Comments by "Taxtro" (@MrCmon113) on "UsefulCharts" channel.

@livingtoaster1358 >like God forbid sex slaves Wrong. He specifically tells them to take sex slaves and they do. Instructs them to kill everyone of a people and only take the girls. Did you even read the damn book? You have no clue what you are defending. Disgusting.
6
@livingtoaster1358 Just acknowledge that the bible is 100% enthusiastically in favour of slavery. No one is persuaded by your idiotic self-hypnosis. Mutilating foreign slaves doesn't make the Hebrews. The book never says that. The new testament is even worse when it comes to this, telling slaves to obey their masters WITH SINCERITY AS IF THEY WERE OBEYING Christ.
6
They literally went on to murder and enslave people. Even to specifically take girls as sex slaves.
4
Yes.
3
Sergio Mattarella?
2
Isn't the pornocracy the most well known episode of papal shenanigans?
2
John Smith I agree, although I think Ursula von der Leyen also has a good claim.
1
Yeah from the video it seems that her mom and dad had more influence.
1
@leepreston9637 I mean, he's right. There is no senate anymore. What's left of the Western Roman Empire is the Catholic Church.
1
Donald Trump is holy Roman emperor?
1
Being a king makes one less of a Roman emperor imo.
1
@garybrown2039 That would be a good comparison if the Spaniards called themselves Aztecs before even going there and if they adopted Aztec culture. The Ottomans saw themselves as Romans before even conquering Constantinople. Of course lots of people saw themselves as Romans, though...
1
Nah, Romanov claim is null and void. I'd say even Angela Merkel and Erdogan have better claims than Putin.
1
In all of those cases it's a mess of law, heredity and conquest. And it's not like in ancient Rome emperors were determined by law nor did the title always follow heredity. The reason we care about Rome is the power and influence we associate with it. In my opinion the spiritual successor to the Roman Empire today is the United States of America. They indubitably are the leaders of the world in culture and also have the largest military. Moreover the United States are an actual republic that has been a quasi empire, has even practiced slavery and they have a senate. So the person with the best claim to the title of Roman Emperor is the president of the USA.
1
@sowietdoge6259 >This debate whether female history should be covered doesn’t exist in the academic historical discipline. Because there is no "female history". There is just history. >Dude, you are so fragile. I love when people prove me right. "The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God". You've predicted that people would react badly to your aggression, congratulations.
1
Sergio Mattarella is Roman Emperor.
1
@mariadewanna >their role is to fulfill men's lust Where and when was that a motivator for segregation or discrimination? It seems to me this notion is a lie made up by sex-negative forces in modernity. I can't think of a single society that was made more sexist by being more sexual.
1
@mariadewanna You did. With the word "cuz".
1
They should ask their god what he thinks about it.
1
Damn, I didn't even think of that. I was split between Donald Trump and Angela Merkel.
1
@mustfaaboassd You shouldn't comment if you don't have the five seconds it takes to look up what "prostitute" means.
1
@fclp67 >whenever someone mentions women he just goes "what about men?" No, he did not. He reacted to the "women's history month" in particular. And he even illustrated what he finds silly about it. He didn't say "what about men". He led the idea of having a history month for specific demographics ad absurdum. >yet I never heard this story anywhere, probably because of anti women bias in history circles Bullshit. How many medieval popes do you know about? The pornocracy is probably the best known episode of papal corruption. It's not hidden at all.
1