Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Sexual Economics Theory vs. Feminist Theory | MGTOW, INCEL, u0026 Science" video.

  1. a: It is not that females' sexuality has value and men's don't, it's more like females' bodies are given a value, and men's aren't. b: It is not that men are generally disenfranchised from partaking fairly in the market place of sex, but that they place all market value [and thus all price fluctuation] on woman.
    2
  2. SET theory does make some sense. Non-Marxism and SET are like meant to be together.
    1
  3. You abstract it.
    1
  4. 23:56 -- It gets "erased"? ... Entropy...hmmm...interesting word we have, 'vitriol', we think that in debate you couldn't possibly think to introduce that; but it's exactly what some people need to hear sometimes: although, in a debate...no...but after all, people can "detect" a hint of vitriol when they've been disagreed with or proven wrong.
    1
  5. By the way this is all going right towards what Marx talks about in 'Private Property And Communism'. That's funny. Very, very funny.
    1