Comments by "Matthew Nirenberg" (@matthewnirenberg) on "The REAL reason behind The Potential GAS STOVE BAN" video.

  1. All that'll achieve is a complete and utter prohibition on all travel. If such a ban were implemented, it'd apply to all private aircraft (even small bush planes) and all boats (no matter how small). Private yachts aren't the problem, remember that all sailing catamarans that are bluewater (ocean) rated (required or its illegal to leave national boundaries) are considered yachts under law. Sailing catamarans aren't harming the environment and remain in service (albeit usually with multiple owners) for 30+yrs. As for limiting the rich to only one home with not more than five bedrooms, two issues arise: 1. What is they have a large family (say 8-14 kids), why can't everyone have a bedroom 2. What is rich? I ask this because the definition of "rich" always has an ever reducing threshold. Once the real rich leave a country, the "rich" get defined as rich; this repeats until the person earning $80,000 before tax is defined as "rich". What's wrong with someone being able to own more than one home or a private yacht? Jealously is very unbecoming and only ever a destructive thing. Jealously and this "the rich this, the rich that" is exactly the bullshit that's single-handedly destroyed Australia and made the place unlivable. My family aren't rich (pre-tax income $85,000) but because the definition of "rich" keeps dropping, we suddenly got categorised as "rich" simply because we own our own home (3 bedroom, 1.5 bathroom (bathroom + toilet room)), regardless that three generations are living in it as thanks to housing being sold to foreign businesses, housing is both unavailable and unaffordable for locals. Its a well established fact that banning things doesn't work within a country. Banning foreign businesses from coming in and buying everything so they can exploit the visa system would dramatically help.
    19
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13.  @MadHeadzOz  I'm not making assumptions. The definition of "rich" reduces every bloody year. Its 7 people and yeah two earning a collective $85,000 before tax - for reasons I won't go into here, none of us qualify for any welfare, plus there's plenty more in need of it than us so it's never even been a thought even though we're all citizens since birth. I'm not spinning any story, I'm stating the facts of my life. I'm not whinging about it but mentioning it as too few people understand how politics of envy and the "the rich are bad" mentality only affects we the average person, never the actual rich. As for knowing how these bans would work - its easy, just look at the EU. They did it but guess who is exempt? The rich. The other point I was trying to make regarding boats is that bans will only affect the average person, the rich will always get around it or simply move somewhere else. I agree with you that the majority of aussie's are absolutely braindead when it comes to politics - I hate how they vote because of one policy without knowing the entire party platform; unfortunately that's the problem of them not giving a damn and having mandatory voting with fines for failing to vote. Most people have no clue about budgets or not spending all their money because they never get taught finance and budgeting at school. They also don't get taught how to do their taxes - they simply get told to go and pay an accountant even though their tax is generally extremely simple. Yes, people need to be responsible for themselves but over the last 30yrs the majority have found it easier to just blame everyone else than have any self responsibility.
    1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17.  @gail1249  You're deluded and shilling people to use electricity for everything which isn't even possible as that would require every house / apartment to be changed to three phase and overall supply to quadruple. Gas is perfectly safe. It has nothing to do with accepting change or not, it has nothing to do with opinion. One of two things are happening, either your equipment is defective (your furnace and ducts) or you're lying. Gas being burnt in appliances that are in proper condition is perfectly safe - that's literally what science says. If your claim of "since I limited use of my furnace my asthma symptoms [have] greatly improved" is true then that 100% confirms that your ducts to and from your furnace are the problem - they're full of dust - ducts are meant to be professionally cleaned at least once a year. Gas isn't going anywhere for a very long time. Sure if you want to waste money and ignore the fact that "correlation doesn't equal causation", no one stops you from changing to electric aside from the excessive cost of doing so. The new "articles" about gas being bad were literally funded by the WEF to further their agenda and to make them money as several of the most important members of the WEF are the induction cooktop manufacturers. Its funny how this "research" suddenly appeared the moment that the induction cooktop manufacturers reported being unable to sell their products and the moment the government decided that they'd rather export their gas for a higher rate than if used locally. How convenient. The WEF are the same people who funded "research" that says that never leaving your house is healthy and that going outside causes cancer to justify lockdowns in Australia, only to then magically bring out "research" that says staying home causes cancer the moment the government wanted people to go out and spend money. The WEF are also the same people who said that food prepared at home causes cancer and that food at restaurants doesn't as its prepared differently. That's utter BS but its official "research". Don't fall for the hype and fear mongering - "science" has zero reputability unless its funded by truly impartial people in modern times. If anyone funding it has an agenda, they'll force the "research" to find what they want or they pull the funding; so guess what, the research says what they need it to, to keep the funding. There are literally huge court cases in Australia about this exact situation.
    1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1