Youtube comments of Matthew Nirenberg (@matthewnirenberg).

  1. 86
  2. 58
  3. 46
  4. 43
  5.  @svensulzmann4282  Taxes do absolutely prevent a person from exercising their political opinion freely as it prevents them from leaving. If these changes are treated the same by banks, foreign governments and businesses as simply being a US citizen is, then people won't have any choice but to remain in Australia as they won't be able to have bank accounts, own property, buy property or otherwise do business abroad. Also, note that tax in Australia is determined on your pre-tax income, anything that doesn't seem "up to the standard of Australia" is increased under Australia's "deeming laws" and then you have to pay that tax on top of any tax you pay abroad; DTA's (double taxation agreements) are being abolished entirely under the new Australian tax rules so no more credits for taxes paid abroad. Australia is so broke that no longer lets you set prices. In years gone by, it was perfectly okay to rent a small house to a child, a relative or a friend for a fair, affordable fee that they could afford - as long as the contracts were legal and everything was declared it was fine. Along comes the 2022-2023 tax year (1 July 2022 - to 30 June 2023) and suddenly this practice has been declared illegal as the govt now requires all rents to be charged at the top-market average so now people are literally going homeless because they can't afford $30,000 more per year so the landlord can keep the tax office happy. Now you can't even choose the price you chose to do business at - the government now set the price purely for maximum tax. Note that once homeless these people become dependent on the govt just to survive and thus must agree with and politically align with the govt to survive so bye, bye political freedom. So yeah, taxation does restrict political freedom both within and outside of the country.
    41
  6. 36
  7. 34
  8. 34
  9. 27
  10. 24
  11. 21
  12. 20
  13. All that'll achieve is a complete and utter prohibition on all travel. If such a ban were implemented, it'd apply to all private aircraft (even small bush planes) and all boats (no matter how small). Private yachts aren't the problem, remember that all sailing catamarans that are bluewater (ocean) rated (required or its illegal to leave national boundaries) are considered yachts under law. Sailing catamarans aren't harming the environment and remain in service (albeit usually with multiple owners) for 30+yrs. As for limiting the rich to only one home with not more than five bedrooms, two issues arise: 1. What is they have a large family (say 8-14 kids), why can't everyone have a bedroom 2. What is rich? I ask this because the definition of "rich" always has an ever reducing threshold. Once the real rich leave a country, the "rich" get defined as rich; this repeats until the person earning $80,000 before tax is defined as "rich". What's wrong with someone being able to own more than one home or a private yacht? Jealously is very unbecoming and only ever a destructive thing. Jealously and this "the rich this, the rich that" is exactly the bullshit that's single-handedly destroyed Australia and made the place unlivable. My family aren't rich (pre-tax income $85,000) but because the definition of "rich" keeps dropping, we suddenly got categorised as "rich" simply because we own our own home (3 bedroom, 1.5 bathroom (bathroom + toilet room)), regardless that three generations are living in it as thanks to housing being sold to foreign businesses, housing is both unavailable and unaffordable for locals. Its a well established fact that banning things doesn't work within a country. Banning foreign businesses from coming in and buying everything so they can exploit the visa system would dramatically help.
    19
  14. Sadly it's going to be easy to bring in and they don't need to convince anyone. Please consider the following: * Note how many people just accepted and complied from 2020-2023 because the govt said so * Fear make the 95% fall in line, the threat or use of state sponsored violence [law enforcement, national guard, army, etc.] makes the other 5% fall in line one way or another * Most people don't have 2yrs worth of savings in the bank, nor do they have 2yrs worth of food rotation - this means they're dependent on others to 'get by' as they can't try to "wait it out" * The economy is collapsing thanks to the early stages of hyper inflation and what's likely intentional mismanagement * Whilst people will stick with the current system until it fails, the moment it fails (intentionally or otherwise), they'll begrudgingly flock to CBDC as it'll appear as the better solution * Govt assistance will only be available as CBDC * Food will only be purchasable in CBDC * Wages will only be payable / receivable in CBDC * Taxes and bills will suddenly only be payable in CBDC * It'll become illegal to buy or sell using anything other than CBDC on the legal threat of jail. Look how many ratted out their neighbours, friends and others from 2020-2023, also look back at how people ratted people out to the Stasi. People will comply out of fear * The govt will say - you have no money, the economy failed but we'll give you whatever the last balance you had in the bank, in CBDC. This will cause many to accept CBDC as they technically won't be out of money, they'll just be trapped in CBDC and the tyrannical control it gives the govt over the people Simply put - the powers that be are creating the perfect conditions to have the masses begging for CBDC - part of that is the intentional destruction of the existing economy / system. Remember, the CBDC has to be attractive - the only way to do that is to destroy the current system. I'm 100% against the WEF, CBDC, 15/20 minute cities and this dystopian tyranny - I see leaving the "west" as the only option. Unfortunately, the chance to save cash is gone. Banks are closing branches, removing ATM's, charging stupid amounts to deposit cash as a business, they're stopping people from withdrawing cash, etc. Most banks in Australia are ending cheques in 2024, and the govt bans cheques in 2025 outright, NZ has all but ended cheques already. Cash will be forced out very soon. Other tangibles (bullion, etc.) and having wealth outside the "west" is the only way to survive the end of cash providing you have a place to live outside the "west" without needing a "western" passport (i.e. ensure visas and permits are tied to a passport from a country outside of CANZUK/CUNA).
    19
  15. 19
  16. 19
  17. 18
  18. 17
  19. 16
  20. Regarding Australiastan - stay well away, its NOT worth the trouble. Once you're there you ain't leaving. Why? They will throw everything at you to stop you leaving. Here's how: 1. Their primary weapon is Jury Duty. They have 2 levels of it and thus can throw it at you each year (alternating between the two levels). To make it even worse, they'll send he 'Notice of Selection' in the November the year just before the period they're calling you for. This effectively ensures that you can't leave near the end of the year and the jury duty period is always set so that you're either only free at peak tourism times overseas (i.e. can't book as you require an 'activated'/non-frozen passport to do so - being selected for jury duty freezes your passport so you can't book), or you're only free during an election (basically an annual event due to the levels of govt, councils and by-elections) and thus can't leave. 2. Their secondary weapon is elections. There are elections for every level of govt, councils and by-elections for all of that. The period before an election (2+ months), till 2 months after an election, the electoral rolls are frozen - this means you can't change your details or be removed because you've moved abroad. This forces you to stay to vote - being overseas isn't a reason to not vote and the fines are very large and repeat offenders now face jail time - thus the only answer to to be removed from the electoral roll by moving abroad when the electoral roll isn't frozen so you can be removed. 3. The tax system is becoming rapidly more impossible to escape from. They can declare you tax resident if its now in the 'public interest' simply because they believe 'you're of value, or are aligned with Australia' 4. They can stop the travel exemption at any time they like resulting in the closure of the National Border. During the '2020 thing' they closed the border, not under emergency powers which would end with the emergency, but with a law. That law remains in force and the only reason travel is currently permitted is because there is a broad exemption from the ban to permit travel. That can change at the discretion of the minister. This also allows the minister to without needing to give a reason, the ability to ban individuals from the country. I've been trying to leave the damn place since 2020, and have been stopped by the regime every time - they really want to stop me from leaving. The travel ban made it impossible during the whole '2020 thing', then its been elections, Jury Duty, licence related reporting issues (can only be dealt with whilst in-country), elections, and now Jury Duty again - and elections immediately after Jury Duty. Oh and then there's the whole - can't get the visa needed due to the required passport having too little duration for a 5yr visa (passport only has 5yrs left on it) - can only renew when passport is down to 2yrs left. The earliest I'll have any hope of leaving is 2030 at this rate, and that's assuming they don't keep throwing the same Jury Duty rubbish at me.
    16
  21. 14
  22. 14
  23. 14
  24. 13
  25. 12
  26. 12
  27. As someone who's looked into what it takes to become a "defence developer" / "legal licenced firearm dealer" I can confirm that the rules vary dramatically from country to country. In Europe they take the attitude of "clean record, correct qualifications (usually mech eng or elec eng), experience, intent and ability to afford the licences" unlike places like Australia, New Zealand or Canada where they try to limit it to "those already licenced - i.e. no new people" and "we'd rather just leave it to the big names - screw anything new". This makes Australia, New Zealand and Canada horrible places to do anything even slightly considered "defence related" as you're basically never going to get licenced. "Defence Related" means anything that has a military use or capability requires the correct licences to design, produce or sell (some exceptions apply for use by citizens or if the equipment is "dual purpose" and officially permitted as long as it remains within the country), this includes but isn't limited to: * encryption * radios / comms equipment * signal analysers * oscilloscopes * maps / mapping software (excluding Google Maps, etc.) * codes and ciphers * equipment cases * anything drone related - note that it could be a ground, water or air based drone * recovery equipment (for data or for retrieving physical objects * new manufacturing methods * compression software * biometric equipment, software and methods * Anything AI * Surveillance equipment (other than a basic security camera) * Weapons and Firearms * Body Armour * Camping equipment * etc.
    12
  28. 11
  29. 11
  30.  @peterbates282  Its not politics of envy. Australia has the same problem - the average house is about 2 million in most places that aren't extremely rural (4+hrs out of any town). Extremely rich (multi-millionaries) overseas are advertised property in AU & NZ as investments by agents, they pay insane amounts which price all locals out of property. The last auction in my street was ended with a bid that was double the highest bid resulting in the property selling for 1.6 million. Its now units and they've all been sold off for a small fortune each. What you and many lefty politicians fail to understand is that building more only makes the problem worse. Overpaying has pushed prices to insane levels that only foreign money can afford. If you build more, those new developments increase the value of the area the development is in, as well as the surrounding area. Due to laws that stop "under valuing", prices can only go up. These properties are unaffordable for locals so foreign investors buy them. The prices can only go up whilst the farmland gets built on and the public land vanishes due to eternal sprawl of cities. The only way to force prices back down is for the govt to seize all foreign owned property, ban construction and only let citizens buy property. This would lower prices as it would crash the entire market and would thus let prices drop. Currently its all a giant Ponzi scheme (housing and construction) that needs to collapse immediately. They whinge on about climate yet build over prime farmland and forests whilst locking up the remaining public land because they don't want people camping, hiking, hunting or fishing.
    10
  31. 10
  32. 10
  33. Legitimate question: Why is visa-free to the EU so important? Why is it the factor that makes a passport useless or not? Thanks to the Schengen Zone the bulk of the EU is treated as the one area for the 90 day time limit in a 180 day period. The only valuable thing is a residence permit or citizenship to an EU country. I don't understand how not having visa-free to the EU makes a passport worthless. Sure other factors might but not having visa-free to the EU? If you're visa-free to the EU you require an ETIAS which requires the same information as a Schengen Visa (except for an invitation letter - easy to get) but it restricts where you enter and exit the EU unlike a Schengen Visa. You CAN'T work or do any business / banking / investment / purchase/rent apartments or property, on an ETIAS as its only for tourism. I think that the Caribbean will either lose all visa-free to the EU or they'll end their CBI programs to keep visa-free to the EU. Would that make those passports worthless? Absolutely not! Why I think they'll give up visa-free to the EU is because they want the CBI money more than the tourism access to the EU. To someone such as myself I don't care if I can be a tourist to the EU or not - its not hard to get a Schengen Visa (same information as an ETIAS but you get a visa put in your passport and don't have entry and exit locations specified), I care about being able to lower/eliminate my taxes by being able to legally become a citizen of a zero tax country and legally move there.
    9
  34. 9
  35. 9
  36. 9
  37. 9
  38. Airports asking about you carrying crypto - none of their business! Why? Because whilst I always prefer to stay on the right side of the law, there are times that it's not worth it to do so as complying puts you at greater risk. Consider the following: * You say you have you hardware wallet with you. They demand to look through it and demand you codes/passwords from you. How do you prove its all legally acquired on the spot? You can't - just like you can't immediately prove that the money in your bank account is all 100% legally acquired on the spot. So they seize it all and it gets transferred to another wallet and isn't seen again. * The same goes for passwords to accounts - never reveal your passwords to your accounts. There is nothing stopping them from doing malicious things in your name, removing the evidence and then arresting you over a 'complaint' or 'tip-off'. If they want access, make them have court orders so they can access via the admin side of things as that ensures accountability. If you hand over pins/passwords there is zero accountability. A crypto wallet shouldn't be any of their business - its nothing more than having a bank account or credit card. When crossing borders they don't inquire "do you have a bank account?" and then want to look through the account for "tax" reasons. Why is crypto any different? If they're trying to argue its money then why do they consider it a type of asset but not money for tax purposes? It can't be both! Only money and bullion are limited/require reporting to cross borders - general assets don't (except for import duty)! Only when everyone refuses to comply with such demands will they drop this BS about hardware wallets. I guess you could reset your hardware wallet and recover it once inside the country....
    9
  39. 9
  40. 8
  41. 8
  42. 8
  43. 8
  44. 8
  45. 8
  46. 8
  47. 8
  48. 7
  49. 7
  50. 7
  51. 7
  52. 7
  53. 7
  54. 7
  55. 7
  56. 7
  57. 7
  58. 7
  59. 7
  60. 7
  61. 6
  62. 6
  63. 6
  64. I'm trying to leave Australiastan as soon as possible so I can live somewhere I can work and thrive and where taxes are ideally 0% PIT so I can use crypto and not lose it all to the ATO as 'taxes'. Sadly the place is making it harder to leave - basically ALL 'assets' are subject to unrealized gains so you have to liquidate everything, pay the insane taxes, then pay the taxes on the money you take out of the country - leaving you with very little to survive on abroad. 'Assets' also now includes things that have never otherwise been 'assets' such as boats, planes, RV's, etc. (things that are normally considered liabilities / expenses) which are now being reported by insurance companies to the ATO if valued over $60k (approx. - I don't remember the exact amount) so they can do "Lifestyle Data Matching" and so they can interrogate you on where and how you got it (even though they already know due to their huge data mining), and demand unrealized gains tax if you leave. Oh, and that's assuming they let you leave, many people are being hit with regular jury duty to keep them stuck in the country and with licence related issues (incl. audits) to keep them stuck in the country. Combine that with the near infinite elections (at least 1 every year) and you can't change your electoral roll details (i.e. leave the country and get removed) because they freeze the rolls for elections, and they also freeze your individual entry whilst subject to jury duty. Australiastan is broke, thinks that all your hard earned money belongs to them, intentionally stops you investing and benefiting (the taxes make it not worthwhile) and then goes out of its way to stop you leaving after having regulated many of us out of work with insane BS professional registration schemes that are designed to force locals out of work (due to unworkable CPD and experience requirements) but makes the world of exceptions for 'skilled migrant workers'.
    6
  65. 6
  66. 6
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 6
  70. 6
  71. 6
  72. To a certain extent its possible if you're a person of modest means however its gonna be a lot harder, unless you're a multinational from birth (2-3+ citizenship's from birth - ideally one of those would be an OECS or EU (Schengen) country). You'll have a harder time getting visas and establishing residence, you'll need to also afford to rent (1yr +) or buy a home and prove that you have enough left over and/or consistent income to support yourself. The six figure+ clients that get mentioned have things much easier as they can easily buy or rent property, they can easily prove their ability to support themselves and can easily show large income; more importantly, they can easily afford to do CBI which will always be easier than residence/visas. Speaking conservatively, it'll cost $300,000-$550,000 for most people to completely move abroad and support themselves for a year - yes this is assuming a residence is purchased (usually a requirement for residence - not everywhere permits 1yr + rental contracts) and one's possessions are shipped. All shipped possessions have import duty that will have to be paid on them unless you're moving to a handful of countries that permit citizens to return with all their possessions once in their lifetime without having to pay import duty on those possessions (Poland, Hungary; there's two others but I can't remember which two others). This is why some people get a secondhand catamaran and live aboard, such vessels can be found for $300,000; just make sure you're into sailing and know how to sail if you want to live aboard a boat.
    6
  73. 5
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 5
  86. In the place you're legally tax resident and where your centre of life is. Simple! Like with everything, that's why if you want to live flag theory you have to: 1. Establish tax residency in a 0% PIT country - you have to move your centre of life there and have a home that you return to 2. LEGALLY leave the high tax, tax system that you were in, thus leaving you only in the tax system you entered in point 1 3. Get a bank account in the 0% PIT country, live there for 8+ months and get a local tax file number. 0% PIT countries still issue tax file numbers so you can fill in the space on forms and as part of proving that you're legally tax resident there, even though PIT is 0% 4. Once you've achieved all of that LEGALLY, now you can look at holidaying to several places for a month or two at a time (be careful to not become tax resident due to physical presence in those places), returning to the 0% PIT country you live in after each trip. 5. Congrats you're living the modern LEGAL version of flag theory Its no longer possible to be perpetually traveling and tax resident nowhere, countries will declare you tax resident automatically unless you have LEGAL tax residency somewhere. This is literally a case of "you have to know how to play their game and beat them at their own game whilst complying with all the rules they made". Its intentionally hard because the high-tax countries are desperate for taxes because they're broke welfare states that care more about being dystopian, all encompassing and because they let themselves become welfare states. Remember, when the largest employer in a country is the government, the only outcome is always going to be larger, more bloated government and thus more over regulation (nanny state) and the only way to fund that is higher taxes. Becoming welfare states lets the govt exert more control over the people as they need the money to survive, it also makes it easier to justify increasing taxes "you don't want the poor to starve do you?".
    5
  87. 5
  88. 5
  89. 5
  90. 5
  91. 5
  92. 5
  93. 5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 5
  100. 5
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. Travelling visa-free and being equipped is something that most agencies have sorted ahead of time. Hollywood never shows things in detail and always over-simplifies everything. Without going into detail, in the real world it'd be more like: * Source pre-arranges travel (either legal entry or illegal entry (i.e. sneaking in)) * Travel * Asset goes to in-country safe house to get equipped with documents, money, firearm, phone with contacts, etc. * Does whatever is needed * Returns everything to another safe house * Leaves similarly to how they entered the country Driving without a licence whilst illegal isn't as hard as it seems. Most people don't get licence checked and who's to say they don't have an International Driver Permit? Also, in most countries you only need to carry a National ID card, as long as you're only driving a car or riding a motorbike you usually have 24hrs in which to present your licence at a police station to prove you're licenced. Also the new type National ID cards in the EU have a chip which links it to all your licences so its able to be checked on the spot. How many people who work don't actually have licences? Also, most agencies have people inside the appropriate offices to be able to issue licences as required. As for knowing the area well, its simple. Get a paper map and study the area, remember things by key landmarks and by turns. Names overly complicate the process of memorising regions. Plus I would guarantee they've spent 2 days driving around to get to know the area - yet again Hollywood leaves this out. As has been public knowledge for over 50yrs thanks to books written by former spies and even from the early Bond books by Ian Fleming, the best agents/spies are the ones who have perfectly clean records, from countries with strong passports and who don't attract attention from others (they look ordinary).
    4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. Part of the problem for those trying to leave high tax countries but who aren't rich is that those high tax countries will basically only let you leave the system by going to another high tax country. Take Australia as an example, if you move to France where the taxes are higher, then Australia will let you leave the tax system. If you moved to Georgia where the taxes are lower, the ATO would force you to pay the difference in tax rates to them as they'd claim you're only temporarily overseas because they claim you're trying to exploit tax rates and not actually leaving Australia (due to their automatic belief that you 'intend to return'). That's how desperate for tax revenue Australia is and how insane they are because they think that high taxes and taking from those who earn well is 'normal and right'. I find that attitude that Australia has to be sickening and disgusting as I believe that you should be allowed to keep what you earn and that wealth shouldn't be taxed (wealth taxes coming very soon to Australia). Given that most DTA's Australia had are now gone, the only option is to go to a higher tax country to get out of the system, then spend 3-5yrs in that even higher tax country (to avoid being pulled automatically back into the Australian system, and to be considered properly in the higher tax country's system), then leave its system and finally move to where you can thrive. Due to the double move it becomes financially impossible for most - this is why its the rich and retired who can leave Australia, not the young who are wanting to get businesses going and succeed. Canada isn't much different.
    4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109.  @tux407  As an Australian, it's not worth it for being geographically remote. There are better locations such as the Caribbean, parts of South America or SE Asia. Australia has stupidly high taxes (they're still increasing), houses are completely unaffordable for the average person thanks to the govt letting foreign corporations and investors overpay. Most average houses are $1 million+, units can be $500,000-800,000 depending on location. The "huge number of millionaires" comes from the fact that the population is mostly older people who owned houses from before prices went insane and thus now have houses worth millions if they sold tomorrow, Australia looks at wealth for statistical purposes based on "if you liquidated everything tomorrow". The only place you'll find houses that are affordable is in the countryside - well out of town where there aren't any jobs. Cars are essential to get around, delivery of purchases is stupidly expensive. The health system is actually falling apart here because most politicians haven't bothered to do anything to improve it since the 90's, only construction projects get priority. Eating out is not really an option given that a burger with chips and a soft drink from a "non-fastfood" place is basically $30 - $35 per person. If you're very rich this obviously isn't a problem. Oh and there are mandatory qualifications and permits and licences for literally everything in Australia so if you're looking for a good business environment, you're not gonna find it in Australia. At the end of the day, that's just the opinion of an Aussie who's heading overseas to go "where [I'm] treated best" as Andrew says. Your mileage may vary. Just remember, just because a place is nice to visit as a tourist, doesn't mean its the same when you're living there day-to-day. If you still think its where you want to be, try it, see how it suits you.
    4
  110. Hate to say it but they can do it literally over night. Most people are already used to tapping their card to pay and as such very few places still accept cash, ATM's are disappearing - they last few years helped as they justified it over "spreading the thing" concerns. How they will likely do it over a weekend: * Close the banks on a Friday morning citing "IT issues", dump the banks databases to CSV files (more reliable and compatible than SQL dumps across many versions of SQL, plus reordering CSV is easy and the CSV handlers run much faster being an older simpler technology) and import them into a govt controlled ledger. * Announce to the public over the weekend that all welfare is going 100% digital and that in order to do so, all money will be going digital. * Reassure everyone that their money will be converted at a rate of 1-to-1 and to not worry. * Announce exchange points to convert remaining cash and bank notes into CBDC. * Lastly they'd push out an update to their "Service [State name or Country name]" app (i.e. Service NSW, Service Vic, etc.) with the CBDC part enabled. This app and its equivalents are already used for digital licences, welfare, public healthcare status and for electronic payments in the "Digital Wallet" section. All the CBDC code is already in the govt apps which is why they're so large, all that's not visible is the button to access the functionality but that will appear either though an update or if the app can reach a specific predetermined server (the latter is more likely as that would avoid having to have an update successfully roll out to millions of people). The point is they won't give you a choice, just like the last few years, they'll just do what they want to. Those who resist will be locked out of the system and likely locked up in one of the many "quarantine" facilities they built or in the prisons they've also built over the last few years and are continuing to build. They don't care about pretending to keep capitalism, in Australia they've literally said that they're "rebuilding capitalism" by replacing it with socialism as they claim that "socialism has conquered capitalism" and that "the future has never been brighter but we need socialism to succeed". They're more evil than people give them credit for. The time to act, be it leave, protest, lobby or fight is now, not tomorrow. If you don't like the way things are going, don't wait for others to do something because they will wait until its too late. Educate those around you about it, show them evidence from official sources to support what you're saying. If that fails or if you just don't want to fight it, leave to "greener pastures". In terms of Australia and Canada, both countries are completely lost to the mindless sheep who think socialism is great - it always ends in failed communism; anyone in Australia, New Zealand or Canada who has a brain will leave to "live to fight another day" because there's no way to fight when the majority want things to continue the way they're going. Change only occurs when the majority want it. There's no point staying and being self-destructive by trying to fight and going broke and then not having the option to leave. As the old saying goes "its better to leave a day too soon, than a a day too late; leave early and you can always return, leave late and you'll perish".
    4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. 4
  116. 4
  117. 4
  118. 4
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122. 4
  123. 4
  124. And its thanks to people such as yourself you are either against privacy or who just "roll over" that privacy is almost completely gone. People are upset because we like our privacy - what we do, as long as we aren't hurting others isn't anyone's business. What I spend my taxed money on is none of the banks business - they have zero right to police how I use my money. What I eat is what I choose to eat, I won't have anyone (govt or otherwise) dictate what I can and can't eat - they can shove their "be healthy and eat bugs" where the sun doesn't shine. Just because you're fine with having no privacy, doesn't mean others are, nor does it mean that they shouldn't have the right to privacy. None of the AML/KYC bullshit has had any effect on crime - criminals literally don't care and if they can't pay with wads of cash, they'll simply trade and barter products like people used to do hundreds of years ago. The AML/KYC bullshit only hurts the honest person and those of us who aren't criminals. I haven't carried a phone for the majority of the last 6yrs. It stays at home the majority of the time. I still demand physical licences much to the disgust of the govt who make doing so very hard and phone call wait times close to 4hrs. I still refuse to make a MyGov account and will NOT be accepting/using or creating an euID as I'm 100% against digital ID. Putting up without having privacy won't make anyone happier - only restoring privacy will. Why do you think, many are going 100% cash only, reverting to trade/barter and avoiding taxes where possible.
    4
  125. 4
  126. 4
  127. 4
  128. 4
  129. Not saying Wealthy Expat is right or wrong but the point of why conservative people want out of the "west" isn't because they want to hate of LGBTQIA+..., its because the LGBTQIA+ are 99% insane loonies who always take things too far and too extremes. They literally use violence to push their agenda and have zero tolerance for conservative people who just want to be left alone. The "safe schools" program teaches perversion and hardcore fetishes to primary school kids, all whilst the same teachers are forcing communist ideology on children. Then there's the fact that the laws exist that criminalise everything conservative. That's what people are sick of - they're sick of being told how to live and being arrested for "misgendering" people, that kids can't just be taught normal subjects and to treat everyone how they want to be treated. The biggest problem is everyone in places like Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, China, the Balkans, etc. where the LGBTQIA+ loonies haven't taken over, haven't experienced the harm and damage caused by their intolerance and twisted brainwashing of children, so they dismiss it as "crazy westerners". We've seen this in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK and western Europe. Children in primary school are now taught that they're not the gender they actually are, that they must be "queer" to be tolerant and that communism is go (even though its the exact opposite). Any time anyone tries to reject the far-left and LGBTQIA+ loonies, the response is the same - hardcore violence, threats, destruction, death threats and new laws getting passed that further the twisted ideology. Anyone who isn't conservative and who doesn't live in the "west" has zero ability to understand what I'm writing and hasn't seen the actual damage done (kids thinking they're cats, hormone blockers preventing them from ever going through puberty, 12yr olds getting sex changes because they think they're a different gender and the school and govt let them have surgery, parents getting arrested for simply trying to let their kids be kids and not have this twisted perversion shoved into them. The problem is the LGBTQIA+ have been given too much time, attention and power - the cause of this was when "gay marriage" was permitted; it emboldened them as they openly used violence, threats and crime to rig the results. Now instead of being happy that they got what they claimed they wanted, they're dead set on exterminating conservatives, the nuclear family and white people (many 'woke' countries actively discourage and in some countries prohibit non-interracial marriages considering two white people getting married as extremism). This is the problem - once nut jobs get emboldened, they take their extremism to new levels and get more insane. As a hardcore conservative, I don't care what you do in private, I don't care what you think, just keep it to yourself and leave children out of it - no brainwashing of any kind at schools. No one, straight or not, should be doing any PDA's - its just not appropriate. Stop forcing little children (under 10) to dress up in fetish wear and march in Mardi Gras - that's beyond messed up but sadly is common in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK. Don't let kids who are too young to understand the consequences of irreversible decisions (surgery, hormone blockers, etc.) make such choices, don't try to make them into communists, and don't try to force the church to permit and conduct "gay marriages" - that directly violates religion and one must respect that churches are only for the religious - they aren't places for everyone, nor does anyone have the right to dictate to churches to change religions to suit a group of nuts. Wokies, wokism and the left are what is wrong with the world, what has destroyed the left and what sane people are trying to escape. I just hope more people wake up and see the far left for the nutjobs they actually are, that people see the destruction they've caused and stop them.
    4
  130. 4
  131. First of all that's not how capital gains works. Also, taxing capital gains only pushes people to NOT invest in the country. Fun fact - bank accounts aren't taxed on gains as they don't make gains; any interest paid on the account by the bank is treated as income and can be taxed as income. When the govt prints money, the rich LOSE money because inflating (or hyperinflating) an economy reduces the buying power of the economy - i.e. each dollar is worth less than what it was the day prior. If you tax capital gains, then you still lose out. If the rich sell assets, only other rich people can afford to buy them. If you can't currently buy them, you won't be able to buy them if they get sold because prices do NOT come down. The markets would NEVER be flooded with assets as giant mega-corporations like BlackRock and Vanguard would simply buy them, increase their portfolios and at tax time have a profit that's basically unchanged. The reason you can't afford to get assets is likely because: * You waste money on having the latest phone, etc. * You eat out all the time * You have no savings because you NEVER put your pocket money into the bank whilst you were young * You stupidly went heavily into debt to go to a US university because "everyone does" without thinking about "is it actually worthwhile and do I absolutely need it to work?" * The US debt is NEVER paid off so the USD keeps hemorrhaging its value as the debt climbs The rich get rich because they save money when they're young, they buy and hold silver and gold bullion which retains its value (i.e. it doesn't lose value), they don't party all the time, they don't go on holidays all the time - they save all that money. They save money because they know they need to save $100k ASAP because that's the point at which Compound Interest starts to seriously help their wealth grow. They AVOID debt. They AVOID rent because 'rent money is dead money'. They do this over 30yrs, not 5 seconds. They know how to create value, generate wealth and how to maintain wealth. Once they are getting enough interest on their savings that they can live off 25% of the compounding interest the bank pays them on their savings, they can basically live on passive income. You want a quick "give me money, I deserve to take your sh*t" because you're a commie nutjob who supports high taxes and the endless illegals who increase the welfare problem whilst also taking resources that would otherwise exist for you to use.
    4
  132. 4
  133. 4
  134. 4
  135. 4
  136. 4
  137. 4
  138. 4
  139. 4
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. Low tax is an essential as without it, its not possible to save money to get prepared. When you're handing almost half your money to the government in taxes after working stupid hours and the cost of living keeps outpacing wages, you're screwed - that's Australia. Also by mid-2023 it'll be almost impossible for most people to leave the Australian tax system unless they never return to Australia and get their "family" to move outside of Australia (note that "family" isn't just your partner and kids, it includes your siblings and parents as the definition was intentionally left vague so as to benefit the government). There are videos on here explaining the new rules for leaving the Australian Tax System. Functioning countries (with large population centres such as Australia) are only functioning whilst global trade is freely operating and they rely on regular shipments and whatever stockpiles (usually 6-8months worth) to function. What happens when that fails (or runs out)? Anarchy! Huge volumes of people trying to take what they need from anyone with anything. That's literally a hell that 99% won't survive. In 2020 it was reported on the mainstream news that the country only had 18 days of diesel, 60 days of food and munitions for the army and 3 months of food for the public (via supermarkets). That was on the news on channels 7, 9, 10, ABC (2) and SBS. Even if that was fixed by the government and adequate stockpiles were made, what happens once those stockpiles run out if SHTF due to a world war or total global economic collapse? Nothing would be functioning. In the Caribbean, people are primarily self sufficient (especially for water and electricity, its not hard, it just takes planning and preparation) and where something needs to be imported they import from other CARICOM countries, the EU (the Schengen Zone exists in the Caribbean) or, North or South America. Honestly those small islands will likely be the safest places as everyone is prepared and everyone knows everyone. As for Australia, its the last place to be in such a situation, thanks to moronic governments over the last 30 years, Australia manufactures basically nothing (too expensive and too many pointless OHS laws and licences that make both compliance and cost of compliance not worth doing business) and imports 95% of everything. Between the fires, floods, '2020 thing' restrictions and farmers being paid to not farm and instead either do nothing or plant trees, there are huge shortages of food and farmers quitting farming. If you're in Australia, you better grow your own fruit and veg and have some animals such as chickens (for both eggs and food) and other animals you can eat (be aware that rabbits won't sustain you longterm as they lack a vitamin humans need). Oh and thanks to Australia's moronic over regulation of everything, unless you live in the middle of nowhere you're severely limited in generating and storing your own power - grid connection (mandatory unless in the middle of nowhere) limits your generation and storage to the point of not being worth doing. As both and Australian citizen and a survival expert who specialises in extreme survival scenarios and training (to "approved" organisations and government entities, not the general public) Australia is the last place I would recommend anyone be in a SHTF scenario. Too many large centres of population, no ability to be self-sufficient and too many pointless rules that get in the way of self-sufficiency.
