Comments by "SmallSpoonBrigade" (@SmallSpoonBrigade) on "Why the 'single bullet theory' in JFK assassination is impossible" video.

@DeanSpence-d9c There could only ever be 3 bullets unless there was a second shooter that was using a suppressor. We know that Oswald didn't have a suppressor as we can hear 3 shots and adding a suppressor for another shot is impossible with a target that's moving that fast. But, if it were a second shooter, then there's a bunch of other issue as in the angle of that other bullet is weird. You would be looking at a shooter using a suppressor and located near where Oswald was shooting from and somehow avoiding being caught when the police rushed the building right after the shooting. It's the usual issue that these sorts of things have, they all are more complicated and have more people and moving parts than are necessary. That doesn't automatically mean that they can't be right, but it's been over 60 years, a good chunk of the eye witnesses are dead and there have still been no leaks of anything that says that there was a definite 2nd shooter.
1
@frankbrzozowski6343 But, the angle of that wouldn't match any of the bullet wounds. There's also the issue of there being no recorded sound of that shot in any of the existing recordings of the assassination.
1
@ILSRWY4 The difference is that she was Jackie O through much of her life, referring to her as Jackie Kennedy wouldn't be any more accurate than using her maiden name after she got married.
1