Comments by "Taxtro" (@MrCmon113) on "How To Get The Upper Hand In Any Argument" video.

  1. Wrong. That's not how those conversations go at all. Not every believer gives up on defending his faith as easily as you do.
    2
  2. WLCs arguments are fine up to the point where he adds "therefore God exists" at the end.
    1
  3. He can't spend his entire life debating every single apologist, you can come up with. Moreover I don't think he ever debated anyone with an IQ under 110. You are throwing your fellow apologists under the bus.
    1
  4. You reduce the entire world to what fits with your childish wants and primitive superstitions. You are the close minded one, not the ones, who take the world as it is.
    1
  5. Yes it is. If what you are saying leads into a contradiction, it must be wrong. In a reductio ad absurdum someone comes to disagree with the consequences of his own argument and therefore contradicts himself.
    1
  6. There is no such thing as an "intellectual dark web".
    1
  7.  @tnvol5331  When did he refuse to do so? I googled the Kastrup guy and he doesn't seem to be well known. I think Harris just isn't aware of him.
    1
  8.  @tnvol5331  Well when did he refuse to debate or talk to Kastrup? Did Kastrup write a mail or something?
    1
  9.  @tnvol5331  So... your first comment was a lie.
    1
  10. I think what Sam Harris achieves is that he's charismatic and can appeal to people while making them feel smart. When he engages in demagogery or over-generalization, it's less than obvious. Also he seems to be genuinely interested in being right.
    1
  11. Yeah that's not how statistics work, Posdrum.
    1