Comments by "Nina Daly" (@ninadaly7639) on "The Officer Tatum"
channel.
-
25
-
12
-
11
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Society WILL NEVER ALLOW citizens to be immune from following the law. Yeah, people are waiting in line to get into the country, while we prop up Americans who feed off of the rest of us, commit violent crimes, commit heavy drug crimes and STILL EXPECT TO BE SUPPORTED BY American taxpayers! Where does that delusion come from? Unskilled workers are unskilled workers. They are jobs ANYONE can do. Why are you surprised that companies would rather hire immigrants for less money, but with infinitely better attitudes than their American unskilled counterparts, who would, and let’s be realistic here, don’t want to work at all. Those people have NOT been contributing to this country, but rather feeding off of it wherever and whenever they can. One could say they’ve been living off of the rest of working Americans for decades. They complain about their living situations when the government is paying the lion’s share of their rent while other Americans have to pay full rate. Does that make sense to you? I got news for you. It is democrat policies that have been subsidizing their lives. Republican policies intend to do away with social programs altogether. Those people will then be in the street, committing crimes to exist. GOOD IDEA!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stefanhuppert6635 OK. Step by step. Please pinpoint a time in history when our borders were “closed”. HINT: You can’t. They never have been. Our southern border is 3,500 miles, it’s 5,000 miles to the north. It’s impossible build a barrier that long and it would only be gone over under and around. So if we have never had a “closed” border, how can we now have an “open” one? Get it? It’s a fiction, a lie, a divisive talking point. Don’t be fooled by it. These immigrants are crossing the border ILLEGALLY, not legally. We have nothing to close and even if we did, we don’t have the military force to man it. Note how these congressmen and senators bitch about immigrants and blame the democrats, but have they proposed a single, even partial, solution? I haven’t heard one. It doesn’t matter who is in the white house, the migrants will keep coming as many have no where else to go. The world is changing and shifting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robertstrickland2184 You need to stop…take a breath. Suppose you and I are friends. We make comparable salaries but you are much more adept at saving money than I am. I come to you and ask if I can borrow $100k to open a dog biscuit stand. You sacrificed to save that money and while you want to lend it to me, but you are worried that if the dog biscuit stand goes bust, I will not be able to pay you back. SO, I say to you, “Don’t worry! I have a rare make and model car in my garage worth $300,000 I can sell if the stand doesn’t work. If I knew when I told you that the car was actually a common clunker worth no more than $300. Have I defrauded you to get you to loan me the money? In your analysis there’s no foul if I pay you back the full $100,000+ the agreed upon interest amount, right? But what if the stand doesn’t work? What if I blow all the money in Vegas? And I stop paying you back? What is your recourse? No point in suing me (which is really expensive), because I don’t have it? Now let’s say YOU are a bank. You’re have now lost $100,000. Do you what happens next? The bank doesn’t eat the loss, it raises their account fees by a nickel for every customer. OR, if there’s a big enough loss and the bank looks as though it will go insolvent (not enough to pay depositors all of their money), the government will use TAX PAYER dollars to bailout the bank. THAT is why our society has deemed that behavior ILLEGAL! In case there’s any doubt, you know that loan applications (and IRS forms) are signed UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, that all information provided therein is true and correct to the best of your knowledge.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bookingbar-barney OK. First, I want you to know, success or failure, I have put thought into what would be the best voice with which to respond in this post. Here goes. Let’s say we knew each other and I came to you and asked if I could borrow $100,000 to start a dog grooming business. In exchange, over a period of time, I will pay you back the $100,000 + an additional 20% ($20,000), for a total of $120,000. What would you want to know? If I’m going to realistically be able to pay you back, right? I tell you, “Don’t worry, even if the dog grooming business fails, I have rare make and model car in my garage that’s worth $300,000 that I can sell and pay you back.”. What if, however, I know that the car in my garage is not the rare year and make I told you, but is considered just a common old used car I might be able to get $5,000 for on a good day? Would you think what I did in that instance was wrong? You might not loan the money to me for 20%, but might for 30%, right? So let’s say the grooming business doesn’t succeed and i stop sending the monthly loan payments. You then find out I lied and have no way to pay you back. Now if you were a bank that was now out $120k, what would you do? Eat the loss? Or add .25 cents to your bank fees and get your account holders to make up for the loss. THAT is one reason, we as a society decided to make that kind of misrepresentation ILLEGAL. Not only if the the loan goes south, but just illegal, period. The argument that “There is no victim, so there is no crime” is just silly. Even sillier is the argument that “It doesn’t matter what info you put on a loan application and people make it up all the time”, is just plain stupid. Let’s not forget that when one signs a loan application oran IRS form, they are attesting that the info contained therein is true and correct to the best of the signator’s knowledge and is signed under penalty of perjury!! If it made no difference what you wrote down, why would that be required??
