Comments by "John Burns" (@johnburns4017) on "Why Should We Tax The Rich? Discussed by Richard" video.
-
1
-
@lincolnpork9357
Firstly, economic rent is when there is:
a) no costs of production;
b) no enterprise;
♦ Land Value Tax does not socially/community exclude anyone. It reclaims commonly created wealth to use for common services. What we create we use to pay for our services. Simple. While leaving private wealth in private pockets. Currently we do the opposite. It is that simple. Land tax is cheap and easy to collect, with huge tax office employing swathes of people, and snoopers. Land, unlike money, cannot be taken offshore. The location of land is known to the inch.
♦ When levied at 100% of land rental value, LVT will eliminate personal income tax and maybe sales taxes.
♦ LVT near eradicates harmful land speculation.
♦ LVT creates a stable economy with speculation near gone.
♦ LVT promotes enterprise, as it makes matters easier for small businesses, as they do not get bogged down in income and sales taxes. In the late 1950s/early 1960s, Denmark found that enterprise was boosted by LVT as investment went into enterprise not locked up in land. The economy grew with zero unemployment.
♦ Of course we charge for use and extraction of what is commonly owned, to reduce, or eliminate income & sales taxes.
♦ Pigovian taxes do not reclaim economic rent, as does LVT, or charge for use or extraction of what is _commonly owned. They are disincentive taxes. They can also penalise polluters, such as fossil fuel taxes. You pollute our environment then you pay.
♦ If people earn money through pure enterprise in an unrigged and unmonoplolised market, let them keep all they earned, as they did good for many along the way. They also took nothing out of society, only putting something in.
♦ Economic parasitical activity has to be eliminated.
♦ Promote productive activities.
1