Youtube comments of SmallSpoonBrigade (@SmallSpoonBrigade).
-
279
-
98
-
97
-
61
-
53
-
46
-
42
-
42
-
38
-
37
-
34
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
29
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
20
-
20
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
I think that's a lot of it. If you speak a few words of the local language, it does make a difference. French has a uniculture, that's how they've opted to deal with mulitculturalism, people are expected to assimilate into French culture. If you can say hello, thank you and several other helpful phrases in French, the experience will be a lot different than if you expect to go and say everything in a foreign language. It's not a high bar, most people could manage that level in less than a week.
Similarly, knowing any Mandarin at all, will get a very different view of China than you'd otherwise get. I was mostly in rural areas and I get invited in to cafes by the locals or have these amazing interactions with people. It was kind of stressful because I was representing hundreds of millions of white people when I did it, but for the most part they didn't have a fixed mindset about foreigners, just most of them had never met any , so it was puresly based on what they saw in the media.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
People like you were never going to vote for him. Let's be honest about that. The fact that you think that we're allies is a pretty strong hint that you don't get what's going on. These aren't conspiracy theories about the establishment rigging the primaries. We don't yet have it on tape for this election, but they had to admit under oath in court, that they rigged the '16 primaries in favor of Clinton. Now, we have a candidate that is clearly senile, benefitting from all of the other corporatist candidates dropping out in the span of 48 hours to get behind a candidate who had won only 1 state and didn't even have any personnel in upcoming states and you don't think that looks at all fishy?
The honest truth here is that if you are characterizing it like that, you're either being paid to do so, or you're so out of touch with reality, that there's nothing that could be done to earn your vote. For those of us in the real world, a vote for Biden is a vote for a life that's even worse than under Trump. Just look at the leaked list of cabinet picks if you don't believe me. He's going to pack his cabinet with war mongers and elites, to at least the extent that Trump has and unlike Trump, Biden is too senile to have much involvement in day to day goals of the agencies.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
False accusations are not incredibly rare. Those are questionable figures that are incredibly hard to quantify. Rape and sexual assault crimes in general are hard to count because most of them occur between people who know each other. Which makes it very, very hard to determine the difference between actual rape and sex where there wasn't an explicit agreement to have sex.
The two are very different morally and ethically.
As far as it being incredibly rare, I had a hard time finding the conviction rate in the US for proceedings that end in trials, but in the UK, it's less than 2/3 of trials for sexual assault wind up with a conviction, meaning that some portion of those 37% that resulted in aquitals were false allegations, we don't really know how many, but legally speaking, the crimes aren't considered to happen. In the US, the numbers are hard to find, but it's a similar problem, these are cases where there might have been a rape, usually the parties have some relationship with each other, but there isn't any evidence to assume that the crime happened beyond the evidence to assume that it didn't happen and it shouldn't be claimed that those incidents aren't false allegations as it's equally valid to suggest that they are. But, doing that would lead to a number that's several orders of magnitude higher. So there's pressure to not admit the truth on that.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
You mean other than the fact that those other sources have all sorts of components that humans aren't supposed to eat, right? Not to mention the fact that we don't even really know what the optimal diet is for people, so how would we know if the diet contained everything that we needed?
Also, meat is about more than just protein. It's about proteins, fats in a form that our body has evolved to digest. Much of the nutritional content of vegetables isn't bio-available, which means that even if it has the amount of nutrients we need, it might as well not as we can't make use of it.
But, if you want to flood your body with testosterone antagonists and other things that are bad for you in order to be a vegan, that's really your own business. But, if you care about health, then meat and animal products are going to be a part of your diet on a regular basis. Optimal health requires a few calories from animal sources here and there.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@paullessard No, the GP is right, the whole industry is a scam. Thomas Kinkade is a really good example, his work is just not very good. But, he made tons of money over his lifetime based primarily on his name and reputation.
The "value" of a lot of these pieces that you see at auction is primarily about the fact that they own something that other people don't own. It's not because the work is necessarily worth more than a different piece is. There's tons of great artists that never sell a single piece, folks like Van Gogh would not be known today if they didn't have somebody financing their unprofitable art. You're argument is that Van Gogh's work was essentially worthless because he couldn't support himself by selling paintings. You're talking about a guy who during his lifetime sold most of his work just for supplies versus now having work that goes for millions when they're even available for sale.
Are his paintings really worth that much more now than back then? No, the reason for the prices is that virtually everybody has heard of Van Gogh, you don't need to know anything about painting to know that they're valuable. Same goes for most other well work being sold for large sums of money, they aren't necessarily any better than the ones that sell for a ton, they just don't have the art galleries pushing them for high prices.
Dale Chihuly reportedly adds an additional 0 to the price of his glasswork that isn't selling to spur sales. If that doesn't definitively prove just how shady the industry is, then I don't know what would.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
We've had the truth on both for decades. Whether people choose to believe it or not is up to them. But, the CIA definitely did start Bin Laden out in the '80s with training and supplies in Afghanistan, I'm not aware of anybody arguing against that. And, there were definitely planes flown into the buildings that took them down. This is also established as is the engineering failures that led to the buildings collapsing under their own weight when the central columns were heated enough to lose their strength.
