Comments by "Paras " (@Paras-iz7ox) on "Jared Henderson" channel.

@NathanHenriquefa yes now Persian were migrated to India because of there war with Muslim around 12 th-13th century so they came to India in gujrat region. They came with there Avesta . The similarities of rig Veda to Persian culture is because of Avesta. Persian culture did't take anything form. Rig Veda but the rig veda took things from Persian Avesta and the confusion is because of the stories at the time when carbon dating was not invented and that's why these unauthentic soruces such as Wikipedia still shows this type of things.
2
@NathanHenriquefa there is no copy of rig Veda found in Nepal there was the rumours only that it found in Nepal and someone wrongly edited the Wikipedia .
2
@NathanHenriquefa devagiri is script not the langauge If a made a langauge and used the Roman or herweb script it won't make my text that I will wrote in new language with adopted scirpt as old as the langauge which was already in use .
2
@NathanHenriquefa old testament doesn't preserved doesn't prove that rig Veda exsisted before tommorow I came up with my made up text and says old one is lost that was million years old and this new one is the same reason is same happened with old testament . It's doesn't make any sense.
2
@NathanHenriquefa no hindusim came much after Buddhism and Jainism was originated approximately the same time when the last buddha -sidharath gotam organised the sramana culture or relegion into Buddhism the roots of Buddhism goes way before to indu valley civilization .there was 28 Buddha before gotama Buddha. And we get proof of 6 Buddha's prior to gotama Buddha from inscriptions . Even the founder of Jainism- Mahavira was the student of Buddha as recorded in Tripitaka scriptures. The hindusim history is nothing but overlapping of brhamanism over Buddhism from 8-9th century .
1
@NathanHenriquefa lol🤣 you believe that hindusim mythology stories 🤣 Give me a proof of Hinduism (brhamanism) that is its own before 8ad ?
1
@NathanHenriquefa oldest rig veda manuscript ever found is 1464 ad old kept in bori institute Maharashtra India . And the same manuscript was referred by Indian government to UNESCO World Heritage for including it . Go and read the nomination form of rig Veda on UNESCO website page number 7 last point mentioned that this (1464 ad) old manuscript is oldest rig Veda manuscript ever found along with 29 other manuscripts . That's what I told you previously there is only stories about hindusim not proofs and these stories emerged during the time when Britishers were founding the history of India at that time brhamins dominated the upper position in India due to castism and these brhamins told these stories to Britishers . The rig Veda stories is also told by a brhamin to Britishers and at that time carbon dating was not founded and when same manuscript was carbon dated it came out to be as old as 1464 ad as referred above .
1
@NathanHenriquefa there is no philogical and linguistic evidence in it the manuscript is found is itself in devangiri script which it not an ancient scirpt but the last developed script in India.
1
@NathanHenriquefa 🤣 there is no proof of rig Veda in even in BC then how it's codification us done in 1200 BC lol 😂 that was mohan jodaro time they were using sign language 😂 writing a book today on dinasaur won't make the book as old as dinasaur period.
1
@NathanHenriquefa 1/ these are all claims infact these are proofs of Buddhist civilization . Pashupati is nothing but a seal in which a man is doing meditation. How can it be link to mythological god the answer his Brahmanical dominant system in India after independence.
1
@NathanHenriquefa can you give a single proof of Sanskrit language from 1500 BC other than Wikipedias claims because this was the time when indus valley civilization existed (last period of indus valley civilization) and they were using the sign langauge secondly the earliest proof of Sanskrit is in dhmma lipi (Buddhist script) which we get evidence from Mauryan empire inscription 300bc it is called buddhist hybrid Sanskrit and then after brhamins made their scirpt (devangiri) but used the Buddhist language to create confusions and to do overlapping of culture from 8th century onwards
1
@NathanHenriquefa go and read the history of that shiva statue it is called kalp vigraha . During china attack on Tibet India helped Tibet and during that time a Tibet Buddhist monk gave a box to Indian helping force to assure it's safety. The Indian force guy took the box to India take the idol in that box and sent for carbon dating when this all happened it was declared as shiva statue instead of returning that to Buddhist monk this is the cruz of hindusim all it done is stole things from Buddhism and rebrand it as hindusim . You may know Swami Vivekananda go and search about his speeche on tirupati balaji temple one of the oldest temple of Hindus . He said in his complete work vol 7 that all temple has been taken from Buddhist and re-branded as Hindu temples. Go and search the mundeshwari temple oldest temple of Hindus search the deity of mundeshwari temple and see it you will get it .
