Comments by "Ikenga Spirit" (@ikengaspirit3063) on "hochelaga" channel.

He wasn't exactly stable, sure he might have been educated in his father's or uncle's job as is common but the dude was basically living as an ascetic for the gospel narrative. So no stable job, probably not too handsome unless u can wash regularly being an ascetic, supernatural powers in the ancient world is generally considered to have spoken or unspoken rules and its not like he used his powers everytime he was hungry or something so probably relatively rare use(like once a month or something)
38
Depends on how you see it. The way you describe it is like God changing game skins which is hereical but if you see it more like while the player controls them, Franklin, Trevor and Michael still have their own thoughts in their heads, then it's closer to that.
21
@bl1tz533 The thing is, people act like this is a sudden change. Look at it more closely and you'll see the change happened in the OT, where are all the God deaths in the OT? Its less Jeremiah and more Genesis. So it is definately not cuz Jesus died, cuz God was already depicted with a much lower kill count in the later Old Testament books like Malachai.
18
God the mother to the extent to represent like the highest female form is basically taken over by Mary. God the mother as part of the God head is a bit iffy and mostly heretical. Jesus can be given more feminine aspects in his role as the eternal logos and to the textent that God's wisdom in proverbs is described in feminine terms and to some extent as well a similar thing can be done with the holy spirit. But those would the formulations that would probably be heretical outside of a non-mystical context cuz Jesus is to be depicted more in the form he incarnated on Earth in (the male son) and the holy spirit similarly in scripture is only described in very non-human and non-gendered terms. So without any scripture or early church basis and the fear that it would be shifting church doctrine just to satisfy people, it will be deemed heretical or close to heretical and dropped.
17
@jacobshore5115 or the 3 races.
4
cringe, heresy.
4
@inserttapehere276 what book is that?.
3
@hihi-nm3uy The first proto-urban societies arise a bit later but around the same time (take a thousand years) as in the old world.
2
@paveantelic7876 It might be older but there are some archeological cut offs for what count as a true city vs very large village or town that it might not have reached at those eras.
2
how did they do it.
2
5:05 Okay, no. Alot of people, including a lot of church men assume that its the whole world they're talking about in that verse but its clear they mean the known world, AKA mesopotamia at the time.
2
I feel like in some of these cases you are mistaking Christianity for Religion, like in the example of extraterrestials giving a religion problem I only see that being true for Abrahamics not for example Buddhism as you have said or Folk religions, that are the majority of religions. Similarly with the claim that religions start as a group claiming to recieve secret knowledge from heaven, the Buddha more is conceptualized as a discovery and while Folk religions have their hidden practices, the general thing isn't considered some original secret.
2
Well, the Author did say so.
1
@paveantelic7876 Honestly it depends on the cut of for archeological evidence. The main cut off I have come across is if the site has clear evidence of stratification while while makes sense would arguably exclude cities like in Sao, Tlaxcallan and the Indus Valley civilization, so I personally think a cut off based on size and a focus on production of finished and semi-finished goods is best(as a site being fairly large already implies it passing the organization treshhold, to me at least). On a size basis, Cucuteni–Trypillia culture that btw like around 5500 BC to 2750 BC would definitely take the cake as the first cities as their sites were larger than even Mesopotamian cities. And for a settlement to get that large it did have to be organized, even if not as organized as the Indus Valley cities but it was probably agriculturally focused, tho. However, some of these cites and sub-sections of a site were specialized in creating finished goods, so those specific sites that produced finished goods have a strong basis to be called the first cities. Also, I might be simplifying things as while sites like Indus Valley doesn't have the super clear evidence of stratification they are super organized, which Cucuteni–Trypillia doesn't have to the same extent.
1
@theokra except that, with the Ginn Islam already has a concept of other not purely good nor purely bad beings that can achieve salvation, something that can be easily extended to aliens.
1