Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Mississippi Signs Off On The New Anti-LGBT Jim Crow" video.

  1. i love seeing liberals be 100% more intelligent than right-wing trash.
    2
  2. you are an idiot. yeah, everyone can afford a mass gay exodus out of state...you idiot.
    1
  3. there is no rights to religious freedom that states that your religion must be foisted onto others. that's the OPPOSITE of religious freedom. I HAVE FREEDOM to be FREE from RELIGION. you open a christian only store, you should open it in a christian only town. besides, the point is, there is no religious freedom rights...only the right to religious freedom...and the right to be free from one's religion. this backwards ass filled with idiot state is demeaning their own statehood. they deserve to be ejected from the US.
    1
  4. um, fuckface, the laws are unconstitutional, hence unconstitutional. do you realize wtf that means?
    1
  5. you're an idiot. nothing is being "pushed". the comparisons are valid btw. they do not need to be 100% duplicate of the discrimination against blacks, because the same things within said discrimination HAPPENS, it's just on a slightly smaller scale, which is an irrelevant 'difference', considering the actions taking place are of the same kind of discrimination that faced blacks -- they were hung, beaten, tortured, and killed. the comparisons are accurate, because gays are still being discriminated against by the people whom have the same outlook as their grandfathers did.
    1
  6. everyone should be required to wear an "idiot star" if they are anti-any sane/rational demographic of people ie gays, blacks, ect ect ... so if you have the 'idiot star', i'll know to deny you any goods and services...now if everyone did this, the world would be a much better place.
    1
  7. if they want it that way then fine, they should go to their own little state outside of the freedom of the US, where only christians reside, then they can practice whatever backwards idiocy they want.
    1
  8. should have arrested them all for treason, that's what.
    1
  9. +The Realest another idiot. the comparison is fair. discrimination & discrimination. no amount of it is righteous, that's why the comparison was made. no one is invalidating the struggles of blacks in America except those idiots like yourself who are invalidating the struggle of others whom are discriminated against as well. also, gays back in the old days were similarly beaten, hung & killed, and tortured ect ect quite freely. it's the SAME THING, but on a smaller scale, due to demographics...but that changes none of the overall discrimination. the discrimination is the same. now that you've been explained the situation...STFU.
    1
  10. what's bullshit? there is no bullshit. the comparison is made because of the actions taken by idiots in discriminating against people -- that is influenced by morons such as yourself, and your self-interested delight in picking and choosing what "discrimination" you'll allow and what discrimination you won't. you're a hypocrite and you should be smacked, shitheel. not in anger. out of pure logic, you should smacked.
    1
  11. ***** no one is invalidating what black people have gone through, except you, by your ignorance.
    1
  12. pick and choose which discrimination is 'better or worse'? you're an idiot. not as big an idiot as some of the people here but still...seek professional help.
    1
  13. none of it is right. period. picking and choosing only makes you look like a hypocrite. discrimination is discrimination. either we have religious freedom or NO. either we discriminate or NO. no picking and choosing WHICH discrimination is better or worse, and no picking and choosing WHICH religious values and faiths are "better or worse". that's ASININE.
    1
  14. blah blah blah blah balh religious freedom is not this. this is not religious freedom. it simply isn't. religious freedom is NOT something that you can foist on someone else, and not something that you can make other people have to consider for themselves or make them do, because guess what, it's not THEIR religion. they are FREE from your religion, and you are free from theirs. the only thing is, though, them being who THEY are, does NOT EFFECT YOU,...you have the religious freedom to not get a sex change operation, or to not like trans people or whatever dumb shit...but you have no freedoms to foist your believe on other people, and to have other people have to take your beliefs into account for ANYTHING. if you refuse to serve people, you should have your business license revoked. also, the states do have control over their own governments, to an extent; only a retarded bunch of idiots would see "religious FREEDOM" as "well, i don't like trans so i don't have to serve them, it's against my religion." guess what...no one cares if it's against your religion to serve them, you're a public service, you'll serve them...or else all this dumb asinine American idiot only bullshit will be taken to court. it's right there in the constitution...if some idiot states want to secede from the rest of the US constitution, then be my guest. but the states won't get away with this forever. 1st amendment = freedom of religion and separation from church and state...state = public business operations. i am never allowed to deny you service because it's against my religion to serve Christians (let's just say that's true) -- get it? of course not. this is for posterities sake. not yours. you won't get it. because you don't understand the 1st amendment and the concept of freedom of religion. FREEDOM -- meaning if your religion dictates that you don't have to serve me, and the states agree with you, then you're gonna be seeing alot of segragation and this will all get settled by simply looking at the first amendment; why? because others will not serve Christians next...people will force people to serve christians...then christians will be all means have to stop the boycott against serving whom they don't like to serve in their establishments...or else American then (people reading this) will then change form a free and secular nation, to a utterly controlled and christian only nation, and everyone will leave, meh, probably for Canada...that or fight you christians on every front, and there'll be another civil war type scenario. but either way...religious freedoms will win over christian tyranny.
    1
  15. if you own a business that is a public service, you forfeit the capability to deny people services based on your not liking their character -- not unless they are openly disrupting your business; or unless your business is PRIVATE. that's the only instance where what YOU are recommending can be allowed. and no, this isn't concerning doing weddings. if you're a Christian priest, you do not have to do weddings you don't want to do...this is not a public business endeavor, but a private one ie you take your own contracts, you aren't obliged to take customers. although preventing the making of laws making it legal for gay people to marry is unconstitutional and largely hateful and idiotic. it will also be stopped, for the above reasons.
    1
  16. *private business. *a cake decorator WHOM works in the private sector, ie, is his/her own boss, and works as a private business owner -- eg NOT an employee working at a public bakery! there is A DIFFERENCE.
    1
  17. no, they aren't. the Bible wasn't written in Ethiopia. it TRAVELLED there from Egypt. gorm.
    1
  18. the Israelites were not black. they were Asiatic. and no, the descendants of African-americans are from Ethiopia, not the tribe of Judah. tribe of Judah resided in current-day Israel/Palestine/ -- not Ethiopia.
    1
  19. you are an idiot. you will perish. you will see nothing.
    1
  20. no. it's the same thing. it's discriminatory, and that's the comparison. it doesn't need to be two exactly the same things to make a comparison of details, you gormless dumbasses.
    1
  21. not when you argue at a constitutional level, though, man. that's where you're wrong. it might be an uphill battle, when someone provides a petition to the courts, it eventually will get to congress. i don't even need to be a lawyer -- seriously, it should be obvious. it's in the 1st, and also citizens do have rights, but there is no right to discriminate, that's against people rights to be free from discrimination, under the 14th, and also the 5th (when it comes to federal or state authorities) and the 9th ("Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.") so, like it or not, people have got a case. this is politics. -- of course, this will be fought tooth and nail.
    1
  22. no, you're not. that's just it. there is no rights against being racist -- there is rights against being discriminated against. LOL
    1
  23. keep repeating that tired old line -- read the 14th and the civil rights act.
    1
  24. than i instruct you to read the 9th.
    1
  25. damn skippy, squirt.
    1
  26. because the Oxford definition of the term. look it up.
    1
  27. you asked "why do they have that name". there is your answer. i never said your thoughts were "odd".
    1
  28. sorry about that. they were. people seem to really misinterpret the name "young turk" because they, to me, they seem to think that language follows a fixed construct.
    1