Comments by "Taxtro" (@MrCmon113) on "Casual Geographic" channel.

  1. I mean even if he has a glock, the bear might still win. The gorilla would have to bring a hunting rifle.
    11
  2.  @spindash64  That means that humans are even more remarkably peaceful. They're too large to be killed by most other animals AND they are the most equipped of all animals to kill other humans. Yet the homicide rate is incredibly low.
    4
  3.  @Style_224  >considering the murder rate has ben high over the years Over what years? Where?
    2
  4.  @eliassvensson5257  > A 2 car crash is that count as murder on 1part? No. >Or only shooting a person.? War? Yes. >And do the count the percentage of total deaths against murder or is it to population ??? All animals die. They counted how relatively frequently individuals are killed by another member of species.
    2
  5. The list is heavily dominated by primates. I'm surprised about snow leopards though. They're already so rare, but apparently when they meet, they use the opportunity to kill each other.
    1
  6. Fortunately we're not a balls-to-the-wall tournament species. Otherwise men would probably get 4 meters tall and die at the age of thirty.
    1
  7. Yeah, it would need a hunting rifle.
    1
  8. None of those have ever hunted a human or really even intentionally killed one. Meanwhile sharks do that all the time and there's several species with global, who can and do hunt ppl. If you're gonna be killed or eaten by a fish, it will be a shark.
    1
  9. Nice, but chimps can't really punch.
    1