Comments by "Ikenga Spirit" (@ikengaspirit3063) on "Based Camp with Simone & Malcolm Collins"
channel.
-
44
-
11
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Speaking of African civ or the lack of it in ur opinion, while Zimbabwe is the largest stone structure, stone building has been in Trans-Saharan Africa since the 2000 BC in the Tichitt culture, ending sometime around say, the first 500 yrs of the Christian era after they were pushed into finally, over the slow over 2000 yrs, south of the Sahaea by Berbers. Not Roman size but they were cities.
Following this, they transitioned into building in earth.
On ur second point of saying, no Roman scale stuff. I am surprised u didn't bring up the Ife, Benin and Igbo Ukwu bronzes(actually brass) that are as realistic as anything in the Renaissance that they either slightly preceded or are contemporary with. So that is an equal level accomplishment (but in brass, not stone) to Equal post-Roman civilization.
Edit
Something that I didn't catch initially is u saying great Zimbabwe was all they had. Now, I hope I am just misinterpreting it but it seems to me like ur saying that was their only structure. This is wrong, there's over 600 known of such stone structures. And thousands more of other structures that used stone in construction but are not of this type.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ur 3 routes for explaining Noah's flood, I explain it as historical and cultural context. Akkadians conquered mesopotamia and syria and claimed to rule the world, clearly "the world" in that time was very lose, the duration of the flood as well is subject to this context, the people of the era seemed to have thought 40 of a thing is very much of a thing, so if something lasts around 40 units or is considered to have lasted a long time its just approximated to 40. I postulate a flood that coverted much of Mesopotamia and Arabia and the animals saved were native, maybe specifically endemic animals. The animals didn't sin to deserve it, God punishing the earth over the sins of man is seen in the story of the fall.
I really think the solution to this is learning the early church fathers, again. Because my historical context explanation doesn't necessarily conflict with ur explanation that is built on the limited understanding of the people, like Origen already said scripture has 3 layers of meaning and we could have just opened up one layer each and the last layer, is the moral of the story. But I still think ur explanation should be guarded from opening up the way to progressive theology.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1