Comments by "Matthew Nirenberg" (@matthewnirenberg) on "Neil McCoy-Ward"
channel.
-
21
-
All that'll achieve is a complete and utter prohibition on all travel. If such a ban were implemented, it'd apply to all private aircraft (even small bush planes) and all boats (no matter how small). Private yachts aren't the problem, remember that all sailing catamarans that are bluewater (ocean) rated (required or its illegal to leave national boundaries) are considered yachts under law. Sailing catamarans aren't harming the environment and remain in service (albeit usually with multiple owners) for 30+yrs.
As for limiting the rich to only one home with not more than five bedrooms, two issues arise:
1. What is they have a large family (say 8-14 kids), why can't everyone have a bedroom
2. What is rich? I ask this because the definition of "rich" always has an ever reducing threshold. Once the real rich leave a country, the "rich" get defined as rich; this repeats until the person earning $80,000 before tax is defined as "rich".
What's wrong with someone being able to own more than one home or a private yacht? Jealously is very unbecoming and only ever a destructive thing. Jealously and this "the rich this, the rich that" is exactly the bullshit that's single-handedly destroyed Australia and made the place unlivable. My family aren't rich (pre-tax income $85,000) but because the definition of "rich" keeps dropping, we suddenly got categorised as "rich" simply because we own our own home (3 bedroom, 1.5 bathroom (bathroom + toilet room)), regardless that three generations are living in it as thanks to housing being sold to foreign businesses, housing is both unavailable and unaffordable for locals.
Its a well established fact that banning things doesn't work within a country. Banning foreign businesses from coming in and buying everything so they can exploit the visa system would dramatically help.
19
-
7
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
Hate to say it but they can do it literally over night. Most people are already used to tapping their card to pay and as such very few places still accept cash, ATM's are disappearing - they last few years helped as they justified it over "spreading the thing" concerns.
How they will likely do it over a weekend:
* Close the banks on a Friday morning citing "IT issues", dump the banks databases to CSV files (more reliable and compatible than SQL dumps across many versions of SQL, plus reordering CSV is easy and the CSV handlers run much faster being an older simpler technology) and import them into a govt controlled ledger.
* Announce to the public over the weekend that all welfare is going 100% digital and that in order to do so, all money will be going digital.
* Reassure everyone that their money will be converted at a rate of 1-to-1 and to not worry.
* Announce exchange points to convert remaining cash and bank notes into CBDC.
* Lastly they'd push out an update to their "Service [State name or Country name]" app (i.e. Service NSW, Service Vic, etc.) with the CBDC part enabled. This app and its equivalents are already used for digital licences, welfare, public healthcare status and for electronic payments in the "Digital Wallet" section.
All the CBDC code is already in the govt apps which is why they're so large, all that's not visible is the button to access the functionality but that will appear either though an update or if the app can reach a specific predetermined server (the latter is more likely as that would avoid having to have an update successfully roll out to millions of people).
The point is they won't give you a choice, just like the last few years, they'll just do what they want to. Those who resist will be locked out of the system and likely locked up in one of the many "quarantine" facilities they built or in the prisons they've also built over the last few years and are continuing to build.
They don't care about pretending to keep capitalism, in Australia they've literally said that they're "rebuilding capitalism" by replacing it with socialism as they claim that "socialism has conquered capitalism" and that "the future has never been brighter but we need socialism to succeed".
They're more evil than people give them credit for.
The time to act, be it leave, protest, lobby or fight is now, not tomorrow. If you don't like the way things are going, don't wait for others to do something because they will wait until its too late. Educate those around you about it, show them evidence from official sources to support what you're saying. If that fails or if you just don't want to fight it, leave to "greener pastures".
In terms of Australia and Canada, both countries are completely lost to the mindless sheep who think socialism is great - it always ends in failed communism; anyone in Australia, New Zealand or Canada who has a brain will leave to "live to fight another day" because there's no way to fight when the majority want things to continue the way they're going. Change only occurs when the majority want it. There's no point staying and being self-destructive by trying to fight and going broke and then not having the option to leave.
As the old saying goes "its better to leave a day too soon, than a a day too late; leave early and you can always return, leave late and you'll perish".