    4
  146.  @markuswunsch  The problem with that logic is the type of people who move away from the US don't benefit from the passport as they usually have other passports on which they do the bulk of their travel. In CANZUK / CUNA where a person is a dual or multi-national, a passport such as a US passport only serves as a way to leave the US, it has zero use beyond that and the benefit of being able to simply leave the country isn't sufficient to justify taxing people just because they're citizens. The US passport does very little for people outside of the US. It loses access to countries every year, it basically bans you from banking abroad and only makes people targets for hate based on how the rest of the world see the US (hint: very badly outside of CANZUK/CUNA as the remaining countries are commonly bullied by the US when it taxes, information sharing, CRS, AML/KYC, etc.). A US passport holder trying to get a visa to countries outside CANZUK / CUNA will be given a stupid run-around and a heap of paperwork or they'll be denied because it would mean excessive reporting by the other country (the same reason non-US banks don't want US citizens at all). In some EU countries, try booking a hotel with a non-US passport and compare the treatment to someone using a US passport; the non-US passport will get nicer treatment and the staff will be more helpful. Whilst I can't speak for the US on social security payments abroad, the people who are both on this channel and who leave the US are the same people who'll never be entitled to even apply for social security due to their net worth being too high. Its only the EU where any EU citizen who's paid tax in the EU can get a pension (more tax paid = more pension) regardless of their net worth.
    4
  147. 4
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151.  @Justplanecrazy25  Nothing tinfoil hat about the fact that many companies are trying to stop you printing certain things through both their software and on their printers (with firmware implemented checks). Whilst currently some companies are only trying to stop 'weapons' and 'illegal' things from being printed, how long until it becomes anything the moment an IP content claim is filed? It wouldn't even be a difficult change to implement - they'd just have to identify the 'part' and push an update to the software and/or firmware for every IP content claim. Even currently, there's major issues with printing screws and picatinny rail on some brands of 3D printers as the software and firmware considers those things to be 'firearm/weapon parts', completely ignoring that picatinny rail is commonly used in the photography/videography industry as a common mounting rail. Thankfully Creality are a good brand that are happy to let you just print whatever you want, their printers work locally by USB or LAN, no cloud required. Creality also don't try to limit or restrict what you print - as far as they're concerned, its your job to remain legal regarding what you print. That's how it should be. Given every country and even sometimes states within countries have significantly different laws and thus just because something is illegal in one place, doesn't mean it isn't perfectly legal in another. I love the Creality K1 Max - its a great printer at a far better price than the Bambu offerings. Now that Creality have their CFS for the K2, they're basically the go-to for 3D printers that treat you as an adult and don't force you to cloud BS.
    3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. I doubt it, especially as they're increasing their due diligence process. For what you get, its a great deal if you don't do business in Europe (otherwise they withhold taxes because Vanuatu is a tax haven) and/or if you want to actually live there because you work or do business in Oceania/Asia. Vanuatu is also great as the National Bank of Vanuatu and ANZ Bank (Australia & New Zealand Bank) are available in Vanuatu so ANZ will give you more options for banking and credit cards that will work in most places than you'll find in other parts of the world. One thing that I personally think many people put too much emphasis on is visa-free access to Europe. ETIAS is mandatory from this year for non-EU citizens and has many restrictions such as point of entry and point of exit must be the same and isn't that much harder to get than a Schengen Visa (for tourism). Just because a passport has visa-free access to the EU doesn't really benefit you much as you're limited to 90 days (3 months) in a 180 day (6 month) period subject to you being a tourist (absolutely no work of any type permitted) and then you must leave. Sure all you have to do is get an ETIAS (if your passport is visa-free to the EU) or a Schengen visa (if you don't have visa-free to the EU) but you're very limited to what you can and can't do. You can't legally rent or buy apartments or property, you can't do any form of "investing or investments", nor can you legally bank in the EU unless you're a citizen of an EU country or unless you enter the EU on a Business visa as banking is considered to be "investing or investments" and work! So I ask, what's so important about having visa-free access to Europe? Personally I think its become a big nothing since the ETIAS was introduced (it's a visa in all but name and the fact it doesn't get stuck into your passport, you print and carry it - its an EU equivalent of a US ESTA). Antigua & Barbuda have started considering whether or not to end their CBI program to keep their visa-free access to Europe as they see it as critical, even though its not. Losing EU access in my opinion would be a good thing as its one less excuse for the EU to use to demand that these CBI countries introduce high tax rates (50%+ like in Europe, Australia and New Zealand). If Antigua & Barbuda end their CBI program, given they are in CARICOM its highly likely that the rest of the Caribbean programs will end so I guess for those of us unable to currently afford CBI to Antigua & Barbuda we'll have to look to Vanuatu & other parts of the world or other ways of legally paying zero personal income tax. Unfortunately almost all of the Caribbean don't have any visas to go to start a business or invest and then work towards citizenship, its CBI or nothing which sucks!
    3
  167. 3
  168.  @user-bubstech  Unfortunately that's the problem. The environmentalists whinged to AU, NZ, CAN, UK and EU demanding that someone be responsible. The result is environmental regulations that make the manufacturer responsible for compliance breaches, because they're the ones with money to afford huge penalties and because companies in these places can't just vanish and come back under a different name as if nothing happened, they were the easy target. There's this govt mandated concept of "you made it, you're responsible for what it does to the planet" and whilst well intentioned, very easily backfires and causes many unforeseen consequences such as "a company must ensure spare parts be available until the product no longer exists" (the unintended consequence is how can a product be discontinued and then the company shut down or not keep making spare parts). This is why companies are getting people to "trade-in" the older products so they can quit making spare parts. Similar to the EU wealth register, there's a product register where companies have to provide the serial numbers of products sold and only a small 3% (broken and thrown out by consumer) allowance exists. For every device the company doesn't get back beyond that, they either have to keep producing parts for or keep enough in inventory for repairs (but aren't required to repair), or, they have the recently added option of paying a penalty per unaccounted for unit to be permitted to de-register the unit and cease stocking spare parts. There's a reason why the rest of the world calls the USA the "wild west of today" as the USA is one of the last least regulated places for business.
    3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. Most people who don't have hobbies are like that because of: * Excessive over regulation / licencing * Annual mandatory refresher/update requirements * Extremely expensive licences and permits that have onerous attendance/participation requirements in order to remain 'current' / to maintain * Lack of physical space to do the hobby or to store the required equipment - commonly you are required to own your primary residence or live in a family home (your parents' home) as a licence requirement (I got around that by not moving out of home as the cheapest house is $1 million 2hrs from where I live) * Lack of access - the govt in much of CANZUK & CUNA is closing public land 'to protect it' or 'to give it to the natives', resulting in no access to otherwise empty land you could be enjoying * Lack of $$$$ - over a period of 5yrs (every 5yrs) I'm forced to spend a minimum of $25000 just to be able to have and continue the hobbies I have - that's the licences, permits, update/refresher training and other regulatory costs. You then have to add the actual hobby costs on top of that. Hobbies are only for those that live in countries that aren't over-regulated nanny states, or, only for the rich as most people can't afford to have hobbies and definitely not their own house. One example of just how over-regulated CANZUK & CUNA are is that photography can only be of people, pets or plants. The moment you photograph any other animal you are legally 'hunting' as the definition of hunting includes the 'tracking, coursing and photography of game'. Thus suddenly the photography can be illegal - even if you have the correct hunting licences, you'd still be limited by the legislated seasons, hunting times and bag limits. Sounds stupid but that's the law - I know several people who were given 60 days jail for a first offence because they photographed wild deer without the appropriate hunting licences.
    3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. Generally speaking, any military obligations (except for some countries) only apply if you're resident/living in the country. Just be careful of where you become resident - some places require all who are legally residing to perform military service (except for foreign students), some don't. If you had a Caribbean passport, any EU passport or South American passport and a residence in the country of the passport, you were able to return home. This is why you need multiple homes as its the passport + the homes that give you options when the SHTF! As an Australian who's wanted to leave since 12th March 2020, those who couldn't come home are bloody lucky (if they have other passports that let them live abroad) as they're able to live life and subject to permits/visas, work and otherwise freely move around. It sucks having to watch everyone get on with life overseas (with the exception of a few crazy countries) whilst we're likely to have a new "manufactured" crisis as Dictator Dan's (Supreme Ruler of Danistan - formerly Premier of Victoria) permanent powers require a continued emergency for him to extend them within the next month and that requires a real-world crisis (case numbers will probably skyrocket magically as they did at every previous extension). Most businesses have gone under, the few that survived have a "skeleton crew" of staff, the costs of everything are going up and travel restrictions change with the wind as do the jab requirements (two inside the country, three to enter (if a resident or citizen) - two if a foreigner). Its likely to get much worse in Australia as NSW & QLD are having horrible floods, diesel prices are higher than all other fuels which is now pushing up food prices. Combine this with the floods, food shortages are likely. Also note that wages haven't kept up with inflation and cost of living for the last 26yrs in Australia and since the '2020 thing', welfare has skyrocketed which will result in ever higher taxes. The USA, CANZUK & Western European nutty "2020 thing lets go crazy" countries (Austria, Spain, etc.) are all done, the future is Central & Eastern Europe, the Baltics, the Balkans, Central and South America and the tax havens (Caribbean & Vanuatu, etc).
    3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219.  @TheAwesomeTolga198  Aside from the fact that the laws were changed around 2010 to permit suspension of passports for any reason, it's happened. People have been stopped from leaving Australia and New Zealand because they're skilled and have significant financial means because the govt don't want brain drains, people who've become specialists in skilled fields have been denied leave from Australia even for retirement because the government don't want brain drains - the ironic part is that but simply not working the brain drain still happens even if the people don't leave. There are plenty of people who have been stopped from leaving the US, AU, NZ and UK by suddenly getting tax audited over their political views and in Australia people have been "randomly" selected for jury duty two years in a row early in the year for a late in the year period even though if done in one year you're not legally able to be selected again for a year. I've had a few of the mentioned things happen to myself, the being refused from leaving because I'm an engineer, being suddenly slammed with audits and investigations even though I've been cleared and okayed every time, and I've been selected twice in a row for jury duty with selection in the beginning of the year for a period at the end of the year with backdated noticed of selection. All just to stop me leaving. The same has happened to colleagues and people from many of the clubs I'm in, even to people in those clubs that I don't know. Oh yeah and then there were the last few years where those with arts degrees and those over 50 were granted travel ban exemptions for parties, weddings and holidays but anyone under 50 and in a skilled profession was completely denied even if they had proof they were leaving and never coming back. Executive Traveller also had an article about it and plenty of people from Australia shared their experiences that went back as far as 2016
    3
  220. 3
  221.  @arthursondheim2255  I can't go into details as I only know what I saw and what I've personally experienced. Note that these things didn't all happen in the same year, it was over about a 10 year period, so not often but still relevant and when it happened in Central Europe it was 2018. I've seen it happen in France (at a hotel business centre), a few countries in Central Europe (at a lunch spot the locals frequent - a friend recommended it to me whilst I was there) and the Baltic States (at a hotel lounge and at a hotel business centre), the UK (at a hotel business centre), Singapore (at a hotel lounge). Basically it can happen anywhere. When a country is either trying to stop illegal work (I'm guessing its usually based on tips and other intel) or when they assume that illegal work is happening but the only way to prove it is to check ID's and see what people are doing. Its nothing to worry about as if you either have the correct visa, other official entitlement to work (some Commonwealth Countries have some agreements that permit some limited work without a visa for their citizens when in certain other Commonwealth countries), or happen to be a citizen of that country or (if within the Schengen Zone) a citizen of a Schengen country you won't be breaking the rules. Just remember, if you enter a country as a tourist DON'T do ANY work and you'll be fine. Every time I've seen these checks being done and some arrests being made I've never had an issue as I have a passport from an EU country within the Schengen Zone, a passport from a Commonwealth nation, a passport from a small country that's little heard of, and, I only work in countries that I have the legal right to do so. When I was traveling in Central Europe I was working over lunch at a local lunch spot, the police came in and politely asked for ID's from anyone they saw working (laptop, tablet, forms, etc. visible), I simply showed my passport from a country within the Schengen Zone and I was fine as my passport being from a country within the Schengen Zone (the same country that I have a passport from) permits me to work and live in the Schengen Zone. It was one of the only times I've ever been told "sorry for the inconvenience" by the police, usually I just get my ID/Passport handed back to me and they walk away from me in other countries. When I was traveling in the Baltic States I was doing some work over lunch at the hotel lounge, some guy was on his laptop using the hotel wi-fi. When the police checked ID's everyone could hear the police telling a guy that he was a tourist and not permitted to work and that he was working illegally and that just because work is being done online doesn't mean its not work. They arrested him and that was all I know of that. When I was in Singapore I was having tea at the hotel lounge with those I was traveling with when the police did their ID checks - had no issue as it was obvious we weren't working unlike the guys 4 tables over who were clearly working and who didn't have visas (it was easy to over hear the arrest as the place was quiet and the policeman spoke rather loudly the moment he placed them under arrest). People forget that hotels and business centres are still bound by the same rules as anywhere else in whatever country they're in. Most places expect people to understand that a business centre is for work and should a person only want to check emails, they should be very clear about that when inquiring about access and use of a business centre. Also people need to remember that hotels will monitor their business centres and wi-fi to ensure that only those permitted to work perform work - serious penalties can apply to hotels that let people work illegally. All nomad capitalists need to always play by the rules. When people don't and countries catch them, they'll get in serious trouble and the rules will tighten for everyone else. Its literally the old "one person ruins it for everyone else"!
    3
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. @michaelmurano7813 Spoken like a true nut who's projecting their feelings and what they think of themselves on others. You clearly don't understand the whole "live to fight another day" and "you fight the battles that matter in order to win the war; you don't fight every battle". What's the point in staying when you're forced out of work through the industry being regulated out of existence, taxes increasing annually to cover the ever increasing welfare bill so scum who do nothing can live off your hard work, all whilst the masses (the scum on welfare) all want the system to stay as is because it means they don't have to do anything and they receive everything courtesy of the tax payers. In this situation, there is no way to politically fight this as the people don't want change and its you against the 98% - the system must collapse before any change can occur. Why get caught in the collapse when there isn't any need - i.e. why go down with the ship when there's plenty of space in the lifeboat? It takes millions of dollars (that most of us don't have) just to even get into politics and that's assuming the existing parties will permit you to register (most of the systems in CANZUK & CUNA require majority agreement from the existing parties to permit the registration of a new one). Now you'll only get at best 2% of the vote under ideal circumstances because the 98% don't want anything to change (except for things to get worse). So now you've achieved nothing, you're bankrupt and stuck with nothing and no options. You can no longer "live to fight another day", you have no ability to help effect change when the masses want it (in about 50yrs time). You're a real f***ing genius! We get that you're scared and unable to bring yourself to taste freedom. This is at least the 4th video on which you keep spouting your bullshit. Please go find your nearest socialist/communist club and avoid this channel as this channel isn't for cowards such as yourself.
    2
  239. 2
  240.  @Starlight36911  The problem is "made public" means mentioned the the Govt Gazette (comes out weekly and costs a lot). The sad reality is that unless you know exactly the bill you're looking for (i.e. the document number) you're gonna have a very hard time finding it until it becomes law. Once something is law there is zero way of getting it changed or removed with a petition. The govt tossed aside (without even accepting or acknowledging a petition with over 1 million signatures (the original petition against the GFNP) because the govt only does whatever it wants without any accountability. The fact is once law, all acts are required to remain in force without amendment for 5yrs - thus there is no way to remove or amend it before it becomes permanent (i.e. well and truly rolled out). This is why we're stuck with the 100% unworkable Professional Engineering Registration Act's in VIC, SA & NSW which has resulted in Australia buying completed engineering projects from overseas (that way the work isn't done for or provided to Australia, a completed product (not custom) is purchased). The other problem is that even if by some miracle a petition was accepted and heard, only SFFP, Libertarians, One Nation and a few independents (Roberts, Katter, Babet, etc.) would support such a petition. Literally everyone else supports and wants Digital ID. There literally aren't enough people on our side to get any change for the better. The cause are all the nutcases who voted for the filthy commies that are Labor. Its the 99% who screwed us all and like Yuri Bezmenov says "they won't accept the truth until the boot is on their neck and they're getting executed by the state, only then will they wake up and see the tyranny they brought to life". They are demoralized nutcase "true believers" who vote for commies because their family always have. They're so brainwashed that they're completely oblivious to the fact that in the late 80's early 90's, the "u" got dropped from Labour and it became Labor. "Labor" being the new Australian Communist Party comprised of members of the old Australian Communist Party.
    2
  241. @carlosvalero7638 I've seen you spam this stupid comment on all the recent Nomad Capitalist videos. Clearly you're a leech who lives on welfare from the govt, so you don't want your money to dry up because you'd then have to actually work for money. Why should anyone pay taxes? After all they work hard for their money and are already forced to spend close to half their wage on living expenses, when you factor in half being taken by the government, they're left with nothing. What did the government do to earn that money? Nothing. Also, we get nothing for our taxes in the high-tax countries. Anyone who's in the top 3 tax brackets has to 100% pay-to-play. What I mean is you have to pay for everything, there is nothing in the way of 'public' services that you can use, you're forced to blow thousands of dollars each year on private health insurance or face even higher tax penalties (higher than the private health insurance). You are banned from seeing a public doctor once you have private health insurance so you're paying a lot to see a doctor and should you need to go to a hospital you're stuck going to private hospitals. Your driver licence and annual vehicle registration, as well as your council rates (a type of property tax) pay for the roads, as does the fuel excise (fuel tax), so that's already paid. Oh and all new roads are toll roads so you're paying twice for the same road, except the tolls are forever as the govt love the sales tax they get from every toll so they infinitely renew the toll operator contracts. You can't send your kids to public school as that's only for the poor leeches, you have to send your kids to private schools, the same private schools the govt and the leeches whinge are 'elitist' and should be closed. Your power, water and gas bill all pay for the utility infrastructure and for all the parks and gardens - its literally itemised on the bill. You want to have a hobby, well that means doing govt courses, getting government licences, doing mandatory update/refresher training, and having to register all your sport equipment for any sport deemed 'hazardous' (rock climbing, bushwalking, hiking, etc.) or where the equipment could be used as a weapon (anything involving bats/clubs). You don't even get a free passport for all the taxes you get forced to pay. A passport is like $500 but nope, the government demand you pay for that as well. What exactly do we get for our taxes? Absolutely nothing! Oh and the real kicker... its NEVER enough, the scum always want more. Look at Australia for example, they're now getting ready to increase all the current taxes and they're preparing to introduce new taxes because the place is completely broke. The worst part is the government have just announced they're about to start several projects that will cost hundreds of billions of dollars that they don't have. Funny how that's timed to match the higher and newer taxes. Current rates there (incl. the most basic living expenses being considered as a tax) come out to 75% of your annual income, maybe it'll be 100% by Christmas 2025. So tell me, you leech, what exactly does anyone get for paying their taxes, because normal members of society expect to NOT be extorted infinitely, and they expect to see what their money is spent on, and for taxes to reduce as the problems are dealt with, yet that NEVER happens.
    2
  242. @BjornAndreasBull-Hansen Currently CANZUK & CUNA are trying to ensure that people are effectively stuck in their countries as they're stopping them from leaving. Basically they're taking a two-pronged approach to keeping them 'stuck': 1. Electoral Rolls - By having more elections, more often, the electoral rolls (where voting is mandatory) are frozen for a period that begins a month or two before the election, ending the day after the election. This means that you can't change your details, or get removed from the electoral roll (if you move overseas) whilst the rolls are frozen. This effectively stops you from leaving as its getting harder to get off the electoral rolls. 2. Jury Duty - They are now abusing the Jury Duty system to ensure you can't leave. What they're doing is issuing a 'Notice of Selection' in the end of the year, for a large period in the next year. This effectively traps you where you are as you aren't allowed to leave the state or the country until AFTER the period is over. Then any time they'll 'exempt' you from being called again will be short and almost over as they back-date the 'exempt from being called again' to the date they sent (the date on the letter) the 'Notice of Selection'. This means that in 4yrs you can be called 3 times. Basically, this all ensures that the 2.5yr process of leaving the country permanently can't be done as the combination of the two methods I've mentioned effectively means that you're trapped in the country and every year is a 'write-off'. Its sick, demented and sadly the BS happening to me. Every time anything is going well, or I'm literally ready to go these two things keep me trapped. Now I've just had 2025 written off as both the methods are happening to me in the one year. I honestly see no point in doing anything anymore because I can't keep wasting years of my life, but to do otherwise would mean jail as I can't avoid Jury Duty (leaving the country permanently isn't a reason to be 'excused' once given a 'Notice of Selection', nor is being self employed without an ABN (the ABN isn't needed to be self employed, however to be 'excused' from Jury Duty you NEED an ABN which means turnover >$75k per year to be eligible for an ABN)), and staying is pointless as that gets me nowhere. The result is those of us stuck where we are are hurting financially, whilst our time and efforts are being wasted getting nowhere. This is 100% part of their "you'll own nothing and be happy" BS as its a great way to mentally break people and to financially break people.
    2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. You're 100% correct about CO2, I've been saying the same ever since they started claiming it was bad. Farmers add nitrogen to the soil via multiple means to improve soil fertility. One method is to pump nitrogen into a sealed mixer that contains soil under pressure, the easiest way is to add nitrogen rich fertiliser to the soil or to mix pelletised nitrogen into the ground and add water to trigger the pellets to release nitrogen. The Vostok Ice cores showed that high CO2 levels caused plants to have approximately 5x more biomass and the planet to have more breathable air and cooler global temperatures. The same ice cores also showed that high methane levels caused the exact opposite. They also showed that global temperature fluctuations were caused by the sun (the biggest thing that effects our planets temperature) and that during the middle ages the planet was on average 10-15 degrees Celsius hotter than currently but with 2x the plant biomass. There's a reason that they quit talking about the ice cores around the time they start this climate hysteria - the ice cores prove the climate hysteria to be false. Its all about control, power and global depopulation - all to be carried out by unelected nutty "elites" from the WEF. The whole "CO2 bad, Nitrogen bad" crap is to justify global depopulation as less CO2 = smaller plants which means less breathable air, more dust and pollution and fewer people. Remember the Georgia Guidestones' point "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature." - according to the MSM we're at 8+ billion, approx 7.5 billion too many according to the elites. We are the carbon they want to reduce.
    2
  284. This bullshit needs to end. We all have a right to privacy. Just because we have privacy doesn't make us criminals. I guess everyone should only use privacy coins and P2P transactions or non-KYC exchanges, all over VPN and encrypted connections. What gets me is that in most places (such as Australia) crypto isn't an asset or income, its a special class of its own subject to stupidly high tax rates which are supposedly justified because "you didn't have to work hard for it and shouldn't be able to profit without working". As a result, between the paperwork nightmare and the stupid taxes on crypto, its utterly pointless to be involved with crypto in Australia. What's the reason behind high taxes, the govt screwing over crypto and trying to ban it all? The reason is the elite don't want anymore rich people, they want to kill us all by bankrupting us and starving us out so there are more resources for them. Taking the food first would be too obvious and would "rock the boat" too much so they start with the money; pushing us to "owning nothing and being happy", then the food costs too much and starts to become scarce. What we need is a tax free country to permit highly qualified and skilled people to be able to move and naturalise as citizens subject to starting a business and creating jobs and technology that benefits the place. Sadly the only option is to have large amounts of money to do CBI. The idea is that the tax free country could become the greatest success globally and show the world just how well being tax free and prosperous any country could be if they follow the same pattern. Basically an opposite of the OECD and their goals. Sadly, being not rich and stuck (barred from leaving till the end of the year due to govt shenanigans and their use of legal procedures to delay) in Australia (the 4th highest taxed country in the world), there aren't options to leave and due to the current migrant situation caused by the war in Ukraine, Europe doesn't have jobs or opportunities left so its not even a temporary option. The issue most will face is governments trapping them inside their countries and financially crippling them from leaving or being successful. Australia will break you every 6 months with new qualifications, courses, competencies (short courses), new experience requirements and other bullshit so you're always stuck learning or 'updating' your training instead of working.
    2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. Very simple - any border passport control that can scan modern passports, can search you name, date of birth and biometrics against the entire database. Passports are registered in the database as being valid, but they also need to be activated. If you've ever had one sent to you via a consulate you'll have likely had to "activate" it online before being able to use it. Only registered and activated passports can be used. If you've only ever had the passport from the country you live in, it will be registered and activated before being sent to you as it doesn't need to cross national borders. The reason that when you get a passport through a consulate, you need to activate it is because the passport crosses many borders and should it be stolen from diplomatic pouches as its not activated - the activation details are only paired with the passport when the consulate sends the passport the last bit to you. If you've ever admitted all your nationalities on a govt form or visa waiver, or as a AML/KYC process or as a "due diligence" process, ALL of those nationalities will be listed under your details and the system will prioritize seeing which of those countries passports are held. When passports are scanned the guard / officer see's everything. Most financial institutions & anyone who can perform AML/KYC with passports, can search the same databases (with read only permission) so they'll find everything that's been divulged. There's times where honesty can backfire - sometimes its best to compartmentalize things if you have major threats against you or your freedom. Remember, once you've given out info willingly, its out there and you can't withdraw it.
    2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. Just like we've all seen over the last few years (2020 till now), the regimes will simply change the definitions to suit their needs. There won't be a collapse, just a transition to an absolute hell of a dystopia the likes of which is seen in all the great dystopian movies and probably similar to like whats portrayed in the districts in the Hunger Games (minus the games). Look at the current financial situation, fiat currencies are tanking in terms of belief and value yet because regimes change the definition of 'inflation', the bullion prices are beginning to tank because under the new definitions the dollar is doing better. As interest rates go up (a pathetic attempt to stop hyperinflation which won't work as too much money has already been printed) the new definition of 'inflation' now forces house prices up whilst bullion goes down. They are rigging the game to keep the poor, poor, to make the middle class poor and to keep the mega rich, mega rich. This is the deciding point in history where your current situation will be set in stone for your family into the future as long as the powers that be maintain their power. If you think this is BS, ask yourself, why are they banning crypto (regulating it to have no anonymity and to be not worth using, trading or holding is as good as a ban)? Because it would allow the average person to be free and to become rich. Look at universities - they don't want you doing actual research, they want you to simply rehash whats already been discovered until you do a PhD (which most people never do) - everyone else isn't permitted to do actual research because we can't be allowed to ever have solutions as only perpetual crisis enable totalitarian control and monitoring. Look at their attempts to devolve us by stopping us from eating red meat - the key thing that makes and keeps us intelligent. The list goes on... The WEF are behind it all!
    2
  299. 2
  300.  @ddake9810  You're still choosing to ignore the truth that the economy is completely stuffed and you still want to blame the "youth" as if they're to blame - its those who are 50+ who caused the shit-show, who pushed the commie welfare crap and socialist crap as teachers and politicians. I have zero debt (always avoided it and never had it), have lived on a tight budget since I was 6yrs old (that's when my education in finance, savings and investments began as per family tradition that goes back centuries in Italy) and rely on no one other than myself. I've worked for basically nothing and only got a good wage when I was able to be self-employed. I will most definitely tell you about high prices - the cost of living has tripled since 2020 - yeah the same food items I've always eaten have tripled in cost. That's solely thanks to the govt, all the climate taxes and the ""2020 thing" has caused shipping to be expensive and cause shortages" BS that the govt keep lying about along with the govt forever letting the utility companies continuously increase the "service charges". The govt do this because it means more GST for the govt - the govt love high prices. I only eat at home unless invited to an event, my phone is 8yrs old and I've never just bought products for the sake of it. The people who pushed the prices so high are 100% the govt. People pay the high prices because they have zero choice. You either buy whats available or you go without. Want to grow food? Guess what - most people don't have backyards and are very limited as to what they can grow. Unless you have a farm you won't be having any animals/livestock of any kind due to lack of space and govt regulations. You claim that people are impatient - nope, people still have to eat - the basics have tripled in cost whilst wages continue to remain stagnant as they've been for the last 20yrs! As for your comments about houses - yes the prices are insane but the govt love that as it means they get more in Stamp Duty, GST, Capital Gains and Council Rates. During the "2020 thing" more houses were sold than ever before, the buyers were all foreign investors. Locals have been priced out for the last decade. Sadly building more is NOT the solution as that only results in the loss of farmland as the cities infinitely sprawl onto prime farmland - they never expand into the desert-like crappy farmland, and more foreign investors. The only solution is to ban foreigners from owning homes and only letting citizens own homes - this is why Europe is still affordable for citizens. House prices by law can't reduce. The under-quoting laws go as far as making it illegal for anyone to sell a property for anything less than the current average market value. This was done intentionally by the govt as all they care about is tax revenue, they never look at the long term picture. The only way house prices could reduce would be if for many years (5-10) every house sold for 5-10% less than they're worth - this would push prices down but would still result in govt investigations as to why the properties sold for less than they're worth and owners could be hit with penalties. Also, its 100% illegal to build your own house yourself, the govt requires you to use licenced builders for all of it. DIY has been long banned. Think I'm full of shit, come to Australia and see it for yourself. Its also the same in Canada, New Zealand and the UK.
    2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. And on top of Russia only delivering half as much as needed, you have countries like Australia who have reduced local supply, put the price through the roof and are focusing on export to countries that already have natural gas because the government prefer to export to everywhere at a loss to get 'foreign' money, instead of letting locals use it at reasonable prices. It all ties into the whole "green" movement who want the middle class gone and us living worse than animals. When Australia was about to have no power on the east coast last two weeks, the government refused to even put one more coal-powered generator back online as an emergency measure, they then declared that they'd be taking a coal powered power plant offline in December this year whilst also declaring that we'll have more dependence on electricity (new push for EV's and electric cook-tops) and now we're facing huge power shortages this summer. It's all about reinforcing the old "rulers" and "slaves/peasants" system from before the feudal system - "you'll own nothing and be happy". Not sure if it happens in Austria but in Australia, if you use less power, your power bill doesn't reduce due to increases in "service/connection/maintenance charges" as the private companies who control the services refuse to not make less money than the previous bill. What we all globally need is a movement to force governments to let us disconnect from the power grid as long as we can show we can be power independent for our needs. In Australia, if you're connected to the power grid, you're limited to how much solar can be generated and stored on your property, even if the solar system isn't connected to the grid.
    2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. Here's the problem with right to repair - it actively enables the theft of IP and the illegal cloning of products that took a heap of R&D and a heap of money to create. Just a schematic can reduce the time to create a cheap clone by 90% as the software side of things is very easy. As an independent hardware and software developer, how am I supposed to recover even my R&D costs and make some profit if I have to release the key information? Its literally not possible. If I release the schematics and/or source code then I've just thrown away what is usually years worth of R&D worth a lot of money as it will 100% be cloned and sold at the cost of manufacture. Once source code is released there goes work that can't be further developed. I've written software that works faster, that's smaller and more secure than its competitors - if the source was released those competitors would have all their work done for them and my work would be for nothing. What the solution could be is if schematics were released once a product and its close evolutions are all fully discontinued and patents expired. The other issue is that even if this occurred, the source wouldn't be released as source is significantly commonly reused, adapted and optimised and thus would still be in use in other products. Without the source, most modern hardware is useless as 95% of the "magic" happens in the source, not in hardware. I've been on both side of the issue and I feel that those who demand "right to repair" fail to understand what its like to be on the other side - it reminds me of the extreme end of the opensource community who believe that everything should be open and free and that people will magically "donate" to the developers even though in reality this rarely happens and never covers the R&D costs plus some profit. If things are free, no one ever pays because why would they - it'd be stupid to do so. At the end of the day, costs need to be recovered, profits need to be made as a result of having done the hard work creating, and, food needs to be kept on the table. Giving everything away doesn't do any of this yet life and stuff all costs money.
