Comments by "Matthew Nirenberg" (@matthewnirenberg) on "Neil McCoy-Ward" channel.

  1. 21
  2. All that'll achieve is a complete and utter prohibition on all travel. If such a ban were implemented, it'd apply to all private aircraft (even small bush planes) and all boats (no matter how small). Private yachts aren't the problem, remember that all sailing catamarans that are bluewater (ocean) rated (required or its illegal to leave national boundaries) are considered yachts under law. Sailing catamarans aren't harming the environment and remain in service (albeit usually with multiple owners) for 30+yrs. As for limiting the rich to only one home with not more than five bedrooms, two issues arise: 1. What is they have a large family (say 8-14 kids), why can't everyone have a bedroom 2. What is rich? I ask this because the definition of "rich" always has an ever reducing threshold. Once the real rich leave a country, the "rich" get defined as rich; this repeats until the person earning $80,000 before tax is defined as "rich". What's wrong with someone being able to own more than one home or a private yacht? Jealously is very unbecoming and only ever a destructive thing. Jealously and this "the rich this, the rich that" is exactly the bullshit that's single-handedly destroyed Australia and made the place unlivable. My family aren't rich (pre-tax income $85,000) but because the definition of "rich" keeps dropping, we suddenly got categorised as "rich" simply because we own our own home (3 bedroom, 1.5 bathroom (bathroom + toilet room)), regardless that three generations are living in it as thanks to housing being sold to foreign businesses, housing is both unavailable and unaffordable for locals. Its a well established fact that banning things doesn't work within a country. Banning foreign businesses from coming in and buying everything so they can exploit the visa system would dramatically help.
    19
  3. 7
  4. 5
  5. 5
  6. 4
  7. Hate to say it but they can do it literally over night. Most people are already used to tapping their card to pay and as such very few places still accept cash, ATM's are disappearing - they last few years helped as they justified it over "spreading the thing" concerns. How they will likely do it over a weekend: * Close the banks on a Friday morning citing "IT issues", dump the banks databases to CSV files (more reliable and compatible than SQL dumps across many versions of SQL, plus reordering CSV is easy and the CSV handlers run much faster being an older simpler technology) and import them into a govt controlled ledger. * Announce to the public over the weekend that all welfare is going 100% digital and that in order to do so, all money will be going digital. * Reassure everyone that their money will be converted at a rate of 1-to-1 and to not worry. * Announce exchange points to convert remaining cash and bank notes into CBDC. * Lastly they'd push out an update to their "Service [State name or Country name]" app (i.e. Service NSW, Service Vic, etc.) with the CBDC part enabled. This app and its equivalents are already used for digital licences, welfare, public healthcare status and for electronic payments in the "Digital Wallet" section. All the CBDC code is already in the govt apps which is why they're so large, all that's not visible is the button to access the functionality but that will appear either though an update or if the app can reach a specific predetermined server (the latter is more likely as that would avoid having to have an update successfully roll out to millions of people). The point is they won't give you a choice, just like the last few years, they'll just do what they want to. Those who resist will be locked out of the system and likely locked up in one of the many "quarantine" facilities they built or in the prisons they've also built over the last few years and are continuing to build. They don't care about pretending to keep capitalism, in Australia they've literally said that they're "rebuilding capitalism" by replacing it with socialism as they claim that "socialism has conquered capitalism" and that "the future has never been brighter but we need socialism to succeed". They're more evil than people give them credit for. The time to act, be it leave, protest, lobby or fight is now, not tomorrow. If you don't like the way things are going, don't wait for others to do something because they will wait until its too late. Educate those around you about it, show them evidence from official sources to support what you're saying. If that fails or if you just don't want to fight it, leave to "greener pastures". In terms of Australia and Canada, both countries are completely lost to the mindless sheep who think socialism is great - it always ends in failed communism; anyone in Australia, New Zealand or Canada who has a brain will leave to "live to fight another day" because there's no way to fight when the majority want things to continue the way they're going. Change only occurs when the majority want it. There's no point staying and being self-destructive by trying to fight and going broke and then not having the option to leave. As the old saying goes "its better to leave a day too soon, than a a day too late; leave early and you can always return, leave late and you'll perish".