SImilarly, there is no need for a conspiracy, any time there's a public route like the one that JFK was riding at the time, there is the potential for a sniper to be in one of the windows, it's why the secret service has to do a lot of work securing the rooftops and have their own team looking for snipers in the windows. It's not an easy job. And Jack Ruby was frequently in the police station where he shot Oswald, it wouldn't have been unusual for him to be there, even without the crowds of reporters covering the transfer.
It's all less than satisfying, but it distracts from actual conspiracies like the Democrats throwing races to the GOP to avoid having to make decisions that anger the donors.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
For those of us that are males that are also gay or bisexual, in particular, it was a nasty trap as you weren't legally allowed to serve, but even after Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Harass, Don't Pursue was instituted, there were still huge numbers of people thrown out of the military and not receiving their honorable discharges. That was extremely expensive and damaging to all those involved for reasons you're fully aware of. A consequence of it is that most military personnel were fine with it as long as they weren't at risk, but it was precarious where being a threat to somebody else's promotion could be enough to get a complaint that would wind up destroying lives.
Removing the draft helped that, but now that things are legally integrated, the draft should return with some teeth to ensure that the rich and powerful are not allowed to avoid their share of the commitment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Technically, the law permits discrimination based on being too young, not too old. However, if the courts would actually enforce the constitution, those provisions would apply to everybody, not just those over 40.
In this case, the fact that there's 2 different ages, one for men and one for women, is the thing that would most likely get them in trouble. However, if this results in some races being kept out more than others, that would likely also be an issue. And considering that the life expectancy of black men is so much lower than for other groups, it probably wouldn't take much of a leap to file suit as a race discrimination thing the way that companies can hire people based on looks, so long as looks aren't discriminatory on any covered class.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yellolab09 Absolutely, the farmers out in the sticks may not have to do much to avoid this, but what about the cities? Sure, they aren't as big as in some other states, but that doesn't mean that people can't get it there. It just means that the threshhold between functioning and swamped is hit with smaller numbers. If they don't get their stuff in order, they'll max out their resources sooner. What's more, any illnesses there, will bring resources that could be used elsewhere. If they're taking the relevant precautions, then fair enough, but if it's because they're too arrogant to put proper measures into place, then f them. They should get no additional resources.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First off, the burden of proof here is on vegans to demonstrate that their diet is sound. We have literally millenia of human experience that demonstrates that a well-balanced diet of meats, animal products and plant matter works. There's examples all over the world. Examples of vegans are much more localized and much more recent. At this stage we're still establishing what precisely it is that makes a diet healthy.
But, with that being said, vegan diets are typically deficient in fats, cholesterol, B-12 as well as having more exposure to various anti-nutrients and hormones that come in things like grains and soy. If you think that animal products are bad, just look at what soy and improperly prepared grains do to the body.
In short, the "benefits" that people generally tout in the vegan diet usually aren't. Cutting your cholesterol and fat intake has some pretty serious health consequences as cholesterol is what gives your cells their soft rubbery consistency and prevents them from freezing and the best sources of vitamins A, D, E and K are mostly from animals.
In some cases, like flax seed oil, the form of nutrients found aren't even usable to humans. But, the forms found in animal based oils are much more easily absorbed.
At the end of the day, humans have teeth like we do because we're supposed to be eating meat. Our digestive system isn't anywhere near long enough to be living a purely plant based dietary lifestyle and anybody who chooses to disrespect their body by cutting out the meat and animal products completely is going to cut a few years off their lives in the process.
The best dietary advice remains to eat plenty of fruit and vegetables and meat and animal products in moderation. Stray too far from that and you'll get sick.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What I'm saying is that I'd rather not get maced and then sent to prison.
And yes, I'm serious about that, just because she started it, and he's likely innocent, doesn't mean that he's going to get off. He's already got his reputation destroyed, it would be just as destroyed if he denied it. On top of that, she likely would have beaten him.
You can't fight back against a woman, you'll be the one that winds up in prison, even if she started it.
Just because you don't actually know how things work, doesn't make it any less dangerous. Men being beaten by women are pretty much always presumed to be guilty, whether or not they actually are. Just look at this comment thread as an example. The video definitely does not show him masturbating. At least not in any sort of effective way, and yet he's already guilty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** That's not possible. Somebody has to pay for the equipment and the tests, labor costs are likely lower than they are in the US, but there's no way that the cost of multi-million dollar, high precision equipment is that much lower there than it is in the US.
The numbers don't compute. Either the numbers are inaccurate or the quality of care in the ER is substantially lower than it is in the US. There's no way that the equipment necessary to run an ER is that much lower than it is in the US.
More likely, you're referring to something that isn't an actual ER, in which case we wouldn't be spending $1k for that either.
