Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "PowerfulJRE"
channel.
-
14
-
3
-
LOL, this guy...the narcissism....
I'm sure "cat-home" guy isn't throwing that many parties, but alas, what else do people have to do, other than A, B, C & D...party, their job [interests], try and get laid, or stay at home and entertain yourself [with cats, presumably]. Maybe, the friend was relying on the party to have something to do; perhaps they put off an alternative plan because they were told to come to the party, which is then cancelled, leaving that person high-and-dry, as it were. His analogy was very poor.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pdxshadow9819 Nice thought-terminating cliche, really quick and brief. More and more like the left everyday. "Listen to you, why, your x, ahaha", and you are a confused idiot, you have posited that you are a: a supporter of action against various groups based on the ressentiment of the actions of some individuals in these groups, b: you wish to conflate them all in to a singular monolithic force, c: you want to aim all of your ressentiment on them, and call them "the deep state", and then use the state to put their 1st amendment rights "on indefinite hold", and then you want to call yourself "anti-establishment". See, this...this is actual empty-headedness.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@beyondchixngiggles >Confidence
In a failing federal system
>Happy place
In inner cities? yeah....not usual. But they do make the most money, collectively, these inner city environments.
>Big picture
People are using the means to effect change from the bottom-up [as the on-high has failed, consistently], if some stragglers come along to try and disturb this process [whether by their own innate dissatisfaction, by their own uncaring and criminal attitudes, or whether as provocateurs], then so be it. It can never effectively color the entire crowd, unless, the fact is, the entire crowd is complicit [which they clearly aren't]. This sets a precedence: if this isn't allowed, then neither will "right"-wing rallies be allowed [clear danger to the public, plus the precedence will already be there that those who are in a crowd are all complicit with one or anothers criminality , by guilt of association], or if they were, it'd be a clear and indefensible dichotomy whereby some Americans are disallowed their 1st amendment rights, and this is will just increase tensions.
1
-
1