Comments by "Taxtro" (@MrCmon113) on "Biographics" channel.

  1. I'm immune to holy water. To harm this redditor, you need a shard of the true cross.
    12
  2. Yes, he is wrong. He is as wrong as anyone could possibly be.
    7
  3. Just because you agree with his abominable views doesn't make him a "genius" with a "good heart". He was a delusional, paranoid murderer with the same backwards worldview as Nazis or Jihadists.
    4
  4. Perhaps, but the problem only exists because of their beliefs in the first place.
    4
  5. "Dealt with it's implications"? Nietzsche rejected gods in favour of equally cruel aristocrats.
    4
  6. "Not a nice person"?! How much of a cruel, contemptable coward can you be, Stephan?!
    3
  7.  @klown463  If Saddam was secular than I'm a giraffe.
    3
  8. Do you actually believe your own idiotic lies?
    3
  9. If you still believe in demons in the 21st century, you are a fool. There is simply no excuse for that. You are willfully ignorant and the beliefs you spread are causing great suffering even today. In Africa people are tortured and murdered for witchcraft.
    3
  10. You really get to enjoy this "order and stability" as you are tortured in some dungeon.
    2
  11.  @NPC-bs3pm  Who is Richard Hitchens? Anyways the one sole creator god is a relatively modern idea. For most of our history people believed in much more likely things, spirits that inhabit certain places or their ancestors living on in a different form. Later there were pantheons of gods with limited powers, who were born in some way and could be killed. By your idiotic argument, you should be in favour ancestor worship more than anything else.
    2
  12.  @NPC-bs3pm  You don't know what is "within reason" when you actually believe in evil spirits. It seems to me that you don't understand what it means to believe something. Or else that some enlightenmented elite, including you, should know the truth, while the masses are fed supposedly useful superstitions.
    2
  13. @Hannibal Barca Oh so Mr "try doing some research" things that doing research is of no use, because all history is just a US conspiracy. Of course the dictator couldn't have been so bad, because that doesn't sound right to you and what sounds right to you is more important than what you could find out via research.
    2
  14.  @bamwesty8158  I'm absolutely baffled about how you get to the point that you call the fight against dictatorship an "illegal invasion". As if some kind of law could be more important than to prevent widespread murder and torture. You are either a contemptible coward or an anti-Western ideologue.
    2
  15. You really appreciate the security while you scream in pain in some cellar.
    2
  16.  @TTSource  That's what anti-American foreigners constantly parrot on the internet. Not something Iraqis say. You are just an illiberal coward.
    2
  17. There is no such thing as a "Western point of view". You'll find Westerners defending this abominable dictator everywhere (because Murica is bad, hm kay?!)
    2
  18. How come no camera ever "witnesses" it? Your lies are transparent to anyone, who doesn't desperately want to believe them.
    1
  19. His ideas are much worse than what he did. But clearly that would not register with someone, who chooses the notorious misathrope Nietzsche for his profile picture.
    1
  20. No, we are not and you should limit your usage of the word "Orwellian" to zero until you've actually read 1984.
    1
  21. ISIS is a birdshit compared to Saddam's dictatorship.
    1
  22. No, he wasn't.
    1
  23. What he believes necessarily leads to the killings. You might as well say "I agree with the Nazis, but not with the killings".
    1
  24. Agreeing with him is much worse than murdering those people imo.
    1
  25.  @ArthurMorgansBurner  >Did i say that? Yes you did. >BUT his secular policies If Saddam was secular than I'm a crocodile. Don't confuse the guy with his party. Oh and no. His regime wasn't that much better than Islamists.
    1
  26. To consider the doctrines in that book wisdom, you have to be either cruel or too dumb to understand it.
    1
  27. Sure.
    1
  28. You are a disgusting misanthrope. "Sovereign state"? Does a state feel hunger or pain? Can a state be happy or unhappy? No. But people can. >no matter how bad the current government is You have given up all moral sanity.
    1
  29. The belief in evil spirits has caused and is causing unthinkable suffering.
    1
  30. Over Kurdistan.
    1
  31. It's better than any other society in history. So? How does his manifesto make sense? He's just a discount Rousseau. A selfish, paranoid misanthrope.
    1
  32. What a perfectly idiotic thing to say. Everyone, everyone should be meddling in international politics to the best of their ability.
    1
  33. "at the very worst?" Lots of people died horrible due to excorcisms, you ignoramus.
    1
  34. "Devoutly disbelief"?! Give me a fucking break.
    1
  35. You have completely lost your grasp on reality, Peter.
    1
  36. To think that Nietzsche was about "questioning everything" is ridiculous.
    1
  37. Rather half of them: the fascists and nationalists.
    1
  38. US soldiers risked their lives trying to save Iraqui civilians from insurgents. Where do you even get the "half a million" figure from? Do you actually believe your propaganda? And how much of an abominable coward do you have to be to prefer tyranny to terrorism?!
    1
  39. I can't get laid... therefore lets go back into the forest and live as nobel savages!
    1
  40. You are like the guys, who abuse their wives and children and then shout at others to mind their own business. Everyone should aspire to be "world sheriffs".
    1
  41. What a pathetic piece of apologetics. Nietzsche said what he said and should be critized for it. To associate a skeptical mindset with him is rather odd. He had very strong opinions stated very clearly and never invited anyone to question them.
    1