Comments by "lordsneed" (@lordsneed9418) on "Will Muslims Replace Us? u0026 What Does that Mean for LGBT Communities" video.

17:30 "if muslims aren't wealthy and productive then they won't be able to rule" Jews were very wealthy and productive in Germany and yet they were still oppressed. Europeans are wealthy and productive in south africa and look at what is happening to them and will continue to happen. It is not safe to assume that minority populations are safe and rule the country as long as they're rich and productive.
59
23:21 "fertility rates are higher in more pluralistic countries once you control for wealth" not among the indigenous populations! If mass immigration caused indigenous populations to increase their birth rates then why have we seen the opposite happen in Europe? Mass immigration keeps increasing in France, Uk, Sweden etc. yet indigenous birth rates keep falling. You keep ducking this very obvious point that refutes this mass-immigration, pro-multiculturalism slogan you insist on repeating every chance you get. Sweden is much more pluralist and multicultural than Denmark or Finland but indigenous swedes have no better fertility rate than indigenous Danes or indigenous Fins.
34
17:50 "Gaza has no chance of winning against israel so it is not about population size but how productive that population is" This is true for conflicts between nations where those nations can use total war and utilise different manufacturing capacity and R&D of next-gen weapons but it is not true for conflicts within a country. Jews were very economically productive in 20th century germany, Indians were very economically productive in zimbabwe, Europeans are very economically productive in south africa. That hasn't stopped any of them getting oppressed by the majority. Think about it if you live within a country and the majority decide they want to persecute you then what are you going too do about it? Start a civil war? no one is willing to do that until the situation gets so bad it's too late, and if you do try Then the government will come down on you like a tonne of bricks and crush you, and even when civil wars do happen they're usually very low tech and just rely on seizing the pre-existing weapons from the military so numbers matter much more.
26
33:00 then what is the strategic long-term fitness value of Malcolm and Simone being pro-lgbt? Same-sex attraction is harmful to long-term fitness since same-sex attracted people tend to have far fewer children. We know that same-sex attraction is mostly environmental from twin studies and that homophobia is much more genetic than same-sex attraction is. So since there is a possibility that exposure to same-sex attracted individuals like teachers or babysitters or sports coaches might increase the probability of your child ending up same-sex attracted, why would you take that risk? If anything, homophobia seems likely to be an evolved behaviour that is reproductively successful because it helps protect children from same-sex attracted adults, since people actually become more homophobic after becoming parents.
19
@SimoneandMalcolm you claim that in europe the more immigration a country has typically the higher its fertlity rate is among the indigenous population. This is nonsense and I'm going to demonstrate that there is no correlation across Europe. In the mean time here are some more reasons why you're wrong. UK, Belgium, nederlands, Germany, Austria, sweden all have comparable levels of mass immigration to France and yet their total fertility rates (including high fertility muslims and africans) are no better than the fertility rates in czech and slovak republics, croatia, hungary, serbia, romania and bulgaria which have had almost no mass-immigration. France has had lots of mass immigration the last 4 decades, so according to your reasoning we should expect the indigenous fertility rates to be higher today than several decades ago. Well that isn't true. Ok well then we should at least expect the rate of indigenous fertility decline to be slowing down over time as france continues mass immigration. And that isn't true either . the total fertility rate has dropped from to 1.68 in france in 2023, meaning the indigenous fertility rate has dropped even more. Infact, according to your reasoning, since the migrant crisis in 2015 coinciding with the syrian civil war and gadaffi being deposed, there should have been a baby boom across Europe in the years afterwards as immigration from hostile populations spiked. Did that happen? No. All of your model's predictions are wrong.
17
what Gs for Gaza represents is that to progs, signalling support for blacks and other minorities they deem to be disadvantaged is much more important than common sense concerns like whether the people you are supporting would ever return the favour. So most of them know that there are no G rights in Gaza but they don't really care because they know that it's more important to signal their virtuousness to their peers to gain social standing or else face ostracisation.
16
@fanOmry what is the evidence for this? I don't believe it.
7
Do whatever you can to support right-wing anti-immigration parties and help them win.
