Matthew Nirenberg
Geoff Buys Cars
comments
Comments by "Matthew Nirenberg" (@matthewnirenberg) on "EV vs PETROL Range Test - MacMaster vs Geoff - BMW 528i vs Porsche Taycan - Range Anxiety Special" video.
2
1
1
1
@jeremyradford5103 Yeah that's in the UK, my comments specifically said what's already being done in Australia - only mentioned as a warning.
Your rubbish about air pollution is an outright lie that comes from the UK govt. There are plenty of videos on YouTube showing the air to be well within safe limits, the danger however is the air in the London Underground which is beyond safe limits and is so dangerous that it should be shutdown until the air can be made safe.
CO2 does NOT cause climate change - CO2 causes cooling, methane causes warming. The Vostok Ice Cores prove this and that is exactly why they are ignored.
Remove CO2 and the plants die and then there's no air to breathe - if the plants are turning yellow when they should be green that's proof that they aren't getting enough CO2. Increase CO2 by a factor of 5 and you'll get 12x plant biomass and a heap more breathable air.
As for why the weather is going crazy - its two things:
* Cloud seeding (the UK, CAN, AU, NZ, USA, Russia and China have all publicly admitted to doing so) which takes moisture from one area and moves it to another. Do this too much and the balance of nature gets destroyed and the weather becomes extreme (what the movie Geostorm tries to cover)
* High sunspot activity which occurs when the sun is in its closest orbit to the earth whilst the earth is tilting towards it (Milkanovitch cycles). This is relevant because it signifies a pole shift which occurs when a warm age or an ice age is coming to an end; the weather goes to extremes during pole shifts as a result of a severely weakened magnetosphere (weakened due to major pole drift exceeding 5 degrees of shift in a year).
Those same oil companies are the ones who produce all the "green tech" at much higher profit margins than they get from oil. The worlds largest producer of solar panels and wind turbines is BP. By "going green" you're literally funding big oil.
Time is not running out. You have been brainwashed and gaslit to believe the lies of people who literally get rich off "going green", these same people want to dictate everything you do. Look at the real facts such as the Vostok Ice Cores, look at the actual experts who got defunded and forced out of work because the actual research they did (such as studying ice cores), didn't fit the "green agenda".
This is just like all the past hysteria:
1960's - Oil gone in 10yrs
1970's - Another Ice age in 10yrs
1980's - Acid rain will destroy all crops in 10yrs
1990's - Ozone layer will be gone in 10yrs
2000's - The icecaps will be gone in 10yrs
None of this ever happened but each scare resulted in more taxes and more govt control over our lives.
1
@jeremyradford5103 And here you are spouting the same ridiculous tropes that the pro-EV crowd love to spout simply because they were told them without looking at the reality - production scaling, different chemistries and recycling.
Production of batteries isn't being scaled for two reasons - safety (production is dangerous except in small batches - OHS laws and regulators prohibited scaling and large manufacturing facilities) and lack of materials (most of the countries where the mining occurs have banned the export of the minerals and metals due to child labour and unsafe conditions.
Different chemistries is a pipe dream that only a few universities are hypothesising - no actual meaningful results have been achieved to date.
As for recycling - its unsustainable, not actually recycling and only viable when fully govt subsidised through ever increasing taxation. Current recycling either just stores the batteries waiting for a viable process to recycle them to be created (after 5yrs they're legally allowed to be declared "recycled"), or, they are shredded in a fluid that prevents them from burning/exploding and then the shredded bits are stored in bags in warehouses until a way of recycling those bits is created. There are no financially viable ways to recover the precious metals that are both environmentally friendly and that comply with all existing OHS laws and regulations. Lead-acid and AGM batteries however can be fully recycled safely and affordably.
EV batteries are worthless once taken from their original car as they are cycle damaged (i.e. near the max number of cycles), have degraded range and because precious metals can't be recovered from them. Also, most EV batteries due to being charged too slowly, too fast or due to being allowed to be at a charge percent outside the ideal range "38% - 92%", suffer degradation which results in them never lasting as long as the warranty claims. Even with the warranty, replacement is still easily $15,000 - $25,000 (battery plus labour cost and disposal costs) which is more than most cars cost brand new.
And before you say I'm against EV's - I'm not - my issue is these problems haven't and aren't being addressed.
When EV's are as safe, as light as their ICE equivalents, not taxed per km (they currently are at a rate higher than fuel excise is, where I live in Australia), as quick to charge as ICE vehicles are to refuel (2 minutes) without expensive charging network subscriptions (required in Australia to charge when out and about), when they don't lose charge sitting parked (ICE vehicles don't lose range sitting parked for weeks) whilst having a week camping in the forest (250km out of town) and when they can tow a 3.5t trailer with ease without losing more range than an ICE equivalent, I'll happily get an EV, but not before, providing the govt change my houses power supply from single phase to three phase at no cost to me - I'm not gonna pay $25,000+ for the trenching, connection and rewiring required just to have an EV as I currently use all 63A available from single phase power.
1