Comments by "lordsneed" (@lordsneed9418) on "The Things Women Aren't Allowed to Talk About in Public (With Meghan Daum)" video.

Even if you think that overall society was better before it was so feminised, , now that we've got to this state we aren't just going to pick up weapons and ride chariots and use force to reduce female influence on society. You need to be able to charm women in order to change their behaviour and get what you want out of them, this has always been true, and you can't charm people if you don't listen to them and find out what they're thinking and so work out what thing would charm them and work out what behaviours you should conceal from them lest you turn them off. And this doesn't just go for females either, this goes for gathering power and support from people as a leader or politician in general. if you want people to give you support and power and then you need ot listen to them to work out what they want and what things you should say to them and what things you should not say in front of them at least until they put you in that position of power. So right now saying " hurr don't listen to women" is just ineffective and counter productive. like malcolm says in the show there are instead several things that would charm liberal women (who are a powerful demographic of society) and could persuade them to help you and give you power like transgender kids stuff . But if you say to them that women will be banned from public office or working with men then you lose that opportunity to get their support.
10
34:25 "being a parent is really hard and it should only be done by people who want to do it or else they'll be bad parents and it is bad for bad parents to have kids" This is almost always false. In reality it is only bad for bad parents to have kids if they are such extremely terrible parents that they would cause their child to genuinely believe that life is not worth living , such as child molesters. If you're merely a rather bad parent e.g. if you become an alcoholic or you beat up your spouse and cause a divorce when the child is 13 years old , then that child you have will still overall consider their life to be worth living and thus it was a good thing for that child that they were given life by you. And so in reality, this " only people who would be really good parents should become parents" antinatalist message is going to nearly always discourage people who would naturally be pretty good or decent or only somewhat bad parents , all of whom should be parents because they will produce kids for whom it is a good thing that they were given life. And so this antinatalist is nearly always going to land on people for whom the message is not true. This is not the only reason why nearly everyone should have kids. There's the fact that not having kids is being a selfish parasite free-rider because you are benefiting from living in a society whose standards can only be maintained by a steady supply of young labour and yet you are doing nothing to contribute towards that steady supply of labour and are only benefiting from other people's contributions to that supply of labour. So childless people are parasites akin to people who don't pay their taxes. Anyone who does this selfish parasite behaviour needs to offset and give an extra contribution to society equivalent to young labour and then it's ok for example there might be some jobs that society needs done that require non-parents in which case this would be noble. But there are limited things like this and still society needs the vast majority of people to have children and contribute to the the supply of new young labour needed to maintain society by having kids. This is not the only reasons why anti-natalism is false and wrong and bad but it will do for now.
3
I really would have preferred hearing another 10 minutes from Meghan about the distribution of views in her private talk groups and how things have changed instead of listening to malcolm's theories about evolved sexual behaviours . Also, pointing out that women are into choking at higher rates than men doesn't refute Louise Perry or Marry Harington's points as I recall about choking at all. It's still obvious that preoccupation with this violent sexual behaviour has dramatically increased in recent decades showing that this is to a large degree a cultural behaviour. Women choose to engage in violent sexual behaviours like the "bdsm community" are hugely disproportionately from very liberal "progressive" backgrounds. Which makes it plausible women seek out violent extreme sex like BDSM or choking/hitting as a warped way of seeking out some semblance of masculinity which they're so deprived of in their "progressive" backgrounds. Whereas women who come from a background where there is genuine , natural , healthy, traditional masculinity do not need to seek out some warped freakish, violent version of masculinity because they have the real thing.
2