Comments by "Taxtro" (@MrCmon113) on "SandRhoman History" channel.

  1. 1620 is not relatively recent when it comes to history. The more recent sth is, the more about it is taught. That said, I'm pretty sure this battle was mentioned in my history classes.
    12
  2.  @pamtnman1515  I could equally claim that it's taken over by the right, because of all of the stuff about colonialism not mentioned. You can't put everything into the curriculum. If people know that the Ottomans tried and failed to push into Europe at around that time, that's good enough.
    3
  3. No. That dumbass outlook makes it impossible for you to understand the origins of conflict.
    2
  4. Almost as bad as elephant guns.
    1
  5. Makes no sense. Would be much easier to hunt animals than to start shit with other humans. Early wars were probably for abducting women and territory.
    1
  6. The motivations changed completely .
    1
  7. ​ @cristi-RO-cristi Your story is equally nonsense. You'll never understand the sources of conflict, because you're ideologically committed to ignore them.
    1
  8. ​ @ryanbarclay7939  Wrong. Women, slaves, clothes, tools, territory, etc. "no one had nice things" What a profoundly idiotic outlook. Your stuff isn't nice compared to what ppl might have in 5000 years. Doesn't mean it's not nice to your peers.
    1
  9. It literally changed in every way.
    1
  10. He literally just gave you the evidence. Besides, hunter gatherers still exist and all the ones we know are very warlike. You simply repeat antiquated stereotypes.
    1
  11. ​ @arthurheine5631 Six dudes fighting six dudes is more than total war when the overall group size is 20. When three dudes get killed, three women abducted, that's a much, much higher impact than any modern conflict.
    1
  12. Lol, that description sounds exactly like warfare today.
    1
  13. Wrong. The motivation changed completely.
    1
  14. Human males are absurdly peaceful for apes, so the peaceful did breed.
    1
  15. 9:25 A THOUSAND casualties? Did they reload during battle or did they have a huge pile of pistols lying around?
    1
  16. So how many wars have you fought?
    1
  17. Your second sentence is nonsense. They also fought to obtain the young women of the other tribe, you can never have too much of that.
    1
  18. "Fight these men for king Richard!" vs "Fight these men, because they called your mother a whore!"
    1
  19. ​@maximilianmoller6044 All animals are evil. A compassionate outlook has only developed glacially with civilization.
    1
  20. The trick is to get the enemy to trash talk our army so they'll have a reason to fight.
    1
  21. What extraordinary rate? The entire timeframe we're talking about has anatomically modern humans, making glacial technological progress.
    1
  22. ​ @silverhawkscape2677 God simply stirs shit up for no reason in that story.
    1
  23. All of that is wrong and cringe.
    1
  24. By that definition, the Nazis didn't wage war.
    1