Comments by "SmallSpoonBrigade" (@SmallSpoonBrigade) on "" video.

  1. 71
  2. 24
  3. I've got a masters in education studies and it's pretty clear that a large part of the problem with modern interfaces is that they fail to take into account how people learn and how they use the software. I started using computers in the mid-80s with an Apple ][. I watched as they got easier to use until about 25 years ago when progress didn't just stop progressing, it actually went backwards. A lot of that can be traced back to people copying what Steve Jobs was doing without understanding why it was working. You had interfaces being simplified in ways that didn't make sense and prioritizing the "User Experience" over the actual functionality. You get these very nice looking interfaces that required education to use, and two programs would do things in very different ways without any real justification. Before that there was a much higher priority placed on sticking to a paradigm that was largely simile from product to product. A menu item might move between pieces of software, but you know there would be a menu item for preferences or settings somewhere and it would usually be under either file or edit. And the things would generally be categorize with hot keys for any of the most important things. That's definitely not to say that it was perfect or that there wasn't room for progress, just that we got into a cycle where removing things and hiding them became more acceptable even though things like MS' ribbon interface just made things more confusing and hard to find. I guess that they could defend it based on telemetry, but when the people who really know how to use the software turn off the telemetry, it makes it hard to get any useful information out of it. To make matters worse, because there's no reason for the way things are being arranged, it makes it much harder to learn the software and you're spending more time concentrating on the interface compared with the time on task actually doing the work.
    18
  4. 11
  5. 11
  6. 10
  7. 6
  8. 4
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 1