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ddake9810 You're still choosing to ignore the truth that the economy is completely stuffed and you still want to blame the "youth" as if they're to blame - its those who are 50+ who caused the shit-show, who pushed the commie welfare crap and socialist crap as teachers and politicians.
I have zero debt (always avoided it and never had it), have lived on a tight budget since I was 6yrs old (that's when my education in finance, savings and investments began as per family tradition that goes back centuries in Italy) and rely on no one other than myself. I've worked for basically nothing and only got a good wage when I was able to be self-employed.
I will most definitely tell you about high prices - the cost of living has tripled since 2020 - yeah the same food items I've always eaten have tripled in cost. That's solely thanks to the govt, all the climate taxes and the ""2020 thing" has caused shipping to be expensive and cause shortages" BS that the govt keep lying about along with the govt forever letting the utility companies continuously increase the "service charges". The govt do this because it means more GST for the govt - the govt love high prices.
I only eat at home unless invited to an event, my phone is 8yrs old and I've never just bought products for the sake of it.
The people who pushed the prices so high are 100% the govt. People pay the high prices because they have zero choice. You either buy whats available or you go without. Want to grow food? Guess what - most people don't have backyards and are very limited as to what they can grow. Unless you have a farm you won't be having any animals/livestock of any kind due to lack of space and govt regulations.
You claim that people are impatient - nope, people still have to eat - the basics have tripled in cost whilst wages continue to remain stagnant as they've been for the last 20yrs!
As for your comments about houses - yes the prices are insane but the govt love that as it means they get more in Stamp Duty, GST, Capital Gains and Council Rates. During the "2020 thing" more houses were sold than ever before, the buyers were all foreign investors. Locals have been priced out for the last decade. Sadly building more is NOT the solution as that only results in the loss of farmland as the cities infinitely sprawl onto prime farmland - they never expand into the desert-like crappy farmland, and more foreign investors. The only solution is to ban foreigners from owning homes and only letting citizens own homes - this is why Europe is still affordable for citizens.
House prices by law can't reduce. The under-quoting laws go as far as making it illegal for anyone to sell a property for anything less than the current average market value. This was done intentionally by the govt as all they care about is tax revenue, they never look at the long term picture. The only way house prices could reduce would be if for many years (5-10) every house sold for 5-10% less than they're worth - this would push prices down but would still result in govt investigations as to why the properties sold for less than they're worth and owners could be hit with penalties.
Also, its 100% illegal to build your own house yourself, the govt requires you to use licenced builders for all of it. DIY has been long banned.
Think I'm full of shit, come to Australia and see it for yourself. Its also the same in Canada, New Zealand and the UK.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And use what? Electricity is dirty and there is no such thing as "green energy" where a grid is involved. What good is an electric cooktop? You need a flame for proper cooking, plus how else are you going to cook when the power is out?
In Australia, old homes are permitted 80Amps of power from the street until any work needs to be done at the switchboard (where meter is installed) at which point the new 63A restriction applies, new homes are only permitted 63A.
Electric cooktops run at 32A with only two high "burners" (read: elements) running. How the hell does one run at the same time, 4-6 pots, the stove and the microwave on electricity? You can't. This is why gas stoves and ovens are essential. Most houses commonly use 40A just for the computers, networking and TV's, etc. collectively.
Sure some places permit you to get three phase power to your house but that can take up to a year to be installed and the install will cost over $100,000 as they'll have to dig up the road and your property as three phase must be installed underground in Australia.
Oh and Climate Change isn't real. Sure the climate changes but if you look at the last 60,000 yrs of temperature data, we're in one of the coolest periods ever. The 1200-1600 was on average 10-15 degrees Celsius hotter than current times.
1
-
@jesseh998 Sounds like you didn't read, or that you skimmed over my comment. I explain why its not possible to use electric cooktops in place of gas. If you actually read my comment you'd know that even if people wanted to use electric, its impossible as suitable power isn't an option and having three phase installed is unaffordable ($100,000+). Its a fact that you can't run 4 - 6 pots on high (96A), an electric oven on high (20A), a microwave on high (20A) plus your normal home equipment/appliances (TV, audio, computer, network, lights, rangehood, etc.) without three phase power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidgoodnow269 Honestly, I'm not surprised to hear 600 rejections. Most businesses aren't hiring people as companies use job postings as free advertising. Most job boards won't charge a business (beyond the initial posting fee) until they find someone for the job. The job ad keeps the business name around.
