. That isn't only a recognition of private property but contractual passing over of labour and property, both of which communism doesn't agree with. 3. The only things aside from that that worked more "communist" than that are Monasteries and Other Church properties like that and the moment commies start calling modern day monasteries(which retain the same basic organization in many places) communist then I'll start taking that argument seriously. As the Marxists and the Anarcho-Communists contemporary with Marx knew, religion is anti-thetical to communism.
3
@Jupiter__001_ Marx and Marxists aren't the only ones that say that religion is anti-thetical to communism, till this day anarcho-communists, communists, anarcho-primitivists(in this case, especially Abrahamic religions) say it and they are correct. Proto-Communism/Ancient Communism is a theory that started out as Communists trying to interprete history according to their theory, for example the Marxist like Engels with no field research made up a theory that mankind was matriachal and with free love and no private property before Patriarchy, Paternality, Nuclear families and Inheritance took over as a packaged bunch. This became part of the core of the Marxist theory of pre-history and was arrived in basically in the same way Ancient Greek philosophers concluded that heavier objects fall faster than lighter objects. So from that history of the term, I am confident that like with how many historians now treat the terms Feudalism and Tribe, Proto-Communism is another abstraction of modernist thought claimed to apply to people that it never applied to. I don't really know of the Hussites in detail so I'm not going to argue that but the same way that I'm am not going to date Capitalism any earlier than the British Industrial revolution, I am not gonna date Communism/Socialism any earlier than the reaction period to that Industrial and Capitalist frame work.
2
If they're like Muslims Prots, then they're based.
1
@zaeidanis To the best of my knowledge, Shia follow the same Quran, which means the same core holy book. The only real issue is that they also believe Hadiths that are less trust worthy and follow their Imams almost like they're Prophets.
1
@armored_half-truck tiny fragments and other fragments probably weren't recovered, if not there'll be no where to fill it in with silver.
1
@armored_half-truck I mean, they don't let people see it so I wouldn't know.
1
@Jupiter__001_ yeah, like 100 years before Marx not not 1000.
1
@konokiomomuro7632 cuz it's gae.
1
@Jupiter__001_ Communism/Socialism before Marx was only 100 years old. My claim about proto-communism conflated it with ancient Communism. Also, check with the recent histography. The word tribe is too blurry to describe anything in good detail, some medieval historians have dropped the term feudalism and civilization is probably next on the list to start to be dropped by some.
1
@Jupiter__001_ eh, everybody knows Communism is supposedly just a subset of logical conclusion (Marxist view) of Socialism. But it's better to go Communism/Socialism when talking about them cuz they're a bundled bunch.
1