General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Matthew Nirenberg
Survival Lilly
comments
Comments by "Matthew Nirenberg" (@matthewnirenberg) on "Situation in Europe November (Part 2)" video.
Who do you think owns large chunks of those businesses through shares - likely the same politicians. Remember during the plandemic how every few months like clockwork, Foley would get out and say 'get tested'? That was because he had a huge financial interest in the test kits - he made money from every test because of his personal financial interests in the company that made them. What is needed are laws that ban politicians from having businesses or shares whilst in office.
3
@SurvivalLilly And then just as many were massacred by the commies, and now the place is a 3rd world shithole where the cops and govt make it up as they go - no such thing as a 'fair trial' or 'rule of law' there - people still get summarily executed by the cops there. It was a 1st world nation under French and non-commie rule. War is human nature whether people like it or not. The reality is that even if you are peaceful, your neighbours (or their neighbours) won't be and thus you need to be ready and able to defeat them. All the 'anti-war' wankers do is destroy everything and hand over the innocent people to the aggressors/war mongers - literally every time. Appeasement NEVER works - it only emboldens the aggressor. * It was proven in the 1930's that appeasing Hitler achieved nothing * It was proven in Vietnam - appeasing the commies resulted in the massacre of innocent people on a giant scale * It was proven in China when Mao overthrew then legal govt (now in Taiwan) and slaughtered the Chinese people, then starved them in the 'Arduous March' * It was proven by the outcome of the Korean War - there's a reason that the DPRK (North Korea) is the shithole that it is where people have no rights * It was proven when the world let Russia invade Georgia and steal two large chunks of it * It was proven when the world let Russia invade and steal Crimea * It was proven when the world let Russia invade and steal the Armenian Exclaves, then gave them to Azerbaijan * It was proven when the world let Russia invade and take control of Mongolia - Russia is still in charge of the country claiming they're 'peace keepers'. Mongolia is no longer an independent nation * It was proven when Russia promised it would NEVER attack Ukraine if Ukraine gave up its nukes - yet they invaded regardless * It was proven in the plandemic - just one more lockdown, just take the jabs. That was NEVER enough there was always more because they liked the power trip they were on * etc. The current anti-war nutcases are trying to give the aggressors what they want. They're trying to give Ukraine to Russia, they're trying to give the terrorists in gaza and west bank everything they demand, even though those terrorists have had 20yrs to make a success of gaza and west bank as the only sanctions they were under were sanctions preventing weaponry and military hardware. They could have become the next Singapore but their want to destroy Israel was deemed more important because they're religious death-cult fruitcakes. If Russia isn't defeated in Ukraine, the EU will fall as Russia is intent on rebuilding the Tsarist Empire. Its better to collectively work together and defeat Russia whilst they're weak, as once they can resupply they'll be exponentially harder to defeat.
1
@tuulameri8499 You're ignoring that its not a little bit of land. Its close to a third of their country as you have to factor in Crimea. Then you're forgetting that giving putina what she wants will only embolden her and then she'll go after the Baltics, Poland, Hungary and Finland. The whole point everyone is missing is putina is doing as she said in 2014 - rebuilding the Tsarist Empire. The only way to stop putina is to defeat the little suka.
1
Because if they had the millions of dollars required to do that, they could simply just pay the taxes. You can't just have a 'trust', they can only be owned by a corporation which is a 'for profit' business. At a minimum it would have to be an investment holding company (that requires financial licences and bonds paid to the govt). Then there's all the legal compliance and mandatory reporting to maintain that corporation, not to mention is has to be making a profit every year. Its like this by design so that Blackrock and Vanguard can own everything you can be happy with nothing.
1
How else are Blackrock and Vanguard supposed to own everything? Remember Klaus Schwab 'you'll own nothing and be happy'...
1
Inheritance taxes are insane BS that shouldn't ever be permitted or considered. Consider the following: * The money has already been taxed as income when it was earned, especially in high tax countries such as Australia * As govts print money inflating the economy, property suddenly is worth more on paper, because the money is worth less. Thus your basic house is now worth over a million. The result is you end up homeless because you have to sell to pay the tax * You built wealth for your family, so that future generations can have it easier than those before them. You worked hard and paid tax on that money. Why should the govt get it just because you died? * If you can't generate wealth for future generations, why would you invest in a country? You wouldn't because when you die, there's no point to having anything. This combined with the insane pay requirements and taxes in Sweden is why the few business that remain are almost entirely automated and employ a mere handful of staff. * Just because you think it will only affect the 'rich', the reality is they will always set the threshold amount in the law as a specific figure, then they inflate the economy and suddenly everyone is over that threshold and now forced to pay the tax. * Inheritance taxes are easily avoided by the rich as they 'own nothing but control everything'. Its the poor who can't escape them and who hurt the most.
1