Youtube comments of SmallSpoonBrigade (@SmallSpoonBrigade).
-
1600
-
1200
-
727
-
659
-
596
-
578
-
533
-
478
-
416
-
389
-
304
-
302
-
281
-
279
-
250
-
238
-
237
-
228
-
198
-
174
-
172
-
170
-
168
-
166
-
163
-
156
-
155
-
150
-
146
-
142
-
139
-
138
-
136
-
129
-
125
-
124
-
124
-
123
-
119
-
114
-
111
-
109
-
106
-
104
-
104
-
103
-
99
-
99
-
98
-
97
-
95
-
94
-
93
-
92
-
89
-
88
-
85
-
85
-
82
-
80
-
79
-
77
-
75
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
67
-
64
-
62
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
It would be helpful to know what the basis was for them wanting the property. These things can get stupid, my dad lost the only build-able portion of a lot he purchased because the city needed that section to widen a bridge. They condemned the land and only paid for the portion they wanted, which happened to be the only portion of the land with any value.
People don't like paying taxes, but taxes is what would allow for this stuff to be handled in a more fair way. I'm not suggesting that we allow landowners to hold the local government hostage, but with appropriate tax dollars, they could be handed out something resembling the value of whatever was taken as intended by the framers of the constitutions.
I personally think that if the police or whoever is legitimately doing their job, that should absolve them personally of being on the hook for the consequences, not the governmental agency that ordered it. Sure, ti does kind of suck to have to pay taxes to clean up these messes, but as this case points out, you don't necessarily have the ability to foresee all the possible eventualities. I doubt she would have hired the man if she thought any of this would have happened.
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
As a YouTube video I watched pointed out, when you make a change like that, you had better prefer the problems of the change to the problems you have, or it's probably not going to work. I'm going to be starting a business soon due to burnout, but I have good reason to think it's the right move for me. For one thing, I'm going to have a 2-year accounting degree to help me guide the planning process, which for a small startup with just one person and probably no inventory is plenty of education on that. And, the burnout is from all the interactions with people at work and the general chaos, I'm autistic, and a lot of us wind up starting businesses because we're burned out from the pointless BS that shouldn't even be a part of the job.
But, that being said, it is often times self-defeating as small business owners tend to work longer hours than they would have if they worked for somebody else, and the business has to grow before you can afford to offload much onto employees or independent contractors.
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
Organization for folks with ADHD needs to come with lowered expectations. What organization looks like for us isn't going to match other people. In general, it's better to get rid as many of the things that you can before you start.
A big thing though is that when you're organizing things, it's important to make it as easy as possible to put things back where they belong. If you've got a bunch of DVDs on a shelf, good enough is if The matrix is in the section that has the M movies. Eventually, if you find that you're not having trouble putting them back, you can consider worrying about the order, or you can number them, but that can cause trouble if you add or subtract any from the list.
It's also a great idea to have a bin or something of that nature where you can just put things that you didn't get around to putting away, eventually it will fill and as long as you put the items away before the bin overflows, you're golden.
Papers may have to be something that just get dividing into, retain indefinitely, retain until X and stored with everything else that needs to be retained until then. Indefinite retention ones are more of a problem, but they tend to be unusual enough that they aren't themselves an issue for most people. You shouldn't have a ton of wills lying around and there's only so many insurance policies that you need.
But, really, the more of this stuff you just get rid of, or don't acquire in the first place, the easier the whole thing is.
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
From what I understand, it is retroactive to when you lost your job. Unfortunately, for many people they will be bankrupt and starving by that point, assuming they even get the money.
That being said, the amount of unemployment is a problem, but it's not the one that people are talking about. I'm fortunate enough to have a job at the local grocery store. But, even with the hero bonus that the chain is paying to help attract and retain workers, I'm still making less than what people are being paid on unemployment. The extra $600 alone is roughly the same as $15 an hour for a full 40 hour work week,without having to go outside, interact with the public and risk getting infected.
I don't begrudge the people on unemployment from getting the extra money, everybody can't work from home and if everybody worked at frontline jobs like grocery stores, emergency services or hospitals, we wouldn't be able to socially distance, but it's beyond crazy that nobody is holding the politicians feet to the fire, for not having given the frontline workers at least the same compensation that they're handing out to the unemployed. In the case of grocery store workers, we're literally the people that are risking our health and lives to ensure that people don't starve and we're not getting any sort of help from the government.
The customers have been awesome, but it's absolutely shameful that none of the frontline professions have been adequately supported or rewarded by the government that's depending upon us. If we collectively chose not to do our jobs, huge numbers of people would die and there'd be rioting in the street shortly thereafter.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@Mark Heyne, water doesn't boil at 100C. I know this because I"ve measured it quite a few times and it only comes out when I'm at home. If I go into the mountains, it no longer boils at 100C.
You think that the SI units make more sense than the imperial ones do because that's what you grew up with. In reality, they're completely arbitrary and even less intuitive than the imperial measures.
If we're being objective about it, both systems are arbitrary, but unlike the SI units, the Imperial measures are based on the human body, so you learn how your body relates to the system and then you can estimate everything in an intuitive way.
The Celsius scale is probably the most egregious case of the SI units being worse than the Imperial ones. A person's body temperature is roughly the same no matter where he is in the universe. Granted, the measures were a little off and that probably should be fixed, but water only boils at 100C under standard conditions. Move up the hill and it changes, move to another planet and it changes. And worse is that you don't compare temperatures to those points ever, that's for calibrating thermometers, you compare to your body temperature the way everybody else does.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
He was on the same vote blue no matter who train as the other people that destroyed our Democracy were. In general, I like this channel, but it was a bit much to shame men into voting for Harris when there wasn't any effort to earn the votes by offering us things that we might want. It was about the impact it would have on other people. And quite frankly, a lot of us are tired of being expected to vote against our own interests because the stakes are so high. The stakes are high every election. Reagan's election resulted in many thousands of unnecessary HIV related deaths. GHWB had the first war in Iraq. Clinton spent most of his administration fighting various scandals related to his dealings and eventually his sex life while delivering very little to benefit the regular people as they fell behind. GWB failed to stop 9/11 and then created a massive war where hundreds of thousands Iraqis were killed in ethnic cleansing, the number may even have topped a million, as the US disbanded their military and failed to ensure there were troops on the ground to prevent the subsequent revenge and recriminations. Obama, basically did fairly little, although he did manage to get a watered down version of the Heritage Foundation's health care plan enacted, but failed miserably to get the US out of Afghanistan. And then, we all remember what happened with Trump in 2016.
The fact of the matter is that the Democrats don't care about what the results are because the consultants that make the decisions are paid either way, and there's never any punishment for failure the way that there is in the GOP.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
@Konrod, you seriously think that powers of 10 make sense? Powers of 10 make conversions that people don't do very often very easy while ensuring that none of the units of measure are convenient. It causes the problem where a meter is really too long for measuring short things and the centimeter is too short. The decimeter is a poor man's foot.
Base 12 is something that gives a large number of ways of dividing it up without having to resort to fractions as 12 has factors of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12, whereas 10 only has factors of 1, 2,5 and 10. So, anything else has to involve either decimals or fractions. Plus, we have 3 joints on each finger giving 12 (if we exclude the thumbs) meaning that we can count to 24, without involving toes.
To make matters worse, all of the units that the SI defines are completely arbitrary and disconnected from human existence. The kilo is based on an arbitrary amount of a specific metal, the meter is definited based on the distance from the earth's equator to north pole and all the other measures are equally arbitrary. At least the imperial measures are easily related back to our own personal body parts, even if the conversion does vary a bit from person to person, it leaves us with a much more intuitive estimate process as those conversions don't change much once we hit adulthood.
6
-
@Ace The FireDragon, most countries use the metric system because they are either too small to have factories building things in the local measure or they didn't have a functioning and enforced system of measure that covered the whole country.
The US never really went through that BS that the French did with thousands of different measuring systems. One of the great things that the Brits did for us was leave us with a functioning system of measure that we created an entire agency to oversea. The Bureau of Weights and Measures would regularly conduct stings and ensure that all measuring devices used for trade were accurate.
As a result, we have a system that's convenient, relatively easy to use and universal across the country. Something that was generally not true in countries that agreed to adopt the metric system measures.
But, as somebody that lived under the metric system for over a year, I will tell you that the things people cite as being easier with the metric measures are just not done often outside of science. You're not going to want to convert miles into feet typically, And probably not into yards either, you'd just use the decimal approximation in most cases as you are unlikely to be dealing with the precision necessary to go beyond 10ths of a mile in the first place. If you do, you're a professional surveyor and you're still not going to mess with yards or feet at that point for the same reason that you wouldn't normally mix kilometers, hectometers, meters, decimeters and centemeters in one measure, it's inconvenient to write.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
I think that's a lot of it. If you speak a few words of the local language, it does make a difference. French has a uniculture, that's how they've opted to deal with mulitculturalism, people are expected to assimilate into French culture. If you can say hello, thank you and several other helpful phrases in French, the experience will be a lot different than if you expect to go and say everything in a foreign language. It's not a high bar, most people could manage that level in less than a week.
Similarly, knowing any Mandarin at all, will get a very different view of China than you'd otherwise get. I was mostly in rural areas and I get invited in to cafes by the locals or have these amazing interactions with people. It was kind of stressful because I was representing hundreds of millions of white people when I did it, but for the most part they didn't have a fixed mindset about foreigners, just most of them had never met any , so it was puresly based on what they saw in the media.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
It's rife with inaccuracies though. The metric system is extremely arbitrary through most of it's units and the unit that was most in need of reform, time, never got fixed. We could have had 10 or 20 hour days with 100 minutes per hour and 100 seconds per minute. We could have had the even months have 30 days and the odd ones, except November with 31 days and put the leap year day at the end of November. But, that never happened.
The rest of the measures are incredibly arbitrary, why 10 000 000 meters to the North Pole? They could have made it any number they liked, 30 000 000 would have given us a meter that's actually convenient, instead of the poor man's yard equivalent. Similarly, Celsius is really bad, it's only valid at sea level under specific conditions. It places the start and end points in weird places where they may not really apply to the location that you're at.
Meanwhile, the KG was based off of a physical artifact that had a variable mass. It's not much in terms of variation, but enough to be a problem.
The Imperial measures aren't perfect, but once you learn the conversion from the lengths of your personal body to the official ones, it's very easy to estimate things without a measuring device at all. And because temperature is roughly based upon body temperature, it's far more natural to estimate Fahrenheit temperatures than Celsius ones.
