Comments by "lordsneed" (@lordsneed9418) on "How DEI Will Kill (More) People" video.

Malcolm and Simone have commented on this kind of issue a few times and I've never heard them address the fact that it is entirely in the interests of black and most other non-white groups to encourage this sort of thing even more because it will help displace even more white people from positions of power and authority and replace them with people from their own groups who will tend to treat them better. They are literally incentivised to complain about racism as much as possible because the more they do, the more advantages they get given, the more white people they displace and the the more positions of power and authority they occupy. In-group preference is just rational and effective group strategy. This kind of racial conflict is the norm in ethnically heterogenous countries. It's as normal as having two unrelated families living in the same household having conflict and instability. The best thing is for everyone to live in their own house. naive utopian individualist colourblind meritocracy isn't going to change human nature.
26
16:41 Malcolm: "Another incidence where this has been happening recently-[REDACTED]" What did they self censor about????
6
@Nylon_riot I don't disagree with most of what you wrote except with the conclusions you draw in the last paragraph. You can't be colourblind towards groups who are not colourblind towards you because that's just letting yourself be taken advantage of and putting yourself at a comparative disadvantage. Why? Because imagine two group living in society competing for jobs and resources : a group of universally colourblind , individualistic people and a group that practices in-group preference . Assuming both groups have the same distribution of talent, the non-colourblind group will over time inevitably outcompete and displace the colourblind group, because in any hiring and promotion committee, the colourblind group will give fair ratings to every candidate, whereas the non-colourblind group will give better-than-fair ratings to their fellow group members . So the colourblind group applicants will only get fair ratings while the non-colourblind group applicants will get fair ratings plus some better-than-fair ratings. So being non-colourblind and having in-group preference is a dominant, effective strategy. the society as a whole might suffer, but the non-colourblind, nepotistic group practicing in-group preference will have a greater slice of the pie than they would otherwise and colourblind people will be worse off than they would otherwise. A group of universally welcoming, colourblind people with no in-group preference are just going to be taken advantage of by non-colourblind people who won't return the same colourblind treatment to them. This is a big part of why homogenous societies are on average higher trust, less unstable, have more charitable giving and have greater community participation
4
26:00 " when this happens and he happens to be black, THEN how do you think the general public will think about black people" sigh Malcolm with the great Californian anti-racist priorities... This is like that Norm Macdonald joke " My biggest fear is that ISIS or some terrorist group like that would get ahold of a dirty bomb and explode it over a major city within the United States and kill tens of millions of people, because then the blowback against innocent Muslims would be absolutely terrible."
3
@oraz. The right does talk a lot about unjustified anti-male discrimination and how it lowers efficiency, how men and women naturally have different dispositions and abilities on average etc. but the reason why racial conflict is a different kind of and greater threat than "the battle of the sexes" is because as kissinger correctly observed "Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes. There is too much fraternizing with the enemy " Men are never going to be at risk of genuine subjugation and potential annihilation or warfare against women because most will ultaimtely realise we're on the same side when it comes to creating families which limits the degree of savagery we can inflict on each other. But the same is not true of ethnic conflict. You can point to a lot of wars between different ethnicities but there hasn't been a single war between men and women.
2