    4
  8. 4
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. You're 100% correct about CO2, I've been saying the same ever since they started claiming it was bad. Farmers add nitrogen to the soil via multiple means to improve soil fertility. One method is to pump nitrogen into a sealed mixer that contains soil under pressure, the easiest way is to add nitrogen rich fertiliser to the soil or to mix pelletised nitrogen into the ground and add water to trigger the pellets to release nitrogen. The Vostok Ice cores showed that high CO2 levels caused plants to have approximately 5x more biomass and the planet to have more breathable air and cooler global temperatures. The same ice cores also showed that high methane levels caused the exact opposite. They also showed that global temperature fluctuations were caused by the sun (the biggest thing that effects our planets temperature) and that during the middle ages the planet was on average 10-15 degrees Celsius hotter than currently but with 2x the plant biomass. There's a reason that they quit talking about the ice cores around the time they start this climate hysteria - the ice cores prove the climate hysteria to be false. Its all about control, power and global depopulation - all to be carried out by unelected nutty "elites" from the WEF. The whole "CO2 bad, Nitrogen bad" crap is to justify global depopulation as less CO2 = smaller plants which means less breathable air, more dust and pollution and fewer people. Remember the Georgia Guidestones' point "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature." - according to the MSM we're at 8+ billion, approx 7.5 billion too many according to the elites. We are the carbon they want to reduce.
    2
  18. 2
  19.  @ddake9810  You're still choosing to ignore the truth that the economy is completely stuffed and you still want to blame the "youth" as if they're to blame - its those who are 50+ who caused the shit-show, who pushed the commie welfare crap and socialist crap as teachers and politicians. I have zero debt (always avoided it and never had it), have lived on a tight budget since I was 6yrs old (that's when my education in finance, savings and investments began as per family tradition that goes back centuries in Italy) and rely on no one other than myself. I've worked for basically nothing and only got a good wage when I was able to be self-employed. I will most definitely tell you about high prices - the cost of living has tripled since 2020 - yeah the same food items I've always eaten have tripled in cost. That's solely thanks to the govt, all the climate taxes and the ""2020 thing" has caused shipping to be expensive and cause shortages" BS that the govt keep lying about along with the govt forever letting the utility companies continuously increase the "service charges". The govt do this because it means more GST for the govt - the govt love high prices. I only eat at home unless invited to an event, my phone is 8yrs old and I've never just bought products for the sake of it. The people who pushed the prices so high are 100% the govt. People pay the high prices because they have zero choice. You either buy whats available or you go without. Want to grow food? Guess what - most people don't have backyards and are very limited as to what they can grow. Unless you have a farm you won't be having any animals/livestock of any kind due to lack of space and govt regulations. You claim that people are impatient - nope, people still have to eat - the basics have tripled in cost whilst wages continue to remain stagnant as they've been for the last 20yrs! As for your comments about houses - yes the prices are insane but the govt love that as it means they get more in Stamp Duty, GST, Capital Gains and Council Rates. During the "2020 thing" more houses were sold than ever before, the buyers were all foreign investors. Locals have been priced out for the last decade. Sadly building more is NOT the solution as that only results in the loss of farmland as the cities infinitely sprawl onto prime farmland - they never expand into the desert-like crappy farmland, and more foreign investors. The only solution is to ban foreigners from owning homes and only letting citizens own homes - this is why Europe is still affordable for citizens. House prices by law can't reduce. The under-quoting laws go as far as making it illegal for anyone to sell a property for anything less than the current average market value. This was done intentionally by the govt as all they care about is tax revenue, they never look at the long term picture. The only way house prices could reduce would be if for many years (5-10) every house sold for 5-10% less than they're worth - this would push prices down but would still result in govt investigations as to why the properties sold for less than they're worth and owners could be hit with penalties. Also, its 100% illegal to build your own house yourself, the govt requires you to use licenced builders for all of it. DIY has been long banned. Think I'm full of shit, come to Australia and see it for yourself. Its also the same in Canada, New Zealand and the UK.