People get brainwashed into thinking that metric is logical, but from an objective stand point, it isn't. It's incredibly arbitrary and makes mental math really hard. Probably the best example is all the people claiming that metric measures are better, but they don't even understand how to work with Imperial measures. Sure, there's a bit of investment, but there are so many factors that working with it without a calculator in the real world is a treat.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
The movie is fine, people will get over their butthurt over some pretty minor flaws. I don't think that it will have the staying power of the first 3 movies, but it's hardly anywhere near as bad as this review suggests it is. I do think that the Rotten Tomatoes audience review score of 89% (as of posting) is pretty representative of what it should be. It's hardly a perfect movie, but it's not exactly dog meat either. I likely will watch it again at some point, something that I can't say the same about with respect to Crystal Skulls.
People are entitled to their own opinions, but I do think this review, as were most of the other ones I saw in the lead up to the initial release, pretty misleading. The writers did a pretty good job in terms of laying pipe where pipe was needed and it's kind of insulting to them to just pretend like the plane flying ability came out of nowhere when that was set up in the first scene that we see Teddy. He's literally sitting at a table with a very bare bones flight simulator learning how a plane works. It's not like they showed up at an airport and all of a sudden he knows how to fly as this video implies.
Yes,there was a fair amount of writer's convenience going on, but that wasn't one of them. Neither was the villain knowing to go to Syracuse. They established that there were two cities of interest with respect to Archimedes and were positioned to where the direction of travel would say where they were going.
The movie is hardly perfect, but it's not a bad movie by any stretch of the imagination. It's certainly the best one in the last 30 years by a long shot.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Yes, also at this point TV has been around as a common thing for well over half a century and it's going to be harder and harder to compete with the best the '50s, '60s, '70s, '80s, '90s, '00s, '10s, ''20s put out and the problem just gets worse over time, we all only get 168 total hours a week to spend on everything we do. Right now, even if we watch 8 hours of TV a day, that's only 1 hour per decade on average, and with how good the TV was in some of those decades due to forward thinking execs that paid for quality, it's going to get progressively harder to compete anyways. Especially, with so much available via both streaming and home media.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I paid, in spite of his commentary, and it was money well spent. It's a good, solid movie, and he's outright lying about some of the details in the review. People should view the film and decide for themselves, but some of the details like how Teddy knows how to fly a plane are clearly established in the film, he doesn't just magic the plane into action. And, there is a very good reason why they opted to kill Mutt off in Vietnam, that was necessary for the scene in Ancient Greece to work and for the end scene with Marion to make any sense at all.
It's hardly a perfect film, but I urge people to watch it themselves and make up their own mind about it. And unlike the Crystal Skulls, it does at least have an ending that follows reasonably from the rest of the movie. And unlike Crystal Skulls, I can see myself watching it again in the future, not just if it's the only thing on TV.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The neighbor should learn to make it him or herself. If you just want a mocha, those are extremely inexpensive to make for yourself. $50 worth of gear gets something that's largely indistinguishable from the real thing. But, even if you want the real thing, you can buy a machine for about $500 these days and it would likely be paid off within a few months at that rate.
I got a mechanical frother off Amazon for about $20 and use it in the microwave for the milk. And I use a ninja coffee maker to brew strong coffee. But, for a more budget friendly option, you can get an airpresso. Those sell for about $20 last I checked and so for just a bit over $50 you can get the equipment, milk and coffee to have at least a week's worth of coffee. After the second week, you're saving money.
So, it's not even a case of having to do without the lattes, the neighbor could still have the lattes, it's just that they'd be homebrewed.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Typically, what I see is Dr. So and So PhD or MD or EDD and the like. In a medical setting, even if somebody isn't a doctor, they'll get the same, just without the dr. at the front. So, often times we'll see a nurse practitioner as in an APRN or a physician's assistant PA.
To make matters more confusing, you're also getting degrees like an osteopathic doctor D.O. as well.
So, having or not having a Dr. at the beginning of the name tells you very little, even if they do have a medicine related doctorate. Not to mention that if you're at a large hospital, there's a decent chance that the individual you are dealing with, a physicist as part of the hospital's radiology department.
The state would have more of a point if there weren't already a requirement to clarify the degree within the fields they include.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@thechosen, I've got OCD, well, I've gotten enough treatment and done enough work that it's probably OCPD.
But, it's a failure to register, not forgetfulness. I've adopted the strategy with dimmer switches that are impossible to visually check to over turn them until my hand starts to slip. Then they're turned off. I have to accept the possibility that the condo will have a fire because if I let myself slip and do the checks, then I'm going to backslide.
Similarly for the locks, I have to do it once really well, and then accept the possibility that it hasn't been locked at all or that the deadbolt only hasn't been locked.
That being said, if TheTrivek42 isn't getting intense discomfort and anxiety from the unlocked door, then you're right about it being just forgetfulness.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
We'll see. They have one of the largest catalogs of titles that people do want to see of any of the studios, so I certainly wouldn't count them out. Also keep in mind that they are right now one of the only streaming services that's in the black. Granted, it's barely profitable, but we'll have to see what happens going forward. They do also have a bunch of properties that they could potentially sell off without doing too much damage to their catalog.
Suggesting that they're going out of business though is a bit of a stretch. Especially if they have already adjusted for the lack of value of the TV stations, and I think everybody knew that was coming, TV is just not what it was. The streaming service is a bit of a bright spot, even if it is just barely profitable as they do have a pretty massive catalog of things that they already own and can potentially create new content with.
But, we'll see, but I wouldn't really expect them to outright go out of business or be sold off as they are one of the largest studios in the world and the DoJ seems to be remembering that they're supposed to be enforcing antitrust regulations, which makes this kind of a weird situation where they can't really be bought, but there aren't really many other options for selling significant portions of their catalog either.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Sanquinity These are cherry picked examples, but people underestimate just how many bad ideas creative geniuses often go through before they even get to the point of being worth recording. Then of those ones, there's a bunch more that get set aside for one reason or another and it's just a tiny fraction of them that even get any sort of real action taken to create. These all have flaws, but as you note, eventually something similar was created that did work. In several cases, like with the tank, there were other inventions that were required to make it actually work, and in the case of the flying machines, he had most of the necessary elements there, the engineering team made that work mostly with stuff they found in his drawings.
Actually taking action to make things real is important, but people underestimate just how hard it is to be a visionary. Just creating ideas that can be acted on isn't necessarily easy, especially if you're more forward thinking than just a simple modification or improvement on what we've got. That's why so many companies are started by duos, one that's better with the vision and the other that's more business savvy.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
False accusations are not incredibly rare. Those are questionable figures that are incredibly hard to quantify. Rape and sexual assault crimes in general are hard to count because most of them occur between people who know each other. Which makes it very, very hard to determine the difference between actual rape and sex where there wasn't an explicit agreement to have sex.
The two are very different morally and ethically.
As far as it being incredibly rare, I had a hard time finding the conviction rate in the US for proceedings that end in trials, but in the UK, it's less than 2/3 of trials for sexual assault wind up with a conviction, meaning that some portion of those 37% that resulted in aquitals were false allegations, we don't really know how many, but legally speaking, the crimes aren't considered to happen. In the US, the numbers are hard to find, but it's a similar problem, these are cases where there might have been a rape, usually the parties have some relationship with each other, but there isn't any evidence to assume that the crime happened beyond the evidence to assume that it didn't happen and it shouldn't be claimed that those incidents aren't false allegations as it's equally valid to suggest that they are. But, doing that would lead to a number that's several orders of magnitude higher. So there's pressure to not admit the truth on that.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
TBH, it really isn't if that's what you're training for, and you don't worry about being able to write it up front. You can choose to include things that are easy to say and memorize the relevant words. If you're in a place where they're speaking the languages, you're going to get to say the same things over and over again. From what I remember of the PRC, they tended to want to know where you were from, whether or not you were married and what your job is. You would then add onto that anything in particular that you wanted them to know, and you'd say it so many times that you could rattle it off fluently before too long.
Even without effective language instruction, I managed to learn enough over the course of a few months to get around on my own. The amount of Mandarin you really need for most things is a lot less than you'd think. Obviously, there's a ton of things that I couldn't do, but I could get around the country, get myself fed. If a taxi would actually stop for me, I could take a cab. Most of the time they wouldn't stop for me, so I wound up taking the bus a lot, or just walking places.
Whenever possible, I would prelearn the vocab that I needed to conduct my business and pray to every available god that they wouldn't ask me something I didn't know or that there would be no problems with the task. If I really needed to, I'd mime things out. That was nearly 10 years ago and I didn't have Pleco to help smooth things out either.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
People like you were never going to vote for him. Let's be honest about that. The fact that you think that we're allies is a pretty strong hint that you don't get what's going on. These aren't conspiracy theories about the establishment rigging the primaries. We don't yet have it on tape for this election, but they had to admit under oath in court, that they rigged the '16 primaries in favor of Clinton. Now, we have a candidate that is clearly senile, benefitting from all of the other corporatist candidates dropping out in the span of 48 hours to get behind a candidate who had won only 1 state and didn't even have any personnel in upcoming states and you don't think that looks at all fishy?
The honest truth here is that if you are characterizing it like that, you're either being paid to do so, or you're so out of touch with reality, that there's nothing that could be done to earn your vote. For those of us in the real world, a vote for Biden is a vote for a life that's even worse than under Trump. Just look at the leaked list of cabinet picks if you don't believe me. He's going to pack his cabinet with war mongers and elites, to at least the extent that Trump has and unlike Trump, Biden is too senile to have much involvement in day to day goals of the agencies.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
You mean other than the fact that those other sources have all sorts of components that humans aren't supposed to eat, right? Not to mention the fact that we don't even really know what the optimal diet is for people, so how would we know if the diet contained everything that we needed?
Also, meat is about more than just protein. It's about proteins, fats in a form that our body has evolved to digest. Much of the nutritional content of vegetables isn't bio-available, which means that even if it has the amount of nutrients we need, it might as well not as we can't make use of it.
But, if you want to flood your body with testosterone antagonists and other things that are bad for you in order to be a vegan, that's really your own business. But, if you care about health, then meat and animal products are going to be a part of your diet on a regular basis. Optimal health requires a few calories from animal sources here and there.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I generally agree here, but, I do think that often times the diagnostic criteria are just defective in one way or another and there's clearly a significant thing going on, but it doesn't have any sort of a diagnosis available, and that can happen even with disorders that are known and have been treated for decades. A really good example would involve the autism spectrum, where there used to be a bunch of different diagnoses and most of them were merged into autism spectrum disorder and social pragmatic communication disorder. There's a reason why I said most, as neither pdd-nos nor Asperger's Syndrome were completely covered under either of those diagnoses, and the previous practice of diagnosing schizoid personality disorder also doesn't really cover those cases either.
So, you get this sort of weird hole where there are people who are clearly autistic, can pass as autistic merely by being themselves, but do not have any possible diagnosis and as such do not have any sort of access to treatment or legal protections as a result of that.
It's definitely not ideal, but the alternative is going to a sympathetic doctor and essentially getting a deliberate misdiagnosis to whatever the closest diagnosis is and hoping that it covers the parts of the disorder in that patient that need treatment while not risking your license to get the person help or sued for malpractice.