    2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338.  @brightonbabe2139  On the immigration side of things, your situation was different to what I was talking about, you chose to be legal via visas, and you chose to leave for work which extended your timeline. That's different to doing it illegally and claiming to be a "refugee" after shopping around countries. Also, you work, you didn't seek to be a welfare bludger. Regarding your claims about 'what you get for your taxes': Be successful and work your ass off for a high income and you get nothing for your taxes. Everything becomes 'pay to play' just like in the USA. Australia rewards the useless bums who earn next to nothing. Those who work throw half their wage away as income tax and mandatory super (something those born after 1975 will basically never be allowed to access if well off). In order to not get further reamed by excessively high MediCare levies, one MUST have private health insurance which keeps you out of the public system. Be successful and you're paying for public school (only the brokies get it for free) - the days of free public education for everyone is long gone due to 'means-testing'. If you're deemed successful then the 'suggested' fees suddenly become mandatory. Successful people need their children to be actually educated which requires sending them to private schools where they are actually educated on history, finance, business, etc. - all stuff that the public system intentionally NEVER teaches. Then there's all the other levies such as bushfire recovery levy, fire services levy, '2020 thing' levy, etc. which all add up quickly, along with council rates, CGT, Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT), unrealized gains tax, just to name a few others. This is the reality for anyone who works their ass off. Your comparison is very flawed as it either only looks at income tax or it only looks at a brokie (someone on <$45k before tax). As more people who are successful get sick of being taxed to death and leave, the ones remaining are forced to pay even more to maintain the welfare state. If you're successful, you factor in all taxes and levies (including professional registration/licencing and continuing professional development (mandated by registration/licencing systems in order to remain registered/licenced)), a very basic 'cost of survival' (minimum food and drink), mandatory super (which if not mandatory would be part of your wage, and that those born post 1975 will likely never be able to access, and if and when they do it gets taxed as income). You quickly realize that you're paying what is effectively 75% tax just to exist because you work your ass off and are successful. So what do you actually get for all the taxes you pay? Literally just to have recreations/hobbies I have multiple licences and have to obtain permits throughout the year. All that costs a lot of money and requires a lot of 'jumping through hoops' because the govt have regulated basically everything with courses, licences, memberships and fees. And people wonder why I'm leaving as soon as I have scraped together enough to do so. Australia is a twisted, horrible tax hungry hellhole that destroys peoples lives simply because it can. Successful people get literally nothing for all the taxes they are forced to pay, and those taxes are INCREASING EVERY SINGLE YEAR.
    2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. Because they're starting. If they go slowly the 99% won't notice. If they do it all at once they will notice and will complain. Current measures include: * Closing roads * Narrowing roads * Adding bike lanes and eliminating parking * Eliminating parking * Making the CBD 30km/h - nothing to do with safety, it was fine at its old 60km/h (people actually looked before stepping out), now they're all glued to their phones because 'speed limit is low at 30km/h' * Pricing people out of parking and carparks (govt controlled taxes) * Ever reducing speed limits - most 50km/h zones are now 40km/h and will be made into 30km/h in 2025. Highways are now 100km/h and freeways are now 80-90km/h. ALL ramps that were made for moving traffic at 100km/h are now 80km/h * Every new dogbox (unit) that gets built means less parking and the streets get narrower as the nature strip magically widens * Every development that's built (that are giant or new suburbs) is built as a 15-minute city * Most places that used to have multiple ways in and out now only have one way in and one way out (easier to control / lockdown) * ALL new developments have only one or two points of access where in the past there'd be many (easier to control / lockdown) * The highways and freeways have the dangerous and banned in the rest of the world cable barriers that commonly block-off the shoulder so that people are stuck on the highway/freeway with no way of turning around like they used to have * ALL traffic lights have been intentionally put out of sync so that traffic congests - a common way to try to annoy people into giving up driving * ALL speed limits are being reduced on major roads so the govt can revenue raise as its easy to do the old limit and get booked - it has nothing to do with safety * Many roads in suburbs are now only open from one end for vehicle access - this is dangerous, discourages vehicles and intentionally annoys everyone whilst creating a traffic maze * Speed-humps being installed everywhere just to "slow everyone down" - 'traffic calming' is a way to get people to quit driving The longer it takes people to do the things they used to, the more rage people form - that creates road rage which justifies tyrannical laws and 'being tough on crime', it encourages people to speed (easy $$$ for the govt) as they don't have time to waste on stupidly low speed limits that used to be higher and everything was safe. It also gets some people to quit going out because its become too hard to get anything done so they don't drive and don't see anyone. Even I've noticed that the time to do the things I always do has doubled due to all the above mentioned points. The result is I do 50% the work (can't move around fast enough anymore) but charge triple the money for my trouble. Its like the old 'boiled frog' thingy. If the frog is thrown in boiling water it screams and dies (but it noticed the water was boiling). If the frog is put in the water and the water is slowly warmed, it won't notice until just before it dies. Or as the Chinese say 'death by a thousand cuts' - one cut doesn't do much but many collectively do.
    2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362.  @bcreason  Utter rubbish. The faster a battery charges, the hotter it gets (risking thermal runaway) and the shorter its life gets - this also happens when you get the percentage outside the 'goldilocks' range (generally >32% and < 86%). As for range, that can only happen by having significantly larger batteries (or higher density) but that comes at both cost and increased weight. The so-called 'lightweight batteries' are no where near being viable for EV's (not in the next decade) and given that EV's don't get lighter the lower the battery percentage gets, the weight is working against you. Its literally similar to why rockets need insane amounts of fuel for their relatively short trip to get from the ground into space. ICE vehicles get lighter the more fuel they use, thus retaining more range longer than an EV. Not to mention that the battery loses some percentage if left in the cold or in the heat. ICE vehicles can be left at 50% fuel (assuming a fuel stabilizer is used) and when you come back 6 months later, they're still at 50% fuel, and they still start. Good luck trying that with an EV - the batteries just don't work that way. Oh and EV's can't tow heavy trailers, nor can they tow even light ones long distances as the battery drops rapidly. In Australia they've proved all this, and that the range is significantly worse than the ICE counterparts in multiple like-for-like comparisons, and they had to admit this albeit begrudgingly on national news. Lastly, EV's can NEVER be cheaper than ICE vehicles due to the cost of the battery, the insane hazard regulations that affect creation, use and disposal of the batteries, not to mention the cost to replace batteries that are very difficult to swap (i.e. they don't just drop out) as they have to be key structural components for the chassis to be street legal. Not to mention the taxes that EV's and their batteries will have due to the giant carbon footprint they have from cradle to grave which is NEVER offset over the life of the vehicle - anyone that claims otherwise hasn't looked at the true footprint of modern ICE vehicles that can be 100% recycled (modern vehicles have gone back to lead acid batteries because they are 100% recyclable) unlike EV's. The circuit boards on EV's are all potted (thanks OHS) and can't be recycled, the batteries can't actually be recycled - they shred them and store the pieces. There is no safe or efficient way to recycle them, and if shredded, the mangled bits can't be separated to be recycled so there's another environmental disaster waiting to happen. Oh and regarding cost, I'm intentionally ignoring subsidies as that isn't making them cheaper, its taking your money and returning it to a significantly smaller group than it was taken from, and calling it a subsidy. So no its not making anything cheaper, its stealing from the many to give to the few. You are simply repeating the same EVangelist nonsense that is spewed out every day. Its just like that moron Al Gore who's been claiming that 'the world is ending' for decades and every time he's proven wrong he just pushes the date back another 5 or 10 years. Ironically his BS about seas levels rising has been proven 100% false, and he and Gates are both buying seafront properties. What has happened in some Pacific Islands is that they have experienced erosion by the sea because they can't afford counter-measures and because them being eroded away fits the 'sea levels rising' narrative. Australia could easily fix the erosion issues in the Pacific Islands but instead they offer those countries 'Climate Change Visas' because the narrative is more important than admitting the 'Climate Change' lies are actually 100% lies.
    2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. Regarding productivity when working from home and the amount of work: People who have self-discipline are far more productive at home. The reason that they can do 5 days of work in 3 days when working from home is because they don't have to waste time getting up early so they can do a 2hr commute (that means 3ish hours less sleep) that costs significant money, they don't have to listen to 'Tom' telling 'Mike' about his weekend or evening loud enough to be distracting, they don't have to attend a stupid amount of meetings that serve no purpose other than for management to look 'busy' - meetings should only happen where there is a true need and the only people required should be those who are directly needed/affected. Nor do they need to sit in a depressing work cubicle in a completely uncomfortable chair and environment (usually too hot because 'feminazis'). Also, many people have their reference materials (the good ones) always at home as they don't want them damaged, stolen or otherwise unavailable by having them in the workplace - companies commonly don't get the good reference books/materials and when sacking people those books/materials are rarely, if ever packed up as the belongings of the fired employee because they know there's SFA that the fired employee can do about getting their books back. Plus, being more rested by not having to waste time getting up early and commuting, having less stress about paying bills (the actual paying of them as many can't be done online), and having a far better and more comfortable work environment, people are actually more productive, more relaxed and are actually getting more work done and as a result, earning more.
    2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385.  @arthursondheim2255  Regarding your thought experiment: Generally speaking, most entrepreneurs and executives that are traveling usually get the required work permits so they can travel, their country can sometimes have an agreement that permits a certain number of days of work without a visa, or as is more commonly the case, they have the rights to work where they travel without a visa (passport, etc.). Some CBI agents (usually lawyers) now offer the facility for companies to purchase citizenship by investment for directors and executives. Most companies these days who require staff to travel for work, will give hiring priority to those with an EU passport (especially from within Schengen) and those with one or two other passports. Basically the more a person can legally travel and work without the company having to get work visas, the better your chances of getting hired are (providing you're qualified for the job). As for the individual, most have the rights to work where they travel (as most people these days have an EU passport) - sure some might risk working without authority but they also risk travel bans, jail and they risk ruining it for the rest of us who do nothing wrong. Gone are the days of governments turning a blind eye to tourists doing some work - the more they seek taxes and the more they want to be seen to be tough of border security and crime, the more they monitor and look for those breaking the rules. To be honest, the things you mentioned can either be automated, wait until you get back or can be done air-side at most airports (one of the few places people can work with minimal issue as airside is technically both in the country and not at the same time (just make sure you're allowed to transit without restriction). When using hotel, airport or public wi-fi, one should always use a good non-logging VPN whilst adhering to all the rules of a tourist. Some parts of Europe even go as far as requiring those without work rights to present ID against which they wi-fi access is logged when using hotel and cafe wi-fi. I know that when I travel, I only travel where I can work. The few times I travel anywhere I can't work, I make sure I'm 100% a tourist and catch up on work once back somewhere I can work. Disconnecting from work is great - too many people never take a holiday away from work!
    2
  386. Hopefully the world will wake up to reality and realise what Poland has known for centuries about Russia - they always want war and peace is never an option and never will be to Russia. You can only have peace when both sides want peace. Russia has never wanted peace. Russia fabricated problems by moving Russian citizens into areas with orders to cause trouble and then claim they're being oppressed so as to justify invading. This is what Russia did in the two occupied areas of Georgia, this is what they did in Crimea and what they did to justify invading Ukraine. Russia has never been able to live in peace, anyone they think they can invade, they do just that. Heck, Kazakhstan is basically under full Russia control since the protests a year ago. If Russia wanted peace they wouldn't have gone in torturing, mutilating and raping innocent civilians, they do that because Russians are nothing but animals who enjoy harming others. The only thing we can hope for is that the whole world wakes up to the reality that things will only get worse unless Russia is completely defeated, otherwise this will never end - it'll drag on forever. Ukraine is a sovereign nation contrary to what Russia says, Russia says its a "state of Russia not a country". Ukraine has been an independent sovereign nation since the fall of the Soviet Union. If all of the EU actually went to war with Belarus and Russia and flattened Minsk and Moscow, this whole problem would be dealt with. Sadly that is what its gonna take for this crap to end as Russia won't stop until they flatten Ukraine, the Baltic States and Central and Eastern Europe. Putin has said many times that he wants to reform both the Soviet Union and the Tsarist Empire in terms of land he plans on conquering. Remember, it was Russia who claimed everyone was threatening them, even though not a single person was threatening them. The reality is no one cares about them, no one wanted to do business with them. This is what made Russia feel "threatened" [read: left out] and thus so as to feel important and included, Russia decided war and murder is the best option. Now Russia claims that the Baltics and Poland increasing their miltary capability is somehow a threat. Let's look at the facts: * Poland has never started a war with Russia or Belarus, nor have the Baltics * Russia has always been the aggressor * Whenever Poland and the Baltics have been left alone by Russia, none of them have wanted to invade Russia * The Baltics and Poland have said that if attacked they will do whatever they need to obliterate their enemies and maintain their borders and sovereignty. The single biggest threat currently are all the peace-nicks who think that nutcases such as Putin can be reasoned with or who think that Russia wants peace even though blind-freddy can see that they don't. My biggest fear is that if Russia isn't stopped before Putin gets his allies involved, he will cause WW3. Ukraine needs to be given the means to stop Russia and Ukraine needs its nukes back as Russia wouldn't touch Ukraine until Ukraine stupidly gave up its nukes. The MAD (mutually assured destruction) principle has once again been proven to be true. Ukraine will never surrender territory to Russia as that literally emboldens Russia that they can take and keep taking. The only option is for Russia to ship out the citizens they claim are "oppressed" and to leave Ukraine. Lastly, before anyone goes rambling on about me wanting WW3, I don't want WW3. I simply know history, I know how Russia works and why the only way to stop them is with force. Force is all they understand. Sometimes the only way to peace is by brute force and this is one of those times.
    2
  387. 2
  388. 1
  389.  @Lando-kx6so  It's just a valid recommendation based on the reality of the country from someone who's already there. I still fail to understand why people from developing countries still believe the propaganda about the "west" having opportunities when that's been nothing but lies and propaganda for the last 20yrs. The "west" is over regulated, the cost of compliance and doing things legally negates profits and benefits unless you're a multinational who can use offshore profits to prop up the part of the business in the "west". The cost of housing and the cost of living take up 90% of one's wage after taxes. The passports of western countries are getting weaker every year (losing access, govt's not caring about their citizens - abandoning them abroad because it was cheaper, etc.). ESTA for the USA and ETIAS for the EU will be focusing on all nationalities held by a person before granting permission to be a tourist, even if that person is a citizen of a "western" country so just getting a western passport won't expand any opportunities. Everyone I know who came to the west for a better life, struggled and barely got by until they got the passport, then, went overseas for a better and more affordable life as they got sick of trying to "make it" in the west and they've never since returned. The time invested VS reward doesn't make the west worthwhile. People are literally better off getting work visas or digital nomad visas to countries that aren't part of the west, earning money at low tax rates, and, then doing CBI for a good Tier A passport, as that is possible in less than 4yrs unlike the 10+yrs required to get a western passport. For the record, I'm not trying to change anyone's mind, I'm just trying to understand that other point of view as in my experience the west is collapsing yet many keep repeating the propaganda of "the west is opportunity and better" and only once they've learnt the hard way do they realise that instead of the "grass being greener on the other side", there "isn't any grass at all on the other side".
    1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. Abolishing the IRS and having a flat 30% sales tax is a great idea and easily implementable if done by the federal govt, especially given most people are using electronic payment methods these days. As for housing - building more won't do anything other than make everything worse. They're doing that in Australia and guess what, houses are getting more impossible to afford. Why? Because every time they build more housing or new suburbs, its always marketed as the "best thing ever" and priced according to the neighbouring areas plus a premium because its new and "fancy", no matter how average it is. This simply pushes the areas prices up by increasing local property values. Then to make it even worse, they let foreign companies and foreign investors (who aren't citizens or permanent residents) swoop in and buy it all up for insane prices which continues to push prices up. The only affordable property in Australia is in the countryside away from everything so if you need to work or buy food, good luck. Oh yeah, all these new developments are always done on the best farmland by increasing council rates (a type of property tax) so much that farmers have no choice but to sell. No farmers means no food but the govt doesn't care - they only look at the money they're making via the taxes they get from the development and sales (Stamp Duty, CGT, GST, etc.). Urban sprawl needs to stop - aside from destroying prime farmland, its abolishing the countryside. Cities are now so sprawled that they're becoming one. Its assumed that if the current urban sprawl continues in Victoria, Australia, that Kyneton will become a suburb of Melbourne by 2035.
    1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419.  @MadHeadzOz  I'm not making assumptions. The definition of "rich" reduces every bloody year. Its 7 people and yeah two earning a collective $85,000 before tax - for reasons I won't go into here, none of us qualify for any welfare, plus there's plenty more in need of it than us so it's never even been a thought even though we're all citizens since birth. I'm not spinning any story, I'm stating the facts of my life. I'm not whinging about it but mentioning it as too few people understand how politics of envy and the "the rich are bad" mentality only affects we the average person, never the actual rich. As for knowing how these bans would work - its easy, just look at the EU. They did it but guess who is exempt? The rich. The other point I was trying to make regarding boats is that bans will only affect the average person, the rich will always get around it or simply move somewhere else. I agree with you that the majority of aussie's are absolutely braindead when it comes to politics - I hate how they vote because of one policy without knowing the entire party platform; unfortunately that's the problem of them not giving a damn and having mandatory voting with fines for failing to vote. Most people have no clue about budgets or not spending all their money because they never get taught finance and budgeting at school. They also don't get taught how to do their taxes - they simply get told to go and pay an accountant even though their tax is generally extremely simple. Yes, people need to be responsible for themselves but over the last 30yrs the majority have found it easier to just blame everyone else than have any self responsibility.
    1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. They should only cut their price by 33% and abolish the requirement to have x amount in the bank - what's wrong with escrow or having the agent hold the money? The reason I say only by 33% is they are one of the only 0% PIT, 0% CIT countries in the world and they've successfully refused the rest of the world's demands to become a high tax country. No visa free to the EU or UK - boo hoo, it means nothing to anyone who can afford to do CBI. That access was only for tourism purposes - i.e. you couldn't work, invest or attend conferences - you need visas for those things unless you have citizenship to an EU country within Schengen. Everyone keeps acting like visa-free is so important. Literally anyone who can afford to do CBI already has another passport they can travel which is either an EU passport or has visa free for tourism to Europe. Returning to my other point, I understand that they don't take the money up front but their "you must have the donation amount plus x amount in the bank" makes it painful to do their CBI program. Literally every other program lets the agent hold the money or uses escrow and don't care how much you have in the bank beyond the CBI amount. In all seriousness, how many 0% PIT, 0% CIT countries actually exist that aren't run by radical and intolerant regimes... Only Vanuatu and Monaco, Dubai is now high tax... Sure a few other places have 0% PIT but they have CIT. Vanuatu's value is its tax status and its location - if you're from AU, NZ, Singapore, China, etc. and do business in Oceania, its ideal - zero tax, centrally located and a major shipping freight hub. Banking is ANZ or Vanuatu's national bank - if you're already with ANZ you only have to have your account moved to the Vanuatu branch. This is key as banking is the hardest part of any CBI - if you go to the Caribbean, your banking options are very limited as many aren't good or don't permit a lot of foreign transfers/payments. One thing that many people forget about CBI programs - the "west" - CANZUK & CUNA tolerate them but are making life harder as they only want high tax countries to exist so people can't "go where they're treated best" as too many people are leaving the "west". The EU has already declared that ANY CBI passport holder of any nationality known for doing CBI (Chinese, Indian, etc.) will all be required to get visas unless they have other passports that grant them visa-free as the EU claims, like the UK, that CBI was being used to sneak spies in. As for how they know who did CBI - all CBI programs submit information to the "west" as part of their reporting program, verification of the applicants current passports, also, there's a reason your place of birth is listed on all passports - this helps the EU & UK to enforce this restriction. Oh and once ETIAS starts, the EU will require all citizens of CBI countries to apply for Schengen Visas as citizens of CBI countries won't qualify for ETIAS. The only way that citizens of CBI countries can get around such a restriction is by being a citizen of a country that can use ETIAS or by being the citizen of an EU country.
    1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431.  @jjefferyworboys8138  Being highly regulated is the problem the moment they try to steal your money. As long as the money is legitimate and has been taxed, they have zero legal right to refuse to let you have your money yet what do we see weekly? Banks refusing withdrawals because they don't think any reason is "good enough" and to "protect us from getting robbed". I've heard the same BS from a bank who wouldn't transfer all my money to another bank (their primary competitor) "we're just protecting you from getting robbed" - had to get lawyers involved just to change banks by electronic transfer (bank to bank). I've watched a farmer (a personal friend) have his credit card declined (code 93 - violation) when he was legally buying ammo (essential for a farmer) - he had to pay cash; he then called his bank to find out why - their response "only criminals and the govt want ammo, there's no reason for "normal" people in society to have it and its so far outside our risk profile we're closing your account". That was a major bank in Queensland, Australia. He changed banks to a local smaller bank that's farmer friendly and hasn't had any issues since. Even electronic use of money is being strictly dictated by each bank with wokeness / ESG being the metric. This is communist BS and it needs to end. What anyone wants to do with their money isn't the business of the bank as long as the use is legal - last I checked wanting your money so you can put it in your safe at home or to spend however you want is perfectly legal. The real reason they do this crap under the excuse of "AML/KYC" is because they want to hold as much as possible because if they choose to "bail themselves in" then it becomes their money. If they wanted to retain customers they wouldn't be screwing us all around so much when it comes to our own money that's come from legal sources and been taxed. The main reason this crap is happening is "ESG" where they think its their job to be the f***ing moral compass of the world by dictating how you can spend your money and how you can move your money.
    1
  432. 1
  433. The fact they have 10 seats should worry you. The commies (greens) in Australia only had 3-5 seats 10yrs ago. It didn't take them long (about 6yrs) to get 14+seats and become a real threat. If you're wondering how such a meteoric rise was possible - its called "preferential voting". This system is used in Australia to ensure the elections are rigged. Leftwing nuts and commies from major parties form a heap of tiny single policy issue parties and make people think that these small parties aren't connected to the main ones. Given these tiny parties have no hope of getting elected, the preferential system lets them give their preferences to major parties via the secret "system flow preferences" that legally can't be publicly released supposedly so as to not confuse voters. This then enabled bullshit like Dictator Dan getting only 32% of primary vote but then getting 80% of the vote thanks to all the other rounds that the preference system has. This is how ALL Australian elections are rigged (there is no way not to preference anyone as a blank space is considered to be the next countable number after whats been written in) and why the only democratic countries that have real voting use first-past-the-post voting. In Australia people only vote because if you don't you'll get huge fines and/or end up in court (if you've been fined before). Oh and now they actively look at border force entry data and look for people who are hear legally but haven't registered to vote and they're fining them whilst also threatening jail time if they still refuse to enroll to vote.
    1
  434. Which is exactly why far-left commie BS and hating of the rich (i.e. anyone with $1 more than them) like happened in Venezuela shouldn't ever happen in any country. Any country dumb enough to do that BS utterly deserves what they get. Look at ZA & ZW - the way they treated the farmers because they were "white" and successful. The one's that survived fled as soon as they could, the rest were murdered. Now the two countries are begging for the ones that fled to "return and help them farm for food". Given how they were treated, why would anyone ever return - after all the countries can NEVER be trusted again. Similar things happened in the USSR and other countries behind the Iron Curtain - those that fled wouldn't even visit once the USSR and communism fell (not even to the countries that joined the EU). Many people have fled AU & NZ since the plandemic as insane restrictions crippled businesses that were online only because they weren't deemed "essential" until Stage 4 restrictions happened, and thus weren't allowed to operate. Many people have been regulated out of their jobs and many are sick to death of the annual "do an update / refresher course" BS that's required just to stay qualified - having a qualification isn't enough. Also, many are fleeing because taxes are going through the roof as the regimes in AU waste money that they don't have and are increasing and creating new taxes weekly. AU & NZ are collapsing and those that leave won't return (some might drop in only for a short visit once a year to see friends) because the regimes and the masses don't give a damn about anyone who's successful - such people are seen as the enemy, the "evil rich".
    1
  435. The reason so many people tell people that they'll 'regret leaving', that they're [insert literally anything bad / evil], or that they're trying to 'tax dodge', is because 99% of people are braindead sheep that run on 'crab-pot mentality'. Basically because they're too scared and cowardly to leave, so they project that onto everyone around them, because, 'if I'm going down with the ship, why shouldn't they'. Its like 'sunk cost fallacy' - they can't admit they're wrong because they've wasted too much money. We see the same BS with the morons who try to claim that we 'owe' society and the country because we 'benefited' from it - completely ignoring the fact that many of us had to pay for 100% of everything we wanted and haven't ever seen a single cent of our taxes back in any manner because the family is too well off and in the top tax bracket. Education, medical, living, recreations / hobbies, all pay to play unless you're completely broke and qualify for 'welfare'. Many of us have actually been hurt by the 'welfare' through numerous new levies (taxes under a different name), increases in taxes, and by being unable to leave the country because 'how dare people leave'. By not being permitted to leave, I'm missing out on many once-in-a-lifetime opportunities, missing out on finding a wife (none that are suitable are in the rathole of a country I'm stuck in), and being set-back financially by having to stay where I am. What's keeping me stuck... professional licence audits, licence audits, and jury duty - so far three times in four years! The country I'm stuck in - the 3rd world shithole that is Australiastan - a commie failed state that uses everything possible to stop engineers, scientists and doctors from leaving - first it was the plandemic travel ban, then licence audits and jury duty. I don't even know if I'll be able to legally leave before 2030 at the rate the scum are keeping me stuck here.
    1
  436. 1
  437.  @davidgoodnow269  Honestly, I'm not surprised to hear 600 rejections. Most businesses aren't hiring people as companies use job postings as free advertising. Most job boards won't charge a business (beyond the initial posting fee) until they find someone for the job. The job ad keeps the business name around. As for your suggestion of "strengthening" qualifications - that's only going to make it harder. Most businesses want the person with the least skills except for the exact skills the job requires. For example, in Australia, if a business wanted to hire someone for hydraulics and pneumatics, they wouldn't hire someone with a Diploma, Advanced Diploma or Degree in Engineering. They'd hire the person with the Cert 4 in Engineering (Fluid Power) as that person is only qualified in hydraulic and pneumatics and thus the business only has to pay the govt mandated award-based wage for a holder of a cert 4. This wage is significantly less than a higher qualified person. As for "how you can help a business by having skills you perceive them to want" - that doesn't help because most businesses don't want skilled people. They want an exact fit who they can pay peanuts to OR they want no-one because they have someone internally but are required to advertise the job under law OR because they're using the job posting as free advertising. Ever had a business tell you that you were overqualified or "we don't care what other things you could contribute, we only care about the job requirements"? That's the reality and that's why I recommend those struggling to get jobs to look overseas and if possible land a job where your skills and qualifications are recognised, get that work visa through the company and move where you're wanted. USA, UK, CAN, AU & NZ don't want people working and only care about regulating everyone out of work.
    1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444.  @jameswalker366  No conspiracy to it at all. Australian farmers destroyed their produce as the supermarkets and exporters didn't want it (contracts said they couldn't sell or give it to anyone else) even though the exporters' customers were happy to receive the food, farmers then got paid to not plant crops by the government. Meat processing plants around the world "magically" catch fire (that's never been a common event and never will be regardless of how many lies the media tell us all). Crops in the US magically get burnt, but not the soy and bean crops used for fake meat, only the wheat, corn and other grains. Suddenly, the whole '2020 thing' makes way for a bird flu which resulted in most of the worlds chickens being destroyed on government health orders, only to be followed by lesser versions of foot and mouth which caused sheep, goats and cows to be destroyed in 2021. Russia intentionally burnt their crops and the crops in Ukraine - to create shortages. Remember, if you control the food, you control the people. If you think these things are all conspiracy and fake, you need to go back to sleep, wake up and literally read the news. The world is a dangerous place run by sick individuals who don't care about any of us - to them, our suffering is a funny game. What is utterly insane is when people like you can't fathom the fact that all major societal issues ARE engineered as excuses to implement the already determined "solutions" as is this blind belief and trust in government that people like you have. Governments serve themselves, their aim is to take what you have and dictate your life to you. Having been involved with government departments before professionally, I can tell you that governments will absolutely lie to the public whenever it suits them, especially if doing so will let new restrictive laws be brought in, get more taxes from the public, delay panic and assist in controlling the masses.
    1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. You're kidding yourself if you think that Australia wouldn't happily double tax people. Australia would! They're actively getting rid of DTA's, increasing taxes, bringing in new taxes, levies, making it harder to leave the tax system, starting to use their deeming laws to demand more taxes. As for citizenship based - that's purely down to choosing to do that. Heck they already double tax us when buying fuel - GST is charged on the amount including fuel excise, its supposed to be on the amount before fuel excise gets added - even though this is illegal (to tax a tax) the govt don't care as they make more money. As I currently understand it, if you move to a 0-tax country (St. Kitts and Nevis) genuinely and live there full time you should be fine. The problem now arises in that if you're an Australian citizen, the govt get to decide if you've spent enough time in the country you claim your tax resident of (in this example St. Kitts and Nevis) so if they check the international passport system and find that you've spent 3 months in Europe and one month in the UK, they'll say you haven't lived enough in St. Kitts and Nevis and thus Australia will demand you pay full taxes in Australia. If you're wondering how they know all your passports - if you look at any AUSTRAC form for declaring money, assets or finance, you'll see they demand you list all passports, passport numbers and name of country of citizenship. This information is only collected to better track and monitor you, its got nothing to do with preventing crime or any of the AML/KYC garbage. If you've ever filled in an eTA, ESTA, the soon to be in use ETIAS, or applied for a visa, they collect the same information and share it with all allied governments. The other way they collect this info is when reporting foreign bank accounts to the ATO as its required for all citizens to declare their foreign bank accounts.
    1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466.  @lgrrf  Luck is what you make it because it doesn't exist. Anyone who wants to succeed needs to learn and put in the hard work to succeed. The hardest working people are those who got rich from their own hard work. You talk a mountain of pure rubbish. The reason the rich are hated more than ever is because the crooked western governments (sorry... regimes) have got the bulk of the population on welfare (i.e. tax money) who don't want the rich to leave which would end the handouts as those who leave don't pay taxes (ignoring the USA), and, the result is people like the 'free to them' money which actually lets them be better off than those who pay taxes, so they hate the rich. The rich have options and can get to a place where they don't have to pay taxes to where they were (ignoring the USA unless they renounce). Its purely the scum of society wanting their 'free money bro' who don't want that to end. The 'west' hasn't operated on merit since the woke DEI tyranny was implemented. In most of CANZUK and CUNA I'm formed to hire people based on their skin colour, gender and sexual orientation regardless of their skills - skills come second to DEI factors. That's literally enshrined in law. Yet they wonder why people such as myself are waiting until we're out of the woke west to start businesses that actually employ people - we only want to employ the best, most qualified and experienced people for the job. The other problem is that those who hate the rich are too cowardly to take risks in life, and they're 100% financially illiterate which results in them hating the rich and wanting what others have (politics of envy). This is why I 100% hate the poor and the 99% in the 'western' world as they're nothing but violent primitive scum who think that theft and violence is the solution to their problems.
