Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Heated Debate On Capitalism with America’s Most Prominent Marxist Economist - Richard Wolff" video.

  1. No, actually, that's already happening on the alktright, cause that's capitalism doing that, mate. Enjoy your capitalism, and your dissolution of culture, long predicted by Marx to be the outcome of Capitalism if it wasn't stopped. I know you would have preferred to be on the human farm [or maybe you'd be a chancellor, but who could say, for sure], but...you can thank Capitalism for all the loss of your ability to attain to your social ends. Go live in Rome or something.
    4
  2. Christians are also inborn communists...so are pagans. LOL.
    2
  3. Yes, but instead of ignoring it, we should unveil it.
    1
  4. Amazon / y - Walmart / z xxxxxxxxx, eventually. No one said "capitalism doesn't work". No one said that. If anything the argument is, "it works too well". Why is that? because of the reasons alluded to in everyday life, and experience. And people can really say "it works", but Walmart and Amazon are two of the most giant corporations fighting for stakes in an extremely high-risk game, inevitably aimed at consolidation, and more and more corporate oligarchy.
    1
  5. What a fool you are.
    1
  6. A nice non-argument, from a non-entity.
    1
  7. That is capitalism. Leads to synarchy.
    1
  8. Because they are the primary alternative, and competitor, to Amazon...they HAVE to do that. Kajiji [sp?] would probably be the next in line...then Craigslist...notice how all these services begin to fundamentally change in their product-placement.
    1
  9. Jorge, you didn't make a point. You are an idiot. Seriously.
    1
  10. PS: You want self-management, and you're complaining about not having it...good luck with that, you moron...cause you are helping your oppressors.
    1
  11. China is hyper-competitive, you don't know what you are talking about.
    1
  12. Plus, things aren't "expensive" on Amazon, things are "expensive" to afford. There is a difference. Amazon has a huge market share, it can afford to sell cheap...listen to the interviewee again, he clearly states this.
    1
  13. You just enabled him...read about about labor theory of value...it covers all you just described.
    1
  14. No, more like - Capitalism = Everyone gets poorer and the rich get richer, and technology lapses into productive modes that are inhuman and synarchy grows smaller and smaller and the rich in their synarchy more powerful and more powerful still. - Socialism = At-bottom the socility strives for ends to be met, they reify boogeymen [Jews], some, and others use their noggins to realize that the power-structure and the economics of Capitalism [and the Feudal structure before it] are usurping those ends....you stand utterly corrected.
    1
  15. LOL, you are just a moron, enjoy the slow dissolution of everything you know and love, all for a buck. You absolute idiot. It's the blowhards that are the funniest, though. LOL, this comment is really dun did it.
    1
  16. Are these same employees going to go without income when the company is not profitable? They already are. Are the employees going to have to pay for losses as well to have the job if the company is losing money...... how are you going to force people to put up money to be part of a business or force business to give up the business to the employees? - They already are, with their mortgages and their losses in upward mobility. You people are too dumb.
    1
  17. Cooking, economics, catallactics You aren't getting the difference.
    1
  18. You are a moron. Socialism has to do with people...not numbers...you can't fathom it and it baffles you, cause you are robotic in every way.
    1
  19. Marxism just says a: poor people suffer more than the rest and are used for their labor, and b: production is usurped by land-owners, corporations, and governments, and the workers become more and more like machines in the great operation which they serve under, against their will, or, when in happenstance they will their own oppression, then thru the machinations of their own dissolution into automatons. -- Unfortunately, this is just going to happen...willy-nilly...unless people comprehend that there is a way to move forward without objectifying ourselves for the sake of those who would defy us at all odds, whether spiritual, or material.
    1
  20. Around 50 minutes in, dude, you already alluded to mom and pop being driven out by Walmart, that's THE POINT! They consolidate, mom and pop suffers, they lower prices than the ALTERNATIVES which are SLIM TO NONE - THAT'S THE POINT! -- Then they can raise the prices afterwards, and in this system [demand-side economics, let's face it], these standardized and normative decisions are made component by component, tech-reproducible, to a T. Goodness...what a GREAT DEBATE, no seriously.
    1
  21. Always with monied interests.
    1
  22. Thanks Capitalism for getting us here.
    1
  23. Get Reza Negarestani.
    1
  24. Nope, but you are a real tried and true jackanapes.
    1
  25. Enjoy your dissolution.
    1
  26.  @talkingrefugees3845  He won't, he just wanted to try and rein in some readers who might just adopt this talking-point like a parrot.
    1
  27. And get super rich [more than anyone ever could before] while doing it. Synarchy is the trend here.
    1
  28. Derp, total idiot, you are.
    1
  29. Plus, your leadership, both Democrats, and Republicans, have already been seditious, moron...you want self-management. Go.
    1
  30. Your mother And society has become a...vempire. Aha, now you're starting to arrive...but you aren't arrived as of yet.
    1
  31. xxxxx... Say goodbye to y and z.
    1
  32. Spitballing numbers Capitalist thinkers are having to get more and more constructivist, aren't they?
    1
  33. Dingbat.
    1
  34. The data just shows exactly what he says...more power and wealth among fewer and fewer sets of hands, and less for those at-bottom. You want self-management. Stop deluding yourself into thinking he didn't have a point. He just did and you can't fathom it, and it baffles you.
    1
  35. Marx predicted all of this you described.
    1
  36. Mortgages for securities-bonds, debts for billions!
    1
  37. Employee, employers, self-employed Plus, not everyone can be employers or even self-employed, unless we were to already work for social ends in a governmental structure.
    1
  38. No, he said there is always a risk - you are just completely omitting what he actually said and strawmanning him.
    1
  39. Lenin That was a very good answer. People tend to forget the revolts happening at all sides by everyone at all times save the incredibly wealthy, and all sides got their way somehow whether by hook or crook. The fin de siècle, and afterwards, was a horrible time for all, save the "aristocracy".
    1
  40. It's getting to be like "here is my personal axiom of professedly 'good' exploitation", then counter-argument which explains things, then "you can't excuse human nature bro!", rinse, wash, repeat.
    1
  41. This debate style Is good. It represents a confidence that I think is good in and of itself.
    1
  42.  @talkingrefugees3845  He truly does...but he doesn't realize that his self-mangement is found at-bottom in the sociality of care.
    1
  43. Derka derka der.
    1
  44. You want self-management...capitalism is usurping that...your solution is more capitalism...don't turn into a "supremacist" or fascist or something...join the proletariat.
    1