6
@Seevawonderloaf Malcolm claimed that productive populations are safe and dominant even if they're outnumbered by the majority. European-descent people in South Africa are an example showing that is not true. The fact that Europeans previously conquered South Africa does not change this fact.
5
"muslims haven't figured out how to have high fertility rates while being wealthy" So what? as the fertility collapse happens in western countries and east asia, everyone will become much less wealthy anyway so muslims in pakistan, egypt, etc. aren't in danger of suddenly becoming so wealthy their birth rates plummet. Plus muslim immigrants in Europe will remain in the bottom quintile and continue to have high birth rates. So the conditions are ripe for them to increase their % of the global population massively and those conditions will continue to be ripe. and when they're 50% of France, Sweden etc. then they will rule those countries the way muslims took over lebanon.
4
Did Simone and Malcolm screen their embryos with an IQ or educational attainment polygenic score? I think I recall them saying that they PGS screened for diseases but idk about IQ. They wouldn't be practicing what they preached if they didn't tbh since they think that there's nothing wrong with doing that and productive people like them manage to get what they want done and they think that IQ is a good thing for their kids to have more of.
3
27:50 "catholics oppose IVF using the argument that a saint forbade fellatio" No, stop it, the main argument against IVF by catholics is the same as that by christians and anti-abortion people in general, which is that it is murder like abortion because you are creating human beings then killing them , in the case of IVF you are creating a dozen or more human beings then killing all but one of them which you implant which is murder and evil.
3
@MiracleBlazze Yes, there's evidence that womb environment often has an effect. However that would simply extend the argument to wanting to prevent these people from being around your pregnant wife or being around you when you're trying to get pregnant. Why take the chance? 20% of gen z now identifies as LGBT whereas several decades ago it was only a few %, which clearly indicates a cultural effect. the obvious conclusion is that if the culture was less pro-lgbt then only maybe 3% of young people would be lgbt rather than 20% and if you want your kids to be high fertility then you want them less likely to end up lgbt so you would rather have a culture that was less pro-lgbt where the chance of yoour child being lgbt was only 3% rather than 20%. There is evidence that sexuality can change after birth, for example people molested as children being more likely to have deviant sexuality as adults, and cases where adults changed to have a deviant sexuality despite no interest as a pubescent or adolescent.
2
@tranya327 I'm not challenging the fact that Gaza stands no chance against Israel, I'm challenging how malcom attempts to extrapolate from that the general conclusion that population size does not matter in ethnic conflicts. It's generally true that a more productive couontry with a smaller population can beat a less productive coountry with a larger population, but earlier malcom was talking about ethnic conflicts in general even within a single country, where it is often not true that the more productive but smaller ethnic group beats the larger but less productive ethnic group. sorry I did not read most of your post because I think you thought I was claiming something different from what I actually was.
2
yeah gulf countries and the fertility of muslim immigrants in Europe show that it isn't just about economics.
1
muslims will take over the UK unless something drastic happens like a civil war the UK will of course become less and less productive relative to other countries over time as it's productive indigenous population ages and shrinks and it becomes a less and less attractive place for highly skilled immigrants.
1
@matthewazrieli5475 your reading comprehension ability is low. I know that Israel and gaza are not the same country, that's my entire point. I'm saying that malcolm is attempting to use the israel vs gaza conflict , a conflict between two different nations, to draw a conclusion about ethnic conflict in general , including within the same nation, that does not hold. I never said nor insinuated that gaza and israel are the same couontry , nor did I say that the counter examples I presented are similar to gaza vs israel. The counter examples demonstrate that the braoder claim he attempted to draw using gaza vs israel as an example is untrue. gj
1
@matthewazrieli5475 can you quote where I said that it's infeasible for a "technologically-superior civilization to enslave and dominate a numerically superior group" ? I said that this is true for conflicts between nations. I'm saying it often does not hold for civil war and I give several examples. So I don't see how you're contradicting or responding to anything I said.
1
@matthewazrieli5475 How are you this unable to read and understand sentences? "I know that Israel and gaza are not the same country, that's my entire point. I'm saying that malcolm is attempting to use the israel vs gaza conflict , a conflict between two different nations, " You're regarded.
1