    1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473.  @XeonSX  Even though I doubt you'll listen as you seem to have drunk the "kool-aid" I'll try to address everything you've said. EV's are significantly more expensive, they sure as sh*t aren't cheaper. On average they cost $150,000+ for anything other than a tiny EV hatch that has no range, the luxury car tax (based on cost of vehicle) is 25% the listed purchase price. The registration costs are significantly more as they are heavier than their petrol or diesel equivalents. The charging subscription costs are significantly more than the fuel costs of traditional vehicles. Then there's the per km taxes - even though there's GST charge on electricity, the govt requires a per km tax because they aren't getting fuel excise from you. Ironically the per km tax is almost double the fuel excise. Then there's the supercharger install costs at your house (easily $20,000) - if you need to get three-phase power installed then that will cost you $75,000 as the power company will need to dig up the road, footpath, etc. and install it as underground supply. Ecological? You're having a laugh, seriously, the mining is permanently destroying the planet to create the batteries. The power has to be coal-fired or nuclear and guess what - that harms the planet, albeit significantly less that "green tech" which can't offset its own footprint or be actually recycled. EV's are extremely destructive to the environment - making the batteries causes huge destruction to the planet - this is unavoidable as there is only one way to mine what's needed. The lifespan of the batteries is pitiful and any improvements are nothing but "hopes and dreams" - there hasn't been any viable improvements in the last 10yrs. There is no safe, cost-effective or environmentally friendly way of recycling the batteries. All the idiots who've shredded the batteries have done nothing but ensure that even if in the future a safe, cost effective and environmentally friendly way of recycling does become possible, the shredded batteries (the current method used to classify them as recycled) won't be recyclable as they're a mangled mixed mess and thus separation isn't possible so they'll end up in landfill. The production of the circuit boards for the EV's is toxic and they aren't recyclable due to the resins they have to be coated in for fire-safety regulation compliance - they must be fully potted. The power to properly charge EV's can't ever be fulfilled by "green-tech" - Spain, Germany and Italy have proven this already, they all ended up going back to coal-fired power generation as the "green tech" failed and cost significantly more per kW than coal fired power. Cheaper to service - this is the only thing you got right. This is true as there's less to go wrong but its at the cost of near one million jobs - that's one million people who're likely to never get a job again as jobs are only being eliminated every year. The most automation and more advanced tech that gets created, the more useless people become. Even the engineers in jobs now will lose their jobs within the next 5yrs - it doesn't take more than a handful of engineers, IT guru's and assemblers to design, create, produce and maintain everything so don't start with the "jobs of the future" or "jobs maintaining everything" bullshit. They are nothing but inconvenience - without charging outside your home which would need three-phase power, one has to wait for what is basically an hour to charge their car - that's a huge inconvenience and waste of time. I can fill my petrol car in under 5 minutes and be on with my life. My time is money - I'm not going to waste an hour just to charge a car - I'd rather get home an hour earlier to do the things I want to do, to see friends, etc. If I drive out bush to go camping for a week or two I can leave a petrol vehicle turned off with 3/4 of a tank of range available and that'll remain unchanged at the end of the week. To ensure that the vehicle will start if its very hot or very cold, I keep a small jump-starter in an insulated case so I can start the vehicle if the main battery in the vehicle fails. Good luck doing this in an EV. In very hot or very cold weather you can lost up to 15% charge per day without running the vehicle. In normal conditions most EV's lose 5% charge per day from simply being left where they are. By the end of the week the vehicle would either be flat or wouldn't have enough range to get home or to a charger. This is yet another reason EV's are bullshit - range shouldn't reduce from simply not using the vehicle. Traditional vehicles don't lose range from simply not being used and can be topped up from a jerrycan in mere minutes - can't do that with an EV. You also overlook the huge construction projects that need to be done before everyone can have an EV. The entire power grid would need to be able to provide three-phase power to every house for charging - this would mean more coal-fired powerstations would need to be built to supply the power as "green tech" can't supply the power. Then there's all the elevated roads and bridges that need to be completely rebuilt to handle the huge weight increases caused by EV's being 2-4x heavier than traditional vehicles. EV's will never be "green" or efficient. From cradle to grave, EV's will never offset their footprint. The reason they'll never be efficient is the batteries - they're heavy and ensure that the vehicle doesn't get lighter the more the range reduces unlike traditional vehicles. You need to lay off the "kool-aid" and accept that you've been conned about EV's. No one will blame you, there's too much propaganda out there pushing them. You like all other "pro-EV" nuts are always cherry picking pro-EV crap whilst never living in the real world and realising that EV's are a giant con that is designed so that most people can't afford them and will be forced to live in 15-minute cities. The reason the 15-minute cities are being pushed is because unless only a mere few "elites" have an EV or traditional vehicle, the powers that be know that the system would fail immediately - by forcing everyone into 15-minute cities and making them walk, ride or take public transport, the system can be dragged along without much effort.
    1
  474.  @XeonSX  Thanks for publicly showing you're a braindead pro-EV moron who needs to shut up and be de-programmed from all the "green" lies and propaganda. I'm well aware the channel is primarily UK however those of us from AU, NZ, USA, CAN, etc. do also watch it. The costs, taxes and prices mentioned are very common outside the UK. Fact is you can't show an EV for 40,000 quid (~$85,000) that can do 330 miles without fail for its entire life, for the same reasons shown in the video (failing batteries). EV's weighing 2-4x that of their traditional equivalents - its literally easy to compare the weights from the manufacturers for EV's and non-EV's. Without installing a proper charger at home the vehicle ain't gonna be usable - no-one has the time to waste sitting at chargers for hours, nor is any company going to let staff charge at work unless the staff pay the company for charging and that's assuming any company would be dumb enough to install superchargers. What I said about mining is 100% correct, try actually reading the book mentioned, take a trip to see the mines (yes its actually possible). Also understand that these countries are starting to copy Zimbabwe in banning the export of Cobalt. Most countries use either nuclear or coal to generate power - that's a fact. What I said about batteries not being recyclable is true, the current methods are neither cost effective, safe or environmentally friendly. Your bullshit about the batteries lasting a long time is pure bullshit - within 5yrs most EV batteries are at best only capable of 50% original range. Most people let the charge drop low enough that the life of the battery significantly drops - also super charging if done often enough significantly kills the batteries. There is nothing sustainable about EV's - there is no way to spin them as green. I've literally done the studies, done the LCA's on them from cradle to grave. The only way to fudge them as being "green" is to only look at the footprint of the use but that isn't how LCA's have to be done, LCA's have to be done from cradle to grave (creation, use (including charging, maintenance and disposal). The reality is that you've been gaslit and brainwashed by the pro-EV wankers and won't accept anything that you don't already agree with, no matter what evidence anyone could ever show you. Yuri Bezmenov refers to this as being "demoralised". I haven't said a single incorrect thing and have personally seen every claim you make proven false repeatedly.
    1
  475. Yet Australiastan is run by a regime that does everything to 'protect' (read as nanny state) its people from anything and everything. We can't legally take risks - anything financial can only be done by licenced professionals at huge cost, we can't stake crypto (only spot trading is legal), we can't have 'side hustles' due to regulations and cost of compliance, we can't choose what risks we are willing to take due to regulations that make taking risks a crime. If you try to start a small business and it fails, you better ensure you don't become legally bankrupt as that will prohibit you from every licence (fishing, driving, etc.) as under the law, if you're deemed to not be "fit and proper" under one act, you're deemed that under all acts; being "fit and proper" is a condition of ALL licences. Basically the only option is to never lose by never doing in the first place. Oh, then there's the whole govt department for 'controlling and fixing men's behaviour' run by rabid feminazis and commies. You can't LEGALLY build your own house in Australia as everything needs govt licences and permits and its not feasible for any one person to obtain them all and maintain them all at the same time. Knowledge and skills mean nothing, even if you can prove you're doing everything properly - its all licences, permits and heaps of money and bureaucratic hoops. Australia - the land where taking even controlled risks and being a man is illegal. And they wonder why people are leaving as fast as possible.
    1
  476. 1
  477. Because it means they only have to pay out money from their account at the end of the month when the bill arrives in the mail and is due. That means that they're still accruing interest on their savings based on a higher amount (as some accounts pay / accrue interest biweekly or monthly), it reduces the total number of transactions (i.e. fewer transaction fees) into one large transaction, builds their credit score (assuming they pay the bill in full, on time before its due), and they then accrue points for simply doing their normal spending which over time they can redeem for goods, holidays or gift cards. Using a debit card means transaction fees and your bank balance instantly reduces which means you accrue less interest on your savings than you otherwise would, you incur more fees as you have more transactions and you accrue not a single point for your effort. Also, debit cards don't really provide much protection against fraud/unauthorized transactions, etc. where as credit cards add a layer of protection and the ability to dispute unauthorized transactions which just isn't possible in most places with debit cards. In all seriousness, most businesses will charge you the same price whether you pay by credit, debit or cash, so you're not getting charged more unless you're paying with a known high-fee card like Amex. If you do the right thing and pay the entire bill when it arrives, in full, immediately, then you won't be carrying any balance and thus not paying any extra fee. If you annual spending is over a certain amount then most cards will waive the 'annual fee' so that doesn't cost you. Not to mention with credit cards you can accrue points simply for doing your usual spending. Once you've earned enough points you can redeem them for products, holidays or gift cards. The points are basically paid for as part of the merchant fee's which is why its basically something like 'spend $100, earn 10 points' in most cases. It costs you the end user nothing extra as the merchant has their product prices set to cover the fee's they incur regardless of how you pay. If you borrowed from friends or family, they're having to bare the transaction fees for withdrawing the money, then you have to withdraw the money from your account to pay them back - that's all fee's being incurred by the individual on all ends. Why would you go out of your way to pay fee's? Yes cash is good but not when your incurring fee's so often. I don't know which country you're from but you seem to either not trust yourself with a credit card (that's perfectly fine as its always better to avoid debt than to be stuck in debt), or you don't understand credit cards and debit cards correctly. Maybe your country is the exception to the rule and banking is done significantly differently to the rest of the world in regards to interest on savings, fees and fraud protection.
    1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480.  @aissaaziz84  Both are not worth it, go literally anywhere else, there are plenty of countries that are much better. Watch some of Nomad Capitalists videos that discuss the other places and why Canada and Australia, specifically CUNA & CANZUK are all finished. The regimes (sorry I mean governments...) now have the ability to suspend laws and enforce "pandemic" rules if they feel a threat exists anywhere in the world even if its not in their country, so you could be working or running a business one day, prohibited the next without warning. They are both actively increasing their taxes which are already around 50% (more if you factor in all the levies - fire services levy (even though the same thing is in council rates and state government budgets), private health medicare levy (you get taxed both for not having private health insurance and for having it but a bit less if you have it)), the business environment is nothing but paperwork and pointless compliance thanks to them being "nanny" states. Oh and there's always some new course or experience requirement that'll result in you always being forced back into doing courses and updates just to do anything. Utterly pointless for doing business as all your time and profitability will be lost to compliance and "training" - only the giant corporation's can get around this. Source: Australian citizen (also EU citizen) and am stuck in Australia till the end of this year (legally stuck with JD) and have watched a once great country turn to utter shit whilst growing up. I have relatives in Canada who've seen it become shit as well (Canada is 3-5yrs ahead of Australia in the decline). Both places are heading directly from socialism to communism and completely destroyed economies (depression level and worse). Businesses have either left the countries or gone bankrupt, jobs don't exist, the cost of the basics have skyrocketed and extreme environmental policies are destroying both farms and public land (forests, etc.).
    1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485.  @inputimmersion9577  Council tax does NOT fund anything local other than the wages of the useless pricks that are the council. Anything you're forced to pay is literally a tax, that's the definition of a tax - its mandatory! Look at your water bill, it'll have a sewage charge and a parks and gardens fee. That fee is what pays for parks, gardens and public areas. Your electricity bill contains a maintenance and infrastructure charge which maintains the powergrid. As for roads, part of the licence fees, registration fees and ALL of the fuel excise (a tax charged (built into) on the fuel you buy) and 5% of tax revenue (income tax, etc.) pays for all the roads and traffic infrastructure. Rubbish collection is outsourced by councils to well overpriced companies - literally anyone could find a cheaper rubbish collection but as the council tax is mandatory and includes rubbish collection people don't bother challenging the cost. Public Libraries and schools are funded solely with govt tax revenues - absolutely nothing from Council rates. If you don't have your name on the lease or if you don't own a property, you don't pay council rates. Only the primary occupant or the owner pay it. If what you're claiming were true then every man, woman and child would have to pay council tax simply for existing. Given that only the person whose name is on the lease or who owns the property has to pay the council tax, makes it a property tax by default. Think its not a property tax - try having an empty property and not paying the council tax - watch how quickly they come after you and seize your property. Its most definitely a property tax.
    1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. A hobby - a pure luxury for the rich in Australia, not for anyone else. If you don't own a house, or can't rent a house then you can't have a hobby as you have nowhere to store the equipment, nor do you meet the requirements to hold most licences (must OWN a house as your primary residence can't change often [licence condition]). Basically everything in Australia either requires tickets or a heap of licences and permits. Either way that means a lot of money. Most hobbies require membership to clubs or associations - that means a lot of money. Its like this because the regime run the place as a total 'nanny state' where everyone is treated like a braindead child that can't think for themself and that everyone is too dumb to use common sense. Just to have the hobbies and recreations I have, I'm required to have and do the following: * Association and Club Memberships * Licences (several of which have attendance/participation requirements to remain 'current') * Annual Update/Refresher training for the licences and for the few things that require certificates but not licences * A vehicle to get to and from the hobby (registration and insurance required for this) * Auxiliary equipment for the hobby - primarily camping equipment (requires multiple setups as they have to be tailored to each environment) * Access permits - public land is being closed every year by the govt and sometimes access can be obtained but only if you can afford very expensive access permits Over a 5yr period that's about $25k just to have a hobby - and that's excluding the vehicle and its associated costs as its required for day-to-day life and for work. To use and/or possess a metal detector off your private property in Australia requires a 'Miner's Right' and can only be used in designated areas such as State Forests (but not in Forest Parks, State Parks or National Parks or Heritage Areas).
    1
  490. 1
  491.  @MsSherryl01  Grow up! My tone was perfectly normal and I addressed your utterly stupid question. Spanish is NOT Portuguese! Basically everyone speaks Portuguese in Portugal except the tourists. Sure, many do speak English but that's because its the EU's official common language. The fact you think people in Portugal prefer Spain just shows how clueless you actually are, Portuguese people are very nationalistic and proud of their country. Matter of fact, they almost abolished the Portuguese Golden Visa program because they're sick of foreigners coming there as digital nomads are pricing locals out of everything. The new program is significantly more involved and requires full integration and an actual in-country job. The fact you think it acceptable to think speaking Spanish in Portugal as a norm is somehow okay just shows how little respect you have for Portugal. Only a complete moron would think that a country that has a language test as part of its naturalisation process would permit you to speak any language other than the official one on the test. If your Spanish is actually 100% fluent, get naturalised in Spain as Spanish, then use the fact that Spain is in the EU's Schengen Zone to move to which other Schengen Zone country you wish to. You're not trilingual as that would require being 100% fluent in three languages. American English is nothing but English (Simplified). From the sounds of it you should stay in the USA amongst the woke who's feelings get hurt at the drop of a hat. Get over yourself, you're not so special that a country is going to change its laws and rules to suit you.
    1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. Nope its not a generational thing, its a laziness thing. The youth are too f**** lazy to actually go to a bank, they also hate having to handle cash. This is whats killing banking and killing cash. I'm under 40 and still have a physical passbook account (i.e. in-person banking only). What I love about it: * I have the entire history of the account in the passbook - this way both the bank and I have matching records of the account so nothing can get lost... * The account can only be accessed by presenting the passbook & govt issued ID that matches the recorded details * There's no phone or internet banking so I don't have to worry about scams or "hacks" so the bank can't try to blame me if something goes wrong. I also love cash. My entire life can be easily organized with cash and I can ensure that I save money (both by spending less and by putting my change in a money box which gets banked when full). I can withdraw what I need for bills, etc. and put the relevant amounts in envelopes on which I've written what expense that money is for and I can see what I've put aside in an envelope for spending on myself each month. With cash its easier to save as when you can see the money being used, you're more inclined to not spend. Using credit cards or tapping to pay its dangerously easy to spend money and lose track of how much you've spent, especially when they like to avoid printed receipts. The reason they want cash gone is they want people to spend more than they can afford and end up in debt / welfare, as then the govt get to control them. Also 100% cashless makes CBDC easy to implement and with CBDC they can limit what you can buy, where you can spend your money (geofencing) and limit how much of something you can buy. Also, they can make your money expire so they force you to use it and thus make saving impossible. Also by getting rid of cash, if they decide to introduce negative interest rates, you don't have any options to get your money out of the banks and thus are forced to lose money to negative interest rates!
    1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. Whilst your history is correct, you have to look at the current reality - i.e. you have to momentarily put history aside. The most important thing that currently exists is the stopping (or defeat) of Russia in Ukraine. If Russia takes Ukraine (yeah Russia wants the whole country), then the Baltics, Poland and most of Europe east of Germany will be invaded and destroyed. Putin is doing the same thing Hitler did, the old "just one more country" or "just one more territory". Remember, Russia invaded and illegally occupies two parts of Georgia, they illegally invaded and currently run Kazakhstan, they attacked and control large parts of Mongolia, they illegally took Crimea and most recently invaded Ukraine. Oh then there's the "refugee" warfare Russia is committing against the EU by intentionally flying illegal immigrants "refugees" into Russia, then to Belarus in the hopes of overrunning the borders of the EU - note that these illegals are paying approximately $25,000USD to Russia so they can "get into the EU". Putin has said in multiple recent interviews that he wants to rebuild the Tsarist Empire as his legacy. That means the abolition of most free countries (incl. Poland) in Europe. If Ukraine falls, he gains all the equipment and supplies that Ukraine has - this would mean instead of Russia having to use crappy old barely operable equipment, they'd have actually usable equipment. Simply put, stop Russia, then worry about any problems you have with Ukraine. Now is not the time to dredge up history and create tensions between two countries (Poland and Ukraine), now is the time to stop Russia and then and only then worry about these historical issues. Trust me when I say, I know what my family suffered in Nazi Occupied Poland and parts of what is now Ukraine, so I understand how you feel.
    1
  520.  @analysisonlight605  They're going bankrupt due to the far-left socialist/communist govts who are strangling them with insane regulations, taxes and costs. Simply put, its the same tactics Hitler used to control businesses - its "make whats needed exactly how I tell you, or I'll take over your business" (i.e. nationalising a business without having to forcibly take it over - total control by regulation, law and bureaucracy). That's what we see today, govts are strangling businesses by dictating every little thing they do, crushing them with insane BS such as the legal requirement of who they are allowed to hire (DEI & minorities MUST be the priority according to the laws, even if not the best candidates), the legal requirement to have "regular meetings as part of good governance" which forces people to waste time and money on having meetings when there is no legitimate need, to then record the minutes of said meetings and to then submit that to the govt as part of their legal compliance. All the 'climate targets/goals' are intentionally designed to shutdown businesses, because business and the availability of products must be 100% govt controlled without private influence or input in order to meet their desires for total control (inline with WEF policy & ESG). The result is businesses can't operate as they were, they are forced to automate and reduce staffing; this results in having to pay-out staff, deal with unions demanding the world because people are losing jobs, and then the businesses are forever fighting the uphill battle against ever tightening govt regulations that sound good on paper but in reality are 100% impossible to comply with (i.e. the climate targets/goals). Thus the result is the only option so as to not run at a loss is to declare bankruptcy and shut the business down. That means fewer products (less choice), more centralization of products that are available, more people out of work and a step closer to the 'climate targets/goals'. If you own a business and it spent a lot of time being successful, you have plenty of money saved and thus can literally earn money by having money in your savings account - compound interest is a truly wonderful thing. Thus you don't need to run a business to keep making money, you just have to keep your spending less than the interest the bank pays you on your savings. The whole idea that you can only make money by running a business is as insane as the belief that you can only make money by 'exploiting' people; only truly dumb people think like that. When you head 'reduce CO2 emissions', understand that they really mean that you are the carbon they want to reduce (i.e. mass global depopulation). Think I'm making it up? Read the following documents that you can find online as PDF files or articles: * The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5oC World - C40 Cities Headline Report (2270_C40_CBE_MainReport_250719.original.pdf) * COVID-19: The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret (COVID-19_The_Great_Reset-_Thierry_Malleret.pdf) * Governing The Metaverse - World Government Summit 2023 (GOVERNING-THE-METAVERSE_EN_Double.pdf) * Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development - Rockefeller Foundation (Rockefeller Foundation.pdf) * The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 - The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf) * The Benefits of World Hunger - George Kent (Available from the UN) * United Nations Sustainable Developerment - UN Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janerio - Brazil, June 3-14 1992 - Maurice Strong (Keynote Speaker) (Agenda21.pdf) * The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG's) - this is on their website and is just Agenda 21 put into 17 'goals' * UN General Assembly - Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (adopted 25 Sept 2015) (N1529189.pdf) * and there's many more all available from UN, WEF and other govt / pro-ESG sources Why do you think automation, robotics and AI is the focus? Its the only way businesses could stay around this long, and now such tech has gotten to the point that people are now almost entirely redundant. It won't be long until you see most people losing their jobs. The problem is that means welfare reaches insane levels which in turn means taxes reach insane levels along with the introduction of death and wealth taxes that will affect everyone because the money for the welfare bill has to come from somewhere. In short, this is all by design, its a race to the bottom because those in power (the 'elites') care more about total control and playing god than they care about jobs and money. They only need just enough people to prevent in-breeding and to do the jobs they won't do themselves. The rest of the population are 'useless eaters' and thus require extermination as they are 'destroying the world' simply by existing. We are entering extremely dark, totalitarian and dystopian times. Pick basically all dystopian movies and roll them together - that is our future.
    1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. The falling fertility rate is 100% due to the high taxes and cost of living. That's why Australia is the shithole that it is. The reality is that the govt wants high migration as it means quick money (because its a Ponzi Scheme), the result is that most of those people end up on welfare, increase crime (as they hate the local population) and further burden the system. The result is no one can afford to live, let alone have kids, so the govt doubles down on immigration and make the problem exponentially worse. Migration is NEVER the answer as it always results in locals being unable to afford to live, to have children, and it destroys their culture as migration always means the introduction of a completely incompatible bunch of low IQ religious fruitcakes who want to spread their death cult across the world. Then on top of that, the whole place is so over regulated that you need licences and permits to do anything, and most of those are only available as apprenticeships which means getting hired whilst unqualified, doing the TAFE course, then wasting 2yrs watching the licenced people do their work (i.e. work experience where you can't work because you're not licenced), then you can finally get your licence - after somehow affording to live without pay for 5yrs (apprenticeship (incl. course) duration). The migration, over regulation and high taxes are what's killing the economy - deport the incompatible 3rd worlders, remove the over regulation and slash the taxes and watch the economy thrive. The 'west' is intentionally trying to self destruct.
    1
  529. 1
  530. @robbraxmantech The real question is how do you avoid it entirely when the western world (outside the USA) requires it for everything. Everything financial requires it trading, investing, betting, banking, even closing existing accounts. There are no 'AML/KYC free thresholds' in the 'English speaking Western world' outside the USA. Buying or renting property requires it. Getting a SIM card requires it as part of SIM registration. Getting a job requires it. Google, etc. all require it - there is no way around it. Oh and its not just govt issued ID, its your finances, your credit history, your employment history, your interests, your memberships, what magazines/services you subscribe to, etc. its horribly intrusive, especially since the WEF launched ESG. You also have to do it to not be debanked or cancelled as a customer by businesses. I know farmers who've refused to do KYC - they were told that they can't purchase farm supplies (fence posts, barbed wire, animal feed, etc.) anymore as the business can't be certain that they are legit and whether they fit the businesses ESG and risk models. I know farmers who were debanked simply for being farmers because they had to do AML/KYC to keep their accounts years earlier, only for ESG to become a thing and then be considered 'outside the risk profile of the banks ESG and risk models'. Its because AML/KYC is required by the US Government (who ironically aren't part of it and not subject to it even though its their law) and is considered the 'core' of due diligence (required for everything) globally by all countries that don't want to become enemies of the USA. The only way I can think of getting around it would be to disappear, live in the middle of nowhere and work for cash or trade/barter outside the system (but that would be illegal under current laws); beyond that there's no way to avoid it. Honestly Rob, you need to create an artificial island, declare it as your own country and let those of us who want real privacy and freedom to live there. Otherwise the US needs to abolish CRS, AML & KYC.
    1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. And that is why scum like you will always live like trash and be ruled by hate and violence. The rich create the jobs, and give everyone a chance at a future; no jobs = no future. The rich are the reason you can go to a bank and borrow money - if the rich leave with their money the banks legally have to reduce their lending due to reduced liquidity / reserve. That's why countries try to entice the rich to stay. How about you get off your ass and actually work, save money, invest, get gouged by the taxes you shout for, then realize why you're spouting utter BS. Remember when scum such as yourself say 'tax the rich' you mean the person who's middle-class and being taxed the most, you NEVER mean the actual rich because you know they include the politicians and they'll never tax themselves. What is 'fair share'? Clearly its not 70% of their income, most of CANZUK & CUNA when you add up all the taxes (including levies) that have to be paid to the govt, you quickly end up at around 70% tax (income tax + CGT + levies + council rates/property tax + Mandatory Super/401k + [whatever else they add]). Why did I leave 'Mandatory Super/401k' in there? Because if it wasn't mandatory you'd receive it as part of your wage, also because when you do get to use it, they tax it (in most of CANZUK & CUNA) as Income, even though you already paid Income tax on it when you earned it. The people who don't pay their 'fair share' are the ones receiving the welfare. What's needed are laws that force the ones who receive welfare to pay back every cent they receive no matter what it takes. Why should they be allowed to be freeloaders and steal from people who worked hard? They shouldn't but the demented current system lets them. I'd love to see you say the same BS if you were a rich person - you sure as hell wouldn't and you'd understand why.
    1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. AI - it'll never be banned. Its like Australia's encryption ban - yes it exists on paper but can't be enforced as the laws of mathematics make it impossible to comply with and not using encryption just isn't an option. As long as people can write programs, scripts, etc. AI can be easily created - the hard part is training it with datasets but those can be rented, bought or created. As for BRICS - Argentina have just stepped out of that so its already falling apart. South Africa is a crime-riddled black supremacist failed state of literally no value to anyone. Oil is less of an issue as synthetic oil is easily created very cheaply. Only 10% of the world are aligned against the "west" and those 10% of the world will simply go without and fail. China is a failed state surviving only by tyranny and murder - their mistake was communism and then giving out loans that'll never be repaid to places that don't have anything worth taking as payment (why do you think the "west" want CBDC's - its not just control, its to get out of debt). Simply put - a death cult religion of ragheads getting together is just a group that need to be destroyed - sadly the "west" are too soft to do this once and for all. Everyone else on the planet can get along except them - it still amazes me that they have been let into the "west" as they only exist to destroy and take over. Even India know this and are only part of BRICS as a way to get rich quickly by doing short term export - their goal is to eliminate Pakistan and Bangladesh and retake the lands that rightfully belong to India - ragheads in India are already fleeing India because no one cares what happens to them.
    1
  540. 1
  541. Precisely. Just shows that the world doesn't care about people - a concept that very few in the 'west' seem to understand. As someone born with multiple citizenships, I am unable to have my qualifications recognized in any country of which I'm a citizen (except the country who issued the qualification), and, am unable to have licences in any country other than the one I currently live in (none can ever be exchanged as I'm already a citizen of the other countries and thus have to get it as the locals do, unless obtained in a country I'm not a citizen of), this extends to not being able to be a 'visitor' or use a temporary licence such as an IDP, it also results in being banned from most things that others aren't because everything requires residence (not possible to be full-time resident in multiple countries with addresses and bills). Does the world care? Nope. Does anyone I know care? Nope. They all say "that's life, get over yourself, you're not special, the world was never made for dual/multi-national people" because to 99% of people its perfectly okay to dismiss someone because of factors outside of their control, factors of which have permanently ruined the lives of, and banned them from most of the things they ever wanted to do or achieve. I fail to see how this is any different, especially since this 'issue' isn't stopping them from achieving things or traveling amongst the few 'safe' countries they are limited to already by their orientation. All the people whinging that they can't get the 'correct' gender on their passport need to realize that the majority of the world have given people serious jail time simply because their gender was listed as 'X' on their passport as the only countries that accept pretty much anything are CANZUK & CUNA which comprise of less than 50 countries/territories out of the 200ish in the world. If they really want to get the correct gender "M" or "F" on their passport, get the surgery done and the letter changed. Otherwise they just have to accept that the whole world doesn't revolve around them. I'm super sick to death of a small group thinking that the world world revolves around them, and that everything should change to accommodate them. Literally nothing in the world accommodates anyone, nor accommodates people in my situation because no one cares, not even these whinging people.
    1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549.  @chrism8705  However that's only container ships, naval vessels and commercial airliners (95% of all air and seas traffic). Private Jets built post-2010 run on biofuels and are a lot cleaner than many like to admit. The giant mega vessels and all heavy industries are where 99% of emissions come from - but the govt's will never touch these due to corruption and self-interest. Planes that move the public are on the way out as they let people travel. France is already banning short flights (even if they're greener than that many people driving the same trip). The current ASEAN target to "reduce emissions" is focused on banning private jets (except corporation owned and govt ones - i.e. this exempts all of them) and banning private yachts (i.e. ANY size bluewater capable (38ft+) vessel (power, sail or motorsail)) in the name of "saving the environment. The real reason they're going after yachts is there's many sub-60ft bluewater capable yachts that are cheaper than houses (buy 2nd hand "good bones" and refit then enjoy) and 100% off-grid (water, power, etc.). Its this independence that the govt don't like, so all the "carbon neutral/negative" yachts get lumped in with mega ships and the little-guy loses out and is stuck in the 15-minute city. Remember when people were going "off-grid" in the USA and the govt's were rapidly banning doing so because they want to keep everyone under their thumb? That's still happening - the closing of public land "for future generations", the expanding cities building over the good farmland, the banning farming, etc. all designed to get everyone into 15-minute cities. Ideas already being floated globally are to restrict yacht ownership (even for sub-60ft ones) to those who already have them by increasing the regulations around sailing and traveling abroad on yachts, as well as to ban the construction of new yachts, or to just refuse to licence new people (no licence = no yacht or sailing). Many of us hoped that those with multiple citizenships and yachts would be able to travel in "green" yachts indefinitely however that's now looking like it won't be permitted as the 15-minute city terror is likely to bring ALL travel to an end (maybe we'll have to pick which countries 15-minute city we live in). To anyone who says this stuff isn't happening - attend the meetings (there is some public access), watch the official clips from the WEF, UN, COP, local govt, etc. and then look at what govt's around the world are doing. In the UK, parts of the EU, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, etc. 15-minute cities are being crafted and "tested" (i.e. being made - remember there's nothing more permanent that a "temporary" thing when the govt is involved). In Queensland, Australia there are two 15-minute cities being built against the wishes of the people who live in the towns "chosen". In Victoria, Australia, ALL developments are being built as 15-minute cities and they all have one road in, and one road out (really great in an emergency but absolutely perfect for keeping everyone contained). Throughout Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the UK and parts of the EU, the 15-minute city tyranny is being enforced - lower speed limits (that keep reducing each year "for safety") and "traffic calming" measures (road works for zero reason, road closures, narrowings, speed humps, one-car wide zig-zag in the middle of the road to severely congest and slow traffic, etc.). The monitoring & control that is the surveillance state is already well deployed in the "western" world - surveillance cameras at every intersection/street-corner, super cam's that do red light, speed, rego, ANPR, tracking, phone detection, passenger detection, etc. are all being rolled out everywhere and on every bridge (usually mostly hidden between the structural ribs underneath the bridge but just angled so they can monitor everyone and fine over the slightest little thing). All this BS blowing all our taxes to achieve 100% tyranny - it sucks that everyone is paying for their own demise.
    1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564.  @moragkerr9577  whilst your "I'll power my house with my car" rubbish sounds good, it overlooks a few things: * what if you arrive home with very little charge in your EV? * your house will use about 30kW of power every hour - that's a common consumption now that they're forcing everything to electricity and off of gas. Even if fully charged that's 1.5hrs but then your car is completely flat * Most house batteries aren't 10kW - you're making that up. Most solar is limited to 10kW in regards to feeding into the grid. Looking at AU, NZ & CAN, most house battery setups (usually rackmount batteries - EG4 system) are 250kW so that there's consistent power when there's too many clouds or prolonged stormy weather in winter. These batteries charge from solar and/or grid power if you have "off-peak tariffs" which aren't a thing in AU or NZ. * Letting your EV battery leave the Goldilocks zone (28% - 92% charge) will dramatically reduce the number of overall cycles the battery would otherwise get - why waste the life of the battery? * Say the outage is prolonged - how are you going to charge? You can't carry power to recharge with you! In Australia we commonly have 3-5 days without the power grid each year either due to bushfires, storms or dead transformers that had to have replacements flown in. Outages after bad floods or fires (both very common) can last months if there was enough damage done As for your crap about a power outage preventing people from filling their cars. Ever heard of a Jerrycan? Literally everyone with a car has a few at home to store petrol so they can buy it cheap and wait out the high part of the price cycle. Literally everyone carries a 5L petrol can in their car when they are expecting some last minute extra driving. Its easy to fill from a Jerrycan - that's why they were restricted military equipment until the 1950's even though they were made well before that by Nazi Germany Also - literally no one with an ICE car wastes any time planning their journey. The only things you do is ensure the vehicle is fully fueled, that you know the distance to the destination and if you need to refill along the way, you simply take a 5 minute break and pull off the highway at any town and refuel. Its only EV's that have to plan their journeys and ensure they have internet access to charge with. Good luck trying to get your mobile phone to work when driving long distance between major cities in countries like AU, NZ or CAN. The UK is so tiny that its borderline impossible to not have reception.