    2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32.  @MadHeadzOz  I'm not making assumptions. The definition of "rich" reduces every bloody year. Its 7 people and yeah two earning a collective $85,000 before tax - for reasons I won't go into here, none of us qualify for any welfare, plus there's plenty more in need of it than us so it's never even been a thought even though we're all citizens since birth. I'm not spinning any story, I'm stating the facts of my life. I'm not whinging about it but mentioning it as too few people understand how politics of envy and the "the rich are bad" mentality only affects we the average person, never the actual rich. As for knowing how these bans would work - its easy, just look at the EU. They did it but guess who is exempt? The rich. The other point I was trying to make regarding boats is that bans will only affect the average person, the rich will always get around it or simply move somewhere else. I agree with you that the majority of aussie's are absolutely braindead when it comes to politics - I hate how they vote because of one policy without knowing the entire party platform; unfortunately that's the problem of them not giving a damn and having mandatory voting with fines for failing to vote. Most people have no clue about budgets or not spending all their money because they never get taught finance and budgeting at school. They also don't get taught how to do their taxes - they simply get told to go and pay an accountant even though their tax is generally extremely simple. Yes, people need to be responsible for themselves but over the last 30yrs the majority have found it easier to just blame everyone else than have any self responsibility.
    1
  33. 1
  34.  @davidgoodnow269  Honestly, I'm not surprised to hear 600 rejections. Most businesses aren't hiring people as companies use job postings as free advertising. Most job boards won't charge a business (beyond the initial posting fee) until they find someone for the job. The job ad keeps the business name around. As for your suggestion of "strengthening" qualifications - that's only going to make it harder. Most businesses want the person with the least skills except for the exact skills the job requires. For example, in Australia, if a business wanted to hire someone for hydraulics and pneumatics, they wouldn't hire someone with a Diploma, Advanced Diploma or Degree in Engineering. They'd hire the person with the Cert 4 in Engineering (Fluid Power) as that person is only qualified in hydraulic and pneumatics and thus the business only has to pay the govt mandated award-based wage for a holder of a cert 4. This wage is significantly less than a higher qualified person. As for "how you can help a business by having skills you perceive them to want" - that doesn't help because most businesses don't want skilled people. They want an exact fit who they can pay peanuts to OR they want no-one because they have someone internally but are required to advertise the job under law OR because they're using the job posting as free advertising. Ever had a business tell you that you were overqualified or "we don't care what other things you could contribute, we only care about the job requirements"? That's the reality and that's why I recommend those struggling to get jobs to look overseas and if possible land a job where your skills and qualifications are recognised, get that work visa through the company and move where you're wanted. USA, UK, CAN, AU & NZ don't want people working and only care about regulating everyone out of work.
    1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. Whilst your history is correct, you have to look at the current reality - i.e. you have to momentarily put history aside. The most important thing that currently exists is the stopping (or defeat) of Russia in Ukraine. If Russia takes Ukraine (yeah Russia wants the whole country), then the Baltics, Poland and most of Europe east of Germany will be invaded and destroyed. Putin is doing the same thing Hitler did, the old "just one more country" or "just one more territory". Remember, Russia invaded and illegally occupies two parts of Georgia, they illegally invaded and currently run Kazakhstan, they attacked and control large parts of Mongolia, they illegally took Crimea and most recently invaded Ukraine. Oh then there's the "refugee" warfare Russia is committing against the EU by intentionally flying illegal immigrants "refugees" into Russia, then to Belarus in the hopes of overrunning the borders of the EU - note that these illegals are paying approximately $25,000USD to Russia so they can "get into the EU". Putin has said in multiple recent interviews that he wants to rebuild the Tsarist Empire as his legacy. That means the abolition of most free countries (incl. Poland) in Europe. If Ukraine falls, he gains all the equipment and supplies that Ukraine has - this would mean instead of Russia having to use crappy old barely operable equipment, they'd have actually usable equipment. Simply put, stop Russia, then worry about any problems you have with Ukraine. Now is not the time to dredge up history and create tensions between two countries (Poland and Ukraine), now is the time to stop Russia and then and only then worry about these historical issues. Trust me when I say, I know what my family suffered in Nazi Occupied Poland and parts of what is now Ukraine, so I understand how you feel.
