Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

Looks at all the eye-sores, cars, trucks, "homes", endless waste Can't see anything worth saving, here.
2
Also, people have already talked about this, too: that knowledge in epistemology and scientific research is qualified, already, by the mere profit motive, first and foremost, before "progress". Just look at how much is spent on the pursuit of knowledge, useless knowledge, because the more useless all the more you can drudge up for "research" purposes. You CAN'T get away with this for much longer, but the people who are pointing it out still...STILL...cannot see that it is the PROFIT MOTIVE that is the problem. It has been and always will be the problem. [...]
1
Hunger Ask the Hunger Artist, he'll tell you, it is indeed a social construct. And I think I know why: biology doesn't care. That's why. It's a simple thing to understand: we have mind, consciousness of mind, we have language (fascinating, no?), and with this, we establish constructs shared between one another (hence, "social" construct). Biology, or erm, "life", to be more precise (otherwise, it'd defeat the purpose of my argument, here, to not narrow in on this lovely term), erm, doesn't care. It doesn't care if I'm doing my best Jeff Goldblum impression, either. It simply doesn't care, because it can't, it can't care, because it can't think: things have no thoughts: we do. We establish the terms. Nothing else does it for us. [...]
1
This is going to be fun: scientists quibbling over data that says the opposite of the current concensus, all because science is easily swayed by which ever way the wind blows, it seems. And people are more than ever just ready to eat up ANYTHING that can help them feel secure in their own ignorance.
1
These tests are already giving a skewed idea of what is entailed in this political landscape...people, on both sides of the isle...people they just say so much dumb crap...and so that would make me consider whether the questions that are asked in these tests are even as relevant to the overall zeitgeist, or just a small window into the ideal 'title' or 'mandate' that one would receive given that they answer correctly a certain series of questions. It's almost like the aspect of asking 'what title am I given' is predicated on answering said questions correctly, and not whether you answer particular questions a certain way or not: like, are the questions predicated on facts, or...or are they just ideas about what constitutes a political opinion? because to me, policy questions and social concerns are half the battle...the rest, to convince me, is that people need to show how they complain or if they make repressive comments which are based on their oversimplified feelings and resentments. [...]
1
You know, it's like everything is a problem...but being alive. The only thing that isn't problematic is something the hardest to admit, for anyone, for themselves, for anyone else. It's being alive in the first place...that...is NEVER prioritized. Everyone for themselves.
1
There are a lot of...people...(...)extremely egregious and asinine people...who let money rule them. They will destroy us all. [...]
1
People seem to like to complain, but then not know or care what they are complaining about (it's odd). I say, I'm going to laugh, when, they have more, I'll laugh, and more, I'll laugh some more...more wants more. And until people can tamp back their want for more (and stop being at odds with nature, even human nature), they can keep getting more and more, and keep suffering more and more, and I'll keep laughing more and more. [...]
1
@AB-wf8ek You wanted ten-google hairpins, right?
1