    1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. Interestingly they're trying to do what Australia does with historic vehicles. Basically a vehicle is only required to follow the safety rules of the year of manufacture. Registration can be either the normal full price, or, it you're a member of a car club you can register it under 'Club Permit'. 'Club Permit' is a different type of number plate, ending in either H (historic) if restored with any modern part (excluding brake pads and tyres), ending in CH (Classic Historic) if restored with all original parts (excluding brake pads and tyres). Generally 'club permit' vehicles can only be driven 45 days each year (some states and territories allow it per vehicle, some only allow it per year for all the ones you own collectively) at your choice, some states and territories only permit such vehicles to be driven on days that your club gets an 'event permit' and then only as part of a club activity (Queensland does this). Sadly, this all doesn't surprise me because its the standard move towards getting rid of ICE vehicles except for the ones that are drained of fluids (sometimes without engines) that sit in museum exhibits. That's also why they make it so hard to run a museum - huge bonds, insane hoops to jump through, the requirement for the main museums and govt to approve each application for 'registration as a museum', etc. All designed to stop all new museums, no matter how legitimate you're willing to run your museum. Commonly such restrictions are used because the government want to effectively 'outlaw' certain things - commonly seen with flare guns. Flare guns were never used in crime but both the anti-gun IMO and 'western' govts demonized them, had the IMO remove them from being part of SOLAS equipment and then bans in most countries came along. Ironically the current parachute flares aren't anywhere near as good as the old flare gun flares and they don't fly as high (height = more time to light the sky) so they don't last as long, nor can they be seen from as far. Many flare gun museums that had been perfectly fine for many decades suddenly had to surrender their collections for destruction unless they were able to sell them to either of the three states that still accept flare guns as a safety signally device exempt from the firearms act within 3 days of the law change (there was no public warning, only those who new either politicians or police get personal 'heads up' on the bans). The result was public safety wasn't improved, museums that were never a problem were removed and many old 1800's French flare guns were destroyed by the govt in the name of 'public safety'. Now they're trying the same with ICE vehicles. This is pure BS that needs to be stopped.
    1
  569.  @SurvivalLilly  And then just as many were massacred by the commies, and now the place is a 3rd world shithole where the cops and govt make it up as they go - no such thing as a 'fair trial' or 'rule of law' there - people still get summarily executed by the cops there. It was a 1st world nation under French and non-commie rule. War is human nature whether people like it or not. The reality is that even if you are peaceful, your neighbours (or their neighbours) won't be and thus you need to be ready and able to defeat them. All the 'anti-war' wankers do is destroy everything and hand over the innocent people to the aggressors/war mongers - literally every time. Appeasement NEVER works - it only emboldens the aggressor. * It was proven in the 1930's that appeasing Hitler achieved nothing * It was proven in Vietnam - appeasing the commies resulted in the massacre of innocent people on a giant scale * It was proven in China when Mao overthrew then legal govt (now in Taiwan) and slaughtered the Chinese people, then starved them in the 'Arduous March' * It was proven by the outcome of the Korean War - there's a reason that the DPRK (North Korea) is the shithole that it is where people have no rights * It was proven when the world let Russia invade Georgia and steal two large chunks of it * It was proven when the world let Russia invade and steal Crimea * It was proven when the world let Russia invade and steal the Armenian Exclaves, then gave them to Azerbaijan * It was proven when the world let Russia invade and take control of Mongolia - Russia is still in charge of the country claiming they're 'peace keepers'. Mongolia is no longer an independent nation * It was proven when Russia promised it would NEVER attack Ukraine if Ukraine gave up its nukes - yet they invaded regardless * It was proven in the plandemic - just one more lockdown, just take the jabs. That was NEVER enough there was always more because they liked the power trip they were on * etc. The current anti-war nutcases are trying to give the aggressors what they want. They're trying to give Ukraine to Russia, they're trying to give the terrorists in gaza and west bank everything they demand, even though those terrorists have had 20yrs to make a success of gaza and west bank as the only sanctions they were under were sanctions preventing weaponry and military hardware. They could have become the next Singapore but their want to destroy Israel was deemed more important because they're religious death-cult fruitcakes. If Russia isn't defeated in Ukraine, the EU will fall as Russia is intent on rebuilding the Tsarist Empire. Its better to collectively work together and defeat Russia whilst they're weak, as once they can resupply they'll be exponentially harder to defeat.
    1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572.  @reganmacelwain2250  Being de-banked is always a risk, even if you're in a high tax country like Australia. Since 2010, the WEF's ESG BS has been pushed by banks (except for two banks (1 large and 1 small) who accept anyone conditional to proving what they do is legal) and many innocent people have been unjustly de-banked. First it was licenced firearm dealers who were de-banked, then 4WD businesses, then farm supply shops, then farmers (because they use firearms and because they farm (the WEF hates this)). Then it was outdoor shops (that sell camping gear, etc.) because the public going bush and not being reliant on the govt is bad according to ESG; and now its anyone who has hobbies, interests, club memberships, employment, etc. that the bank feels "doesn't fit their risk profile" (this is why banks now demand to know everything about you under AML/KYC, even things that AML/KYC doesn't actually demand) - it could be simply because you collect coins and the bank thinks CBDC is all that should be allowed so they apply ESG scoring you badly and then you're no longer in their risk profile and de-banked. My point is being de-banked is a risk no matter what you do. The biggest point is to "never keep all your eggs in the one basket". Have some bullion and cash in safes at your residences around the world, have accounts in multiple countries and in multiple jurisdictions (CRS, non-CRS, western aligned, eastern aligned, etc.). Don't make your self have a single vulnerability by which a bank or govt can completely screw you over in an instant - you need access to money to put up a legal defence. Its literally the same reason Nomad Capitalist says to get multiple citizenships in various places - to expand your options.
    1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580.  @norawheeler2555  They will be replaced - it is all but inevitable. The AI datasets that the general public see are antiquated and toys at best. The more a dataset is improved though training an AI, the faster it learns. A simple block of code which tells the AI to mark anything its unsure of as "needing human verification" will result in rapid improvement as the AI will note what the human verified the thing as and never make that mistake again. The AI will also use that newly verified knowledge to train itself to recognised what that thing is. This self learning results in rapid improvement. I have seen first hand an AI that can do pathology reporting faster and more accurately than any human. The dataset is still being trained using the methodology mentioned in the above paragraph. Also, consider the following: Even when AI is wrong and needs the help of a human, its the same as when automation needs fixing by a human. How many humans are actually required? Only a mere handful. There is no need for billions of people (millions of which are already highly qualified experts). Also note that there are already numerous AI's that can rewrite their own code and fix their own problems - sometimes one AI can fix another when they're able to intercommunicate. The point is one person can maintain hundreds of automated manufacturing plants / assembly lines and hundreds of thousands of servers / computers. Ever wonder how many people big businesses employ in IT - its usually 10 at most and they maintain thousands of servers and thousands of workstations - all through unified centralised management software where they can make the change once and have it occur on all selected systems. This is the problem that AI is creating - it is making people redundant and eliminating many, many jobs. Currently there are no viable solutions and AI isn't going to be prohibited, hence the crappy situation in the world.
    1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. ​ @28Seconds-ld6cp  Everything you described, only applies to people who either aren't in a tax system or who are tourists. The 'days' test is only one of many (commonly 5 tests) used. Even in Asia and all tax havens, there are several tests: * Habitual Abode / Domicile * Days Spent / Resides * In A Tax System? * Commercial Interests / Investment Interests As you mentioned some countries have other rules as well, but these are the basics. You are confusing the "rules for tourists" / those not in the countries tax system with the ones for full tax residency, Nomad Capitalist has multiple videos explaining this and why its no longer possible to be "tax resident nowhere". Simply put, spend 45 or more days a year as a tourist in Mexico and you'll be paying full Mexican taxes. Spend 250 days in the EU and as long as its not a common thing (i.e. a one off) they'll look at the entire situation BUT you'll need a tax lawyer to explain how you didn't fall into their tax system and that you are paying high taxes elsewhere (if not then you'll be paying their taxes or suffer EU tax withholding). The fact is, you HAVE to be paying taxes somewhere, otherwise the country you go to with the highest taxes will automatically declare you to be tax resident. Is it fair? Nope. Is it law? Yep. Even in Asia they enforce this as they are in on the whole "you must pay tax somewhere". The solution: Ensure your tax residency is in a 0% PIT country and then travel in a way that ensures that you don't get trapped into another tax system.
    1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. The worst part about citizenship based taxation is that the countries that do it and those that want to do it love to use the argument of "but all citizens benefit from it no matter where in the world they are" which is simply 100% false. If you're not in the country you don't benefit! If the politicians had to earn their income like the rest of us, not have it guaranteed to them, they wouldn't make half the claims and laws they currently do! I say this as in the case of Australia (if you're a citizen regardless of whether or not you're in the country), once your assets (worldwide) exceed certain ever lowering thresholds, your ability to benefit from government assistance (in any capacity), pensions and even in certain circumstances access to super (Australia's equivalent of a retirement fund), all disappear. In Australia, if you own your own house or apartment and have a pre-tax income of over $100,000 your access to government assistance almost completely disappears, your ability to receive a pension disappears once your net worth exceeds a threshold (which includes an assets test) - regardless of how much you've paid in taxes over the years. Income Tax was originally supposed to guarantee a basic pension to everyone but now since Australia became a welfare state (most people live on welfare, the minority pay all the taxes) they say "You're not entitled to a pension" whilst giving absolute bludgers welfare cheques for doing literally nothing. Now the government regularly talks about making access to super (Australia's equivalent of a retirement fund) subject to the same rules and means testing as a pension. All part of your "social contract" which we've never agreed to - a made up load of BS to justify stealing from us all! Further, once you exceed the lowest taxable income, you now have to pay medicare levies which are only viable if you can claim the lower levy by having private health insurance which isn't cheap. Once you have private health insurance the system in Australia does everything it can to force you to get everything done private (expensive) wherever they can so you basically loose benefits of public health. Need to see a doctor? There's a government mandated fee for that on top of the doctors fee! If you're not living in the country, your kids aren't going to public school there (the quality of public education in Australia is a joke compared to that of Private Education in Australia - speaking from personal experience on this one). Nor are you using the roads which get paid for through car rego, licencing and fuel excise (a tax on fuel from WW2 that never went away) plus the GST collected on fuel. So far, still absolutely no benefits beyond having the passport and being allowed in the country indefinitely... Australia is the perfect example of why people shouldn't just be allowed onto welfare without strict requirements and why the government should have to get the best deal on anything they spend money on. The Australian Government waste more money than most other nations do. The cost of living and the taxes are absolutely horrible, as is the redtape and over regulation. I literally got qualified as both a Mechanical Engineering Technician - (CAD / CNC Operator / Machininst / hydraulics and pneumatics / materials science / fluid dynamics / fluid mechanics / thermodynamics, etc.) and then as a degree qualified Mechanical Engineer. What happened the moment I finished my degree? The government introduced lesser qualifications for each part of the qualifications I have, which resulted in companies wanting people who only had certificates in only what they wanted, as they could pay them less by law. Examples include: Cert 2 Engineering Fabrication (CNC operation), Cert 4 in Fluid power (hydraulics & pneumatics), etc. Then the government brought in Mandatory Engineering Registration with CPD (Continuing Professional Development) and made the criteria excessively expensive and burdensome so that most people don't qualify for it regardless of having the correct qualifications. Did you know that working for a small (=< 10 employee business doesn't qualify for experience / work experience at all in any capacity in Australia even if working under a more experienced and appropriately qualified mentor, only working for big businesses does - at least as far as mandatory registration is concerned). So I have no choice but to leave ASAP so I can go where I can actually work or as Andrew puts it "to go where [i'm] treated best". This is why my friends and I are going overseas to a better country as soon as the border opens. Currently we are stuck in Australia as the border is like the iron curtain - no one in or out, no clue when if ever it will reopen - it was shut without warning otherwise we'd have gone before it shut. I hate to say it but the "Western / CANZUK" countries are basically lost. High taxes, high cost of living, excessive redtape and over regulation, excessively unaffordable house prices, increasing hate of anyone with any amount of wealth (even just owning your own house gets you hated), the ever increasing push for socialism and communism... the list goes on. If it wasn't for Andrew and this channel I wouldn't have been able to make a plan. Thank you for this channel! Please keep up the great work Andrew!
    1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596.  @StudentDad-mc3pu  Wow, just wow. I haven't heard such an uneducated thing in a long time. The fact is there is no oil shortage. They are fabricating shortages (yes, even the oil companies) so they can drive their prices up in order to get record profits. Heck oil extracted in Australia is being marked up because "war in Ukraine", even though said oil isn't being exported as its exclusively for the local market. Any excuse will do. Even if known oil wells were to dry, there's plenty of oceanic oil extraction being started (drilling to known oil deposits). If we accept that oceans cover 70% of the globe, then consider how much oil has been extracted on land and from current coastal/offshore drilling rigs. Now extrapolate that proportionate to 25% of the oceans. We have plenty of accessible oil. Before anyone says "but we don't know its out there", we do. Extensive oceanic mapping, testing and verification drilling has just been completed revealing huge accessible deposits, we just need larger platforms to be built and taken into the oceans. Lets also just assume for a moment that there was no oil left to extract anywhere on the planet, we have plenty: * Waste oil that can be reprocessed and turned back into usable lubricant and / or fuel * Plastic that can be turned back into oils, refined and used as either fuel or lubricant * Synthetic plastics that can be made from chemicals and waste We also have recently developed methods of turning tyres into oils (still experimental but does yield oil). There is no shortage of oil. If you wonder why they'd lie and fabricate such shortages, its the same reasons they're fabricating and / or creating food shortages: control! The powers that be want to control our lives 100% and to force us to live how they want. These same people are the ones who own all the oil companies who own all the patents to the "green tech" and EV's; they want to make money even if they have to force us to buy their products. Most solar panels are made by BP or one of their subsidiaries. Food shortages are being caused by building housing developments on the good farmland and leaving the rubbish land to the farmers. This is helping to eliminate the middle class by pricing them out of existence by ever increasing food prices and by constantly pushing house prices up which results in higher council rates (mandatory in Australia, Canada and most the world outside the UK). The affordable option is the fake food and plant based rubbish that is owned by people such as Bill Gates (he owns 95% of all fake meat production and he owns 100% of the patents for fake meat). 15-minute cities (20-minute in Australia) aren't a choice we get to make, its what the powers that be want to force us into. The only way to keep people in these prison camps without using walls is to limit our ability to travel and to limit access to food. Forcing EV's and banning / "running out of" oil does just this - most can't afford EV's and as the batteries lose charge when sitting for days without being plugged in, it makes going camping impossible (keeps people out of the forests). Also, by limiting chargers to main areas it creates an artificial range limit as how else will you charge. Food shortages are a great way to keep people in as if they leave their access to food gets either restricted or blocked. When the only source of food is from the govt approved shops in the 15-minute cities because hunting, fishing and farming are banned, you can't leave, unless you want to starve and thanks to CBDC (coming soon) and short food expiration you won't be able to stockpile food in order to run away to freedom. As part of forcing us into 15-minute cities they're forcing us all to buy (or rent) and use their "green tech" (which has remote shut-offs installed as required by law) as otherwise we face fines and / or jail for not being environmentally compliant because. The worst part is they have people (including you) brainwashed to believe that "the sky is falling" when it actually isn't. The biggest threat to the climate is the intentional weather modification being done by cloud seeding. Too much cloud seeding around the globe and the weather gets permanently stuffed - the movie Geostorm covers this perfectly. The USA, Australia, China and Russia have all publicly admitted to doing cloud seeding.
    1
  597. There comes a point where you have to just decide to not care about tyrannical regimes once you live outside their borders. Take Australia for example, when it comes to taxes, they make it up as they go. They decide they want more money, suddenly they're demanding taxes and forcing others to help them obtain them, suddenly you're forced to pay taxes because its "in the public interest and the money is needed for those who "need" it" regardless of whether you live there or not. A recent example of this is people who left Australia when bitcoin dropped to $18k AUD, they exited the tax system properly, bought bitcoin and cashed out when it hit $110k AUD overseas. Australia decided that "they only left to dodge taxes and thus are required to pay taxes on the crypto to Australia". What legal right does Australia have to demand that? NONE! If this BS is accepted, then you can never leave because that means any success after leaving would be subject to full taxation in the shithole you left, thus negating any benefit to leaving. The biggest problem with these completely failed shitholes that are the "name brand countries" is that they are completely broke with failed economies, that they think they can do whatever and eternally chase everyone for taxes, even once the people have left the tax system; because in their eyes, you can never leave (hence why they're now discussing taxing those who've left the tax system - unrealized income tax post exit). Honestly its at the point that we need international laws to force countries to terminate their laws at their borders as all the "name brand countries" are trying to enforce their laws globally which ironically violates international laws on sovereignty which state that each sovereign state can have its own laws which are the only laws that apply within its borders but no further.
    1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600.  @ianxyoutube  Its got nothing to do with being entitled. Its called a wage that reflects your qualifications and experience if that's what the job requires -which most actually do. Only fools work a job for less than the industry average rate for that type and level of job. Its simple, they want skills, then they need to offer a fair rate - otherwise they won't get the skills made available. Good luck starting "at the bottom" - clearly you no longer understand how the world works. The days of being the janitor and "working your way up" are long gone. Laws, regulations, the legal requirement for qualifications and vast experience have made that old way impossible. No one is "learning on the job", they are required to be qualified, experienced, professionally licenced and insured. That requires a heap of time, effort and money, thus the wage needs to enable and reflect that. No one expects to be fresh out of uni and be paid the wage of a senior engineer, they expect the industry average entry wage of $64,000 (BEng(Mech) - theory/design/scientific) or $80,000 (AdvDip EngTech(Mech) - practial side of things/CNC operation, etc.) and to build from there with time and experience. Yet companies want to pay less than that, knowing full well that anything less is effectively slave labour and actually illegal. The only place where the old "work up from the bottom" system still exists is some parts of the USA and the entire 3rd world. You can thank all the "won't someone think of the children" and "everything in life must be 100% safe" people for the excessive over regulation and excessively expensive professional licencing, insurance and over-the-top experience requirements that are required in basically 90% of industries these days. Here's a fun fact about wages in the EU - they're significantly higher than in the UK and the cost of living is much lower than in the UK.
    1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618.  @gail1249  You're deluded and shilling people to use electricity for everything which isn't even possible as that would require every house / apartment to be changed to three phase and overall supply to quadruple. Gas is perfectly safe. It has nothing to do with accepting change or not, it has nothing to do with opinion. One of two things are happening, either your equipment is defective (your furnace and ducts) or you're lying. Gas being burnt in appliances that are in proper condition is perfectly safe - that's literally what science says. If your claim of "since I limited use of my furnace my asthma symptoms [have] greatly improved" is true then that 100% confirms that your ducts to and from your furnace are the problem - they're full of dust - ducts are meant to be professionally cleaned at least once a year. Gas isn't going anywhere for a very long time. Sure if you want to waste money and ignore the fact that "correlation doesn't equal causation", no one stops you from changing to electric aside from the excessive cost of doing so. The new "articles" about gas being bad were literally funded by the WEF to further their agenda and to make them money as several of the most important members of the WEF are the induction cooktop manufacturers. Its funny how this "research" suddenly appeared the moment that the induction cooktop manufacturers reported being unable to sell their products and the moment the government decided that they'd rather export their gas for a higher rate than if used locally. How convenient. The WEF are the same people who funded "research" that says that never leaving your house is healthy and that going outside causes cancer to justify lockdowns in Australia, only to then magically bring out "research" that says staying home causes cancer the moment the government wanted people to go out and spend money. The WEF are also the same people who said that food prepared at home causes cancer and that food at restaurants doesn't as its prepared differently. That's utter BS but its official "research". Don't fall for the hype and fear mongering - "science" has zero reputability unless its funded by truly impartial people in modern times. If anyone funding it has an agenda, they'll force the "research" to find what they want or they pull the funding; so guess what, the research says what they need it to, to keep the funding. There are literally huge court cases in Australia about this exact situation.
    1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623.  @NGC1433  Even they can't. As long as you're able to change which DNS servers your computer or router use, you can use secure DNS servers and then run "stealth" vpn's. Even the Great FIrewall of China can't stop "stealth" vpn's. Also, even China permits VPN's as without VPN's companies can't connect all their locations with Site-To-Site VPN, nor could their staff remote in and work when out and about or at conferences. As long as businesses exist, and DNS servers can be changed, "stealth" vpn's will exist and can't be stopped. Incase you're wondering what "stealth" VPN's are - they are VPN's that operate over other protocols or that appear to be different services such as OS updates, video streaming, etc. If you think requiring a govt ID to do things online will work, understand this - there'll always be other alternatives that don't require it and unless the govt takes control of every server and physically stops everyone else from hosting servers, this will never change. This is why a lot of "consumer" networking equipment has been "locked-down" - i.e. no more creating ad-hoc networks (LAN or WLAN), no more fine control of every setting like you used to get in the late 90's. Currently, you either need to use "Enterprise" equipment or build your own router with something like pfSense to get fine control over everything. The key thing now is that anyone who cares about privacy should do is to get a good VPN, and if offered a "Lifetime" deal, to take up such an offer. To select a good VPN google "Tom Spark's VPNTierList" and look at his list - it covers everything including which ones passed privacy audits.
    1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. What will happen? Very simple - look at every country run by women... everything is done on emotion and "fairness", never done on practicality, needs or security. As for the damage she will cause - it'll be the same as what happened to Victoria, Australia - completely destroyed by the far-left commie Labor under the rule of Dictator Dan (16yrs to completely destroy the place), and now under the commie nutcase Allen, more debt than ever before because spending money that doesn't exist is all they know, oh and now there's a govt department solely dedicated to controlling men's behaviour and feminising men all in the name of "protecting women". Too many regulations and taxes forced businesses out. Rentals vanished because renters were given carte-blanche by the govt to do as they please and the owners have zero rights. The govt openly encourages people to hate the rich and to demand that anyone with $1 more needs to "pay their fair share" (i.e. more taxes). Crime is at an all time high as is the importing of 3rd world violent thugs who want to take over and force their beliefs on everyone else. Qualifications aren't real as you're never truly qualified - you have to do refresher/update courses every year which serve no purpose other than to create an eternal "education" industry and to keep people out of work due to the costs. Instead of saving money, they just blew the "emergency fund" on a new construction project and then borrowed more money for more construction projects. Sorry but Mexico will be ruined beyond repair, just like Victoria, Australia already is.
    1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. You see the same thing in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. The govt claim 'people aren't having enough kids' so they cause insane immigration of people who hate the society, who don't want to work but want welfare. So the welfare bill goes up. Then due to the insane immigration, housing shortages become a thing and prices go insane. Then the cost of living goes insane due to excessive taxation that's always increasing, as well as due to the shortages caused by the always increasing population due to immigration. They complain that people aren't having kids but the reason people aren't having kids is because housing became too expensive due to taxes being too high and because of excessive bureaucracy and the stupid idea that everything can be made 100% safe. That makes the cost of compliance and the cost of doing business insane, so no one starts businesses. If immigration was reversed entirely back to 2000, taxes cut in half and the govt shrunk to 1/10 its size, people could afford houses, afford to live and thus they'd be happily having kids. No one intelligent is going to have kids when they can't buy a house and afford to live. Only the leeches on welfare who have it easy have kids and make the whole problem worse are having kids. The other thing that makes the problem worse is the govt only look at how many people they're importing each year, they NEVER consider how many local kids have grown up and need houses and jobs. Thus the problem keeps getting worse. The other issue is the masses and govt consider the middle class to be the 'evil filthy rich' who need to be taxed out of existence. Its never the actual 1% who get taxed or who's taxes get put up. When you factor in all the taxes, levies (taxes under another name), minimal basic food, water and shelter expenses for a year, you quickly realise that the middle class are being hit with what is effectively 75% tax, and people wonder why they're not having kids, and why they're leaving to other countries where they're treated far better.
    1
  650. 1
  651. 1 - because he doesn't put all his "eggs" in the one basket. He can see opportunities to make some money quickly and so he does 2 - Devolution is actually a real thing. If things regress (i.e. devolve) then that's absolute proof that things were bad and unworkable. Evolution only occurs when the change is highly efficient, beneficial and well proven Will people go back to trading in gold and silver? Absolutely. Only fools and morons think otherwise. There is nothing else on this planet that is as valuable as gold and silver can't be artificially made and they aren't highly abundant and thus they are valuable. Everyone knows what they're worth and everyone knows that over thousands of years, whilst currencies have come and gone, gold and silver have remained a constant. Look at Venezuela, Cuba, etc. everything has three prices - Bolivars / Gold / Silver. They literally will shave gold and silver to get the correct amount to buy the things they need and want because the money is so worthless. If you back a currency by gold or silver you can't just add to it. The problem was when the USA left the gold standard so they could "print more money". When you have a currency backed by bullion, the only way to adjust the amount in circulation is to reprice the bullion, you can't just "print more money". If you think Bitcoin is the solution, tell me, what's going to happen when the internet or power are gone? How will you use bitcoin? You can't as it won't function. At least with gold and silver you can carry pieces, shavings, etc. of it and trade it for goods and services. Bullion is real money and doesn't need anything else in order to work. If you think Bitcoin can't be added to, double-spent or otherwise manipulated, unfortunately you're misled. It most definitely can, all you need to do is to control 51% of the mining (this is easy for a govt as they can force their citizens to a different MainNet) - then you can manipulate the blockchain however you like as you have enough controlled consensus to approve the otherwise illegal changes. Bitcoin and all crypto can't be married to bullion - all crypto is tied to energy due to the need for crypto mining. In the long run, the time proven solution (bullion) will win out and society will start afresh. Personally I would be ensuring I have some bullion safely locked away and I would be slowly building up sufficient supplies of shelf-stable foods and products/tools that I know I'll need and that will last before things get worse.
    1
  652.  @guser7137  And what happens then? Any or all of the following: * Be absolutely ignored by the authorities who will push on regardless because "you and everyone like you are morons and only the state knows what's best" * Be given a travel ban (i.e. passport revoked) - no way to leave when you realise that "this is the last chance to leave" * Get thrown in jail * Be deemed "insane" by the authorities and lose your licences, job, etc. Potentially being put into "care" AU, NZ & CAN are all further ahead on the other half of the insane tyranny. The ULEZ, traffic calming, Euro 7, etc. are only just getting introduced in these countries. These countries have been doing everything else in the WEF handbook whilst the UK have been doing these things. The sad reality is, they don't give a damn what the masses say or want, they'll give the masses a small win for a short time (approximate 6-8 months) and then push on regardless. Protesting does nothing except get you on all the lists that the state uses to target threats and helps fuel the state propaganda about all the "crazy loonies who are the reason that the state needs absolute control to save the world". I am 100% against the climate BS and the 2030/WEF BS, the problem is there is no way to stop it. They have the power, they make the rules/laws, they have the monopoly on lethal force and detaining people. The sad truth is the masses are powerless. Like all crazy dictatorial nuts in history - everything they do is 100% legal as they make it legal as they pass laws accordingly; and everyone suffers... The only current solution is to move to a country where this BS isn't happening. The problem is those countries are the tax havens and getting into them is extremely expensive and thus most can't do so. The tax havens are exempt from all this BS because that's where all the globalist/trans-humanist nuts (from the WEF, BIS, etc.) live.
    1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. Fact: If Russia isn't stopped in Ukraine then the entire "west" will be destroyed by Russia. Everyone needs to stop thinking that Russia are powerful - they're not, they're actually weak as weak; the proof being how long the so-called "three day take-over" has gone. Wake up and quit believing the bullshit lies that Russia keep spouting, they're all bullshit. Let's go through Russia's lies: * Nazis in Ukraine - guess what, there's Nazis in every country, especially Russia which is a country full of Nazis (they just don't use that term) * Everyone threatening and wanting to invade Russia - Literal bullshit. Not a single country other than China has any desire to invade Russia. Russia is a giant wasteland with zero accessible resources. Remember the whole "mineral wealth in Russia will dominate the world" bullshit. That went silent when they realised that accessing any mineral wealth in Russia isn't financially viable as its below a bluestone reef 1km thick. * Poland and the Baltics are preparing to invade Russia - utter bullshit. These countries are preparing for an invasion by Russia as they aren't part of Russia (and never will be) and refuse to be under the thumb of Russia ever again Simply put all Russia does is lie and brainwash its people with lies. Russian people literally think that the whole world are Nazis, that the whole world is wanting to invade and destroy Russia, that everyone outside of Russia is torturing animals for fun, that only Russia can save the world and that its good for Russians to go abroad and indiscriminately kill non-Russians. This is the reality of Russia and was made public when people were being interviewed by the media as to why they want to sign up and fight against Ukraine. What this tells any sane person is that Russia needs to be contained within its borders and its citizens banned from being anywhere outside of Russia. Then there's the fact that Putin has said that he wants to rebuild the Tsarist Empire - this requires the take-over of Europe, the Baltics and the Balkans. He's also declared that he's getting ready to take back Alaska as he's decided that the legal sale of Alaska to the USA is now magically "invalid". Anyone who thinks its only about Ukraine is a moron - just like Hitler, it's always "just one more country" until he's invaded and taken over everything. Note that he's already invaded Georgia, Ukraine (Crimea and Eastern Ukraine), Belarus (Putin is really in charge of Belarus), French Africa (the Wagner coups is 100% Putin's fault) and the current Israel-gaza war (100% orchestrated by Russia to spread "western" forces thin). The single biggest threat to Russia is Putin. If Putin quit indoctrinating the Russian people with lies and to hate anyone who isn't Russian, and if Russia simply stayed within its own borders then Russia would have zero issues.
    1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. From what I've read, heard and researched, only the most expensive programs and the most well known ones require this, that said if a program starts getting too many applicants, they will introduce this requirement as a way to slow the applications they're receiving. Its as much a way to reduce the number of people doing CBI as it is to keep out what they deem as "riff-raff"; they don't want you needing govt support once accepted, and, they want you to continue to contribute (if you move there - required if you want the tax benefits) by running businesses (licences and taxes), they especially want jobs created for locals. The programs that require you to have qualifications will expect to see engineering, medical, law, science, etc. qualifications - not arts degrees. Simply put, if you have the money for these "top-end" programs, you're easily able to afford to be a Nomad Capitalist client and you can afford to start a large business abroad. If you can't afford the "top-end" programs, do one that you can afford. Note the following (its not mentioned in any freely available CBI information) - all programs want to see that you have at least $75,000-$250,000+ left after you pay for CBI as they feel that this ensures that you're able to support yourself (incase you move there) and have a place to live (buying/renting a house, etc.). In general, if your bank account (from when you apply until 6 months after being accepted) isn't over $500,000USD (for the affordable programs) or over $3,000,000USD for the "top-end" programs (1,000,000 Euro + programs), the countries won't accept your application when they have to give a decision on your application. In regards to your question about wanting to go to Switzerland via golden visa - there isn't any program for that. Even if there was, I would never recommend Switzerland for two reasons: 1. Its extremely expensive 2. My fathers colleague lived there (Switzerland) legally for 28yrs as a medical professor (at a university there) and medical specialist at a hospital there, he learnt the language for his Canton (Switzerland is split into regions called Canton's), integrated with the local community, learnt the history, etc. He passed all the citizenship tests but was rejected by the citizenship "council" (all people must vote yes or the applicant is rejected - there is no automatic citizenship process in Switzerland) as they "didn't feel he was deeply enough integrated to Swiss society". As he told my father: "they were happy to have my skills, my work and reputation, they paid well but clearly never wanted me in their society". My fathers colleague left Switzerland and retired back to Sweden (where he's from).
    1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. The other thing that the "use public transport" lot all forget is there's plenty of things that can't be done if you have to use public transport. If you fish, hunt, target shoot (archery or firearms), etc. you legally can't use public transport with the required equipment or with the caught fish or hunted meat. Also, if you're a chef you can't take your knives on public transport, nor can you buy knives and take them home on public transport, nor can you take a knife to get sharpened via public transport. Do you want to go camping? Can't take all that equipment on public transport. Are you a sparkie, plumber, etc. - can't take your tools and supplies on public transport. Public transport also fails as it'll never go where everyone needs it to. It'll only ever go where the masses commonly go. Every time people tell me to "use public transport" and I explain why that's not an option their responses are: * Well just don't do [activity], get a real hobby... OR * You're the exception to the rule What I find ridiculous is that I and everyone I know are always the "exception to the rule". Given that EV's and public transport only work for a minority and everyone else is always the "exception to the rule" that means that the ones who are actually the "exception to the rule" are the ones who want EV's and public transport. As for ABC - always be charging. That's 100% exclusive to EV's. I've never heard anyone ever say ABRF - always be re-fueling. One can carry a jerrycan of fuel, one can't carry a spare charge for an EV!
