Comments by "Taxtro" (@MrCmon113) on "COURT TV" channel.

@hollihendricks8017 You're the exact same as the people blaming rape victims for being at a disco alone. How about not raping people?
1
@frankie1012 He was chased by a crowd, repeatedly brought to the ground and assaulted and still didn't injure anyone, who wasn't an imminent threat to him. He's infinitely more mature than you will ever be.
1
@mannydaprofit2869 If he was a black kid OR attacked by right wingers, you wouldn't make up bullshit to attack him. You'd praise him for trying to spare his attackers.
1
The attackers were not victims. They caused their own death via their own bloodlust and Rittenhouse did everything in his power to save their lives. If they were murdered they were murdered by themselves and at the same time many others were saved by the victim's control over his weapon. The victim didn't injure anyone, who was not an imminent threat to him.
1
@johnphilpot5205 No, he didn't. And you would have known that if you had actually watched the footage instead of parroting others.
1
@AliceA333 There is multiple videos. One of them shows Kyle being attacked by the first attacker, Rosenbaum, shooting him in self defense as a last resort.
1
We can see that he is innocent on the videos.
1
Everyone, who actually watched the videos and has the tiniest bit of integrity, agrees that it was obviously self defense. Left wing, right wing, libertarian, whatever.
1
@ohreallyeliza There's legit communists, who say it's obviously self defense. There's people of all political views, who can watch a video and not lie to themselves about the content.
1
@rebeccaboyar7072 No way both of you had the same retarded idea. You actually think they were afraid of their own son and instead of doing something about it, they installed cameras? I don't even know where to begin expressing how stupid that is.
1
The first guy also charged at Rittenhouse. The guy on trial was always the victim.
1
@murrayflewelling1258 >committed a crime by being there No. But even if, wtf is your point? You are there, so you can't defend your life.
1
He did better with that gun than the vast majority of police and military.
1
If he was a black young man, he probably wouldn't even be on trial. The videos make it clear that it's self defense. No one would be calling for his blood if those were right wingers attacking him either.
1
Mary's solution to everything: child abuse.
1
Kyle is the victim and he's more of a man than you will ever be. He did everything in his power to spare his attackers and when he shot he only injured people that were an imminent threat to him. Really couldn't have handled it better. In the same situation you would have killed twice as many and got killed yourself. He acted admirably, better than most police in the same situation.
1
@robinsternes The people he shot in self defense aren't victims. Kyle is the victim. And he did everything he could to spare them. They killed themselves.
1
He protected even the people attacking him. Did everything in his power not to shoot at them and only started to defend himself at the last possible instance.
1
@roxannemoser Your son would have 100% shot earlier than Rittenhouse and probably injured more people.
1
"The right wing"? You mean everyone with the tiniest bit of integrity? Everyone, left or right, I know, agrees that he's innocent. The only people, who don't, are a fringe minority of extremists, who refuse to acknowledge the evidence at all.
1
How about you actually watch the video? He never shot him in the back intentionally. Also you're still allowed to defend your life even if the people, who are trying to kill you think that you killed someone. Kyle did more to spare those people lives than you have ever or will ever do to support anyone's life. To call him a "murderer" is the most absurd thing. You would have shot twice as many people in the same situation and probably gotten killed as well.
1
@haven8146 Lol, the house looks downright sterile. You're one of those unhinged idiots, who think that no single centimeter of a house should ever be used for anything.
1
I don't understand how he's even on trial when there's video evidence of him being the victim. His attackers should be on trial.
1
@nadia-tp1xv The week this came out I watched the videos and figured out that it was obviously self defense within a couple of minutes. You should do the same instead of copying other people's lies.
1
@roxannemoser He did literally everything not to kill. You would have killed more people in the same situation. Most policeofficers and soldiers would have killed more people in the same situation. He risked his own life multiple times, because he tried not to shoot. And when he finally shot he only injured people that were direct threats to his life.
1
@hotsauce1646 He showed more discipline that night than you ever will. You would have probably hit half a dozen people in the crowd. He hit no one besides the people being the greatest imminent threat to him.
1
@sinickasdavis9619 Wtf is wrong with you? He shot them at the last possible moment and still managed not to injure anyone but the people immediately threatening his life.
1
The entire thing is on video and you can see him shooting exclusively in self defense while being in immediate danger. >I hope he does something with the luck he was given ~ He had terrible misfortune and handled it admirably. He did everything he could not to shoot his persuers. > underage immature boy run around playing army He did better than 90% of professionals would have. Any policeman or soldier would certainly have shot earlier.
1
The roller coaster poem was pretty bad, but I wouldn't shoot anyone over it.
1
Remorse for what? Not shooting earlier? He did everything he could to spare his pursuers.
1
> arm himself and go to another town and run around yelling he's a medic and this and that That's what you find aggravating? Not people putting buildings on fire, looting and attacking innocents?
1
@SharonStar62 Wtf are you talking about? 14yo are the most cruel demographic.
1
He repeatedly risked his life not to shoot anyone. You would have shot more people in that situation. Only that in your case it would have probably been bystanders.
1
He did render aid. And he was attacked and defended his own life. It's absolutely disgusting how you're talking about him. He was the victim.
1
@jedheart8059 He did literally everything in his power not to kill anyone. Only when he had no other chance at all did he shoot. And you call that "in cold blood"? You'd have killed five times as many people in the same situation. He saved people by endangering his own life and only firing at the last possible moment.
1
I can't imagine my son committing such a dumb murder without any serious attempt at a cover up. He can't be mine, my genes would produce much smarter murderers.
1
>why the state believes the minimum age to be responsible was older than him He did better than the vast majority of policemen or soldiers would have done in that situation. >total lack of judgement and recklessly kill anyone He only shot at the very last possible moment and only hit people that were an imminent threat to his life. Police and military would have shot much earlier and killed more people. >he is too emotionally young to carry. And the kid proved He did everything in his power not to shoot. You'd have killed twice as many people and probably gotten killed yourself. He somehow managed to exclusively injure people that were directly attacking him and only the worst of those. >he is the reason they are dead No, their reckless bloodlust is the reason they are dead and Rittenhouse did everything he could to save them. He is the reason many more are not dead. People that you would have shot in the same situation. People that I would have shot in the same situation. People that nearly everyone would have shot there.
1
-Shows up with rifle, not machine gun. -Offers medical help and puts out fire. -Attacked by rioters, retreats. -Upon being cornered shoots at last possible moment to defend his life. -Chased by more rioters, flees. -Refuses to shoot at attackers even when brought to the ground. -Shoots the most persistent attackers as they are an imminent threat to his life.
1
What a disgusting thing to say? He almost got himself killed trying not to hurt the people, who were after him. And you STILL blame him for defending himself. You think a rape victim needs to get raped, because otherwise she was the only one, who hurt others that night? That is what you believe. That is what you stand for. Against the victim.
1
He defended his own life when there was nothing else he could have done. And he only hit people that were an iminent threat to his own life. He shot later and accepted greater risk to himself than any soldier would ahve.
1
@mwatts6755 Not only is he not guilty, he risked his life trying to spare his attackers.
1