Comments by "panner11" (@panner11) on "The Man Who Took LSD and Changed The World" video.

  1.  @KeyleeMai  I mean he didn't write that particular paper. The fact that human pride puts so much value on name order that you burn all bridges is the real folly. The fact that he went on tour as a celebrity rather than continue any scientific work shows how important the science was to him. He didn't care about any of them before he left either.
    3
  2. just don't go the route of expert AIDS denialism supporter leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands and you're golden.
    1
  3. What does handsome have to do with it? This guy seemed to be good looking in his youth, and was in fact a sleazeball womanizer. This guy being an a-hole was fine, but the helping a AIDS denialist dictator...suddenly it's not such a net positive.
    1
  4. Tbh, it doesn't take over actual creative tasks. It takes over the busywork in creative fields, but not the actual creative work in creative work. Anything that needs to drawn or designed for a utilitarian purpose, Ai can do. Like corporate logos, youtube thumbnails, etc. But work that requires artistic expression, no one serious would use an AI for that. Basically, AI does not threaten art itself, but it does threaten the livelihoods of contract artists. But technology has done that to every field throughout the years. In art itself, graphic design first threatened traditional artists. Then, a boom was experienced where graphic design meant artistic jobs were more abundant than ever, and now the cycle starts again.
    1