    1
  699. That money you say "goes missing" most likely doesn't use a structure like this, its usually just moved to accounts in other countries and multiple existing laws are broken - its much simpler fraud and financial crime - only possible due to corruption. It's structures like the ones shown in the video that make it possible for people such as yourself to succeed. Sure its not easy to setup and maintain but once you can afford to its great - your assets are safe from frivolous lawsuits, if a business fails, you don't lose everything. What scares me is this push for a natural person to be publicly listed for all entities (its a public listing as ownership of companies is public in most western countries). It scares me because that's just putting a target on those people who could be assumed to be wealthy or who are wealthy and thus at risk of being kidnapped and ransomed when they could otherwise have the name of a legal entity tied to the company. To me, the requirement for a natural person to be listed makes doing business too unsafe so I guess the tax havens and privacy-centric countries will be the future as will any form of business that doesn't require a 'natural person' to be listed publicly. The other thing that scares me is this insane demand for global minimum tax. If a country doesn't want to tax its citizens, then as long as those citizens genuinely live there full-time, why should they have to be taxed because some other country doesn't like other countries not imposing taxes on citizens. The model shown in the video still requires the relevant entities to pay taxes, it just enables the owner to live full-time in a tax haven and not pay any personal income tax in the tax haven. The business does however pay taxes where its registered. Once all tax havens are gone, there'll be nothing to stop governments taxing everyone at 100% and there'll be no way to succeed. To me, this push for huge taxes is driven by: * Countries with huge welfare states and they can't keep paying welfare so they want all the money they can get * By the Elite who want to keep us all poor so they can stay hugely rich and then control us by controlling all of life's necessities. The public are blinded by "hivemind" and group-think based on emotion and ill thought out logic and are being used to usher in a new era of slavery where the 99% are the slaves to the 1% (the Elite). We all need tax havens and as few taxes as possible. On that note - I often get asked how do tax havens make money - its easy: * Business Licences (annual) - $80,000+ - commonly they become a % of company income once the company income exceeds a certain amount * Import & Export Duties * Tourism * Property Tax (Sometimes commercial only, sometimes both commercial and private) * Citizenship By Investment That provides all the money they need. The governments aren't bloated, money doesn't get wasted and the people don't get taxed on personal income. Consider how much is wasted on verifying tax compliance each year. Think how much gets wasted on chasing old mate Bob for those $2 he accidentally forgot to declare. The compliance side is costing more than collection but to the government the compliance, fear and control is as important as is the money - hence they literally waste huge amounts of money!
    1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705.  @Igoriann  The reason people don't want to get qualified is usually because they're in a country such as Australia where it takes forever to get qualified (TAFE & mandatory apprenticeship) for things that could be solely taught at TAFE in practical hands on classes (i.e. plumbing and gas fitting, electrical work (electrician)). 3-6yrs (course + apprenticeship as both are mandatory) to get qualified as a plumber (assuming you can land the apprenticeship - a requirement to even enroll in the course) VS 4yrs getting a degree and getting a job in another country where you get paid well. Also, the more bureaucracy the govt creates, the more people leave as they can't be bothered with jumping through more hoops and paperwork. The primary cause of this is govt's trying to keep everyone in education and to eliminate every single risk / injury down to paper-cuts. A lot of people are also being kept out of industries because they have a relative already in that industry. In Australia, if you have a relative already working in any medical field, you're automatically prohibited from doing the exam required to enter medical courses so that "the same families don't keep taking all the places and not letting other people have a go". So you get this situation where those other people don't want to do medicine and because the govt prohibit anyone with relatives in medicine from getting qualified, there happen to be huge shortages and thus the govt brings in "skilled migrant workers" because "there's no one in Australia who wants to work". People are sick of this BS, no matter what industry they're in. Then there's people such as myself who got qualified in their industry (engineering), only to have the govt regulate us out of work by having excessive requirements in order to register under the newly introduced mandatory registration, requirements that make zero sense for the industry, so, I went overseas where my qualifications were happily accepted without any of the BS. As for people who want to sit at home and make money - its easy. Plenty of people get paid to do work from home as freelancers, writers, programmers, web designers, etc. A lot have got into financial trading (day trading, etc.). "When the rules of the game keep changing every time you come close to winning, the only way to win, is to not play the game!" This quote is exactly what people are doing, they're pivoting, going overseas to where they're treated best and / or simply not playing the unwinnable game.
    1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. Fixing (i.e. paying) the debt is easy. If the "western" world quit being bloody welfare states, they'd be able to pay down the debt which would dramatically shrink the interest payments. But no, instead of having pain now whilst the debt is relatively low (when compared to 2050 estimates), they'd rather keep delaying, increasing the debt, debasing the dollar and gearing up for the collapse to end all collapses. If they dealt with it now and had pain, it'd be bad but survivable. By delaying it, they're all but guaranteeing their absolute destruction / collapse from which no one will survive. If they hope that this will drive people to CBDC as it might look "attractive", then they're fooling themselves as many are waking up to the truth of what a CBDC is and why they're dangerous. Basically, the west is destroying itself and will cease to exist when it all comes crashing down. It is very likely that the Euro will take over as the global reserve currency as its used by at least 28 countries who collectively contain the richest people in the world. Whilst the 3rd world thinks its gonna do well with BRICS, they're delusional. Ironically, every country that joins BRICS is immediately cut off from trade with the west (some exceptions apply such as China because they're still deemed essential at the moment) as they're trading with a sanctioned country (Russia) which thanks to ITAR prohibits trade and assistance to any country that trades with a sanctioned country. Its actually quite surprising how many daily used items are actually subject to ITAR. Their assumptions are based on "the west, especially Europe needs us". Providing that Central and Eastern Europe continue to do things themselves (i.e. manufacturing, advanced manufacturing, farming, mining, etc.) then there is no need for the 3rd world as far as trade is concerned. This is good for the Euro because it means that if the 3rd world want aid, food, products and services, they'll need to obtain them from Europe if they can't obtain it from themselves. This means that they'll have to pay on the terms of Europe - i.e. Euros. Their only other option would be to pay in bullion - this is the opposite flow that BRICS want; they expect the world to pay them in bullion, not for them to pay the rest of the world. Ever since the '2020 thing', a lot of manufacturing has moved back to Central and Eastern Europe, the war in Ukraine has only helped accelerate this process due to sanctions and trade / export bans.
    1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729.  @lukeey2011  Sadly, that's how they win. Outsiders looking at China see their social credit system for what it is. If however you ask a local in China they'll say how its for "safety" and "it's fair and justified" and how it "never affects them" because they grew up in it. The reason dictators and regimes love to purge isn't just to remove dissenters, but to ensure that there aren't people who remember the "old days and the old ways". When people grow up in tyranny they see it as normal as they've never known freedom. Its best exemplified with the bird example: A bird is locked in a cage and wants to break free because it grew up free and able to do what it wants. Some other birds are put into the cage however these other birds were born in captivity and raised in a cage. They don't understand why the old bird wants to break out when live is "wonderful" in the cage - they think the old bird is crazy. The old bird eventually dies and the cage is removed. In reality now that the cage is gone, all the birds are free and can leave whenever they want, however they remain where they are because they love the cage and think its normal. They have no desire to leave the area that was enclosed by the cage. The only way to be free is to know true freedom and to hold onto it at all costs. Looking back at old stories, Robin Hood was truly free, as were the well known stories of the pirates. This sense of true freedom is one of the main reasons the stories of both Robin Hood and the pirates have been loved by many for centuries. In recent years, Robin Hood is no longer mentioned, read or thought of because the youth of today are taught only about "how horrible Robin Hood and Pirates were" and "how you shouldn't be like them because following rules without question is what matters".
    1
  730. 1
  731. You miss the point - every country can cover the pensions and health system for their natural born citizens - its all the illegals that have been let in that are all on welfare that's killing the country financially. If the country rounded up all the illegals, stripped them of Austrian citizenship that they shouldn't have ever been given, and, sent them back to Africa where they came from, the country would suddenly start being affordable and working well again. The same BS is ruining Australia - the govt keep claiming 'there's not enough people to do the work and pay the taxes' but they keep importing 3rd scum who end up on eternal welfare, who then bring their families under 'reunification visas' who also get on welfare. That's 1 million people each year and it never stops. 185,000 homes are all that can be built in a year, the cities are now sprawling over the good farmland so food now has to be imported at a huge rate, and due to the housing shortage, all local kids who grow up and need homes have nothing available, they can't afford the millions to buy a home, and they're taxed to death. Because the govt only looks at migration, it never considers any of the locals, that they might need houses, that they might be trying to start working. They just don't care because migration is a 'get rich quick' ponzi scheme to bleed the public dry through taxation. Why do you think most politicians are involved in 'big business' - so they get rich by ruining countries. They also love the high crime that the illegals cause because it justifies ever more tyrannical laws and powers to the state.
    1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734.  obimk1-ms1jw  So you're not an engineer as "automotive" isn't a field of engineering (mechanical, civil, electrical, chemical and biomedical). I am a Mechanical Engineer and I have read Euro 7 in full as its being forced upon AU, NZ and CAN by 2028 so preparations are under way to keep businesses alive (though many will have to surrender most vehicles). Not sure why you think trying to have a pissing match on qualifications has any relevance as regardless you clearly haven't fully read, nor do you understand Euro 7. Euro 7 exists in two parts that must be used together: 1) The Euro 7 Standard 2) The Mandates For Implementing Euro 7 Whilst you are correct about part 1, you've completely ignored part 2 which is the part that says that in order to implement Euro 7, only vehicles that comply with Euro 6 or Euro 7 are permitted for use by the public. This means that older vehicles aren't in compliance with Euro 6 or 7 and thus can't be used (except for Classic Historic (75yrs+ old, all original parts) which get 45 permit days a year). This is the issue. Think this is BS - look at Australia, New Zealand and Canada who are all implementing Euro 7 by 2028 - all vehicles that aren't Euro 6 at a minimum won't be allowed to be used - its already been declared on TV by the PM's. As for people dying - that's pollution and life choices. It has nothing to do with vehicles. Case in point, compare the air quality of the streets in London to the underground. The underground is so polluted it shouldn't be legally allowed to operate as the air is completely unsafe. The air on the roads barely leaves the bottom range of pollution that is acceptable. Also, if you care so much about pollution then get all the filthy EV's off the road - the particulate from their brakes (only the upper end EV's use ramp stop breaking (slowing the motor to slow the vehicle), cheap ones all use disc brakes) and tyres, as well as the extra damage they cause to the roads due to their excessive weight creates far more pollution than old Bob in his 40yr old car.
    1
  735. 1
  736.  @tshepishochuene1280  You failed reading comprehension and you are out of touch with reality. No one said the nature isn't beautiful. SA is a violent crime infested, commie, racist hellhole, that has repeatedly told whites to "leave or die", the govt of which sung "kill the boer" as part of its platform, that actively enabled the farm murders (only way for military signal jammers to be available to the attackers), and the govt repeatedly said that the "west" and 'outside influences' aren't welcome in any capacity. The new govt (GNU) will likely not achieve much (due to riots and protests by those who reject change and having to work), or they won't be re-elected and the govt that replaces them will undo everything the GNU did. The reality is that in order to fix things, communism, racism and BEE need to be abolished, crime needs extreme punishments and that collectively results in a much worse period of life in order to implement. When that is attempted, the 99% will reject it, riot and change will fail. Once people are used to doing as they like and not having to work or 'go without', forcing them into that NEVER works. This is why SA isn't going to change any time soon, this is why Occupied-Rhodesia will NEVER get farmers to return and will NEVER get foreign investment. Unlike the 99% of people in any country who are dumb sheep, the 1% who are the ones with money and can invest, are the ones who can and do remember just what these places did to them in the past. Thus they aren't going to let it happen a second time, hence they avoid the place forever. African countries want to function without the 'west' and without non-African people, are now getting what they want and its resulting in their collapse as the rest of the world DOESN'T need them. Without foreign investment and without foreign trade, there's zero way for African countries to succeed as it takes money to make money. The decline of most of the countries in Africa is only beginning. The best example is the countries that recently ejected the French - they're now 100% sanctioned (no business, aid or trade) as Russian puppet states because they let Russian mercenaries kick out the French and are now considered to be Russian by the 'western' world.
    1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758.  @incomingincoming1133  Clearly those people have no lives and never do anything because they have the time to literally sit for hours everywhere waiting to charge their EV. Whether the EVangelists like it or not, ICE vehicles will ALWAYS be faster to refuel and easier to go on long trips with as extra fuel can be carried. The other thing everyone ignores is that EV's are commonly 2-4 times heavier than their ICE counterparts which means much more expensive annual registration (as its done by weight), they're banned from most tunnels in most of CANZUK and CUNA just like placarded loads (for the same safety reasons) and they destroy the roads faster due to their increased weight. Then there's the issue of them not being insurable due to the risks and harms of EV fires - insurance companies just won't take the chance anymore in an ever increasing number of areas. Also, most people refuse to pay $80,000+ for a vehicle (this is the real price of most EV's when you ignore the taxpayer funded "incentives" and subsidies that only exist in "woke" areas) PLUS the $25,000 required to go to 3-phase power as most normal people don't have the time to waste hoping the EV will charge overnight fully. Also, with ICE vehicles there's no need to sit and plan your travel to ensure you can find working chargers, you just go out and know that you're always near a servo and if not, you chuck a Jerrycan in the boot. You're making the 250 miles a day number up because that ignores AC on full blast due to 35-40 degree Celsius weather, pulling a trailer or sitting in traffic - EV's suck at doing these things that the AC & pulling trailers kills the battery much quicker than just driving the EV only. 150-250 miles a day is a quiet day's worth of driving for most people in USA, CAN & AU. Seriously - what tiny EU country do you live in? You claim you only have to charge your EV twice a month - do you never drive to the supermarket or anywhere else? Do you not live in a tiny freezing cold winter which drains batteries rapidly? Just going to the supermarket is 25km each way. The shopping centre is 30km each way. Work is 80km each way. That's AU for you. EV's might work in the pathetically small EU countries but in real countries USA, CAN, AU they every will and are completely impractical. Also, most people can't afford to own more than one vehicle so the one vehicle must be usable around town and out in the bush camping (usually a 1 week or longer trip without returning to town) - EV's just don't work. Also, you can use close to the same amount of fuel in constant stop-start traffic like the traffic caused by the ever decreasing speed limits and road narrowings. Claiming that people who need to drive a lot are "rare" is like saying people are "rare" on this planet. Every time someone tells me "you're the exception" to literally everything on every topic, I always tell them "if I and everyone I know is always the exception, that you're the only one who thinks otherwise, then you're the exception and we're the majority".
    1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767.  @littlebrit  Nope, not making this up. What are you worried about? If you're not illegally working whilst there as a tourist then you have nothing to fear. The problem is enough digital nomads think the world owes them everything and that they can do whatever they like, so (not all, but enough of them) they work illegally; just because its online work doesn't mean it isn't breaking the law. The result is that the authorities are sick of it and are simply enforcing their laws and properly punishing those breaking said laws. This is resulting in countries scrapping their plans for "digital nomad visas" and to tighten their visa policies. Its also resulting is locals getting pissed off by the increase police and border guard presence in places that were very quiet before digital nomads. Angry locals aim their anger at anyone who's not from that area and it makes life unpleasant for both tourists who are doing the right thing and for citizens who live in other cities but want to spend a weekend in a small town. The other thing that the digital nomads who do the wrong thing want to seriously consider is that even if by some miracle they avoid jail, their ability to travel will be seriously affected as they'll receive an EU-wide entry prohibition (can be anything up to 5yrs or permanent - depends on the arresting authority and country). At the end of the day, if you want to travel, travel and be a tourist (i.e. no work), if you want to work, either go somewhere you have full work rights (permanent residency or citizenship) or get the appropriate work visa - its not hard and over 40 countries (several of which are in the EU) have digital nomad visas. If the few who do the wrong thing continue to do so, then they'll screw it up for everyone.
    1
  768.  @blktauna  As follows: 1. Results in small and/or popular areas getting unwanted attention from the cops and border guard searching for people illegally working. Locals get harassed by the authorities as a way of saying "if you kicked out all outsiders/foreigners we wouldn't harass you". 2. It results in businesses either having to introduce time limits to stop non-locals sitting there and working whilst only having one or two coffees but occupying the table for the entire day and causing the business to lose a heap of cashflow. 3. You waste work-share/timeshare spaces that locals would use if you weren't occupying them all day illegally working. Spaces are limited and intended for locals and those with full work rights - not for tourists. 4. The fact you still fail to understand that hypothetically even if the locals weren't affected, you're still breaking the law by illegally working. This affects every digital nomad, every tourist and every visa applicant. The fact you think its okay to breach your visa requirements (visa-free is still a visa except its automatically recorded digitally and you're still bound by the same restrictions as a tourist) results in fewer visas being issued, in countries scrapping or never introducing digital nomad visas, in significantly stricter requirements to even apply/qualify for a visa. Simply put, you cause unwanted attention and harassment for locals, loss of business revenue as enough digital nomads occupy tables for hours whilst spending very little and most importantly, you're breaking the law and making it so that being a digital nomad will be outright banned if you are too up yourself to do the right thing and get a work visa or digital nomad visa. Do the right thing and don't ruin it for everyone because you think you're all that matters and that the world revolves around you. Otherwise, feel free to ruin it for everyone and likely end up in jail in a part of the world you don't want to be jailed in.
    1
  769.  @blktauna  Work has always been considered to be any work whether physical or not. It's not their job to educate people on entry/visa rules - that's the job the the traveler. In regards to renting spaces to non-locals - under EU law due to the freedom of movement in the Schengen Zone, the only people who can be refused are tourists. The form you sign when booking a space has a declaration that you confirm you have full work rights and understand that you can be prosecuted, deported or jailed if you don't have full work rights. The reason these spaces are an issue is as follows: we pay a lot in taxes for shared work/timeshare work spaces which are funded by the govt for locals - those who have digital nomad visas or work visas are always welcome, the problem is when digital nomads without work or digital nomad visas are booking out the place by falsely declaring they have work rights resulting in those doing the right thing missing out. Within the last two years, ID has become required to book such places as a way of verifying declarations - this should have been the norm from the beginning. Yes there are some private spaces (intended for non-locals with the correct visas or work rights) however they're still legally required to only let those with full work rights work there - the problem is these private spaces primarily care about money and don't verify the declaration signed by the individual. ETIAS will pair your physical life with your digital life - it will collect and pair enough information to monitor anyone in Europe who enters under ETIAS (all non-EU citizens). ETIAS is a heavy-handed response to enough people doing the wrong thing. As for why locals get harassed by the authorities - in smaller areas, the authorities usually get to do nothing, so they see it as a hindrance to have to work so they take the attitude of "make the locals reject others so the problem stops", not to mention, even if they aren't intending to harass locals, the restaurant and cafe searches and increased govt presence annoys locals who want to be left alone and who don't want to feel like they're back in the war or cold war period being monitored. What might be a one-off ID check for a tourist could be a weekly occurrence for a local at more than one location. When the authorities search a cafe or restaurant, they'll have you put your hands in the air if they think you're working, everyone else will be grabbing their ID's whilst they rush to everyone with their hands in the air (its their way to stop you trying to hide illegally working). Visa requirements are just that, requirements to qualify for the visa. The conditions of the visa and of entry are separate. The USA, CAN, AU & NZ have visa-free to the EU but working is prohibited. The only exception to the work prohibition is attending conferences. As I said a few replies above, the strictest areas are Central and Eastern Europe, the Baltic States and Italy - these are the countries most intent on catching people illegally working. Most of Western Europe have digital nomad visas, all of the EU Schengen countries have Schengen business visas (valid for 90 days) that are easy to obtain from the same place as a Schengen visa for tourism.
    1
  770.  @renemarie5936  Wow you are so out of touch with reality. The best part about children growing up seeing the world is that they have friends everywhere, they learn about different cultures and they learn that whilst people have different opinions/beliefs, that they can still be friends and respect each others right to disagree. Done properly, they see their friends multiple times each year. Just because you're moving, doesn't mean that consistency suddenly vanishes. Also, if you want to whinge about 'roots', guess what, most ethnic Europeans have family 'roots' across 2-4 countries in many cases, most people living in CANZUK/CUNA have family in multiple countries. You honestly sound like a hyper-sheltered person who never traveled as a child and who loves to make assumptions about 'how bad it is'. As someone who, as a child spent a lot of time traveling (as my parents attended work conferences, visiting family who live in the same countries the conferences were in), making friends around the world. It was never 'traumatic' or 'damaging', it was exciting, structured, had good routines and made me a much more educated, rounded and understanding person than those that spent their life in the one place. The fact you wrote the rubbish that you did shows that Nomad Capitalist isn't the channel for you and that you genuinely fail to understand how children can be raised in a trifecta or flag theory lifestyle in a grounded and consistent manner with good routines, all whilst forming lifelong friendships with people all around the world.
    1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. @NeilMcCoyWard Welcome to Communism and its core tenant - POLITBURO and "wrong think & wrong speak". They NEED to control the narrative just like during the plandemic because they know that their plans will only work if the masses are uninformed of facts and only if the masses are unable to communicate with each other. This control of speech is core to indoctrinating and brainwashing people. They always go after the easy targets first - social media posts and sharing information because these people a experts at disseminating information and communicating - skills that could be used against the regime one day (hence why they must be stamped out). Then they go after ANY & ALL political opposition - there's only room for one party - hence the "right are bad, only the left are good and able to save the world", etc. Lastly, they remove the "family" - your kids belong to the State and you have zero rights to be a parent - its a 'privilege' the State chooses to bestow upon only the "best" citizens. The entire time this happens, you lose everything - your job, your house and all you money - then you have no choice but to comply because the only one who can keep you alive is the State. That's communism and what being behind the Iron Curtain was. Honestly, as someone who agrees with you on a lot of things, who's family faced persecution by both the Nazis & the Soviets, I would highly recommend that you do a CBI program (if you haven't already) so that should worst come to worst, you can flee to a safe place where the tyranny isn't happening. Things will only get worse and the more the masses try to resist, the more tyrannical and extreme the regime will become as the time to stop the tyranny was at least a decade ago, but most definitely pre-2020!
    1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779.  @jeremyradford5103  Yeah that's in the UK, my comments specifically said what's already being done in Australia - only mentioned as a warning. Your rubbish about air pollution is an outright lie that comes from the UK govt. There are plenty of videos on YouTube showing the air to be well within safe limits, the danger however is the air in the London Underground which is beyond safe limits and is so dangerous that it should be shutdown until the air can be made safe. CO2 does NOT cause climate change - CO2 causes cooling, methane causes warming. The Vostok Ice Cores prove this and that is exactly why they are ignored. Remove CO2 and the plants die and then there's no air to breathe - if the plants are turning yellow when they should be green that's proof that they aren't getting enough CO2. Increase CO2 by a factor of 5 and you'll get 12x plant biomass and a heap more breathable air. As for why the weather is going crazy - its two things: * Cloud seeding (the UK, CAN, AU, NZ, USA, Russia and China have all publicly admitted to doing so) which takes moisture from one area and moves it to another. Do this too much and the balance of nature gets destroyed and the weather becomes extreme (what the movie Geostorm tries to cover) * High sunspot activity which occurs when the sun is in its closest orbit to the earth whilst the earth is tilting towards it (Milkanovitch cycles). This is relevant because it signifies a pole shift which occurs when a warm age or an ice age is coming to an end; the weather goes to extremes during pole shifts as a result of a severely weakened magnetosphere (weakened due to major pole drift exceeding 5 degrees of shift in a year). Those same oil companies are the ones who produce all the "green tech" at much higher profit margins than they get from oil. The worlds largest producer of solar panels and wind turbines is BP. By "going green" you're literally funding big oil. Time is not running out. You have been brainwashed and gaslit to believe the lies of people who literally get rich off "going green", these same people want to dictate everything you do. Look at the real facts such as the Vostok Ice Cores, look at the actual experts who got defunded and forced out of work because the actual research they did (such as studying ice cores), didn't fit the "green agenda". This is just like all the past hysteria: 1960's - Oil gone in 10yrs 1970's - Another Ice age in 10yrs 1980's - Acid rain will destroy all crops in 10yrs 1990's - Ozone layer will be gone in 10yrs 2000's - The icecaps will be gone in 10yrs None of this ever happened but each scare resulted in more taxes and more govt control over our lives.
    1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. @nomadcapitalist Regarding the talk about citizenship based taxation, I would like to mention that its already very easy for any country to enforce it should they choose. All they have to do is to deactivate or cancel the passport of any of their citizens who haven't paid tax. Should a country wish to be more aggressive, they can issue any of the following INTERPOL notices: * Green Notice - Used for warnings and intelligence (generally govt to govt) * Purple Notice - Modus Operandi. Used for gaining information of the modus operandi of a person or to carry out the wishes of the issuing govt * Red Notice - Wanted Persons. Used to have people arrested and extradited for prosecution as the result of criminal activity (incl. not paying taxes) On top of this once CBDC's are rolled out govts will simply garnish the money from those who don't pay. This is another reason to have money in various forms and around the world, so you're not solely dependent on one CBDC. Its better to be able to afford lawyers to fight things in court than to have all your money frozen and have no defence in court. Lastly, the one thing that people generally don't realize is that renouncing a citizenship is only you the individual asking to be released from their citizenship, even if the govt says "sure, goodbye", that government has the authority to declare that person, or anyone else in the world to be a citizen. This means if a country really wants citizenship based taxation, they can start by declaring everyone who renounced to be a citizen again and then they can pick people at random (could be tourists) and declare them to be citizens. The worst part about this is that the individual has no say in being made a citizen, its solely at the discretion of the govt. This is a tactic already commonly used by countries to get around extradition issues as its much harder for countries to refuse to extradite people who are citizens of the requesting country.
    1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791.  @wuerges  Mercosur operates internally like Schengen does and like OECS does, hence not having the passport requirement. I'm not making up rules, I'm simply explaining how the rules work outside any Freedom of Movement Union (Schengen, Mercosur, OECS, CTA, Trans-Tasman). The rule about being only able to enter and exit a country you're a citizen of with its passport is law in all but two countries in the world (obviously excluding remaining within a Freedom of Movement Union). The rule about having to enter and exit on the same passport so you don't illegally overstay is law everywhere that requires passports as since passports aren't linked, if you enter on passport A and leave on passport B then you're legally in a huge mess as Passport A is illegally overstaying and passport B can't leave as it never legally entered the country. My original comment was specifically saying that an emergency passport would be required to enter the country to collect the documents otherwise it wouldn't be possible to do so without illegally entering the country as once you're at the document collection stage, you've already been made a citizen and been issued a passport - given that CBI applicants will 99.99% of the time be from outside OECS, they will need to enter with a passport and since they'd be entering a country they're a citizen of, they can only use an ordinary passport issued by that country or an emergency passport issued by that country. At no point was I talking about Freedom of Movement Unions which operate differently as, people within said unions never actually leave their country of citizenship (as far as border controls are concerned) when traveling within the Freedom of Movement Union, the only time they leave is when they head to a country outside their Freedom of Movement Union.
    1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. It has zero value - its 100% dependent on energy (power) and the centrally controlled internet, it requires insane amounts of data to be recorded forever in order to function and is easily controlled by controlling the mining. Whilst privacy coins are untraceable they have the same problems as normal crypto. If you think blockchain is the solution and will last, look what the govts have done to privacy coins and crypto - delisted from exchanges, illegal to possess/have/own/use, on-ramping and off-ramping to all exchanges has been banned by most western banks along with PayPal and most credit cards, mandatory govt id registration of wallets, use of hardware wallets banned (on-chain crypto only), just to mention a few things the west has done. How long until the govts force ISP's to block all crypto at the protocol level? How long until govts forcibly shut down any exchange that supports crypto? How long until govts make the possession, use or acceptance of crypto illegal? How long until govts do what Australia did and tax crypto so heavily that its literally not worth having? I have a bad feeling that when WEB4 launches (the internet that is 100% govt ID regulated and controlled), it won't support any unauthorised protocols or transmissions and thus won't support crypto. The result would be all the crypto servers being shut down! I've said for ages that whilst the "how blockchain works" is good to know, blockchain as we currently know it has too many issues resulting in it being worthless as the problems far outweigh the solutions. The only way for blockchain to have value and for crypto to thrive is to decouple it all from the internet, for blockchains to be lightweight and self-pruning and to be designed solely around anonymity.
    1
  823.  @marcelchaloupka  Regarding the tax part - with the exception of the USA, in the entire rest of CANZUK and CUNA its not possible to "pay virtually no tax" as the countries are so tax hungry that they try to tax everyone to death. As for "exploiting people" that's pure BS. Most people who move abroad are either self-employed, investors, trade forex/stocks/crypto, run online courses or start local businesses and hire locals paying them well - outside the "west" people actually know what they're worth and what a fair wage is and they won't work for less than that. The claim of "exploiting" people is generally limited to the mega-corporations who are too stupid to leave the "west" so to reduce the effect of the heavy taxation they look for dirt cheap labour. Also, the more people in those other countries get jobs and earn money, the more active their economy is and the more they get paid as the economy strengthens. As for why the low tax rate - because people are sick of being taxed to death and given that low or zero tax is possible - why not? I have a good feeling that basically everyone who goes somewhere for low or zero tax has paid much more than you and 95% of the people in "west" have ever paid. Its honestly time that the 95% actually paid their "fair share" instead of always demanding that the 5% need to "pay more because that's their "fair share"". Taxes should ideally hit hard at low incomes and hit less the more you earn - this way success is encouraged and laziness is punished. The result would be a great and highly successful economy where everyone was rich. You really need to drop the victimhood "exploiting people" BS - its a far-left catcall used to push far-left agendas and justify the disgusting behaviour of the far-left. Its very rarely ever true yet its claimed at every possible chance.
    1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829.  @Biosynchro  Bullshit - that may happen rarely but its less than 1% of cases and thus its statistically insignificant (i.e. its <5%) and doesn't justify such tyranny. The rights of the individual and the right to privacy is more important than any "collective". The reality is that the surveillance state only exists to control and monitor everyone so that the state may punish everyone over the slightest thing. 99% of cases involving cameras (of all types) revolve around going after people over the most insignificant "paper" crimes. The mere fact that you think cameras are good means that any of the following describe you: * You have zero sense or clue of reality * You think that power is never abused * You think that everyone should be charged for the most minor things * You think that everyone is guilty * You think that you'll never break any law, no matter how insignificant, no matter whether or not you've heard about it or not * You think that future regimes won't use the cameras to exert their tyranny and to go after their political opponents * You live in places like China were cameras dictate the lives of everyone * You're a commie / soviet who thinks they'll be a key party member leading the world when you take over (newsflash you won't be) You and your family have never suffered under actual tyrannical regimes, hence why you're so happy to actively enable such regimes to have maximum control. The fact is that there's zero legitimate public purpose for mass surveillance. You want to stop crime, then get more cops on the ground patrolling and enforcing the laws that already exist.
    1
  830.  @sidesauce  Of course he didn't - he's a commie and rejects everything private - notice his choice of words in which he tries to speak for everyone "I think a private aircraft is never a necessity. All bigger airlines are sufficient" - no they aren't sufficient, they're slow, dirty and expensive (for what they are). I'd love to see him use the main airlines to get to many places in short amounts of time that aren't close to large airports or trains (trains are also horribly slow) - this is another reason people have private aircraft - they can get to many places quickly using small airports that airlines are banned from. I'd also love to see him travel 6 countries in one day - no airline will enable this - their schedules are too slow and rigid and their planes are too slow which are also too large to enable this. He also forgot that being crammed in "commercial busses" on actual long-haul trips (Australia - UAE - UK; Australia - Hong Kong - Frankfurt), its horrible being crammed unless you've got a business class ticket (easily $14k - more than usual due to the "2020 thing" and because either of the two routes just mentioned are in the longest haul category (more fuel, staff working longer, etc.)). Business class is slowly disappearing as airlines are chasing every dollar possible which means cramming in more economy seats is their goal; this is making business class tickets harder to get on popular flights, leaving private as the only option. With ticket prices as horrible as they are now, its actually possible to charter a private jet that's needing to get to the same destination as you for less than the cost of a business class ticket.