    1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. AI - it'll never be banned. Its like Australia's encryption ban - yes it exists on paper but can't be enforced as the laws of mathematics make it impossible to comply with and not using encryption just isn't an option. As long as people can write programs, scripts, etc. AI can be easily created - the hard part is training it with datasets but those can be rented, bought or created. As for BRICS - Argentina have just stepped out of that so its already falling apart. South Africa is a crime-riddled black supremacist failed state of literally no value to anyone. Oil is less of an issue as synthetic oil is easily created very cheaply. Only 10% of the world are aligned against the "west" and those 10% of the world will simply go without and fail. China is a failed state surviving only by tyranny and murder - their mistake was communism and then giving out loans that'll never be repaid to places that don't have anything worth taking as payment (why do you think the "west" want CBDC's - its not just control, its to get out of debt). Simply put - a death cult religion of ragheads getting together is just a group that need to be destroyed - sadly the "west" are too soft to do this once and for all. Everyone else on the planet can get along except them - it still amazes me that they have been let into the "west" as they only exist to destroy and take over. Even India know this and are only part of BRICS as a way to get rich quickly by doing short term export - their goal is to eliminate Pakistan and Bangladesh and retake the lands that rightfully belong to India - ragheads in India are already fleeing India because no one cares what happens to them.
    1
  44. 1
  45.  @norawheeler2555  They will be replaced - it is all but inevitable. The AI datasets that the general public see are antiquated and toys at best. The more a dataset is improved though training an AI, the faster it learns. A simple block of code which tells the AI to mark anything its unsure of as "needing human verification" will result in rapid improvement as the AI will note what the human verified the thing as and never make that mistake again. The AI will also use that newly verified knowledge to train itself to recognised what that thing is. This self learning results in rapid improvement. I have seen first hand an AI that can do pathology reporting faster and more accurately than any human. The dataset is still being trained using the methodology mentioned in the above paragraph. Also, consider the following: Even when AI is wrong and needs the help of a human, its the same as when automation needs fixing by a human. How many humans are actually required? Only a mere handful. There is no need for billions of people (millions of which are already highly qualified experts). Also note that there are already numerous AI's that can rewrite their own code and fix their own problems - sometimes one AI can fix another when they're able to intercommunicate. The point is one person can maintain hundreds of automated manufacturing plants / assembly lines and hundreds of thousands of servers / computers. Ever wonder how many people big businesses employ in IT - its usually 10 at most and they maintain thousands of servers and thousands of workstations - all through unified centralised management software where they can make the change once and have it occur on all selected systems. This is the problem that AI is creating - it is making people redundant and eliminating many, many jobs. Currently there are no viable solutions and AI isn't going to be prohibited, hence the crappy situation in the world.
    1
  46. 1
  47.  @ianxyoutube  Its got nothing to do with being entitled. Its called a wage that reflects your qualifications and experience if that's what the job requires -which most actually do. Only fools work a job for less than the industry average rate for that type and level of job. Its simple, they want skills, then they need to offer a fair rate - otherwise they won't get the skills made available. Good luck starting "at the bottom" - clearly you no longer understand how the world works. The days of being the janitor and "working your way up" are long gone. Laws, regulations, the legal requirement for qualifications and vast experience have made that old way impossible. No one is "learning on the job", they are required to be qualified, experienced, professionally licenced and insured. That requires a heap of time, effort and money, thus the wage needs to enable and reflect that. No one expects to be fresh out of uni and be paid the wage of a senior engineer, they expect the industry average entry wage of $64,000 (BEng(Mech) - theory/design/scientific) or $80,000 (AdvDip EngTech(Mech) - practial side of things/CNC operation, etc.) and to build from there with time and experience. Yet companies want to pay less than that, knowing full well that anything less is effectively slave labour and actually illegal. The only place where the old "work up from the bottom" system still exists is some parts of the USA and the entire 3rd world. You can thank all the "won't someone think of the children" and "everything in life must be 100% safe" people for the excessive over regulation and excessively expensive professional licencing, insurance and over-the-top experience requirements that are required in basically 90% of industries these days. Here's a fun fact about wages in the EU - they're significantly higher than in the UK and the cost of living is much lower than in the UK.
    1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1