This particular problem is set to get worse when future diagnostic criteria remove the ScPD diagnosis and attempt to cram those patients into either schizotypal or avoidant personality disorders with no provision for the autistic patients for whom the entire diagnosis was originally created.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Misogynistic is a bit of an overstatement, but I saw the movie and the boycott is pretty ridiculous. It's not as good of a movie as the original trilogy, but it's better than Young Indiana Jones and Crystal Skulls. It is kind of disgusting that the series won't end because there's no longer an appetite for the sorts of stories that are involved, it's just because a bunch of people are butt hurt over there being a female colead. Let's be honest, the critcisms that led to the boycotting were pretty superficial and if you see the film, it's pretty clear that in most cases they either were done for creative reasons or weren't that big of a deal. I generally hate PWB, but she's actually not too bad in this one. I can't see her replacing Indy, but she's far better than Kate Capshaw was in Temple of Doom. (Not sure if it's an acting thing or she just had a better part to act)
I went in buying the flavor aid that it was going to be terrible, but it really isn't. It is not a perfect movie and I think that it would have benefitted greatly from Spielberg directing it, but it's not exactly a bad film either. Yes, they should have fixed the writing with the villains and with PWB as those are genuine issues, but honestly, they don't detract anywhere near as much as people are suggesting.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Generally speaking, repressed memories aren't a real thing. The brain doesn't really work like that. Most likely, you were either traumatized at an early age when you were developmentally deciding whether the world is by and large safe and secure or dangerous and insecure. Any memories from that age tend to be extremely fragile no matter how a person's experience was.
The other possible scenario is that those particular memories were misfiled in some fashion. That also happens where somebody has a traumatic event and for some reason represses the emotional component of the event by downplaying it's significance.
But, speaking as an educator, once a memory is formed, it's there, when you think you've learned something and it's not there when you need it, you're either stressed and not accessing all of your brain, it wasn't transferred into long term memory or it wasn't stored where you thought it was stored.
I suppose, it also could have been a series of relatively minor events that you haven't connected together. That's one of the big differences, PTSD really needs a specific event to kick it off diagnostically.
EDIT: there are also some medications that mess with memory preventing memory formation. These are usually used in surgery, but there's a few out there that have other uses that may have some negative impact on memory formation.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@loyalzerg Yes, and if for some reason the paperwork is fraudulent, you're then in a position where somebody who did nothing wrong has lost most of their worldly possessions. Even just packing and leaving in one day is a big ask. Most people who have houses also have jobs and commitments, and it can be difficult to get movers, or even trucks, on that kind of short notice. Then, you've got to have someplace to put the stuff. If it's an actual squatter, they'd see it as a possibility, for those that think, or do, have a real claim on residency, they shouldn't have to plan for the possibility.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@b33thr33kay Absolutely, there are tons of variations on therapy, with varying degrees of scientific support, by the time that somebody starting now runs through the available options and programs, these sorts of treatments likely will be there Also, it's probably going to be a while before it gets covered by insurance, so this is a good time to start saving up for it. Worst case there's money for a vacation to celebrate the results.
Some people can and do make it through significant mental illness with the tools we've got. So, there is little reason to wait for these to be approved. Start with what we've got now and hopefully get at least some benefit. I've personally been diagnosed with several of the generally regarded as worst mental illnesses to have, as in extreme rates of self-murdering, hospitalization and worse. And, I'm not like cured, but with the right group therapy I function, even when I'm in a bad situation generally. It may be that in the case of @giaccommander7474 more is needed, but trying requires hope and if you haven't got any hope, then you're at an extreme risk for self-murder
(BTW, there's a reason why I use the term self-murder, sanitizing it to a euphemism or even just suicide hides just how ugly the act is. I hope that others will stop whitewashing it so that people will take it more seriously)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@setheast2773 I used to work pickup through most of the pandemic and I'm currently working on an accounting degree. The short answer is that the department does lose money on the face of it, there isn't a mark up for the service, as long as it's a large enough order. During the worst of it, there were a few customers order hundreds of items in one pickup, so many that they wouldn't fit in their car.
But, my guess is that there's a few things going on that make it worth it to these stores to offer. First off, for some businesses like office supply stores, the profit margin on pickup is probably better as the orders are likely smaller and some of the items on there have better profit margins than what you see at a grocery store. Secondly, I do think that the job will eventually be heavily automated the way that they did with self-checkout with people only being involved in small portions of the job, like picking out fruit and putting it into a bag for the robot to collect.
The service also reduces the amount of time that inventory sits on the shelf and the workers doing the work spot problems that aren't noticed by people who aren't constantly circulating the store really looking at each shelf.
The most interesting bit is that a department that loses money may still result in a store that is more profitable by bringing in more customers, spreading more of the costs and potentially as a write off during tax season.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
We've had the truth on both for decades. Whether people choose to believe it or not is up to them. But, the CIA definitely did start Bin Laden out in the '80s with training and supplies in Afghanistan, I'm not aware of anybody arguing against that. And, there were definitely planes flown into the buildings that took them down. This is also established as is the engineering failures that led to the buildings collapsing under their own weight when the central columns were heated enough to lose their strength.
SImilarly, there is no need for a conspiracy, any time there's a public route like the one that JFK was riding at the time, there is the potential for a sniper to be in one of the windows, it's why the secret service has to do a lot of work securing the rooftops and have their own team looking for snipers in the windows. It's not an easy job. And Jack Ruby was frequently in the police station where he shot Oswald, it wouldn't have been unusual for him to be there, even without the crowds of reporters covering the transfer.
It's all less than satisfying, but it distracts from actual conspiracies like the Democrats throwing races to the GOP to avoid having to make decisions that anger the donors.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If I were the attorney for the buyer, I'd be looking very closely at why the contract went south after the original closing date. They knew that the housing market had heated up, and probably before the forced sale of the previous residence. So, they could have cancelled it prior to the closing date, I'd want to know why they cancelled after the closing date, because if there's any 3rd party involved, that 3rd party could well be on the hook for the consequences, and damages, of the contract breaking up, even if the builder's waivers are ruled enforceable.
That being said, don't sign a contract where you're not comfortable with clauses being exercised without specific triggers you have control over, and preferably, not if there are clauses that you wouldn't be comfortable with in general. And definitely get an attorney to go through things any time the amount of money starts to become uncomfortably large, especially for property.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It's not the taxpayers that get screwed over by canceling the debt, it's the responsible people who didn't take on debt that they couldn't afford.
Waiving the debt is a form of moral hazard where people who chose to behave responsibly get screwed. I was fortunate enough that I could get the state to cover the first 2 years because I worked hard and was able to use the money the state was going to spend on high school for college. I was also fortunate enough to have had parents that had saved over the years to ensure that I wouldn't have any loans.
But, even without that help, I would have had the option of studying part time over a longer period of time, enlisting in the military, getting a job with the state and none of those would have required me to get a loan in order to get a quality education.
Were I not a white man from a middle class household, there might even have been scholarship money available as well.
People who chose to take on debt shouldn't be rewarded by having the loans canceled. It screws over those that behaved responsibly, we won't be getting any of our money back, but some irresponsible folks that took on loans they couldn't afford get forgiveness, ridiculous.
The main reason why college costs are out of control is that people keep lining up to pay. If people stopped paying the ridiculous sums of money, the college administrators would be forced to stop wasting money on pointless non-academic services and focus on the things that actually help education. Multi-million dollar gyms are just not essential to higher education.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What do you expect? The courts have been pretty ballless when it comes to raining this sort of abuse of power in. What the TSA does is pretty much completely unconstitutional and not even effective. I remember when I was a kid, my dad would bring one of those classic buck knives on the plane. He'd toss it in the bin along with his change, the security screener would see it and give it back to him after he passed through the metal detector. There weren't mandatory sexual assaults to get on the plane, and the experience as all around relatively relaxed. Sure, being hijacked was a thing, rarely, but if the passengers went along with it, you might get hijacked to Cuba, and then released to return home. (Even after 9/11, it wouldn't have been much different, it's just that people would have known to fight back)
And, it's only possible because interstate travel is no longer a constitutional right in any reasonable sense of the word. If I want to travel out of state, it's hours of driving, or a quick flight that requires subjecting oneself to what used to represent an illegal search.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@DukeOfJam7591 The 2nd wouldn't be controversial if there weren't so many morons out there. Both the case law and the constitutional amendment weren't at all confusing until relatively recently. Arguably, the 2nd amendment shouldn't be in the constitution at all due to a technicality related to the punctuation not matching. So, you get people that think it means one thing because one version says one thing and another group saying it means something else because the other version says that as well. And they're both sort of partially right as there is a version that says both things.
But, the bit that most people get wrong, is that the 2nd amendment is what allows the national guard to exist independent of the federal government. That is currently the only well-organized militia we've got. We could arguably expand that to law enforcement, but going further than that requires mostly gutting the words and intention of the amendment as there is no process for training or organizing the rest of the citizens. It's why they get most of the same gear that the military does, but we don't. I haven't ever seen anybody arguing earnestly for the ability of the population to own mortars, tanks or nukes. Because that would be absolutely nuts. But, there are people that will argue that the line ought to be at various forms of handguns and rifles, even though the constitution was written manly decades before repeaters became a common thing and if you wanted to shoot multiple times without reloading, you had to carry multiple guns to do it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Professionals are trained to see ASD symptoms in intellectually disabled white boys under a certain age. Anybody else is likely to have problems getting a proper diagnosis. I've personally been going the route of collecting every single misdiagnosis for ASD possible, and they still don't want to admit that it might just be ASD. I've been diagnosed and/or treated for Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Schizoid Personalitly Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar 1, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Somatacization Disorder, OCD, ADHD and I'm probably forgetting something in that list. I think the only ones I haven't yet been diagnosed with are Borderline Personality Disorder and PTSD.
At this point, I'm kind of stuck pushing for an ASD diagnosis as that list is bad enough that getting decent medical care can be an issue as so much of what I deal with medically isn't taken seriously as with all that comes a bunch of psychosomatic disorders like idiopathic tinnitus, IBS and migraines.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I hate to break it to you, but no matter what program you go through, or if you just do it yourself, once somebody is an alcoholic, they are an alcoholic for life. Yes, some people, myself included, do get to a point where most days we don't need or want a drink, but you're going to have bad days that spring up out of nowhere, sometimes years after the last meaningful urge to use and if you make it through that, it goes back into remission. I gave up on any notion of being "cured" years ago when after the better part of a decade without any urges to drink I started having days where it was all I could do to keep from crawling into a bottle and taking up residence. That hasn't happened to me in several years, fingers crossed.
Part of the problem is that you can't really say somebody is no longer an alcoholic other than in retrospect on their death bed having hit a point where there were no more urges and that's rarely the case.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Indeed, the grid leaves traffic designers with a lot more options when it comes to routing traffic. With a cul-de-sac system, if a key road needs to be closed or has heavy traffic, there's no guarantee that drivers will know how to route around it, and there may not be a good way of doing so.