This is PART I. (to be cont’d)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dreichert1438 1). The cos had no idea he had fentanyl in his system. Only Floyd knew that. 2). The “plethora of officers” you refer to were one cop who had been on the job but a few weeks and another on the job for a just a few days. 3) Did you see the entirety of the footage from first contact? Floyd was resisting from the getgo. Floyd, a former football player, was 6’4”. 230 lbs. Chauvin was 5’9”. 140 lbs. If you saw all of the footage you saw all 3 cops at once were unable to control Floyd who simply refused to comply. Are you suggesting after 20 minutes of fighting them, the cops should have just let him be while they waited for the ambulance? That would have been stupid. 4) There WAS NO bad policing here, only a bad and foolish suspect. It’s not the cops that have the problem, it’s the idiots who not only choose to break the law, but simply refuse to accept responsibility when they get caught. Are mistakes sometimes made? As risky and volatile as policing is, I would be shocked if they weren’t made. Are innocent people sometimes wrongfully suspected? Bound to happen. But isn’t that a small price to pay for the well being and protection of society as a whole? If a suspect is innocent, is there any good reason for them not to cooperate to clear that suspicion? 5) But what can not be tolerated is this utter lack of respect for the law and those who risk their lives to enforce it FOR ALL OF OUR SAKES!! The utter hubris and entitlement of these brats thinking they can tell cops what they will and will not do, who smack talk officers and refuse instruction, who are dumb enough to believe these irresponsible laypeople with their own agendas who have filled their heads with erroneous interpretation of laws and “rights” are the reason for incidents like this.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nathanholliday6324 And that IS a problem. There is a percentage of Americans who deny and refuse to listen, understand, or even acknowledge the 91 CRIMINAL CHARGES Trump is facing in courts of law, but believe, as they are told to, pure innuendo about Biden hook, line, and sinker. But let’s be fair. If you can definitively tell me what crime Biden has committed and identify the evidence that proves it, I will listen all day long and, if proven true, will support prosecution 100%. Will you do the same?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Joel-wx7zk Ii think you’re missing the point. This puts no developers at risk who follow the law, only those who cheat and lie as a normal business practice. I wonder if you realize how much damage unscrupulous developers have done to this country. Why do you think we have a shortage of affordable housing today when we have a fair housing act they are supposed to be complying with? They lie and cheat, that’s how. You seem to see this as the equivalent of listing your house for sale for $1,000,000 when it’s market value, established thru comps, is no more than $300,000. In such a circumstance, you can ASK as much for the house as you want. Market reality, however, means most likely no one will buy it at that price because it’s not worth that much. That is NOT this situation. Here, a bank is asking the applicant to list assets that can be sold to pay back the loan if the development project goes belly up. The bank HAS TO know the reasonable value the house can be sold for. In the case of an abandoned development project, they want to know the borrower will still be able to pay back the money and interest he borrowed. You can’t possibly believe that banks do individual appraisals of every piece of property offered as collateral. Do you know how much appraisals cost??
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1