Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Democracy Spring Arrests Continue, Including Ben & Jerry" video.

  1. plus it's just way more baseless fun. there'll even be a balloon artist for making funny hats, for the winner's audience, and a, like, balloon cane for all the loser's, for when they're busting their ass back home.
    2
  2. not really. conservatives are really the purveyors of lashing out against the freedom of the people, and whom consistently belittle the constitution.
    2
  3. they are talking about progressive topics, as this is a progressive network. they do not need to sound alarms at every Muslim's idiocy, especially considering -- where's the terrible Muslim attacks that are so prevalent in the US? oh right, there is very little in comparison to right-wing crime (see Oregon), blue collar crime, and the other various trials, as such, in the US; and considering this is a news cast for the US, you can imagine they want to stick to that news that is relevant in the US, and that pertains to it. PS: whenever a Muslim attack happens in Europe (or the rare attack, in the past decade, in the US -- 2?) TYT covers it -- and i don't recall anyone ever saying that "all other religions are the cause for Muslim extremism"; i'm sorry, but where did you hear that from? i've never seen it on TYT.
    1
  4. that's why being alone helps sometimes -- people's thoughts, if they were like the wind blowing one way, we might be able to tell where we were going; but there are many winds.
    1
  5. LOL Hilary is not better than Trump. that's like trying to distinguish the better between gadflies.
    1
  6. i guess you could vote based on who's got the longer neck, but...pretty sure that ain't gonna happen.
    1
  7. perhaps we should decide our representative by a race up a giraffe's neck, first one to the top wins?
    1
  8. do you not like democratic elections of your representatives without them being bought and paid for by outsiders to your lifestyle and freedom of choice, practically guaranteeing that you cannot elect anyone based on your vote alone, but instead being based on the $$$ forked over to them?
    1
  9. um, Sunbeam? no. my trouble is not what you suspect at all. there is no problem with me and who people vote for -- it's the fact that when the candidates are given superdelagates,that squashes the individuals whom vote with their vote, and not with their money -- because given the fact of PAC lobbying interests and the superdelegates, there is more people whom can sway the vote, without it being based simply on their vote, because they can CHOOSE whom to vote in, come primary elections; as opposed to simply being tallied fairly. after all, that's why they're called "delegates", because they delegate who the winner is going to be. it's not democratic, it's anti-democratic.
    1
  10. this one. but besides that, the proof is, as they say, in the pudding; there is no fairness in having the democratic vote DELEGATED by those whom have more power than the common voter. this is not democracy. this is rigged.
    1
  11. because it invalidates everyone else's vote who didn't vote for Hilary, in that sense. because their vote is useless in the tally, if the vote isn't selected by the number of votes per state tallied, and instead is chosen by the sway of the delegates, whom provide finances for smear ads, whom buy votes from corporate interests looking to catch windfall of big interests from the administration, especially, by the by, when concerning international policy. how can you claim that delegates choosing the vote, instead of relying on the number of votes to win -- without swaying the public or corporate interests on who to vote for (tantamount to fraud in some countries) and whom to pledge their allegiance too,  monetarily -- isn't 'bought' but is 'realistic' democracy and  fair?
    1
  12. because the people are easily fooled and bought morons.
    1