A typical grid city will have a system of main arterials and side streets. People wouldn't normally be driving down side streets until they get close to their destination, hence why they tend to be narrower. The ones around here are basically one lane roads in most parts of the city with a parking lane on either side. It tends to keep speeds lower as you do need to pull off to the side of the road if a driver is coming from the other direction.
Contrast that with the suburbs, and it's a right proper mess. You're not going to know how to get anywhere without a map and/or gps and if you do miss a turn, you may not even realize it for quite some distance.
The solution here is really to fix the zoning so that there's more mixed use where it makes sense, improve public transit (BTW, mass transit, apart from subway, is a whole lot easier to do if you've got a grid layout to a city) and ensure that the streets you mean to carry the bulk of the traffic are set up to handle it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, and that's the problem. The vaccines are highly effective at preventing death and permanent disability, but quite bad at preventing spread. Actual medical experts pretty much agree that you cannot vaccinate your way out of a pandemic with an imperfect vaccine.
Ultimately, the only way out is for people to contract the virus and survive because they were vaccinated. But, that's not politically popular with a portion of the left. Ultimately, masking up, keeping businesses closed and getting boosters is of very little value at this point. They should have paid people to get the vaccine, allowed the vaccinated to not wear masks, and started opening up. At this point, the virus is endemic to pretty much the whole world and won't be going away, but with the vaccines and the medical treatments, the body count should continue to drop.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I gave up listening about 4 minutes in and just skipped around. It's just really grating to hear all that talk about the argument being this, from somebody with that accent while completely missing the point. When the US did stimulus checks, that money was, on the whole, spent rather wisely by the people who were in bad financial situation. And it's hardly the poor people making stupid decisions, it's that there's an entire system set up to prevent them from making other decisions. There's a lack of affordable grocery stores in those neighborhoods, there are significant restrictions on having any savings to cover emergencies, the moment you go slightly over the income limit you get a cut to benefits that puts you in a financially worse position than you were in.
The reason why it looked so promising in 3rd world countries is that the main drain for those poor people is corruption and that can potentially be dealt with. They don't have a formalized system set up to exploit the poor and have a permanent underclass the way that the US does.
Additionally 1,000 people in the middle of an established economic system does not a valid study make. The kinds of changes that UBI is expected to bring require a much larger portion of the local population to benefit from. It's money coming in near the bottom and filtering its way to the top. The people at the bottom have the money to cover basic expenses without working, so there's more money available for spending in the local economy Which filters up to more economic growth over time. What's more, because it is such a small study, most of that money probably wound up in the hands of Amazon as that's often the most cost effective way of buying things these days, but it does nothing at all to improve the local economy and little to lift those people out of poverty. Additionally, this was only a 3 year program, it takes a good chunk of that time for an economic system to adjust when such a radical change is made.
As far as the 1.3 to 1.4 hours less, that's nonsense. Most of the folks who would qualify for this sort of thing were working significantly more than 40 hours making ends meet and the drop in income is probably not significant when you consider the cost of traveling to another job and the related expenses of working. Which makes sense, they needed to work less overtime, so they did.
The long term financial change not changing is to be expected, as I already stated, this was just 3 years long with the money mostly going out of the area.
This whole video is just the sort of ignorance that has come to characterized the debate. Ignore the fact that the study is simply too small to have any sort of expectation of a meaningful outcome and then say that we studied it, it didn't work, so don't bother. Which is stupid. People were working too much, so they cut back a bit. There probably would eventually have been some improvements, but burnout takes a lot longer to overcome than some people seem to think
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
There's a special place in hell for people that push this kind of foolishness. You managed it, but basic math and economics says that everybody can't. If everybody was making that kind of money, then you'd need to be making 8 or 9 figures in order to enjoy that lifestyle.
I feel sorry for the suckers that don't realize that.
There is, at least in the US and Europe, enough wealth being produced for everybody to have a roof over their heads, food on their table and health care taken care of. There's probably enough for everybody to have a modest vacation and eventually retire. Beyond that, there is not enough for everybody to live the kind of lifestyle that people making 6 figures are typically living.
Yes, we can grow the economy some and we can reduce the amount of effort needed to produce that wealth, but we're nowhere near the point where most, let alone all, people can manage what you've managed and it's cruel and self-serving to suggest otherwise.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That's the thing, these aren't "random" checks in the sense that you're thinking, they will check everybody on a given train or bus for compliance, but the buses and trains that they check are random. From what I recall of my, 2 rides, on BART, this system isn't that much different, there's no method of preventing people without tickets from leaving at the end of their trip. But, apart from that, the system is very similar in terms of how payment is handled. You either have a pass or have to buy a ticket at a kiosk for the appropriate number of stops and once you've got that, you can board the relevant trains and get to where you're going.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@paullessard No, the GP is right, the whole industry is a scam. Thomas Kinkade is a really good example, his work is just not very good. But, he made tons of money over his lifetime based primarily on his name and reputation.
The "value" of a lot of these pieces that you see at auction is primarily about the fact that they own something that other people don't own. It's not because the work is necessarily worth more than a different piece is. There's tons of great artists that never sell a single piece, folks like Van Gogh would not be known today if they didn't have somebody financing their unprofitable art. You're argument is that Van Gogh's work was essentially worthless because he couldn't support himself by selling paintings. You're talking about a guy who during his lifetime sold most of his work just for supplies versus now having work that goes for millions when they're even available for sale.
Are his paintings really worth that much more now than back then? No, the reason for the prices is that virtually everybody has heard of Van Gogh, you don't need to know anything about painting to know that they're valuable. Same goes for most other well work being sold for large sums of money, they aren't necessarily any better than the ones that sell for a ton, they just don't have the art galleries pushing them for high prices.
Dale Chihuly reportedly adds an additional 0 to the price of his glasswork that isn't selling to spur sales. If that doesn't definitively prove just how shady the industry is, then I don't know what would.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What I'm saying is that I'd rather not get maced and then sent to prison.
And yes, I'm serious about that, just because she started it, and he's likely innocent, doesn't mean that he's going to get off. He's already got his reputation destroyed, it would be just as destroyed if he denied it. On top of that, she likely would have beaten him.
You can't fight back against a woman, you'll be the one that winds up in prison, even if she started it.
Just because you don't actually know how things work, doesn't make it any less dangerous. Men being beaten by women are pretty much always presumed to be guilty, whether or not they actually are. Just look at this comment thread as an example. The video definitely does not show him masturbating. At least not in any sort of effective way, and yet he's already guilty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First off, the burden of proof here is on vegans to demonstrate that their diet is sound. We have literally millenia of human experience that demonstrates that a well-balanced diet of meats, animal products and plant matter works. There's examples all over the world. Examples of vegans are much more localized and much more recent. At this stage we're still establishing what precisely it is that makes a diet healthy.
But, with that being said, vegan diets are typically deficient in fats, cholesterol, B-12 as well as having more exposure to various anti-nutrients and hormones that come in things like grains and soy. If you think that animal products are bad, just look at what soy and improperly prepared grains do to the body.
In short, the "benefits" that people generally tout in the vegan diet usually aren't. Cutting your cholesterol and fat intake has some pretty serious health consequences as cholesterol is what gives your cells their soft rubbery consistency and prevents them from freezing and the best sources of vitamins A, D, E and K are mostly from animals.
In some cases, like flax seed oil, the form of nutrients found aren't even usable to humans. But, the forms found in animal based oils are much more easily absorbed.
At the end of the day, humans have teeth like we do because we're supposed to be eating meat. Our digestive system isn't anywhere near long enough to be living a purely plant based dietary lifestyle and anybody who chooses to disrespect their body by cutting out the meat and animal products completely is going to cut a few years off their lives in the process.
The best dietary advice remains to eat plenty of fruit and vegetables and meat and animal products in moderation. Stray too far from that and you'll get sick.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+Will Darling, it's hardly my fault that you don't know what you're talking about. I've already enumerated why you're wrong, but since you're kind of thick, I'll do it again.
You can't look up characters in a Chinese dictionary, if you have the stroke wrong, you'll have to learn to write each character so that you can trick the people reading, your running script will never be legible to other people, you'll have a much harder time developing the muscle memory to write effectively and people will know that you're an outsider.
Yes, with tons of practice, you might be able to slowly write in a way that people won't know you're doing it wrong, but that's a huge waste of time and energy when the rules are pretty straightforward in most cases. Yes, there are a few characters that violate the normal rules, but most of them follow them in an easy to comprehend way.
The Chinese and Japanese do a fair number of things that are inscrutable to outsiders, but this isn't one of those things. They write the way they do because it's generally the best way of doing, just because you think you know better than they do, doesn't make it so.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** That's not possible. Somebody has to pay for the equipment and the tests, labor costs are likely lower than they are in the US, but there's no way that the cost of multi-million dollar, high precision equipment is that much lower there than it is in the US.
The numbers don't compute. Either the numbers are inaccurate or the quality of care in the ER is substantially lower than it is in the US. There's no way that the equipment necessary to run an ER is that much lower than it is in the US.
More likely, you're referring to something that isn't an actual ER, in which case we wouldn't be spending $1k for that either.
Even in the ICU, $1k here is a lot of money. I remember spending an entire night in the ICU and the better part of two days in a hospital and the cost for that was roughly $18k before insurance, IIRC.
Like I said, there's no way that your spending $50 for something that costs us $1k, $300 or even $500 I could believe, but there's no way that the cost is 5% of what ours is without massive cost cutting measures taken at the expensive of quality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@adriankoch964 It's a stupid design decision. In the US, anything that has only 2 prongs is supposed to be double insulated to protect against shocks. Things with a 3rd prong don't require the extra insulation as the ground should intercept any of that current and direct it out of the building via the ground wire. Having GFCI is nice, but it doesn't protect against shocks as the video indicates, so you still need the extra insulation if you don't have the ground.
In the US, GFCI is typically required in the locations that are most likely to benefit from them, mostly kitchens, bathrooms, garages and other areas likely to have moisture. You can install GFCI berakers if you like, but then you have issues related to figuring out where the fault was that triggered it, when the more typical US practice is to just include the GFCI at the outlet which helps greatly in terms of figuring out which one did it. The one that makes a bigger difference is AFCI, and that is still coming, but that protects against far bigger concerns related to arc faults that can lead to fires.
As far as earthquakes go, that's BS, the west coast of the US regularly gets earthquakes and the likelihood of having any power coming in when none can get out is a rarity, to say the least, assuming it's even possible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Let's be real, she didn't do a very exhaustive search for treatment options if she's 29 now, has been going through the process for 3.5 years, which means she was roughly 25 at the point where she started it. With how little experience the medical community has in dealing with autistic women, I don't know how any of these doctors can sleep at night seeing a woman that age, late diagnosed, going through this process right now as a bunch of changes have been coming in terms of the support and help available for the autistic community in general and autistic women in particular.