1
@NathanHenriquefa when a text is made its not made in one or two copies it is made in several copies specially in large country like India and if you claim that copies of rig Veda lost then it's absolutely idotic . Even the Buddhist scriptures has been destroyed in India but they didn't vanished . They circulated to China , Indonesia, Afghanistan and other South Asian countries
1
@NathanHenriquefa there is no Vedic culture at all. Give me a single concrete proof not assumption and claims.
1
@NathanHenriquefa can you put down the reasoning that these specialties provide for there claim or they says so because some pro- brhamin govt buyed them to put foreign man authentication seal to manipulate people. Btw you didn't provided any single evidences of two of your claim and one main claim that you have done in starting that 1/ rig veda is 1500 BC old and 2/second claim is Sanskrit is also 1200-1500 BC old . I already debunked both of your claims no philogical nor archaeological evidence found of rig Veda Secondly Sanskrit if first used by Buddhist in dhmma lipi that too started from 6-4 BC Now hindusim Sanskrit is written in devagiri scirpt that is totally different from Buddhist hybrid Sanskrit so don't confuse between two there is no proof of hindusim in Buddhist hybrid Sanskrit either. Now hindusim devnagari script Sanskrit is itself developed in 8-9th century and all of its proofs also find in this same Devanagari script langauge . Maybe they saw the opportunity to overlap the Hinduism over Buddhism by creating their scirpt and using the same langauge that's why they began their relegion and for that they took things from different religions book at that time to somehow create their own so called scriptures to overlap Buddhism and in which they succeeded also. For example when al Biruni came India he noted in his kitab ul Hind . Edited by Edward page number 107 I think . He wrote that brhamins can Marry 4 wives kshartiya 3 vaishya 2 and shudra 1. Adopted the concept from Islam. And whole rig veda rituals is copied from Zend Avesta.
1
@NathanHenriquefa what is not matching .? And of what things you want proof I have given all the proofs . About that shiva statue you should search kalpn vigraha history you will get all the things in detail which I told you how a Buddhist Tibetan monk handover that idol to Indian force and about mundeshwari temple diety it is self explanatory once you search up the image about trupti Balaji temple . Swami Vivekananda in his complete work volume 7 chapter -sages he wrote every Hindu temple is taken from Buddhism You didn't gave a single proof of rig Veda tommoro any one can claim that there book is lakhs of years old When you will ask for proof then they will say absense of poof doesn't mean our book is not lakhs of years old lol 😂 you need to have some basis some grounds on which you claims things .
1
@NathanHenriquefa now you clear that rig Veda manuscript is not of 1400 BC or -1500 BC it's manuscript it 1464 ad old now tell me the basis on which you are saying that the book is older than the proof of that book . It's totally copied version of Zend Avesta.
1
@NathanHenriquefa Africa people holding oral tradition for millennia then they must be having proof of it otherwise how you know that they are holding a oral tradition over thousands years old as you are not present there same goes with other things you must be having proof of burned churches otherwise how you know that those burned churches even existed before. What you are doing is just making assumptions and relating it with rig Veda to prove it old which is absolutely idotic
1
@NathanHenriquefa archeological study go in depth other than preserved text so you should provide the what depth study proves that rig Veda is older than its oldest manuscript.
1
@NathanHenriquefa which Buddhist book you have read. You have read about the Buddhist relegion and not about the Buddhist history. The Buddhist people outside India also don't know the roots of Buddhist history and the history of Buddhism in India . I came from same land and from same people where Buddhism originated here we know our history.
1
@NathanHenriquefa any thing which doesn't Exists at the first place then how can you claiming to be existed at that time . For example you said about oral tradition of Africa people then there should be proof of oral tradition if they are claiming anything based on oral tradition. Tomorrow I can also claims that my book is lakhs of years old and when I will be questioned about its proof then I should simply says it was oral tradition ? 😂
1