Comments by "SmallSpoonBrigade" (@SmallSpoonBrigade) on "" video.

He's corrupt and incompetent and seems illiterate at times when it's most convenient to the people buying him presents. I really and truly do not think you want people to follow that example.
5
Who's trying to disarm the national guard?
2
No, it's not. Or do you honestly think that people should be permitted to have their own tactical nukes? No right is absolute.
1
@CD-vb9fi That is an absolute lie. That has never in the entire history of this country been the case, and even with the massive expansion to the interpretation of the 2nd amendment in recent decades, still not true. The 2nd amendment was always about the national guard and policing agencies. That being said, grenades, RPGs, nukes, switchblades, gravity knifes, tanks, daisy cutters etc., are not now legal really anywhere, and some of those things have never been legal for possession or use by private individuals. It's kind of amazes me that there's so much ignorance on the pro-2nd amendment side about what precisely the text means.
1
@MrSev3369 Perhaps you should go back to history class. Weapons like the AR-15 were not even considered when the 2nd amendment was passed and many of the folks involved in that process didn't even think we'd still exist as a country long enough for it to become an issue. As far as our existence as a country, we had no standing army because the framers of the constitution were so afraid of a military-industrial complex developing, hence why the national guard has a 2nd amendment right that was not extended tot he rest of us. And, that remains the case, the national guard is allowed to have military grade weapons, but not private citizens.
1