Even in the ICU, $1k here is a lot of money. I remember spending an entire night in the ICU and the better part of two days in a hospital and the cost for that was roughly $18k before insurance, IIRC.
Like I said, there's no way that your spending $50 for something that costs us $1k, $300 or even $500 I could believe, but there's no way that the cost is 5% of what ours is without massive cost cutting measures taken at the expensive of quality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
TBH, the joke wouldn't have been a problem, if she wasn't benefiting from an oppressive system that puts some people in the position where they have to work these jobs or become homeless. For me personally, I'm lucky to not have to worry about eviction or going hungry. But, most are not so fortunate.
Personally, I specifically took a job at one of the local grocery stores specifically because people need to be fed and since I likely already had it, it made sense for me to be on the front lines. I lack the necessary medical training, so it had to either be grocery store, shipping company or private security as those are all ways in which I could contribute.
But, there is a certain logic to refusing to deliver or support the leaches that put us in the position of having an insufficient quantities of respirators, personal protective gear and means to produce whatever medications are found to be effective.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jimmy Early, The schools aren't doing that though, they're placing the burden of proof on the accused, and denying him an attorney and the right to cross examine the accuser.
In a situation like that, there's no hope of getting the truth, there's no guarantee that there even is a victim as often times both parties were drunk at the time and neither party was in any better position to consent than the other. Or, there's just no witness available, so there's no way of knowing whether or not there even was a crime committed.
The only reasonable way of handling it is to make sure the cops find out and do their investigation. If there isn't sufficient evidence to move forward with criminal proceedings, then there shouldn't be consequences for the accused either,. Perhaps find some way of separating them when possible, but that's it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I used to live in China and it's really a mixed bag. I met some of the nicest people there as well as some of the scummiest dirt bags there. A lot of it depends on where you're from and what you look like. A lot of the Chinese I was dealing with in rural areas had never met any other white people before, so I had to be on my best behavior constantly, as one bad encounter with the only white person they've ever met could cause the rudeness.
In cities, it was a lot less so, they had some sort of an idea what to expect in a lot of cases, but the society is very tribal in the sense that guangxi and personal and family connections are important. Guanxi doesn't really translate, but it's a relationship, a debt and obligation and partnering. If you're coming in as a tourist they don't really know how to categorize you, so a lot of the normal social scripts don't necessarily apply. Additionally, most tourists are on tours and don't get much beyond where the typical tourist areas.
Also, if you speak any Mandarin, or the local dialect, you'll find that they warm up a lot, much of the "rudeness" is just that cities are busy and the culture is very introverted with outsiders being viewed with suspicion for political reasons.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mattwong5403 Except that's clearly not the case when the generals are this incompetent. We've known since Vietnam, and probably earlier, that you cannot win a war on foreign soil without the support of the local population, and you cannot get that support if you're not protecting them from the enemy. 2 opposing armies having at it is not going to guarantee that the locals will take a particular side. We failed in Afghanistan and Iraq because there was never any serious intention of protecting the local population from being annihilated by the enemy. There were never enough actual personnel on the ground to do the job, nor was there any interest in drafting more to make it so. Ultimately, Iraq has fared somewhat better, but mostly because the Shia were able to slaughter enough Sunni to reduce the internal strife, which is probably not what the people planning the invasion were expecting as they didn't do anything at any point to prevent or address it. In Afghanistan, the fall was swift in large part because we were paying one side to fight with the Taliban and that was the only reason they were fighting. They didn't particularly want what we wanted them to want. At least not in numbers large enough to field a large enough military to stop the Taliban from seizing control almost immediately.
The best trained military in the world should have competent people from top to bottom and the US military definitely does not, the higher you go, the less competent you're talking. Most of the conflicts we've been embroiled with over the last couple decades are the direct result of incompetence at the DOD and our intelligence agencies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's a tough question, but I think the physical medium is less of an issue than what options allow for easy backup, verification and replication of those files. Personally, anything smaller than a Blu-ray disc is just not worth considering. You'd have to spend so much time swapping discs to verify the contents that it wouldn't be worthwhile.
Personally, I use a combination of online backups (A good online backup service will have a way of backing up a copy locally as well as online. Most of the time you don't need the online backup, that's just if the building burns down or somebody steals your stuff) and a ZFS ZRAID-5 to store my files. They can be quickly scrubbed to discover read errors on an automatic basis and to report any files where the checksum does not match with the expected value and repair the damage. If it can't be repaired, it will tell me precisely which files I need to recover from my backup. I've had multiple disks go bad in this arrangement, and I just keep a spare just in case a drive does start to go bad. I have yet to lose any data due to a hard disk failing since then, and most of the time I don't even need to touch my online backup other than to verify that the files are good.
I haven't had a chance to do it, but I need to set up an offline set of disks that I can quickly mirror from time to time. The vast majority of the files I have on my computer do not change very often, so having those files backuped up to storage media that I only need to plug in from time to time to verfiy and update would be good for me. I just don't have the money right now for 2 8tb disks.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1