What's more, autism ought to be on the list of reasons that you're not permitted to make use of this service as we are notorious for getting fixated on something and pushing towards it whether it's a good idea or not. Combine that with depression and it sets an incredibly bad precedent.
It's not like I don't get it, I've had a lot of crap over the years that doctors told me wouldn't be curable, and to some extent they were right, but in the year since I finally understood the results of my neuropsych exam and the implications, things have improved a lot. It still often times sucks, but at the end of the day, better treatments won't come if the people who most need them opt to self-murder.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That sounds nice. To operate a business in the US, you need city permits for every city that you do business in. Licenses from every county and state as well. And that's on top of the federal taxes that you have to have paperwork filed with. All of them have different rules and regulations about what is and isn't taxable. Some of them do it based on business property, like my county, some do it based on income like the federal government and others tax based on sales. It's a real mess and if you're just sole proprietorship, as in working by yourself for yourself, you have to hire a tax accountant or spend huge amounts of time figuring things out in most cases.
The county here literally requires that you report everything that you use, even if it wasn't purchased by the business, so if you do work from home, you're technically supposed to register and pay based on everything you used, even if it's not owned by the business. So, if you take your laptop from the desk to the couch to do your work, you're technically supposed to list both, even if you're just working from home that day. They do give you $15k worth of assets before you have to pay property taxes on it, but it's ridiculous and in some cases, especially with second hand goods or ones that you owned before opening the business, you may not even know how much to declare for the purposes of taxes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We won't know unless it's found. If the disappearance was either due to an implosion or it getting caught in the wreck, then it probably wouldn't much matter as there's no equipment in existence that could save them. If they sank to the bottom, but weren't crushed, perhaps, any other possibility, probably.
At any rate, at this point, they're likely dead from dehydration or hypothermia, and if they're not now, then that's likely to happen before they run of air and the sub hasn't even been located yet. Once it's located, it would take time to raise, assuming it's not on the surface, and they can't just crack it open on the surface, it would need some time to decompress and I don't know if there's an option for that with this design.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That's my main issue. These things may well help, but only in service of actual, real treatment. Drug addiction is usually an issue of poor social connections or an underlying medical condition that's being self-medicated. If you don't address those things, then the likelihood of getting and remaining clean is pretty small.
I tend to cringe when things like magic mushrooms and MDMA are being touted as solutions to drug abuse problems as the research isn't really there yet and the fact of the matter is that if you're not dealing with the actual issues driving the use, then it just runs the risk of bandaging over the problem, or worse.
Personally, I've been clean from alcohol for a little over 20 years now, and it only worked because I gave up just about everything. I lost all my friends from that period of my life and I pretty much had to start from scratch socially, building a life with people that either didn't use or who would respect my wish not to drink at all. These days, I'll drink a little, but only limited amounts of alcohol removed products like near bears and wines. The less than 0.5% alcohol hasn't been an issue for me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kittyearsheadbands8810 Honestly, if it weren't for the last century of purposeful vandalism and destruction of German culture in the US in response to WWI and then WWII, I wouldn't see anything at all wrong with it at all. But, I do take issue with people suggesting that it's somehow progressive to steal more Germanic things, as if there wasn't a period of time where we had "liberty cabbage" and "Salisbury steak" in an effort to "get the Hun." But, somehow when various white subcultures borrow things, it's cultural appropriation and wrong. Casting her as Snow White is the epitome of cultural appropriation and a little bit of self-awareness of it isnt' asking that much. Worse, there's not going to be decent roles for people of color, if all that happens is that white roles get reassigned to people with a bit more melanine in their skin.
I wouldn't personally have an issue with it at all, if at some point, I thought there'd be some reckoning coming for the various racists that continue to lie about the wars. Yes, the holocaust really happened and was probably even more horrific than most people realize, but there were also tens of thousands of German civilians that were murdered by the Allies in the closing days of the war as retribution and thousands that wound up in American concentration camps in the US. Not to mention the language literally being banned for a period of time from public education. BTW, it's completely possible to think that the Nazis were evil incarnate without letting the allies off the hook for the evil deeds and ethnic cleansing that they did during that same period of time.
It's a bit like the actual issue with the dwarves here where they were a fine feature of the original stories and when Disney did the animated film, but at some point, the characters should be brought to life in a way that's more nuanced and reflects that they have actual personalities beyond the one trait that inspires their naming.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is good legal advice, it's a bad idea to count on getting a judge to overturn the terms of a contract. There may not be sufficient grounds to do so, or you may simply find a judge that is less likely to do so and the appellate court might say no. In either case, you're out of pocket thousands of dollars just to get that no.
That being said, given the facts of the case, those waivers shouldn't be sufficient to get the builder off the hook. Forcing the sale of their previous home, moving the closing date and canceling is far more than simply the builder's convenience, at least to most normal people. Without forcing the sale, the builder probably would be able to cancel the contract, but I'd be very curious myself about what prompted the closing date to be pushed back and there may well be a 3rd party that could be sued for interfering with the contract who isn't covered by the liability waivers with the prospective buyer. Because if they just thought they'd be able to get more money in the abstract, they probably would have canceled the contract prior to the contracted closing date. If they pushed the date back and then cancelled after the original closing date, that implies that there may have been some negotiations or shopping around of the property going on. Obviously, there are other possible reasons, but I'm sure a good attorney would be getting papers to cover whatever communications were going on with respect to the property.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
50% doesn't seem that unreasonable, perhaps for "showers" that probably is a bit much, but for growers, 50% is definitely possible. For many growers, just normal sitting there versus being about ready to be on the job is that much. The average length is about 5.6inches and the length increase just on a normal day between soft and hard can be anywhere from about a half an inch to 3.5 inches. So, yep, 50%, is definitely possible, but not necessarily for everybody.
Yes, as far as the balls go, they do get rather far away when it's hot, the dick though only has so much it can grow.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's worth noting that for folks with ADHD, we should be making it as easy as possible to put something away, even if it makes it harder to take out. (I'd say that's more of an especially rather than an even if) Because that's going to be the issue, taking something out usually isn't an issue if you want it badly enough, but putting it back is commonly where the friction lies. Keeping books, or CDs, or similar, in alphabetical order is great for finding it, but a massive pain for putting them back and if you buy a new item that starts with A, you might be stuck moving everything else. But, if you just say, it's good enough for it to be in the As or A-C range, it'll be far more likely that it'll be put there. Even though it will take more to retrieve than if it was in strict alphabetical order, it's still far easier to retrieve than if it wasn't put away at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@albertwatkins7050 No, and you can't really yell fire in a crowded theater either. In the case of the bomb, there's presumably a terrorism statute that covers it. In the latter, it's not technically illegal, but given how dumb people are, you should probably expect that somebody is going to start a rush to get out and trample people. And if that happens, you probably would have criminal liability.
There's a lot of things that aren't technically illegal in and of themselves, but are still likely to wind up with somebody being arrested. Around here, public nudity isn't technically illegal, but it will be prosecuted anyways under other rules. The local parks are technically all clothing optional, but there's been a bit of a truce where only certain areas of certain parks allow people to exercise that right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've been working for a grocery store the last month or so, because people need to eat. The company I work for has been providing PPE and some additional pay, but where is the government in all of this? The Democrats were talking about getting us all $13 an hour in hazard pay, but after announcing that, they haven't actually pushed for even one additional cent.
I'm fortunate, in that I already had corvid-19 early on and have less to worry about than most of my coworkers, but it's still not right that we're receiving additional compensation only from our company, whereas the people on unemployment are getting what is equivalent to $15 an hour just for being on unemployment. Don't get me wrong, I don't begrudge them the money, and I am grateful to have a job that I'm not likely to lose, but still. It's an insult to the various people that are risking our health and lives, that we're being given nothing from the government to help mitigate the risk or increase the reward of ensuring that various people have access to job. In my case, my job is to go around the store shopping so that other people can just pick their groceries up at the store. I'll never know for sure, but it's highly likely that there will be people alive after the pandemic because my coworkers and I were taking on that risk instead of the customers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, or it's a broken problem, but either way it's worth taking a bit to consider what's going on because that's not an acceptable result. In general when you have a step where all the variables disappear, you have to take a step back and consider what's happening. Often it's a mistake, sometimes it's the result of there just not being a solution, for example, looking for where Y=5x crosses Y = 5x +1. They're parallel, and won't cross without freaky curved surfaces. Or, if we're in 3, or more, dimensions, they could be skewed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SlyNine Most people can't. I got a summons recently, it was like the 6th one and the 3rd that I was actually able to do. I'm not sure if I'll have to report, but in post-pandemic America, I just got a post card to register with the court and anytime between then and the 8th, I can be contacted by the court to report. They've got it down to the point where it's 1 day or 1 trial. But, that's still a lot for many people as they pay basically nothing. I'm fortunate that my employer will cover the difference between what I would have made and what the jury duty pays, but that's not legally required of any business.
For what is one of the most important things that citizens are called on to do, it's an absolute scandal that jurors are left with no pay, I"m sure when the pay was established it was decent, but I make more in a half hour than what jury duty pays for an entire day. Last time I was on jury duty, I could easily spend more on food, if I chose to eat out, than I'd be paid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jimmy Early, The schools aren't doing that though, they're placing the burden of proof on the accused, and denying him an attorney and the right to cross examine the accuser.
In a situation like that, there's no hope of getting the truth, there's no guarantee that there even is a victim as often times both parties were drunk at the time and neither party was in any better position to consent than the other. Or, there's just no witness available, so there's no way of knowing whether or not there even was a crime committed.
The only reasonable way of handling it is to make sure the cops find out and do their investigation. If there isn't sufficient evidence to move forward with criminal proceedings, then there shouldn't be consequences for the accused either,. Perhaps find some way of separating them when possible, but that's it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
TBH, the joke wouldn't have been a problem, if she wasn't benefiting from an oppressive system that puts some people in the position where they have to work these jobs or become homeless. For me personally, I'm lucky to not have to worry about eviction or going hungry. But, most are not so fortunate.
Personally, I specifically took a job at one of the local grocery stores specifically because people need to be fed and since I likely already had it, it made sense for me to be on the front lines. I lack the necessary medical training, so it had to either be grocery store, shipping company or private security as those are all ways in which I could contribute.
But, there is a certain logic to refusing to deliver or support the leaches that put us in the position of having an insufficient quantities of respirators, personal protective gear and means to produce whatever medications are found to be effective.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
IANAL, but courts tend to defer to what's on the paper alone, without considerations for external factors as there's no way of knowing about that. But, given the circumstances involved here, the missed closing date and the cancellation made after forcing the sale of the previous house and days before the new closing date; I'd wager that there's grounds to suspect 3rd party interference. The market has not changed that much in just those few weeks to warrant the builder expecting significantly more money for exercising that clause.
