Comments by "SmallSpoonBrigade" (@SmallSpoonBrigade) on "Tucker Carlson: We were shocked to learn this" video.

  1. We've had the truth on both for decades. Whether people choose to believe it or not is up to them. But, the CIA definitely did start Bin Laden out in the '80s with training and supplies in Afghanistan, I'm not aware of anybody arguing against that. And, there were definitely planes flown into the buildings that took them down. This is also established as is the engineering failures that led to the buildings collapsing under their own weight when the central columns were heated enough to lose their strength. SImilarly, there is no need for a conspiracy, any time there's a public route like the one that JFK was riding at the time, there is the potential for a sniper to be in one of the windows, it's why the secret service has to do a lot of work securing the rooftops and have their own team looking for snipers in the windows. It's not an easy job. And Jack Ruby was frequently in the police station where he shot Oswald, it wouldn't have been unusual for him to be there, even without the crowds of reporters covering the transfer. It's all less than satisfying, but it distracts from actual conspiracies like the Democrats throwing races to the GOP to avoid having to make decisions that anger the donors.
    2
  2. Nobody has come up with an explanation that's simpler or with more evidence than that Oswald was working alone and was shot by Ruby also working alone. Efforts to shoehorn in other parties wind up running afoul of what we reliable know and involve ignoring that these are people who had established histories prior to the assassinations. As unsatisfying as it is, sometimes people just get lucky to be in the right place at the right time to put a plan like this into effect.
    1