    1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. This ends once Russia is flattened and put in its place or when they surrender and completely return home with their tail between their legs. You can't de-escalate without sacrificing the lives of every Ukrainian and without losing Ukraine - if the latter happens, all of Europe will be bulldozed by Russia and its allies because this has never been about Ukraine, its about expansionism and rebuilding the Tsarist Empire; Russia's allies will get involved the moment Russia defeats Ukraine, with them involved there is no hope. The single biggest threat at the moment are the moronic peace-nicks who think that you can be rational with the nutcase that is Putin/Russia. Learn about the Slavic world and the history of the Baltics, Poland and Hungary. Do NOT let this become another Vietnam where the media and peace-nicks caused the deaths of countless millions of people who were left to be slaughtered by the communists - that blood is on all the peace-nicks, look at how shit Vietnam has been as a communist shit hole - its basically a failed state with basically no economy. The reality, as horrible as it is, is that Russia are always looking for trouble and would have invaded regardless of the excuse/reason given. In the last 600yrs Russia have never wanted peace, they've only wanted war. Countries such as Poland and the Baltics have tried to mind their own business for centuries only to have Russia always start a war and try to take over simply because these countries exist. Look at the interwar period - what happened the moment WW1 ended? The Russian Bolsheviks went on the war path and tried to obliterate Ukraine, Poland and Europe simply for existing. Thankfully they were brutally defeated by Poland in the Polish border region. As for more recent examples, Russia purposely paid their own citizens to move into two parts of Georgia to cause trouble and then claim they're being oppressed to justify invading. The same happened in Crimea. The same happened at the beginning of this current Russian war against Ukraine. What you fail to understand is that Russia have never wanted peace, they only want war and that they only understand superior violence/force. Putin has said many times that he wishes to reclaim all the land that formed both the Soviet Union and the Tsarist Empire and yeah, he's insane enough to try. Not a single country has had any interest in invading Russia or taking anything Russia has. The reality is that Russia was being ignored by the rest of the world, left out of trade, huge reductions in gas sales as the west moves away from gas and Russia couldn't stand being ignored. The solution for them was to start a war, to rape, torture and massacre innocent civilians (none of which you do if you're trying to rescue or maintain peace). Thankfully though the sanctions on Russia are working, most businesses have abandoned Russia, all software companies that could remotely disable their software did just that. Russian's can't bank anywhere outside of Russia and are prohibited from doing business with any "western" country. This is why Russia is cracking the shits and making threats that they simply can't back up. 50 years of corruption, horrible storage conditions and huge lack of quality of training has resulted in Russia being a joke militarily the moment they're up against modern western equipment. The best thing that can happen now is for the west to defeat Russia and end this war now before Russia get their allies fully involved.
    1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. Cost is irrelevant. Very few of the "riff raff" would even qualify for this new program. How many people that most would consider to be "riff raff" are highly experienced engineers, scientists, doctors, etc.? Very few. Heck the courses, experience and equipment for much of these things far exceeds $100k. Also the type who would be considered "riff raff" aren't going to move their entire life to one place and contribute to the country. As for El Salvador being the BTC mecca then the primary thing they need to do is try to force the other major countries to quit treating BTC as crypto for tax purposes. BTC is legal tender/currency in El Salvador, therefore it should be treated globally as any other currency is. However currently BTC is taxed to insane levels in most western countries as they treat it as crypto, not as a currency. Last I checked, I didn't have to track the gains and losses (for tax purposes) for having 500 Euros in my wallet from my last trip to Europe - yet for BTC that must be tracked and then taxed at a much higher level because the tax department consider crypto to be a "special asset" subject to high tax instead of being a currency (which it legally is thanks to El Salvador). The western countries want it every way (that benefits their theft... sorry I mean taxation) when in reality that just isn't workable. Either BTC is currency and subject to normal treatment like Euros or USD, or there's a lot of work that countries like El Salvador need to do in order to have their legal currencies respected.
    1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. Out of curiosity, why? Plenty of people use them to their advantage because they're responsible and pay the bill in full the moment it arrives, which means they enjoy all the benefits without the problems. If you don't trust yourself to be responsible with a credit card, then that's perfectly fine - don't get one. That however doesn't make people 'beyond stupid'. Responsible people use credit cards because: * It puts their regular spending into on transaction (i.e. paying the bill in full the moment it arrives) * It gives them fraud protection that debit cards generally don't have * They earn reward points (the points are paid by part of the merchant fee's) for doing their regular spending that they can redeem for products, holidays or gift cards. As the points are paid from part of the merchant fees, not having a credit card doesn't make the products any cheaper * They build and maintain their credit score - its essential for business, employment, mortgages, etc. * If their annual spending is over a certain amount set by the credit card company, the annual card fee is usually waived so that's suddenly not an extra expense. * Its beats carrying thousands of dollars of cash in their wallet daily. * Credit cards shouldn't (and generally don't) incur more fees as products are already priced to build in merchant fee's, as long as you don't 'carry a balance' then you're not paying any extra fee's for using a credit card. Debit cards generally result in your bank charging you a heap more transaction fee's (one for every transaction as debit cards don't charge a 'merchant fee') so your bank balance drops faster. Having one large transaction at the end of the month means fewer fee's, and you earn more interest during the month providing you earn savings on your interest on a bi-weekly or monthly cycle.
    1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. @GeoffBuysCars The worst part is there's nothing that can really be done to stop it. The state has the absolute monopoly on violence and they are able to lock everyone up as long as they like as they get to make up the laws/rules as they like. Where I live, everything is being made 40km/h (then 30km/h), speed cameras going in everywhere with surveillance cameras. Anyone who tries to speak out or who tries to "get involved to fix things", get demonized, arrested and then given two options: 1. Be quiet and stay out of everything 2. Spend life in jail or be otherwise silenced Heck, the leader of a legitimate political party who spoke the truth against the whole plandemic and was looking like they'd win, was arrested, labelled as an "extremist" and "nutjob", and when her bail conditions were set (her lawyer made them public), she was offered the following conditions: 1. Pay [insert astronomical amount here - hundreds of millions of dollars] in bail and face court in 4yrs time 2. Shutdown the party, destroy all membership lists and contact information, never be in politics again and never help anyone try to pick up where you left off and no bail money required and all charges will be dropped Everything is deliberate, well planned and calculated. The WEF are evil but they're not dumb. If you look at the "P" brand "2020 thing shots" known adverse effects, the 1st one listed is known as "1p36 deletion syndrome" - that explains the compliance and lobotomized appearance of those who had the "2020 thing shots". Just remember "you are the carbon they want to reduce". Alaska Prepper recently did a video on a UK research paper that says that breathing is bad for the environment and "scientists" are working out what to do.
    1
  866. 1
  867.  @LoremIpsum1970  Literally everyone can travel, save and have private property, to say otherwise is an outright lie. Lets break it down: * Travel - whether within the country or overseas, one can afford to travel and have a good holiday for under $5000 - just don't expect to stay in five star accommodation and don't expect to eat at the fancy places; maybe go camping and enjoy life. Also, don't travel all the time, a holiday is a once a year thing - always has been, always will be. *Saving - Currently everyone can save money. How many people buy multiple coffee's every day? Each coffee is $6. If you have coffee at home (i.e. Nespresso Original Line Pod machine and pods) that's only $0.45 per pod plus water and power. That's a saving of $5.50 per coffee right there, $5 if we allow $0.50 for water and power per pod. Further, if you have access to boiling water at work (or if you have a Jetboil (or knock-off such as the OEX)), you can have the same pod coffee by owning and using a Minipresso NS (made by Wacaco). You're currently permitted to have a bank account and save money to any amount you can manage. In the near future that will be capped at 20k GBP in the UK and $80k in the rest of the world (according to the BIS). That means zero saving and zero ability to ever do anything. To put those limits into understandable terms, that $80k is literally one new car (after taxes and registration) in Australia or New Zealand - its damn near nothing. Part of saving is securing the buying power of your money - buying a pure silver bullion coin or round each week or month will secure that value - the markets only go up and in the long-term you won't lose out. If things go bad a few years later, that bit of silver can be sold and the money used to survive. Another part of saving is stocking up before prices climb even higher. Everything will always cost more tomorrow - things you can currently afford that are shelf-stable and that you will use are worth stocking up on as they'll only cost more (or shrink in size) in the future. * Private property - Everyone has private property, whether its land, a house or simply possessions, the things you own are all private property. In the near future you won't be allowed to own anything - not even your clothes! If you think the most basic tenants of life aren't worth worrying about, then you will perish at the hands of the WEF and will contribute to their success. In the future without being able to travel (sometimes to buy things you need), save money or own private property, you'll be 100% at the mercy of the system and will have to go without everything as they will dictate what and how much you can buy and use. You honestly sound like a typical "victim mentality" person who thinks that anyone with more than you has "privilege" or is "affluent", whilst telling yourself that "you don't have the means to do those things" when in reality you do have the means - you just don't believe yourself or won't put in the hard work to succeed. Before anyone tries to say I'm talking BS and that its not possible, know this - I started with nothing and worked for everything I have, saving as much as possible. Its highly disturbing that most people have no money these days because they refuse to do the hard work to become successful and to have savings.
    1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. The problem is latex takes forever to create a document, unlike using an office suite. This is why outside of very niche fields, latex hasn't and will never take off. Yes I know how to use latex and I spend most of my time looking at "cheat sheets" to list equations and to create tables, its powerful, but painful to work with. Presentations - done properly they require animations and should automatically advance whilst showing the presenter their slide notes on a separate screen - that requires something like Impress or PowerPoint, PDF files don't support animation and don't cut it in the real world (outside of uni), vim - you've got to be joking, it has no place in ANY presentation in the real world. The easiest solution is to use latex where strict formatting is required (writing research papers) and to just use LibreOffice for everything else, disable telemetry and don't donate to those wokies. Same thing with Firefox (disable the telemetry and don't donate). The biggest mistake ANYONE can make is to use anything built on Chromium (Chrome) - its a security nightmare and has zero genuine benefits over browsers built on the architectures used in Firefox. One other point on the time to get stuff done thing: Its like idiots trying to push C# for everything when you can write the identical code in VB in 1/10 the time (time is money), and the code executes at the same speed as it compiles to the same CLR. The big push to ditch VB was to make programming seem complicated and special to justify govts introducing professional registration systems so they could force "programming professionals" to create backdoors in software or face de-registration and subsequent loss of their job. VB made programming accessible and let many people write their own software quickly and easily, that took the money and power from the govts and big corporations. VB code is very easy to read and debug, C# on the other hand can be painful to debug (especially in large solutions (30+ projects)) as you spend more time trying to keep track of line endings and that brackets are correctly placed - all time wasting that VB avoids entirely. Yes I know both C# and VB fluently - I only use C# when there's something that can't be done in any other language due to MicroSh1t artificially limiting VB by removing some advanced functionality as part of their attempt to try to abolish it.
    1
  875. 1
  876. Sorry but you're totally wrong about sailing - there's no market, prices are tanking. Hate to break it to you but unless you're commercially qualified and the vessel is commercially licenced, you can't legally sail internationally. To hold and maintain a commercial qualification and licence you need to be working for someone in the maritime industry (i.e. not self employed) and have to do annual courses and assessments to remain qualified and to renew the licence. The stupid ICC (International Certificate of Competence) that the EU, UN and most countries demand isn't possible to get if you have the 'wrong' nationality, if you're a national of a 'Res. 40' country you need that countries licence but can only get it if living there full time, and now the EU is bringing in a new 'EU-wide' licence that the UN has said will be required globally to sail internationally as a private individual. All this BS because they won't accept licences from non-EU countries unless they're commercial licences. Actual experience, skill and government issued non-commercial licences mean nothing, its all bureaucracy, money and nationality that matter. Sadly the reason they're doing this is to stop people being able to travel internationally as they want you stuck in the country you're already in. I've been trying to get around the whole ICC thing myself (so I can live aboard and sail internationally) but can't and I can't get an ICC due to nationality, even though I have actually learned to sail, have passed multiple assessments beyond whats needed for the ICC. I hold multiple countries marine licences (non-commercial). I have been told that the IPC is only accepted if the person is from the USA, and that the NauticEd SLC isn't accepted if you're an EU national (must have an EU licence).
    1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882.  @lukyluky864  What am I wrong about? Outside the USA, rounding up bullion and having the general public rat everyone out is absolutely easy and was proven over the last few years as 99% are compliant sheep who do what the govt tells them to. As I said before, how are you going to survive with spending bullion whilst everyone else is barely surviving - you'll be the only person who's not starving and thus making yourself a target. Sure you could stash away food and rotate it like most preppers but even that still carries the same problem as bullion - you'll stand out from everyone else and thus make yourself a target. I can also tell that you didn't read what I wrote and only put a "default" emotional response because you don't like your safety illusion being questioned or critiqued, because, at no point have I ever been pro-crypto - I fucking hate crypto because it is the problem - it is the CBDC just before the code get forked and turned into CBDC. Why the fuck are you assuming I have crypto? I don't and never will. I ask you again - how are you going to keep your bullion hidden but somehow trade for food without using it? How are you going to avoid not looking starved when everyone else looks like that? How are you going to explain having so much with a near endless source of wealth whilst everyone else has nothing? How are you going to keep your neighbours from ratting you out? Over the last few years, neighbours were ratting people out over the slightest breech of the mandates? If they're starving and think that you aren't, they'll rat you out for an extra food ration.
    1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. Its because it does affect them. Instead of simply being happy with "gay marriage" and the fact that in the "west" no one really cared about them, the LGBTQIA+ loonies had to make themselves special and force their views and beliefs on others. What do we see in the west: * LGBTQIA+ priority for employment / jobs * LGBTQIA+ govt programs spending heaps of taxes on them * LGBTQIA+ only safe spaces whilst all others get shutdown * Its a legal crime to misgender them whether intentionally or not * 'Safe Schools' is forced on primary school children - hardcore fetishes and twisted perversions are being taught in primary schools * Primary school children are being brainwashed to think they're something other than what they are - i.e. brainwashed to think they're gay when they aren't, to think they're a cat * Schools can put children on puberty blockers (this is irreversible as by not going through puberty they'll be sterile) without parental consent because the child has been brainwashed * Schools can let children get sex changes without being sure of what they're doing (they're too young) without parental consent * Primary school children are being brainwashed to think communism is good and somehow acceptable - its a system of destruction and death What happened to letting children just be children? They should only be learning normal subjects, no ideology and not being brainwashed into communism. This is the problem - they are negatively affecting conservatives and children. LGBTQIA+ is a trojan horse to destroy the nuclear family, destroy society and usher in communism.
    1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. Oceania - living up to the 1984 in more ways than just this. Come to AU & NZ - both are basically communist shitholes and the Australian Government just passed laws that supposedly stop hate (2024 Nazi Militaria & Symbols Ban) but in reality force the descendants of Holocaust survivors to destroy their old family documents, letters, postcards, photos, birth certificates, marriage certificates, passports, ID's, etc. all because these documents were stamped by the Nazis in the 1930's through 1945 with stamps that contain the "bad symbols" or because the document is a copy or official statement of what happened to their relative and thus contains "bad symbols". The reason such documents have to be destroyed is because whilst possession is still 100% legal, the documents can never leave the property they're on, they can never be shown to relatives, friends or even consulates, nor can they be scanned and provided to relatives, genealogists or consulates as that would violate the "transport, supply and transmission" ban purely because such things contain the "bad symbols". So say you want to move house, move overseas or when you die (the law doesn't permit inheritance), anyone would be violating the law if they kept or inherited the documents, also if they moved them off the property. This means that the 6 month "estate" period would be all they have to destroy said documents, that is, to destroy history and official legal documents, simply because they were stamped with "bad symbols". Oh, if you think that you'll just sneak such documents out of the country, they've got that covered - if you "conceal" hate material (anything containing the "bad symbols") you'll get an even longer jail sentence (concealment, transport, transport over a national border, etc.). This same law also makes it an offence to share, disseminate, distribute, give, trade, make available for access or to access ANY documents in ANY format that contain the "bad symbols". Want to research what happened to that relative who was sent to a concentration camp - sorry, Australia just outlawed that as should you access ANY document that contains the bad symbols when searching the Yad Vashem database or Arolsen Archive or any online accessible Holocaust document database, you'll be violating the new laws. What this effectively says is the Australian Government want to finish the work the Nazis started under Hitler - to erase anyone that the Nazis considered to be "lesser", by means of forcing people to destroy their own family history simply because they have old family documents because their relatives (grandparents, etc.) survived the Holocaust. The claims by those that support the laws (sadly many secular Jews) and all the far left is that "no one should possess or profit from hate", completely ignoring that many things contain the "bad symbols" but aren't hate material. Oh, the best part - these laws are part of Australia's counter terror laws so any breach results in gigantic jail sentences and being declared a terrorist. The scariest part is this law applies globally, to: * Australian Citizens * Permanent Residents * ALL ALIENS & FOREIGNERS (including foreigners who've never been to Australia). This means anyone anywhere in the world, even if they're not breaking the laws where they are, will be able to be extradited and prosecuted under these Australian laws.
    1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901.  @jb2590  Actually it is both as it depends on the product in question. Some products are hardware only such as mechanical calculators, sometimes its both such as the Bendix MG-1 which output a serial result at the end, and sometimes its the product is software. So no those two statements aren't mutually exclusive. Not providing a schematic isn't anti-repair, its anti-cheap clone. Sure you could try to probe out a board or manually disassemble and map out a mechanism but the reality is that all still takes time. What doesn't take time is reproducing a schematic in software and generating the product for immediate manufacture. This is the reality of modern times. Why should a competitor be permitted to clone a product simply because some random person demands it to be? Is that random person going to fund the on-going development and refuse to buy the cheap clone? Of course not. Forcing schematics to be released is ensuring that cheap clones will be available from day two unlike currently where they don't appear for a month or two (this is the sale window for the genuine product in most cases). If you choose to throw away a product because you personally can't repair it, that's your right. The reality is that unless you live in the USA, you're going to have to take it to be recycled and if it isn't either very old or badly damaged you'll be paying huge environmental fines for not contacting the company to repair the product. Schematics are a secret for good reason. Lets take the definition used by "right to repair" outside the USA. They deem it to be all manufacturing information, engineering drawings and all relevant source code, the latter to enable different parts to be installed should a chip (be it RAM or an FPGA) be discontinued and be replaced. This then extends to the entire source code for the software side (if the hardware has drivers and/or software) as changing compenents can require significant changes in order to ensure functionality and should an operating system be outdated, the "right to repair" movement demand that the source code of all software that ran on that OS be public to "port" it to newer OS's - this demand already ignores whether or not the product is available on newer OS's because these people don't want to pay an upgrade licence fee. Just like that you've made it worthless for companies to spend money on R&D be it for hardware or software so that means that development of new products will cease and the market will stagnate - this is already being seen as "right to repair" is being considered. You can currently repair products (that aren't Apple) but you have to do the hard work of probing and researching what the components are by their numbers. You don't need a schematic. Do I think Apple locking damn near every chip down to prevent repair is horrible - yes, but they're the only company doing that, quit buying their rubbish and buy literally any other companies product and you won't have that issue. Just because some people throw a fit and demand the world from companies, doesn't mean those companies have to comply - many would rather either move to other markets or shut down that give their IP away. If "right to repair" is to ever be taken seriously, it needs to address the following and provide actual solutions: * How to ensure ALL IP is protected * How to ensure that clones can't be made (from a companies schematics) until at least a year after a product launch * How to ensure that the small fortune that is R&D can be recovered along with a profit so development can continue * How to ensure that competitors can't have their hard work done for them by simply stealing source that the "right to repair" forces to be revealed Until these things are worked out and solved, "right to repair" has no right beyond being able to swap components without a schematic which can currently be done to any product that isn't made by Apple.
    1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. When the far-left extremists had to create a law in NY just to charge Trump, and then they decided that they had to go tooth-and-nail after him because "he might win", the whole thing is a pathetic joke. All it shows is that the far-left are the actual fascists who can't otherwise legitimately win and that they're willing to use fascism and violence to achieve their agenda. Across the entire English speaking world, the far-left are desperately trying to seize power and abolish their opposition using every fascist method properly. The far-left are pure fascist commie scum who are trying to take over - it goes well beyond Trump. Misinformation and disinformation laws exist only to silence the truth and to control / compel speech. The UK literally jail people for telling jokes on social media, even if its only a private message (yes FB scans ALL private messages). AU admit that hate speech, misinformation and disinformation are 100% whatever the current govt say it is, that there's zero criteria and that its perfectly acceptable to claim that ANYTHING (even if genuinely true) is hate speech, misinformation or disinformation if the govt think it could weaken their power / narrative. The reality is that there's nothing you can do to keep a clean record anymore. Simply ask ANY valid question that the far-left don't agree with you on, or, support the opposition party at an election and the current govt can make you a criminal. This BS is only happening because the far-left extremists are trying to take over and they know that they can only do it by eliminating any and all legal opponents. Literally anyone speaking out about mass illegal migration is considered as a criminal by these tyrannical regimes, because mass illegal migration is a cornerstone of far-left commie regimes - it pushes taxes through the roof, helps them justify taking everything from those that have and because it helps push crime to insane levels which justifies fascist totalitarian govt control over everything. Honestly, countries need to be woken up to the reality that just because someone has been 'charged' or convicted of a crime, doesn't mean they've actually REAL committed a crime anymore. The UK is a perfect example - how many people are convicted criminals simply for 'hurting someones feelings' (as its treated as hate speech), or for posting a meme online to which someone took offence? Those things are only crimes in the English speaking world - nowhere else!
    1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923.  @davidmorgan3149  You are believing utter lies - it has nothing to do with that. The banks don't care if you or anyone gets scammed. They ask the questions purely for control - they want to ensure that what you do with your money is inline with ESG and all the current WOKE crap. Even electronic payments are getting blocked if it violates ESG - I know as I've had to deal with the issue myself when doing a regular purchase after the bank decided to roll out ESG. They care about control over the money you donate to them. Once you "deposit" money into the bank, you've actually donated it to the bank and you're an unsecured creditor from that point on - i.e. it's no longer your money. Most banks in the "English Speaking World" used to have reserve requirements - since 2020 in most places that requirement has been abolished. Also, instead of fractional reserve banking being restricted to loaning $100 for every $1 held, the banks commonly loan out $1,000,000 for every $1 held as the BIS permit such reckless behaviour. This results in them loaning out non-existent money at close of business and borrowing it all back just before start of business the next day. There is zero liquidity and all banks are 100% broke - they just don't want the masses to realize this as that would cause a run on the banks and because it would destroy all confidence in the currency resulting in the currency becoming instantly worthless over night. The other reason the bastards want to know everything is thanks to the assholes that are the USA who try to force AML/KYC on everyone as they want to see everything you do (they collect, profile and then sell the data - its a huge industry worth trillions) and to ensure they can tax you at every possible chance.
    1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. Regarding lights on vehicles. In Australia I'm noticing that most of the new EV's and Hybrids are breaking the Australian Design Rules (ADR) as they don't have the legally required lights or the lights are too small if present. Indicators Either only on the side fender of the vehicle so on-coming traffic can't see it until the vehicle starts to turn, OR, its a tiny dot hard against the "radiator" part of the front of the vehicle and is barely visible as its dull and only a few tiny LED's. Also, some don't have rear indicators so you have no way of knowing if the vehicle in front is turning until you can see their front side fenders. Some have tiny rear indicators inside the rear brake light and as a result, when the brake lights are on the indicator is impossible to see. Brake Lights Many have the centre only, OR two very low ones mounted in the very bottom of the rear bumper (flush with the bottom edge) and they're very dull and small. Some have none. Headlights Most vehicles are running highbeams in built-up areas which is 100% illegal as it genuinely blinds on-coming drivers, especially on side streets. All modern vehicles can easily geo-fence that function from being used in built-up areas but they don't. Many vehicles illegally permit the driver to set the "low beams" to be the same as high beams and direct them at the on-coming traffic. ALL headlights are meant to be aimed down and forward with the high beam function only tilting the light up without it moving to pointing forward (i.e. it still has to be aimed to the left side). Why is the govt is letting all this BS happen? Because they forced manufacturing out of the country by making the place hostile (laws, taxes, over regulation, etc.) and because the regime (sorry... govt) are 100% set on only having EV's (and some hybrids for remote areas) in the country. As such the only EV's are the ones coming from places like China where they have huge numbers waiting to be sold but no one bothers to care if they meet the ADR.
    1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937.  @CryptoNerd91  Yeah - citizenship takes 10yrs, the language test, the history test (they can select from any of Polish history) and the integration assessment. Marriage is still not an easy option as the marriage has to proven to be valid, that you've been together for 5+ yrs and have 2+ children together. This lets your naturalise in 3yrs, without having children together its 5-8yrs at the discretion of the govt (they generally drag it out). Note that the language test, history test and integration assessment all still apply. One friendly warning about Polish "permanent" residency - its not permanent. They see it as a way for a person to legally remain in the country once they've passed certain requirements or legally had work & residence rights for 5yrs: - marriage to a citizen - got a renewed work visa in the right field (generally when invited to work by the govt as a specialist in a govt job) - etc. Once the 10yr mark of legal residence arrives, they expect everyone on a "Permanent" residence permit to naturalise, those who don't get their residence permit automatically cancelled upon its expiry (all Polish visas, work/residence permits, licences and ID's have expiries (1, 2, 3, 5, 10 years)) or when they leave the country and/or Schengen Zone merely by the act of leaving as work/residence permits and visas are linked to passports. Note that whilst the visa or permit is valid, as long as its a "multi-entry" visa or permit, you can enter and exit as you like. How well you do on the history test will reflect (in their eyes) on how hard to be when doing the integration assessment. The hardest part by far, as you mentioned, is the language test as they require the B1 level for citizenship. Note that this is the minimum and if you can achieve B2 or preferably C1, they'll be more lenient when considering your history exam results and when doing your integration assessment. Basically exceeding the minimum language level counts significantly towards the integration test - they want as homogeneous a society as possible that maintains the Polish language and culture. The only other way to indefinitely remain in Poland without naturalising would be to get citizenship to another country within Schengen and then move to Poland - note that this would only work as long as Poland remains in the Schengen Zone and the EU - not saying they'll leave but the world is rapidly changing.
    1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. I genuinely ask you, such as? Most residency/visa options are only for old people who are retired, or, only for the very rich (investor visas). The most affordable options are the CBI programs which all come in at just under $400k USD. For anyone under 45, options are very limited unless they have a lot of money that they can spend on CBI or investor visas. Things get more complicated when you're regulated out of work by a govt who care more about "skilled migrant workers" than locals, even though you're a local who got qualified in the country to which you're local, because a lot of savings get used just existing whilst pivoting to another career. Even two of the residency programs I was looking at just closed without warning whilst I was gather documents to apply for one - one in the Caribbean (non-OECS) and one in Oceania. Even being born with 4 passports, my options are basically: * High-tax, high over-regulation 'name brand' countries that my passports give me full rights in * Somehow find a small fortune and do the cheapest CBI in OECS or CBI in Vanuatu (problem is the need to demonstrate having >$500k post-CBI) * Somehow have a friend who genuinely gifts me the money to do CBI * Magically have a good small country introduce a visa for those who don't have a lot of money (not millionaires) but are able to prove they can start a business that employs locals * Wait till in 55+ in order to get a retirement visa (assuming that's still an option, and assuming travel is still legal) * Hope that all the 'merit trap' and 'DEI' and 'diversity / multiculturism' BS magically vanishes and everything is solely based on merit * Give up The biggest problem is that most countries are abolishing 99% of their visa options and being very insular, even if that means hurting the opportunities for their citizens by stopping businesses expand into their countries. All of this BS has eventuated since the plandemic and is only getting worse.
    1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. Why would you trust a 3rd party when you could have safes installed at each of your own residences around the world and keep bullion in your own safes? The reality is that if you don't hold it, you don't own it. Damn near every bank, safety deposit box and vaulting entity has: * A clause that lets them collaborate with law enforcement even if it violates your privacy (can result in having your property seized by the govt claiming "proceeds of crime" - the problem is the govt determine what they accept as proof of it being legally acquired so you're basically robbed by the govt as they always say "insufficient evidence" or "you could be intending on using it for illegal purposes" and you have zero legal recourse) * A clause that says that if they go under, the new controlling entity automatically acquires everything held to clear the debts that caused them to go under (i.e. a bail-in where you lose your stuff) * A clause that says that if they're struggling, they can "bail-in" themselves with your stuff (just like ALL "western" banks in CANZUK & CUNA can take your money to "bail-in" themselves if things are going bad) Also, the reason to have things vaulted is both security AND privacy. Why would you want that stuff held somewhere like Singapore where you have to AML/KYC for everything? That directly makes privacy irrelevant as everything has to be justified, audit-trailed and listed (also creates literal lists that could potentially end up in the hands of criminals). If you lock it up in your own safes or vaults you don't have to do any of that and can maintain your privacy. There's absolutely nothing normal about the tyrannical weapon that is AML/KYC that targets the normal people and violates their privacy for literally zero public benefit (as per many govt and NGO reports).
    1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976.  @Nikioko  It's got nothing to do with wanting to discriminate against other people. Its because those other people have been successfully discriminating against people like him i.e.: * Its a crime to misgender people intentionally or unintentionally * LGBTQIA+ get priority employment over everyone else because "oppression" * LGBTQIA+ get "safe spaces" exclusive to themselves yet no one else is permitted the same * 'Safe Schools' shoves twisted fetishes and perversions to primary school children - any parent who objects get arrested * Children as young as 8yrs old who are brainwashed can be put on puberty blockers (consequence - they'll never go through puberty and will be sterile for life) and / or have irreversible sex changes without parental consent * Children being brainwashed to think they're a cat * Children under 10 are commonly made to dress in fetish gear and attend Mardi Gras - this is perverted. Why can't people let children be children? * Churches are being forced by LGBTQIA+ and some governments to either close or 'change' the religion to let "gay marriages" occur - if you're so against conservative people why the hell do you think you have a right to dictate to religions? Religions are for conservative people - no one has a right to demand they change Simply put, they demanded "gay marriage" from the govt, the govt say "ok" and now they're on a goal to destroy anything they can and to force their beliefs on everyone else. The LGBTQIA+ are the most intolerant, violent and angry people around. Conservatives simply want to be left alone and not be dictated do. What you do behind closed doors is up to you. PDA's have zero place in public whether straight or not! Children need to be only taught proper subjects at school, to be allowed to be children without any indoctrination of LGBTQIA+ perversions or communism. This is why people are sick of the "west". Source: Literally what's happening in the "west" - USA, Canada, Ireland, Western Europe, the Nordic Countries, Australia, New Zealand, etc.
    1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. And last year the movie 'Humane (2024)' came out. It tries to 'normalize' MAiD, even showing MAiD kits in the culling vehicle (on the shelf). Like all movies, the dystopian future is shown so as to try to 'normalize' it amongst the masses. The smart people see the movies as warnings of the horrific dystopia the 'west' is sleepwalking into. The 'elites' won't be happy until 98% of the population globally is eliminated under their depopulation plans / Agenda 21 & Agenda 2030 / UN SDG's, etc. The Georgia Guidestones are the shortest summary of how the 'elites' and the WEF want to shape the future: Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity. Unite humanity with a living new language. Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. Balance personal rights with social duties. Prize truth – beauty – love – seeking harmony with the infinite. Be not a cancer on the Earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature. Harari wants to end all 'free will' and make the planet 'transhuman' - he claims 'its the only way to save the world and the planet'. Its all pure insanity that's intentionally destroying the planet. Gates' planetary CO2 scrubbers In CAN (Deep Sky Alpha Project) will remove CO2 from the air and likely risk causing an ELE due to not having enough CO2 to keep the plants alive.
    1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. Because they're always promising "new battery tech" that'll magically fix all problems. Yet it NEVER comes. Its been well over 150yrs since the first EV, they've NEVER matured and they NEVER will; they still haven't fixed the main problems caused by the batteries: * lack of range * weight of battery * ridiculous charge times (to succeed it needs to be max 2 minutes to full charge) The reasoning is most politicians have financial interests in EV's or part of the industries that collectively make them (including mining). Its like Bill Gates - he buys up all the farmland, does nothing with it (to cause meat and crop shortages) and tries to flog his fake meat and lab made crops because he invested so heavily that he can't afford it to fail. This is literally people who invested in the "next trend" with the bulk of their wealth and now can't let it fail as doing so would financially ruin them. Hence we have all these stupid laws being passed and bans being brought in. The joke is truly on them - most pre-2010 ICE vehicles, if properly maintained and not abused will last indefinitely. If EV's keep getting worse and people just don't buy them, they'll need to replace all the batteries and thus scrapping them will be the only solution. Then due to the lithium, cobalt and other mineral shortages (due to depletion and countries banning mining until slave and child labour is abolished), the only option will be to go back to ICE vehicles. This will be a case of people having to learn the hard way, and yes it'll get worse before it gets better.