Going through discovery based on those weird behaviors by the builder might well reveal 3rd part interference that would not be covered by the contract. The screwed over buyers might well not be able to sue the builder, but if there was a 3rd party interfering, that party does not have a waiver with the buyer, and would be potentially liable for any damages that occured if they did indeed induce the builder to terminate the contract.
Obviously, we wouldn't know whether or not that's the case, but given how important it was for the builder to have this family close and then at the last minute to feel equally strongly that they not move in, after changing the closing date, something may be going on that isn't covered in the contract.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@margarita8442 There's the rub, assuming that they are indeed still alive, they don't have any way of knowing if they've been located with time to be extracted from the sub. This is like a real life example of one of those ethics dilemmas that people like to think about. They don't actually know if they're going to be rescued, and if they aren't going to be rescued, then offing themselves to preserve oxygen is just extending the suffering of the younger passengers. And, if they are rescued, they don't really know if the rescue is going to come a few minutes later, or if the sacrifice will make any difference.
Plus, these are all wealthy people from what I can tell, they don't have any sort of morals or higher purpose, if they did, they wouldn't be so rich. The company owner might be the only one that isn't in that position, but also likely the only one that can keep things kind of in perspective as well. So, who knows.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gasdive That's an example of grossly overspeccing the power supply. There's only a small number of things that legitimately require that much juice. In order to get that, you have to massively overspec all of the wiring in case you need the extra capacity.
It's incredibly dumb. In the US, there's a solution to that, you run a different circuit for such things, or you wait. The power coming into the house is more than enough to do that.
We can't have that in the US in large part because, unlike in Europe, we didn't have to rebuild everything after WWII. And you make it sound like it's just the US, from what I can tell, it's hardly just us and the Japanese. You see 10A 240v systems in much of the world and while that is a bit higher than what you see in the US, it's not that much higher.
There's also the issue that if you're going to have the extra juice, then you're having to spend extra money if you need an extension cord that uses the extra juice.
When all is said and done, it just makes no sense to make that change for so little gain.Certainly not enough to throw out all the infrastructure and start over.
1
-
@Monkeh616 Such ignorance. You guys had a newer electrical grid than we do. One of the perks of that is that you can design them better without having to worry about integrating into an older system. In the US, we have been using an incremental approach, you no longer see those plug systems that we used to use in new construction. You also don't see new systems using aluminum wiring these days either.
We have increased the voltage a bit over the decades, but shy of throwing everything out and starting over, there's only so much we can increase it.
The other issue though, is that the other systems are massively overspecced. You don't need the 80% rule, because most devices just cannot use enough juice to get anywhere near that point. Perhaps space heaters or an electric car charging system can, but the vast majority of the things you'd plug into the walls isn't going to stress the system.
As devices get more and more efficient, the advantage is going to go away. Things with heating elements will always use roughly the same amount of power because they're converting the electricity into heat on purpose, but for virtually everything else, the power consumption is getting to be less and less.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The problem with lifetime licenses is that they have to be pretty expensive to actually mean that. The issue is that they don't generate any more income, so it has to be set aside, and it has to be enough to pay for continued support, and that's not cheap. I've seen various businesses have to figure it out. Redchairsoftware back in the day had the best software for connecting my Nomand Jukebox 3 to my computer, but they went out of business in large part because $20 for a lifetime license was too little for the work they were putting in, and they were locked into a shrinking part of the market. DDI Software did probably the best job in terms of negotiating the reality that the model was unsustainable. Anybody on a lifetime license could continue to use it, but the support was largely limited to things that would continue to allow use, not new features. Which, in all honesty was fair enough, had he continued to try to keep the license terms the same forever with new features, it likely would have just caused the company to go bankrupt leaving the folks with those lifetime licenses without even a modern, and very well featured, piece of software to use.
A lifetime software license can really only continue for a lifetime if it's massively expensive, otherwise, it's always being partially subsidized by something else and if that something else starts to dry up, a company can run into trouble rather quickly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I work in food service and there are a lot of things which would make me too sick for work, but not too sick to go outside and do things. Diarrhea is one of them, if I've got watery bowel movements in the last bit, I can't go into work. So, even if I do take some medicine and it clears up, I still can't go to work right away. The same goes for vomiting. So, I can be chilling at home and generally fine to goof off, but be potentially infectious and could give somebody food poisoning if I went into work.
Really, what this says is that we need stronger protections for days off. A mental health day is a legitimate part of one's health and a legitimate reason to call in sick. I'm autistic, and I do a really good job of coming in if at all possible, but there are definitely days when I'd rather not show up because I can't do things that shouldn't be a part of my job, but corporate expects us to smile and give customers "good" eye contact, whatever that even means. It hasn't been a problem yet, but technically it could be a hassle to deal with at some point in the future.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They don't say that the WTC buildings were brought down by planes, that's what happened. The planes were seen by people crashing into the buildings and because the WTC buildings were set up to allow for large, and mostly, open floor space, if anything caused the core to fail the whole building would come down. In this case, too much of the fireproofing was destroyed by the planes to protect against the subsequent fire. That's been known for quite a few years at this point, and is completely consistent with the towers being designed to withstand a smaller plane, with less fuel, colliding with them.
As for why building 7 collapsed like that, it's because that's how buildings virtually always come down. They're engineered from the beginning to collapse inward, gravity works downward and barring somebody screwing it up massively, the building always comes down like that. You'd have to have a Kobe style earthquake where the land liquefies unevenly or screw up the explosives placement to get anything else.
Now whether the building was intentionally brought down or fell down due to the underground connections is another matter, but there's no way that they would have been able to rig all those explosives that quickly without anybody noticing it. Getting your hands on that much explosive material without being on a list is rather hard to begin with, but then installing it all without anybody noticing it's being done while there are a bunch of people in the building is something that does require a lot of justification.
As far as I can tell, this is simply a byproduct of the chaos on the day and if you pay attention to the on the ground journalist, she doesn't refer to building 7 when she's talking. People make mistakes, and presumably everybody involved here was in shock. I don't think that anybody outside of NYC had ever heard of building 7, so it's a bit of a stretch to suggest that people were reacting to that one. More likely, there was a mix up and somebody had a script ready for when the building did collapse due to being weakened. And now, we get to spend time over 20 years later, trying to turn it into something that it's not. This is just like JFK, it was Lee Oswald and a lot of luck that resulted in the assassination being successful. I know folks don't like that because of the huge impact it had on the history of the '60s and '70s, but that's the truth, and even today, nobody has turned up conclusive proof of another option being likely.
It's sad to see this channel devolving into a bunch of misinformation and conspiracy theories when there's very reasonable, and well-supported explanations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's a tough question, but I think the physical medium is less of an issue than what options allow for easy backup, verification and replication of those files. Personally, anything smaller than a Blu-ray disc is just not worth considering. You'd have to spend so much time swapping discs to verify the contents that it wouldn't be worthwhile.
Personally, I use a combination of online backups (A good online backup service will have a way of backing up a copy locally as well as online. Most of the time you don't need the online backup, that's just if the building burns down or somebody steals your stuff) and a ZFS ZRAID-5 to store my files. They can be quickly scrubbed to discover read errors on an automatic basis and to report any files where the checksum does not match with the expected value and repair the damage. If it can't be repaired, it will tell me precisely which files I need to recover from my backup. I've had multiple disks go bad in this arrangement, and I just keep a spare just in case a drive does start to go bad. I have yet to lose any data due to a hard disk failing since then, and most of the time I don't even need to touch my online backup other than to verify that the files are good.
I haven't had a chance to do it, but I need to set up an offline set of disks that I can quickly mirror from time to time. The vast majority of the files I have on my computer do not change very often, so having those files backuped up to storage media that I only need to plug in from time to time to verfiy and update would be good for me. I just don't have the money right now for 2 8tb disks.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This underscores just how irresponsible that Governor of Florida is to not have closed the bars and the beaches, knowing that spring break was coming. They could well bring the disease back to their homes.
I likely had a minor case of it when it first showed up in the US, and it was no fun. I was fortunate, in that I didn't need a ventilator, but I did have extreme fatigue, difficulty breathing, fever and runny nose. But, I was still able to breathe well enough not to need extra treatment. If I had been able to get tested, I would have, and I would have been willing to self-quarantine, but testing wasn't available in late January if you weren't coming back from China.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Please don't misrepresent the around the forearm method. If you're doing it that incompetently, you're going to damage the cord. The right way to do it is to allow the cord to get used to it by being gently and double coiling it when you first get it. First you coil backwards to get basically all the twists out of it. Then you coil it forward rather loosely. After a period of time, the wires will gently adapt to the shape and you can coil it just as fast as you did with the other method. Once coiled you'd hang it on the wall between work days allowing for gravity to gradually help the process. Yes, it is work, but anything worth doing is worth doing right. For larger gauge wires, you don't really have much choice as trying to daisy chain a 10 gauge wire gets to be a bit of a challenge if you want it to have a reasonably compact size.
My Dad has been doing it for decades and I've never seen a single extension cord in my 40 years on this planet that he had to replace or dispose of due to wires damaged by coiling. In fact, after a while, the cables want to be coiled like that and it's very obvious when you haven't got it quite right. Every once in a long while, something might fall on one and damage it from outside, but the only wires I've seen trouble with were the result of the insulation physically breaking down with the wires still intact. So, please don't misrepresent the technique, it does work quite will if you actually bother to take the time to do it right. The main reason it doesn't work is that people don't do it right as coiling is just slightly less obvious than just dumping it in the back of the truck and untangling it later.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This might be the last time I say it, but Jayapal is absolutely correct. The status quo sucks, permanent Daylight Saving Time is horrible, the only meaningful improvement would be to standardize on standard time. But, that doesn't require an act of congress, any state can go off the current DST debacle for standard time, it's just if you want to go to permanent Daylight Saving Time that you need federal approval.
The fact of the matter is that in WA state we get approximately 7.5 hours of light, shifting to DST doesn't benefit us at all as we'd still be commuting as the sun goes down, having completely given up the much more valuable morning light. The sun would go down around 5:30 rather than 4:40 which really doesn't help most workers at all. But, it does make it more dangerous for kids because rather than the sun rising just before 8am, it would be just before 9am after the elementary school children are already at school.
What's worse is that the most populated parts of the West Coast would be disproportionately darker than those towards the eastern part of the time zone, meaning that Seattle, to LA would be harder hit than those further east in the time zone.
She is absolutely on the right side of this issue for her constituents. We don't want permanent DST, it's mostly the retailers and business groups that want it. The farmers certainly don't want it, they get up based on the light and the animals. Educational officials don't want it as it's hard to get students to show up and be awake after the change.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You must be a millenial if you're letting MS off the hook for the inconsistency. As somebody that's used MS products from MS-DOS 5 up until the current releases, I can tell you that it is precisely because they're incompetent and don't really care what they're doing.
