Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Hillary Wants Government To Decide What "Fake News" Is" video.

  1. don't be dense. if police didn't perform terrible acts, we wouldn't have had the Rodney King case, we wouldn't have laws against POLICE BRUTALITY. get it?
    4
  2. freedom of the press.
    3
  3. no, the press is any and everyone who can publish or press a work.
    2
  4. yes. that's called "freedom of the press". as in the printing press. anyone can own one, and anyone can use their freedom to print on it. but you'd probably be sued for libel and slander.
    2
  5. lol, baby want your baba?
    1
  6. nice random words.
    1
  7. LOL, someone needs a diaper change.
    1
  8. they're an opinion panel. just as everyone is allowed comment, here on youtube, about their opinions, so is TYT, just the same. it's all a form of journalism. what does "all" mean, in this instance? you mean they've never covered and "actual" instance of police brutality? you gotta be more specific.
    1
  9. "overwhelming majority" seems like an overstatement. most of the cases i've seen of police brutality being assessed from the news IS police brutality, because brutality isn't something one can readily miss, or misinterpret. if a police officer is beating you down, when you're restrained, that's police brutality. doesn't mean charges get brought on the police. doesn't happen, most of the time. that's why they are ready to "jump the gun", if you will, when anything resembling brutality (again, hard to miss) shows up, especially in video form. yeah, they make assumptions. like for example, Michael Brown, that's a clear case of misjudgement in part of speculation. but that was a predominantly normative case of how to deduce what is and is not police brutality (though he [Wilson] still should have called for back-up, and put out an APB, when Brown started to run...shooting down a public street at a target at 148 feet, not the safest route of action for public safety....). but then there are alot more cases where it's clear the police acted without due course, and they often times (most of the time) do not receive any charges...take Tamir Rice for example. also: do you put IMO in all your comments online? those comments could also be considered journalism. social media journalism. =)
    1
  10. i didn't say Brown was, i said it wasn't. did you misread? i am not familiar enough with the Sterling or Scott case to comment; and Tamir Rice wasn't brutality...it was murder (in my opinion. they followed no procedural tact, and they rushed two-feet away from him, and shot him within two seconds...that is not proper procedure. in fact, it's a complete dereliction of duty.) PS: although i don't think that they were racially motivated shootings, them saying it was, isn't racism. that kind of non-logic is truly absurd. they aren't being "racist" by making "racially-charged comments". don't tell me you're a lib and can't tell the distinction between the two. that'd be sad.
    1
  11. misuse of stats to justify police misconduct. LOLOLOLOLOLOL
    1
  12. "Not all latinos are white and they shouldn't be counted as white since everyone keeps claiming they're not." so because people are idiots, we should try and change reality to their perspective? nah. "It's misleading and no, white people do not commit more crime per capita.... " according to statistics, and demographics, they do. check the FBI tables. "You're so stupid that you're talking about something you know nothing about.... Learn what per capita means before you even dare to say anything about it." it means per person, silly.
    1
  13. nice sources (not). LOL New York and Chicago would have nearly NO CRIME if blacks were removed from the city. LOL that's hilarious. you don't know how statistics work. overgeneralization and data dredging is your friend.
    1
  14. you should lose the blinders.
    1
  15. humanity is an echo chamber.
    1
  16. you are against freedom of the press?
    1