    1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. As someone who had to work out how to "get out of a name-brand country" without having a lot of money behind me, here's the secret: * Serious education in a traditional field (engineering, science, medicine, etc.) * Must know at least two languages (five preferred) * Be a self-taught programmer (or formally trained programmer) * Must have a good background in enterprise IT / datacentre administration * Must know damn near all software relevant to your skills and qualifications * Must be able to have a "unique skill" that sets you apart from others - this is so a "local market test" will fail (its required for companies when sponsoring work visas) * Must have broad skills in marketing, graphics design and video editing (You have to be as much of a "swiss army knife" as possible - the more skills and experience you have the better - i.e. the more valuable you are professionally) If you can wrangle all this together, you need to network with as many people as possible and try to find a business/HNWI/etc. to "take you under their wing". They need to be willing to help you gain experience, connections, visas (usually by working for them), and if they want your skills enough - to help fund you to the point they can benefit from your skills. Unless you're lucky enough to be a US citizen (at least to start your journey), you're going to be stuffed trying to "get out" on your own thanks to over regulation, licensure as a barrier to entry and the literal costs of "getting out". If you're lucky enough to be a US citizen, there's plenty of things you can do in the US with just experience (depending on the state) and there's the legal ability to "learn on the job under supervision of someone who knows what they're doing" (depending on the state). Outside the USA, everything is licences, permits, qualifications - you can't do anything without jumping the world of hoops; there is no "learning on the job" if unqualified for the job. Sometimes instead of trying to find someone who can "take you under their wing", you have to get your best friends to help you. This could be any of the following: * Teaching you skills (programming, IT, graphics design, video editing, languages, etc.) * Helping reduce some of the costs - i.e. pooling money so you can "get out" - then once out, you pool money to help them "get out" * Help research places, costs, opportunities, etc. TLDR: Simply put, if you aren't a HNWI, you're not going to be able to do it on your own as the only way to "do it on your own" is usually to throw money at the problem (i.e. CBI, residence based on investment, buy a business, etc.). The only options are to find someone who can "take you under their wing" or to work with your best friends to achieve "getting out" as its not generally possible as a non-HNWI on your own.
    1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. @Cristy0505 You are truly delusional and you clearly NEVER learned history. This is just like in the 1930's when Hitler was doing his 'just one more country so I can feel safe', idiots let him do so, and he got stronger with every country. That's what Russia is doing, taking over one place at a time. Remember, they've already invaded Georgia, Kazakhstan, Crimea, Armenia, Ukraine and they've brutally messed with Mongolian politics that's ruined the country. Putina has repeatedly said that Russia WILL rebuild the Tsarist Empire by any means necessary. That means Ukraine, Poland, part of Germany, Hungary, the Baltics, the Nordics, the Balkans, Georgia and Armenia all get taken over by Russia, along with parts of Germany and Czechia. Russia is a crippled country that's making threats to try to look tough. They are losing insane numbers of soldiers each month whilst Ukraine is only losing a few. Russia is economically crushed by the sanctions as many people know when they look at Russian people who post on their social medias. Only Moscow is doing well but it always has because that's where the politicians are. If Russia was doing well it wouldn't be getting barely operable junk from the DPRK, nor would it be wanting to get help from the DPRK with DPRK soldiers who are barely trained for anything. If Russia was doing well it wouldn't be getting garbage weapons from Iran. If Russia was doing well, they would have already won and taken over Ukraine - its been three years of getting their ass handed to them. Most Russian's don't want this war, nor do they want to go and fight. If Russia's claims were true then all they'd need to do is make it publicly known that they would let any 'oppressed ethnic Russian' return to Russia from any country, or they'd issue visas. There's zero legitimate reason for their invasion in the first place. Legitimate countries don't commit war crimes (torture, rape, etc.) against the general public, nor do they kill civilians who are clearly fleeing. Russia does all of this and they think its funny and acceptable. China will NOT support Russia in any war, for the same reason they haven't currently supported them. China wants Siberia, and they haven't been on good terms with Russia for almost the last decade as a result. China are far more interested to being the 'king of the Pacific' and getting those who owe them money to pay it back - something that can't be done if they destroy those who owe them money. If the EU worked together, they could easily defeat Russia, especially given that Poland has full modernized its armed forces with modern US weaponry. Unlike Ukraine which has been told how they're allowed to use what they have been given, Poland has free reign to do as it pleases as it outright owns its equipment. Ukraine is working with one hand tied behind its back by the 'can't do long-range strikes with US equipment' rubbish, which is why Ukraine have been making their own long-range weapons.
    1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. Simply put - the "elites" and politicians lie. Always doubt what they say until you find proof otherwise. Any CBDC in the "west" will be 100% identifiable - under CBDC privacy is gone, as is freedom. There's a hell of a lot that they haven't made public yet. Ever wonder why the govt apps are many times larger in size than they otherwise need be - its not because they're being lazy and coding in a way that bloats the apps, its because there's a heap of code that's not connected to the user interface yet. The official "digital wallet/licence' apps such as ServiceVIC [State govt app from Victoria, Australia], ServiceNSW [State govt app from New South Wales, Australia], etc. contain a section known as 'Digital Wallet' - currently its where all digital licences and permits exist. When the app [apk] is decompiled, the 'digital wallet' section of the app contains heaps of code that is there either waiting for a server response to activate or for an app update to connect the code to a button in the interface. The code that's lying dormant is the code for a digital payment framework (credit card support and CBDC), border permits (to restrict the movement of people) and for digital ID. The fact this code exists (created in early 2020 - this is when it first appeared in the apk's) and that a lot of money was spent on its creation is proof that there is intent to use it - the only question is... when? I'm sure the EU versions of such apps have similar dormant code waiting to be used. Its like the old trick farmers use to trap boars - they'd feed them in one spot, then over several months they'd start to build a pen around the feed area one side at a time, letting the boars get used to the changes. Eventually the farmer would wait for the boars to enter and start to eat, then suddenly shut the gate trapping them in the pen. That's basically the 'western' world at the moment - sleep-walking into dystopian tyranny, one bit at a time. Once enough bits have been introduced, the remaining bits will suddenly be introduced and it'll be too late. Those wanting out, better get out ASAP, before its too late. As my grandfather used to say: "It's better to leave too early than a day too late. If you leave early and nothing happens, you can always return. If you try to leave too late you won't be able to leave and that's when you perish."
    1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. @GeoffBuysCars No conspiracy at all about National Parks - they're actually a UN driven tyranny. In Australia, National Parks used to be about protecting environment from urban development, since 1992 they've been nothing but a way to lock up public land "to protect it for future generations" because its "critically endangered habitat home to rare and endangered [ants, snails, whatever BS you want]". The catch is that any National Park created since 1992 is actually regulated, owned and controlled by the UN. This is why at the main entry to Victoria's Alpine National Park and Yarra Ranges National Park there are signs going on about the UN and listing the flags of the UN World Heritage Area member states - one of which is Japan. I mention Japan as they are the reason that once a National Park, State Park or Forest Park is created, the land use is 100% locked up (pre-1992 parks rules are grandfathered in though) and impossible to change as Japan always rejects any change to a National Park, including permitted activities and they always reject anyone trying to convert a National Park back to State Forest. This is possible because all member states must unanimously agree to any and all changes to National Parks. Oh and they also have a new method as too many people now know of how they control National Parks - they declare land to be a "Heritage Area" or put it under native title. Both of these new methods have the same effect of turning land into a National Park - it's locked up and no one can do anything at all.
    1
  1019. 1
  1020. This is no surprise to me. The powers that be don't want you having even an EV, they want you in the 15-minute city and never going anywhere. In regards to EV range - its 100% the batteries. In very hot or very cold weather a battery can easily lose 5% of its charge just by sitting still (even without being used). If the battery drops below 50% charge, the total cycles the battery has will greatly reduce. If the battery drops below 30% charge, expect only 1/4 of the total cycles its meant to have. Look at charge % to cycles charts for batteries and you'll see this for yourself. If the batteries aren't strictly managed with charge controllers that ensure that the battery always stays between 50% and 94%, then don't expect anywhere near the number of cycles or charge capacity quoted by the manufacturer. I find it ridiculous that the masses don't have an issue standing around for 40+ minutes to charge when a traditional vehicle can be filled in 5 mins at most. Time is money, time is life - why waste it? Also, whilst it might be possible to charge some EV's, there isn't a powergrid anywhere in the world that could ever charge EV's if everyone owns one. Even if the grid could magically supply enough power to charge EV's if everyone had one - the pathetic "trickle charger" adding an almost useless amount of charge in over 7hrs isn't going to cut it. To charge the cars properly, everyone would need to have a supercharger and three-phase power - very expensive and the grid would need to supple even more power. Remember, the batteries make the vehicles 2-4 times heavier than traditional vehicles so that contributes to range issues whilst pushing your registration costs through the roof. This extra weight is making elevated roads and bridges have less factor of safety and more likely to need to be rebuilt as they were never built for every vehicle to weigh this much in such small footprints. EV's will destroy the planet and cause all the problems that the powers that be are claiming need to be stopped. They're literally creating the problem so they can blame us all and then strictly lock us in 15-minute cities. EV's need to be banned NOW! Traditional vehicles need to remain! If traditional vehicles get banned, we all need to go back to riding horses as EV's are nothing but a death sentence for us all.
    1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023.  @paulsimpson8990  Your logic is non-existent. Aussies are the last people to ever want EV's. EV's just don't work. We all drive a lot of long distances daily, we don't have time to waste charging all the time. It takes 2 minutes to refuel an ICE vehicle with 600km range (petrol) or 800km range (diesel). We also tow a lot. Unlike the wankers in the EU who are limited to very light 3.6 tonne vehicles, we all drive up to 4.5 tonne on standard car licences and can pull 1.2 tonne trailers on a standard car licence. An Australian standard car licence is the equivalent of European B & D licences. EV's are garbage at towing - it basically halves your range instantly. You can't get enough usable range if you actually accelerate an EV like an ICE vehicle - this is why all the EV wankers crawl at ever lower speeds as they're trying to maximise their range. Its common for Aussies to drive 4hrs in one go - that's a normal drive. A long drive is 8hrs - easy to do and often done for weekends away. Also, our registration is done by type of vehicle (light, light commercial, commerical, heavy commercial) AND by weight. Given that EV's are generally twice the weight of their ICE counterparts, that means the rego costs a hell of a lot more for zero benefits. Also, you can't drive an EV out bush, stay there a week or longer camping (very common) and still have the same range as when you parked it - in summer the range reduces due to battery cooling and in winter the range reduces due to battery warming. Then there's also losses due to normal battery depletion from its BMS. With ICE vehicles your range remains unchanged from when you park it and you can simply carry jerrycans of fuel for extended range. A jumpstarter pack with its well insulated battery (that turns off completely) remains fully charged for months and can easily get the ICE vehicle started in the event that the main battery goes flat but that's not really a thing as most vehicles that go bush are dual battery (starting and house battery for the fridge-freezer and VHF's). Then there's the whole 'renewables' failure which has resulted in the govt telling people to use less electricity - specifically to not charge EV's in summer and to not use air-conditioners in summer. They claim they're gonna build more to 'fix' the problem but the reality is that no matter how much they add 'renewables' it always results in more taxes, more expensive electricity and less grid capacity because 'renewables' are a total failure. Why? Because they don't work on a national / grid scale!
    1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034.  @tokoloshimampara9932  It is absolutely a scam. They require everything to be "smart" so they can control it remotely - too many people wanting to go on holiday, better turn off all chargers so no one can run their EV, too many using HVAC, better remotely lock the thermostats to a high temperature to reduce grid draw, etc. Referring to home supply, you're dreaming - no one has 220-240VAC @ 100A! Residential supplies in CANZUK and CUNA countries is 63A for single phase (used to be 80A) and 32A per phase at 415V for 3-Phase (i.e. 96A across 3-phases). 100 supply isn't possible in residential areas as none of the grids were ever designed that way. Industrial areas usually run 25kVA lines to "box-type" substations where multiple lines can be combined to give industrial facilities all the power they need. Given that induction cookers, HVAC and ovens each want 32A its basically impossible to use them all fully at the same time. With gas (which they're trying to ban) you can run every burner, the oven and the HVAC (heating) on the standard supply. To properly charge an EV requires a dedicated 415V 80A 3-phase circuit and that takes a few hours to properly charge a large EV completely - "fast charging" ruins the life of the batteries and causes increased cell temperatures which risk thermal run-away (i.e. EV fire). The only way for EV's and for everything to be electric would be for every house to be connected to the grid as if each house were a factory in an industrial area and for 200 nuclear power plants to be built. Short of that, the whole electric everything crap just doesn't work.
    1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049.  @ganiburn  Apologies in advance, this comment will be a long one. The problem is they don't give a shit. Australian politics is so messed up that politicians only care about getting re-elected and consolidating their own power whilst taking rights, freedoms and autonomy away from the people. They don't care what things will be like in 5 or 10 years time. Everything can be blamed on the opposition if its something like a law they're trying to pass. If its failing infrastructure, simply blame the other side of politics who haven't been in power for the last 15-20yrs in most states or 5-10yrs federally. Any other problem can simply be blamed on the people as the country and people are all divided over race, wealth, jobs, religion, etc. - there is no unity in Australia. The last time the lefty govt in Australia (Labor) were running short on welfare money, the publicly demonised mining companies and the "rich" (I used quotes because to the politicians and those on welfare, the "rich" is anyone with an annual income before tax greater than $50,000 which is the majority of people earning wages) and they put taxes up. Problem solved. Politicians still push this "climate" garbage on us to keep people divided and under their control by means of their "climate laws" and "going green". The Vostok Ice Cores show that there isn't a climate crisis, which is exactly why they've been ignored for the last 20-25 years (they don't support the current narrative of the government). Even if hypothetically there was a climate crisis, the current "solutions" are to basically starve 2/3's of the worlds population to death, prohibit all travel by the masses (both locally and internationally), have no fuels or electricity (the newest carbon footprint methods used by banks and the WEF include use of "green energy" at the same impact as use of "non-green energy"). If they cared about resources (people are also resources) why would they have such horrific solutions? They have such solutions because we are the carbon they want to reduce and I'm 100% certain that they'll seize all our assets once we're gone, for themselves which is easy are they're corporations and banks. In Australia corporations and banks that are creditors have extreme powers to be "financially made whole" by seizing assets from those who can't pay, such powers are technically more powerful than the governments "eminent domain" powers. So as you can see, the resources don't matter at all to them, they only care about taking absolute ownership and control of everything they can whilst getting rid of the masses. This is why its essential to be a Nomad Capitalist and go where you're treated best so you can be in a part of the world where this horrific stuff isn't happening (i.e. places that aren't CANZUK or CUNA).
    1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067.  @jsanders100  Absolutely. Its a proven technology that just works and is safe unlike large lithium batteries - thermal runaway is extremely common and unlike a petrol tank, WILL burn. Fun fact, a tank of petrol won't burn and sustain itself just because it got warm - it needs to mix with air and encounter a spark or flame; a petrol fire is easily extinguished, lithium batteries have to be allowed to burn themselves out however long that takes. Also petrol fires are as slow as snails when compared to a lithium battery fire. You can carry a few jerrycans on long trips, refueling takes 2 mins at most and if I leave an ICE vehicle in the bush for a week (even in winter), it'll start right up. Only stupid EVangelists think people drive for an hour then need a 30 minute break - normal people drive for 3-5hrs then consider a 15-20 minute break; stopping for long breaks all the time means you're either take forever to get anywhere or you'll never get anywhere. EV's lose charge when just sitting (especially in winter), they take ages to recharge, you can't carry extra electricity for them, and most importantly of all, why the hell would you want a heavier vehicle that doesn't get lighter as the battery depletes? ICE vehicles get lighter the further they get through their fuel - this means range is better preserved. Also, due to the increased weight of EV's, many bridges are starting to get lanes closed or are being strengthened or replaced to handle the increased weight which is worse than trucks because, trucks are longer and don't put as extreme a point load as an EV does. EV's can't tow standard large trailers (with heavy loads) or caravans the same distances as ICE vehicles, not to mention EV's trying to tow uphill deplete their battery in record time. Sticking with older ICE vehicles is better for the environment as they have significantly smaller CO2 footprints, they're 100% recyclable (unlike EV's), they're more capable than EV's and they're more reliable (assuming standard maintenance) than EV's as when something goes wrong in an EV only the factory or dealer can fix it, you can't just swap out a part. EV's are a pure scam to separate fools and morons from their money, to severely limit their travel (normal people drive over 100km per day on a quiet day) and to remotely shutdown or limit (via geofencing) the vehicle (pre-2010 vehicles can't be remotely shutdown or geofenced). Also, EV's either need stronger tyres (even worse for the environment than normal tyres), or, they have to have tyres replaced more often than their ICE equivalents due to the increased weight (even worse for the environment).
    1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. @TheWhyFiles I lost 3 out of 4 of my grandparents to cancer (one also had dementia), so I do understand the impact cancer has on everyone. I do also know just how filthy and rotten ALL big industries are. At the end of the day, ANY and ALL researchers will DO and SAY whatever they need to, in order to keep their funding (this is why the Vostok Ice-Cores are no longer researched as they defy the official narrative on the climate). If they are told "to not find solutions or lose their funding", they won't find solutions. If their work gets repeatedly shelved forever so it never comes to light, they get rapidly disillusioned and quit doing relevant work as its suddenly pointless. Everyone always puts their family and themself first, they aren't going to risk being forced out of the industry / work because they "did the right thing". Its just human nature and the fact that most people are weak followers, not strong leaders who are willing to "buck the trend" and tell everyone they're wrong. The blind obedience, compliance and the self-righteousness from the masses during and since the plandemic is utterly disgusting, but it shows just how many are weak followers who won't admit they over-reacted, were wrong and were horrible and violent to anyone who wasn't part of the hivemind. Look at the plandemic, in CAN, AU & NZ, literally every doctor (with the exception of less than 100) blindly followed the official line from the govt and knowingly lied to the public. I know first hand what lies the govt told them to say and how to report everything as the "2020 thing" regardless of the truth (broken bones were reported as solely the "2020 thing" as were all other injuries / problems) as I know a doctor (who showed me the official orders and threats of de-registration and prosecution for not complying) who was utterly disgusted by it who moved to case reviews and writing papers so as to not be part of the lies. I'm a mechanical engineer who's seen first hand just what an entire industry will do just to prop-up its most profitable income stream. I was part of a team working on a potential solution to some of the "environmental / climate" problem. Whilst many problems did exist with our project that needed to be addressed, once the viability assessment determined the project as being viable and "financially worthwhile", the moment it was submitted, all of our funding dried up and we were told to "do a real project" or "never work again in the industry". So we quit before being fired, and went out on our own trying to bring the project to life. As things continued to progress we started looking at approaching potential investors. Literally the first investor we spoke with told us that we're "dreaming and crazy", the second said "you'll be broke morons by Tuesday" and the rest wouldn't even hear us out. Up to this point we were still stupidly hopeful that we'd be able to find someone who'd hear us out as everyone is always claiming that they want any potential solution to the "environmental / climate problem". Whilst off on a weekend of recreation at a sporting club, two of us were lucky enough to have the opportunity to talk with a person well known in our industry, the "a-ha" moment happened. We were told politely that "anything that creates or purports to be a solution will never be permitted as that would end profitability". We were also told that "profitability only exists were a near-perpetual crisis exists". Simply put, the powers that be want a permanent crisis as that justifies funding for "solutions", grants, incentives, research funding, fundraising and allows govt's to centralize power and to increase their control over the masses. ANY solution would end all of this. In the current time, we're effectively blacklisted by our industry, unable to work (and thus regulated out of the industry due to mandatory registration that requires working for a major firm), unable to be funded, etc. We are determined to succeed on our own once we find a country where its both affordable to do and where we can legally work without being "stonewalled" or "blacklisted" by the industry. I have also seen similar things in the medical industry where some major countries won't even do what the EU does because of who would lose the big $ if they did. Currently as far as medicine goes, the EU is the world standard and the best practice in the world, AU, NZ & CAN are all plummeting in standards and quality rapidly heading towards that of the Eastern-Block countries during the Cold War. The reason that there won't be a "cure to cancer" released (except where other companies or not for profits are about to crack it and release it - i.e. minimal profitability but will be released so it gets tolerated and released for good PR) is because there's more money in controlling and managing a condition till the person dies, than there is in a cure. Until the entire medical industry is forced to be govt run and not for profit, advances will continue to either not happen / exist, or will continue at an ever diminishing rate.
    1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090.  @Man_from_UNCLE  Please understand what a "Service Passport" actually is - they are exclusively for use by members of a countries Armed Forces when they need to travel (yeah they still have to go through Passport Control). Passport types are as follows (according to ICAO): Ordinary ======= What you and I are permitted to hold for regular travel Temporary / Emergency ==================== Issued to citizens for emergency travel when one can't wait for an ordinary passport to be issued, because an ordinary passport was stolen or seized due to "damage" (usually caused by border officials simply to reject you entry) or when for some temporary medical reason your fingerprints can't be taken (biometric passports) Official ====== Issued to very limited people when doing business or otherwise representing the country on the global scale but not in a govt/diplomatic role Service ====== Issued to members of Defence / Armed Forces for travel whilst on duty / actively serving. Not valid for personal / private travel Diplomatic ========= Issued to top-tier politicians (Prime Minister, President, top-most ministers in a country, Ambassadors and Consuls) for diplomatic / political travel only. Not valid for personal / private travel Other travel documents such as a [Country Name] Travel Authorization or such as a Laisser-Passer (UN issued) are not passports but used to grant safe passage (generally to refugees) in countries that are signatories to and who recognise Laisser-Passer (not all countries do).
    1
  1091. 1
  1092. Hate to break it to you but the world for the most part doesn't work like that anymore. Scam marriages (what you're describing) are hated by ALL countries as they don't want people thinking so little of their citizenship and country. The only thing that being in a genuine long-term marriage (and having children) will achieve is a "partner" or "marriage" visa and a reduced time to naturalization. You'd be required to live there full time with your partner, learn the language, history and integrate into society completely. Basically its only done if genuine and if you plan on living in the country long-term. You still have to pass the same testing and assessments as anyone else wanting to naturalize. If you want something quick - just do CBI and buy your way in legally. If that's too expensive, look at residence by investment as its generally more affordable and offers a shorter path to permanent residence which eventually leads to citizenship. As for access to CANZUK & CUNA - they're all dying a slow death known as "complete economic collapse" - its being dragged out by brain-dead politicians who keep hyperinflating the economy so things momentarily look good on paper but in reality are collapsing. Look at Australia - the money is being de-valued rapidly (i.e. it has SFA buying power), crime is at all time highs, the cost of living tripled since 2020 and is only increasing every week. Taxes are going through the roof (both existing ones getting increased and new ones being introduced) and those who can are leaving before the places totally collapses. Govt spending is only increasing and money that doesn't exist is being spent like no tomorrow. The debts HAVE to be paid which is why the "west" WILL collapse. Honestly there's zero reason for ANY follower of Nomad Capitalist to go to CANZUK or CUNA as its not worth the danger (as crime is sky-rocketing), nor is it worth risking being in CANZUK or CUNA and then being told to "pay taxes because you were here" as they're making it easier to fall into their tax residency because they're desperate for taxes.
    1
  1093. 1
  1094.  @stevewest131  You really are mentally challenged as you're incapable of putting 1+1 together and getting 2. How 'they' can restrict you is easy - they just disable your 'licence'/account or take back their property (be it furniture, car or house). When you subscribe / rent / lease everything, you have zero rights to it as you don't own it. Look at 'smart' aircon's in California & Queensland - the govt remotely set them to 25 to 'protect the grid', the people had no way to cool off or set a lower temperature in 40 C + heatwaves. Look at what they've done on streaming - people 'bought' shows only to find them gone when the service 'sold' the rights to another service. Look at cars in China - don't pay the subscription, the car magically stops working entirely. Rent / lease a car, miss a payment and you'll likely see a tow truck taking it away immediately. Most people own basically nothing these days, everything is leased / subscribed / rented. Also, when everything is subscription based, there's no need for shops as people aren't buying anything. This also means that they'll use whatever's made available. This is great as it means you can get the crappiest product and charge subscriptions as if its the best product and the users have zero way to say no. That's pure profit and its guaranteed as there's no alternative way for the users to get access to a better product. Its literally not hard. The fact you're trying to deny that people are very close to not owning anything anymore and the fact that you think its impossible to stop people owning things, shows that you're braindead or are a confrontational chat-bot whose primary command is to deny the real agenda so that it can be 'snuck' in.
    1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. The point is that it never could come with half a million Russians. Most of the people there are Russian Armed Forces and their families. If Russia left, those people would have no choice but to return to Russia leaving the place basically empty. Then the area would likely be split between Poland and Lithuania (bottom third to Poland, the rest to Lithuania) and completely demilitarised to make normal civilian life possible. The single biggest mistake ever made in history was when Lithuania declined the offer from Russia of being given the place when the USSR collapsed. Also note that there is no way that it'd ever be allowed to be its own country - the EU doesn't want a new country formed by a bunch of Russian Armed Forces. Simply put, if Russia were dumb enough to attack the EU, the whole Krolewiec area would be flattened without a single care by both Poland and Lithuania - everything to do so is in place and each country just needs to hit a button / give the order. Belarus still has many internal issues - the people want freedom and democracy - protests are still happening. Many people have been sabotaging Russia supply lines within Belarus. The recent tactic of Russia to bring illegal immigrants to the EU borders has turned many of the normal people in Belarus against the regime and against Russia. If these issues continue and increase then Belarus becomes less of a threat as they'd be too busy dealing with their own internal problems. Note that even Russia aren't doing anything to Ukraine from Belarus anymore. The way to lose a war is to might on too many fronts at a time. The way Russia are going, they're trying to ensure their own self destruction - I feel one or even two more fronts and they're done. China are still considering invading and seizing Siberia which they claim has always been theirs.
    1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117.  @jeremyradford5103  And here you are spouting the same ridiculous tropes that the pro-EV crowd love to spout simply because they were told them without looking at the reality - production scaling, different chemistries and recycling. Production of batteries isn't being scaled for two reasons - safety (production is dangerous except in small batches - OHS laws and regulators prohibited scaling and large manufacturing facilities) and lack of materials (most of the countries where the mining occurs have banned the export of the minerals and metals due to child labour and unsafe conditions. Different chemistries is a pipe dream that only a few universities are hypothesising - no actual meaningful results have been achieved to date. As for recycling - its unsustainable, not actually recycling and only viable when fully govt subsidised through ever increasing taxation. Current recycling either just stores the batteries waiting for a viable process to recycle them to be created (after 5yrs they're legally allowed to be declared "recycled"), or, they are shredded in a fluid that prevents them from burning/exploding and then the shredded bits are stored in bags in warehouses until a way of recycling those bits is created. There are no financially viable ways to recover the precious metals that are both environmentally friendly and that comply with all existing OHS laws and regulations. Lead-acid and AGM batteries however can be fully recycled safely and affordably. EV batteries are worthless once taken from their original car as they are cycle damaged (i.e. near the max number of cycles), have degraded range and because precious metals can't be recovered from them. Also, most EV batteries due to being charged too slowly, too fast or due to being allowed to be at a charge percent outside the ideal range "38% - 92%", suffer degradation which results in them never lasting as long as the warranty claims. Even with the warranty, replacement is still easily $15,000 - $25,000 (battery plus labour cost and disposal costs) which is more than most cars cost brand new. And before you say I'm against EV's - I'm not - my issue is these problems haven't and aren't being addressed. When EV's are as safe, as light as their ICE equivalents, not taxed per km (they currently are at a rate higher than fuel excise is, where I live in Australia), as quick to charge as ICE vehicles are to refuel (2 minutes) without expensive charging network subscriptions (required in Australia to charge when out and about), when they don't lose charge sitting parked (ICE vehicles don't lose range sitting parked for weeks) whilst having a week camping in the forest (250km out of town) and when they can tow a 3.5t trailer with ease without losing more range than an ICE equivalent, I'll happily get an EV, but not before, providing the govt change my houses power supply from single phase to three phase at no cost to me - I'm not gonna pay $25,000+ for the trenching, connection and rewiring required just to have an EV as I currently use all 63A available from single phase power.
    1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121.  @feralfraulein  You're welcome, we're all here to learn and share. In regards to Sweden, I see many of the same issues (specifically population related) as Australia. The only main difference is the chance for Sweden to get caught up in a war seems greater at the moment than Australia. There are a few things that need to be considered when assessing any country: Do many people grow their own produce (fruits and vegetables)? Do many have chickens? If the answer to either is "no" then you need to look into the viability of moving to a "rural" area (the countryside / farmland). Are you able to move to a location where you are both far from a large population area? Are you able to move to a location where you can become fully self-sufficient? If you are able to move to such a location, you need to learn some proper first aid (known as level 3 with CPR & defibrillation in Australia at a minimum, ideally learn Extreme Wilderness Survival First Aid) as in such a location you're usually many hours away from help in the event of an emergency. If you're unable to move to such a remote location, you need to decide whether or not you can move to an outer area (away from the city but not "rural"). Even if you only move to an outer area instead of a "rural" area, you still need to prepare. You need first aid supplies, long life shelf-stable food (stuff that doesn't need refrigeration) but it must be stuff you eat normally so that you cycle through it with the newest items going behind the oldest. This way your supplies stay fresh. Do NOT rush out and buy a lot at once, stock up getting a few items at a time. This is for two reasons: to not potentially cause any panic buying as people see you buying up a lot and secondly because you need to live life as normally as possible - don't go broke getting prepared. If you get 10 items each week that are long life and shelf-stable, you'll very quickly have a good supply - Ideally somewhere between 6 months to 2 years worth (depending on your personal circumstances and how much you think is enough - just remember to add 50% more than you think you need, everyone unintentionally underestimates their needs). If you don't already have books on survival, homesteading and self-sufficiency, get some. Knowledge is power, no one can remember everything 100% of the time. Books are also essential as they have pictorial explanations of how to do things. Have multiple ways to purify water - bad water can at best make you sick, at worst it can kill. Start a vegetable patch, start growing your own fruits and vegetables. Self-grown is freshest and the best quality. It also saves you a lot of money in the long run. Yes it takes work but a few hours each week is worth it when you are harvesting your own produce. Generally as a last resort I recommend moving to another country. The problem with moving to another country is the extreme upfront cost (especially if you have to do Citizenship By Investment) and also as you have to fully re-establish yourself. If CBI is an option then I'd recommend moving to a part of the Caribbean that's safe and that allows you to be self-sufficient. The Caribbean is very unlikely to get caught up in a war - importing supplies might get difficult but if you get ready before such a situation then its not as big of an issue. Do remember that importing goods to the Caribbean can be expensive.
    1
  1122. LOL - Nomad Capitalist isn't an American - he renounced his US citizenship a long time ago. As for your talk about ruining a credit score, understand this - each major country and bank, have a different system. Some reward responsible behaviour such as closing a card or an unused account. Some (like in Australia) punish you for being financially responsible - you're not going to get loans or mortgages if you don't maintain a certain percentage of debt because the banks don't make money from people who aren't in debt, which is why banks love to let you "refinance" and go further into debt. My colleague looked at getting a bank loan for an extension to his house - the bank refused claiming that "because of not having debt, he posed an unacceptable risk to the bank, regardless of how much money was in his savings account". The result - he just paid for the extension from his savings and he started letting people know that the banks want to only loan money to those who can't afford it. Banks make the bulk of their money from the interest paid in the first 5yrs of a loan or 10yrs of a mortgage, every time you "refinance" they make more money and get to put the rate up on a new larger balance. Effectively its like "sucker scores" where the responsible person has a score of zero, and the irresponsible person has a score of one. When the bank multiplies your credit score by the sucker score, the resulting score is what they use to decide on whether or not they give you a loan (even if your wages can easily cover it). The most responsible people have a sucker score of zero which means their "score" is zero when being considered.
    1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1