As for your suggestion of "strengthening" qualifications - that's only going to make it harder. Most businesses want the person with the least skills except for the exact skills the job requires. For example, in Australia, if a business wanted to hire someone for hydraulics and pneumatics, they wouldn't hire someone with a Diploma, Advanced Diploma or Degree in Engineering. They'd hire the person with the Cert 4 in Engineering (Fluid Power) as that person is only qualified in hydraulic and pneumatics and thus the business only has to pay the govt mandated award-based wage for a holder of a cert 4. This wage is significantly less than a higher qualified person.
As for "how you can help a business by having skills you perceive them to want" - that doesn't help because most businesses don't want skilled people. They want an exact fit who they can pay peanuts to OR they want no-one because they have someone internally but are required to advertise the job under law OR because they're using the job posting as free advertising.
Ever had a business tell you that you were overqualified or "we don't care what other things you could contribute, we only care about the job requirements"? That's the reality and that's why I recommend those struggling to get jobs to look overseas and if possible land a job where your skills and qualifications are recognised, get that work visa through the company and move where you're wanted. USA, UK, CAN, AU & NZ don't want people working and only care about regulating everyone out of work.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Whilst your history is correct, you have to look at the current reality - i.e. you have to momentarily put history aside. The most important thing that currently exists is the stopping (or defeat) of Russia in Ukraine. If Russia takes Ukraine (yeah Russia wants the whole country), then the Baltics, Poland and most of Europe east of Germany will be invaded and destroyed.
Putin is doing the same thing Hitler did, the old "just one more country" or "just one more territory". Remember, Russia invaded and illegally occupies two parts of Georgia, they illegally invaded and currently run Kazakhstan, they attacked and control large parts of Mongolia, they illegally took Crimea and most recently invaded Ukraine.
Oh then there's the "refugee" warfare Russia is committing against the EU by intentionally flying illegal immigrants "refugees" into Russia, then to Belarus in the hopes of overrunning the borders of the EU - note that these illegals are paying approximately $25,000USD to Russia so they can "get into the EU".
Putin has said in multiple recent interviews that he wants to rebuild the Tsarist Empire as his legacy. That means the abolition of most free countries (incl. Poland) in Europe. If Ukraine falls, he gains all the equipment and supplies that Ukraine has - this would mean instead of Russia having to use crappy old barely operable equipment, they'd have actually usable equipment.
Simply put, stop Russia, then worry about any problems you have with Ukraine. Now is not the time to dredge up history and create tensions between two countries (Poland and Ukraine), now is the time to stop Russia and then and only then worry about these historical issues.
Trust me when I say, I know what my family suffered in Nazi Occupied Poland and parts of what is now Ukraine, so I understand how you feel.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ianxyoutube Its got nothing to do with being entitled. Its called a wage that reflects your qualifications and experience if that's what the job requires -which most actually do.
Only fools work a job for less than the industry average rate for that type and level of job.
Its simple, they want skills, then they need to offer a fair rate - otherwise they won't get the skills made available.
Good luck starting "at the bottom" - clearly you no longer understand how the world works. The days of being the janitor and "working your way up" are long gone. Laws, regulations, the legal requirement for qualifications and vast experience have made that old way impossible. No one is "learning on the job", they are required to be qualified, experienced, professionally licenced and insured. That requires a heap of time, effort and money, thus the wage needs to enable and reflect that.
No one expects to be fresh out of uni and be paid the wage of a senior engineer, they expect the industry average entry wage of $64,000 (BEng(Mech) - theory/design/scientific) or $80,000 (AdvDip EngTech(Mech) - practial side of things/CNC operation, etc.) and to build from there with time and experience. Yet companies want to pay less than that, knowing full well that anything less is effectively slave labour and actually illegal.
The only place where the old "work up from the bottom" system still exists is some parts of the USA and the entire 3rd world. You can thank all the "won't someone think of the children" and "everything in life must be 100% safe" people for the excessive over regulation and excessively expensive professional licencing, insurance and over-the-top experience requirements that are required in basically 90% of industries these days.
Here's a fun fact about wages in the EU - they're significantly higher than in the UK and the cost of living is much lower than in the UK.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1