If you'd used Windows 3, 95, 98, ME, XP, Vista and 7 you'd see a very clear evolution going from something rather rudimentary to something that's quite well polished. And if you were one of the few people to use Windows 1 or 2, you'd see it there as well.
What changed is that they threw the entire thing out with WIndows 8 when they tried to support one UI on all of their devices, from small smartphones with touch screens to massive desktop monitors using keyboards and mouses for interacting. The end result was something that was butt ugly and didn't function very well.
Had they stuck to evolving what they had, they likely wouldn't have generated as much excitement, but that's a good thing. This is computer software for people to use to get things done, it shouldn't be changing just for the sake of change. People shouldn't have to learn how to use the software all over again just because MS wants people to be forced to buy a newer copy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Kyle, I generally agree with you, but it's not "a little bit more than they would be making," it's roughly $15 an hour in addition to the normal unemployment they would be getting. The extra alone is significantly above minimum wage in most parts of the US and even here where our minimum wage is higher, the $15 is almost as much as my base pay for 40 hours over the course of the week.
I don't begrudge them the money, but Lindsay Graham has a point, that there's a problem. He's wrong about what the problem is, I'm a frontline worker and due to the generosity of the grocery store chain, that $15 an hours from unemployment is only about 3/4 of my pay for working 40 hours. But, I have to actually work and I have to do so in a public space surrounded by people. I do get basic PPE from my employer and am required to wear the mask, but there's still risk involved here.
When they put the provision in there for the extra $600 a week for unemployment, there should have been a similar provision for those of us working frontline jobs to also get $600 a week in order to help compensate for the extra risk we're taking on. It's a comment on the dedication of those working in grocery stores, hospitals and other essential places where the work has to involve direct contact with the general public that those businesses and enterprises remain open and people can still access essential goods and services. It's also a bit of a slap in the face that I'd be making more on unemployment by such a large margin while the politicians have done precisely dicky mcgeezacks to mitigate the situation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It was a similar sort of a thing at my previous job. They kept offering me promotions, but you get a very small bump in salary, no increase in ability to enforce whatever managerial decisions you get to make, and you get yelled at if everything isn't the way they want it to be. I got stuck managing the department for 4 months without any pay, I found out at that point, that they weren't going to give me the manager bonus, a portion would be going to the new manager when they eventually decided to hire one, and he'd be getting a bit of bonus based entirely on the work that I had done.
I stuck around for a few weeks, but the whole thing just reinforced the reasons I had for not wanting to be a manager there. I could do the managerial tasks quite well, but I had absolutely no faith that after having been promised by corporate that I'd be taken care of, that taken care of meant being present when they gave somebody my bonus and completely left out of any pay for the work I had done, while they took their sweet time looking for somebody to fill any of the open positions in the department. I think, there were supposed to be 3 or 4 total, and we had 2, which meant the only way to cover all the shifts would have been for us to both work 7 days a week.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You're doing the fans a disservice with this review. The plane flying it is set up when we meet Teddy. It's not like he doesn't have a sense of how to fly a plane, it's that it's only been on a basic simulator. A stretch, but not out of nowhere. I've got ADHD, and I didn't have any issue sitting through the movie, the pacing was fine by me, I enjoyed the car chase sequence and for the first time ever, I actually liked Phoebe Waller-Bridges in something.
I do agree that the villain should have had better writing, but keep in mind that they established that Archimedes only lived in two cities, so if they're going the wrong way towards one, then it's not unreasonable for them to guess that they'd be going to the other one.
Personally, I'd recommend strongly that people watch the movie as it is actually pretty good if you just want an action film and realize that Harrison Ford is really too old to be the only protagnosit in an action flick. He does a pretty good job of keeping up with it, but he really needs other characters in a way that he wouldn't have 20 years ago.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Having lived in China teaching English to those students, I cannot emphasize just how horrible it is. The government knows that it's a horrible situation, and there has been progress made to de-emphasize that test. At this point, there is a plan B for those that fail it, but the whole point of the test is to quickly weed out the students that they don't have available space for at their colleges. If anything, it makes the problem of upward mobility even worse, as those with the power can afford to fail the test and then go overseas to get their degree. Then, when they come back, they have a rather fancy foreign degree.
Despite the BS you hear in the US, the fact is that the Chinese government is well aware of how bad their educational system is and is putting a large amount of resources into making it less traditional and somewhat more western. Having students attending all those subjects and then only be tested on a couple of them is a massive waste of time, and students just go through the minimum motions they can get away with in order to not be punished.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is generally good information, but they didn't fold Asperger's Syndrome into Autism Spectrum Disorder, most people who were diagnosed as AS would have lost their diagnosis entirely if the DSM didn't include a grandfather provision for those with a well-established diagnosis and treatment. In fact 2/3 of those with AS and atypical autism diagnoses would have otherwise lost them as the spectrum was constricted to remove those least able to defend their diagnosis. I'm personally parked in the hole that they created. I'm somewhere between ADHD, ASD, the Cluster A PDs, the Cluster C PDs and Social Pragmatic Communication Disorder where there really isnt' a recognized diagnosis, so I can have severe autistic traits that have set me back a bunch, but there's no diagnosis, so no legal protections and only treatments that are available for anxiety or Schizoid Personality Disorder and that is likely to be removed from the ICD eventually as there are few if any pure schizoids out there which makes it a diagnosis that isn unnecessary.
Really, the whole thing is a massive mess just because a few researchers thought there were too many diagnoses being made, even though that always happens with a new diagnosis and it can take some time for the clinicians to adopt a new diagnosis and figure out what it really looks like in the wild. They were studying autism for a full century, but the higher masked versions weren't really even being studied actively until sometime in the '90s and nobody was even researching masking until somewhere around the turn of the millennium.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Of course it should be required, the sort of people who ride without helmets are exactly the same people who should be wearing them all the time, because they're too immature to make wise decisions. This whole, I don't want to, I don't want to, I don't want to, foot stamp reaction is not something that reflects and individual who has the maturity to get away without wearing one.
People who don't wear a helmet do not understand what it's like to go around with a head injury. Trust me, it's not fun to wake up in the ICU and have the doctors watching carefully to see if you're going to be able to feed yourself and not be allowed to get out of bed without somebody holding a harness while you walk so that they can verify that you can still walk without hurting yourself.
It's one thing if that crash is fatal, but if it's not fatal, they're going to regret their decision to not wear a helmet.
Similarly, those other bits of gear are what are going to reduce the likelihood of waking up in the ICU without an arm or a foot and collectively contribute to the likelihood of pulling through at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
From what I understand, the term dwarf has been sort of grey area for decades, with some folks finding it to be offensive and others having it be a preferred term. Really, I wish people would pay more attention to how they're using the words rather than what the words are. Of course, with black folks using the n word and close variants of it, and then saying that nobody else can say it, in virtually any context, it doesn't exactly move things forward, it's incredibly hypocrytical, considering that that's not even their word. That's a word that they've appropriated as their own, it's a word that refers to redneck, or cracker culture if you really want to push the boundaries, they're just the most recent group for it to be used. And it's hardly just black folks that have it used sand n, is a term that people use unironically to refer to Arabs.
Also, there's nothing particularly leftwing or progressive about TYT, they've always been in it for the money, and they were pretending to be leftwing when they thought it would get them money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The short answer is that even regular clothing gets very heavy when it gets wet. I remember having to do a float test years ago where it was a half hour fully clothed. It is not as easy as one would expect, unless you're wearing lighter than normal clothing. Add to that, the rest of the kit that a typical officer would be wearing and that alone could be enough to drown them. They could potentially take the time to get out of it, secure it and jump in, but even if they managed that quicky enough to get to the distressed swimmer, there's then the issue of being drowned by the swimmer as he climbs on top of the officer to save his own butt and drowns them both.
So, really, I don't see anything in the video that would lead me to think that the officers could have done anything more. But, this is just the video that gives the best view of the now deceased, we don't really know exactly when the other officers called for the dive team.
A death is generally not something to celebrate, but in this case, it was his own stupid decisions and refusal to obey lawful orders that got him killed. Unfortunately, the bystanders will likely have trauma to work through for years to come. I'm fortunate enough to have never seen a drowning, but I'd imagine that it would be pretty horrible to see somebody dying that could potentially be saved, but isn't because the necessary equipment isn't there to do it. Just having to watch until they slip beneath the water seems horrible. I don't think being on the phone with dispatchers is really that much better.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
TBH, I used to live there years ago and it wasn't like that back then. I doubt very much that things have changed that much in the last decade. It's a country of over a billion people, there are going to be some A-holes. For every one monster child like that, you're going to have literally dozens, if not hundreds, of better behaved children.
A large, and difficult to solve issue, is that the typical kid spends so much time in school studying for their high school final exam, and doing what the adults around them say to do, that there isn't a lot of time for developing emotionally. It has worked for them for many centuries, but it can put them at a disadvantage when it comes to competing with other countries for development resources.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yellolab09 Absolutely, the farmers out in the sticks may not have to do much to avoid this, but what about the cities? Sure, they aren't as big as in some other states, but that doesn't mean that people can't get it there. It just means that the threshhold between functioning and swamped is hit with smaller numbers. If they don't get their stuff in order, they'll max out their resources sooner. What's more, any illnesses there, will bring resources that could be used elsewhere. If they're taking the relevant precautions, then fair enough, but if it's because they're too arrogant to put proper measures into place, then f them. They should get no additional resources.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ultimately, it is the bank's fault for not having a process that would catch that. It doesn't take much effort to verify the recipient against the name of the business that was the intended recipient. That would be a similar level of verification to what you'd get with a check. In order to send money, especially that amount, there are anti-money laundering regulations that require that the banks know whom the parties involved are. So, it's not like they don't know who's sending and receiving the money, they just didn't have adequate ways of verifying that the information was correct.
And yes, triple checking is nice, but some of us have learning disorders that make that tough and there's typically a lot of numbers involved, if any of them aren't correct or you've misread the original account number, it can be very hard to find the mistake. Whereas having to get the account and bank numbers correct on top of the name of the intended recipient right would have prevented this from happening. I work at a store that handles Western Union, and I've been there when customers were having issues because the middle name of the recipient was incorrect and the money couldn't be received. (Such mistakes can only be handled by Western Union, not the 3rd party retail store that has the machine)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, what she's got is clearly treatable. What's going on with her is pretty common within the autistic community and I doubt there are that many of us that haven't considered self-murder. The problem here is that euthanasia laws should specifically be for real problems that can't be solved. She's only 29, that's nowhere near enough time to have genuinely tried the most appropriate mental health therapies for autistic folks. One of the unfortunate realities is that we don't get the same benefit out of some of the most common treatments that non-autistic people do. There's a lot of adjustments that can be made to how we live our daily lives to improve things and she quite frankly has not been diagnosed long enough to have any right to have other people involved in this nonsense.
I realize that there is this human compassion to let people free themselves of their suffering, but there's no particular basis for assuming that this is going to continue for decades. The amount of information about autism and how to deal with it has been increasing a lot, and I mean a lot. In the 15 years between when I narrowly missed out on my Asperger's diagnosis due to having a bunch of schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses in my charts, there has been a massive amount of improvement in terms of the options for improving quality of life and sources of things to try.
And, I do get it, it's not like I haven't ever stared down at a bottle and thought about it, but at the end of the day, each time you step up to the abyss and decide not to do it, it gets a bit easier, and as scary as it was seeing monsters everywhere because I suddenly lost my ability to see any faces at all, at least now I know that it's because of autism, not because of schizophrenia and I just need to continue to just ignore it and it'll go away with some rest and a reset.
1
-
@Dutchlad112 I'm sorry, but that's bullshit. Most autistic adults have a similar laundry list if we weren't either diagnosed young or very lucky. Personally it's Generalized Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar, Schizoaffective, Schizotypal, Schizoid Personality Disorder, ADHD, OCD, Stigmatization issues, IBS, tinnitus, severe allergies to animals, heat stroke and water intoxication amongst other things. And I'm not super rare in that regard. A bunch of those were things that I grew out of or where there was some reasonable debate between doctors as there aren't medical tests that can always tell the difference and some of those are very hard to do a proper differential diagnosis on. And some of them, I probably didn't have, it was just the underlying neurological condition.
The point is that, I don't see anything in the reports that suggest that she's really that special in terms of the suffering. There is a lot of concern about people with depression and self-murder as the condition literally robs people of any hope for the future, the same hope that you need to proceed with treatment long enough to find one.
The human spirit is a lot stronger than people think and I do question whether she'd be throwing in the towel if she had to be the one to do her own dirty work, or if she'd keep looking for other options for treatment as mental health care has been going under a bit of a revolution the last couple decades, especially when it comes to various neurodivergent people. I don't I would have had it so tough if I had been allowed to know that I've got some sort of pervasive developmental disorder rather than just being really screwed up in the head.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Mogman150 That's demonstrably false, if that's causing the cord to break then you've either been doing it wrong or you've got a cheap cord. My Dad has several extension cords that are decades old where he's done that every single time and the wires inside are going to outlast the outside protective cover. If you half-ass the coiling process like he is doing in the video, then yes, you're going to wind up with a broken cord, but if you actually do it correctly, then no, it won't break, not now not after decades. You do it gently and respect the wires on the inside, over time they'll gradually adapt to a certain curve and resist any other coiling you might want to do. After time, you'll take it around the forearm and the cord will just want to be that diameter even without needing your forearm.
Extension cords often need a bit of time to break in due to the way that they come coiled from the factory. Over time the wires and cover will relax a bit and you'll get a better coil out of it. The main downside is that unlike the daisy chaining making a coiled extension cord longer is a bit less convenient and you need to be more mindful of getting it wrapped to prevent it from tangling when you're storing it.
One of my personal pet peeves is when people use a technique incorrectly, get bad results, then declare the technique to be bad, when it was just the implementation by a bunch of knuckleheads that was to blame for the failure.
1
-
@judsonkr Nope, he showed 2 right ways and a third deliberately incompetent right way. If you did the other methods that incompetently, they wouldn't work out well either. My Dad has a number of extension cords that are years old and in most cases decades old that he's coiled in roughly that manner regularly. In fact I've only seen him buy a new extension cord because he needed a thicker gauge, longer cord, was already using the other ones or a cheaper one got damaged by something external damaging it. I've never seen him buy a single replacement cord due to the way he coils them. Not once in the last nearly 40 years that I can remember. The difference is that he doesn't force them into that coil, he developed the coil in each extension cord by gently coiling it the same way each time and allowed the cover and wires to gradually sort themselves out. Now, if you take one of those extension cords and try to coil it in any other way, it tells you not to F-ing coil it like that. But, if you do it the right way, then it will coil up very nice, very neatly and very easily. The wires inside will easily outlast the outer cover and the bits at either end.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yep, this video is rather embarrassing. Actual experts on the topic recognize that you can't vaccinate yourself out of a pandemic with vaccines this imperfect. Scientists have managed to do it with Small pox and are on the verge of doing it with Polio and a few others, but the efficacy rates of those vaccines are much, much higher.
Even if accept the figures that Mike is quoting, and I see no particular reason to doubt them, it still makes Ryan Grim a moron for thinking that the vaccine will do much to prevent the spread. That's not how vaccines work. Physically being in close proximity to somebody that's infected can rather quickly burn through any protective effect that the vaccine might have and lead people to get infected. On top of which, anybody that has a weakened immune system might still contract it even with full vaccination. I know one 90+ year old that has contracted it twice after being fully vaccinated because at his age, his immune system just isn't that strong. He survived because he had the vaccine, but no amount of other people getting booster shots will prevent that from happening.
If we cared about ending this, we'd admit that the vaccine + medical advances are good enough and go back to business as usual. Eventually enough people will survive that the cases of hospitalizations and deaths will plummet. But, in the absence of much, much better vaccines, there's not much reason to believe that a booster is going to do much, especially when so many people in the developing world haven't gotten their full vaccination yet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@battleboat12 Yes, a different sporting event sharing that name would almost certainly run afoul of the trademark, but if it were something that was completely unrelated and not trading off the tournament, it might be allowable. For example, a black friday style sale running during the same time might be able to use the term, provided that it didn't cause any confusion over a connection with the tournament other than being at the same time.
But, using march madness in some other country where the tournament isn't a prominent thing likely wouldn't run afoul, even if the NCAA bothered to register it there. (Although, if it's that unnotable, they probably wouldn't bother to register it there, and as such there wouldn't be anything to infringe upon)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
For those of us that are males that are also gay or bisexual, in particular, it was a nasty trap as you weren't legally allowed to serve, but even after Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Harass, Don't Pursue was instituted, there were still huge numbers of people thrown out of the military and not receiving their honorable discharges. That was extremely expensive and damaging to all those involved for reasons you're fully aware of. A consequence of it is that most military personnel were fine with it as long as they weren't at risk, but it was precarious where being a threat to somebody else's promotion could be enough to get a complaint that would wind up destroying lives.
Removing the draft helped that, but now that things are legally integrated, the draft should return with some teeth to ensure that the rich and powerful are not allowed to avoid their share of the commitment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Technically, the law permits discrimination based on being too young, not too old. However, if the courts would actually enforce the constitution, those provisions would apply to everybody, not just those over 40.
In this case, the fact that there's 2 different ages, one for men and one for women, is the thing that would most likely get them in trouble. However, if this results in some races being kept out more than others, that would likely also be an issue. And considering that the life expectancy of black men is so much lower than for other groups, it probably wouldn't take much of a leap to file suit as a race discrimination thing the way that companies can hire people based on looks, so long as looks aren't discriminatory on any covered class.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@godssara6758 Unregulated militia, or do you you regularly train and receive orders? The militia to which that refers is the national guard. They're regulated, trained and equipped. The 2nd amendment does not refer to firearms, it refers to arms because it's not talking about individuals' rights, it's talking about the sort of weaponry needed for national defense. So, it's just blatant made up BS to indicate that it's just firearms and extends to ones so powerful that the people writing it likely wouldn't have been able to imagine. Cannons, missiles, machine guns, chemical and biological weapons, nukes, mortars, mines and drones are all arms, and none of them are included in the 2nd amendment as currently imagined, and more than one of those isn't even legal under international law.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Was casting a Latina as Snow White really the right thing to do here? I mean, it's rather interesting how when it's a white person being cast as a role that was written for people of color, that it's cultural appropriation, but somehow when the oppressed group is white, the same standard does not apply. It's frustrating that after a century, there's still no meaningful acknowledgement of the cleansing of German culture from America, and it hasn't really stopped.
There's nothing inherently wrong with recasting the role to different ethnicities, but it should be actually rewritten, otherwise, you're insulting multiple groups and I don't think that it's asking much for people to pretend like doing something that's been a matter of routine for a century is somehow a good thing or progressive. Taking German culture and destroying it isn't progressive, and it's not OK. If you're going to re-imagine the role, that's fine, it's public domain, have at it, just please don't pee on our legs and tell us that it's raining. Or better still, lift the equivalent story from a different culture for once.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I used to live in China and it's really a mixed bag. I met some of the nicest people there as well as some of the scummiest dirt bags there. A lot of it depends on where you're from and what you look like. A lot of the Chinese I was dealing with in rural areas had never met any other white people before, so I had to be on my best behavior constantly, as one bad encounter with the only white person they've ever met could cause the rudeness.
In cities, it was a lot less so, they had some sort of an idea what to expect in a lot of cases, but the society is very tribal in the sense that guangxi and personal and family connections are important. Guanxi doesn't really translate, but it's a relationship, a debt and obligation and partnering. If you're coming in as a tourist they don't really know how to categorize you, so a lot of the normal social scripts don't necessarily apply. Additionally, most tourists are on tours and don't get much beyond where the typical tourist areas.
Also, if you speak any Mandarin, or the local dialect, you'll find that they warm up a lot, much of the "rudeness" is just that cities are busy and the culture is very introverted with outsiders being viewed with suspicion for political reasons.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CD-vb9fi That is an absolute lie. That has never in the entire history of this country been the case, and even with the massive expansion to the interpretation of the 2nd amendment in recent decades, still not true. The 2nd amendment was always about the national guard and policing agencies.
That being said, grenades, RPGs, nukes, switchblades, gravity knifes, tanks, daisy cutters etc., are not now legal really anywhere, and some of those things have never been legal for possession or use by private individuals.
It's kind of amazes me that there's so much ignorance on the pro-2nd amendment side about what precisely the text means.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mattwong5403 Except that's clearly not the case when the generals are this incompetent. We've known since Vietnam, and probably earlier, that you cannot win a war on foreign soil without the support of the local population, and you cannot get that support if you're not protecting them from the enemy. 2 opposing armies having at it is not going to guarantee that the locals will take a particular side. We failed in Afghanistan and Iraq because there was never any serious intention of protecting the local population from being annihilated by the enemy. There were never enough actual personnel on the ground to do the job, nor was there any interest in drafting more to make it so. Ultimately, Iraq has fared somewhat better, but mostly because the Shia were able to slaughter enough Sunni to reduce the internal strife, which is probably not what the people planning the invasion were expecting as they didn't do anything at any point to prevent or address it. In Afghanistan, the fall was swift in large part because we were paying one side to fight with the Taliban and that was the only reason they were fighting. They didn't particularly want what we wanted them to want. At least not in numbers large enough to field a large enough military to stop the Taliban from seizing control almost immediately.
The best trained military in the world should have competent people from top to bottom and the US military definitely does not, the higher you go, the less competent you're talking. Most of the conflicts we've been embroiled with over the last couple decades are the direct result of incompetence at the DOD and our intelligence agencies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1