Comments by "John Burns" (@johnburns4017) on "Sky Sports News" channel.

  1. 1) Everton have an excellent squad. Brazil's striker plays for them, who scored three goals fro Brazil within the past month. 2) They have just under a quarter of the season left to play. 3) The problem is that no one can see them winning a game. 4) Look at the stats. The pass accuracy is appalling. That shows a lack of confidence. 5) Lampard plays a back line far to high meaning they are susceptible to counter-attacking. His defenders are not fast so cannot keep up with breaking opposition strikers. He has to play a defensive game relying on the skills of his stokers to occasionally poach goal. 7) Man have lost only two games in the past 11. They are a strong team.
    2
  2.  @Kkksh_  Yes in crucial games into his own net.
    2
  3. Man U have only lost two out of the last 11. One was to Man C away. They are a strong team.
    1
  4.  @cummerchant542  Only current from matters. BTW, Everton have only beaten Man U once in the past 15 games.
    1
  5.  @cummerchant542  I was saying: Man U have only lost two out of the last 11. Everton have only beaten Man U once in the past 15 games.
    1
  6. Everton do not play in lower leagues.
    1
  7. Are Leeds getting promoted?
    1
  8. Why?
    1
  9. He did. When he came Rodriquez and Digne left. Boy do they need those two now.
    1
  10. Forest will survive. They are relying on Everton to beat Luton, which will by then 100% ensure EFCs safety if EFC win. Forest have Sheff U, Burnley and Chelsea. They should get 5 points from them. Luton to get 5 points from their last last games? Doubtful. If Luton Get 5 points (tall order) Forest only need 4. GF will take them through.
    1
  11. All for a £19 million indiscretion in the commission's eyes. 1) The reality is that it is less than Haaland's wages per ann. A whole bunch of Premier players earn around that figure. 2) The government scuppered a sponsorship deal because a Russian is involved. 3) Penalised on Interest on the new stadium! That was deemed normal expenditure for Liverpool FC.
    1
  12. Not the board. When imploding under Raffa, they picked a new director of football. They also picked a new manger. Decided on building a new stadium which is now half built. What else do people want them to do? Put on their boots?
    1
  13. Donald Trump was clearly and obviously paranoid. He thought the system was against him. To him the US election was rigged and all news was fake. He then succumbed to his paranoia attempting to overthrow a democratically elected government, calling the front line perpetrators of this insurrection beautiful people. Nottingham Forest have adopted Trump's stance.
    1
  14. Sell the stadium to who? QPR?
    1
  15. It was an iffy decision in the first place. They were desperate.
    1
  16.  @PHIL-rm8qz  The players were demotivated under growling Benitez. They have by far the most talented squad in the lower half of the table. Everton's board were relying on a new younger manager to motivate the players. It failed.
    1
  17.  @PHIL-rm8qz  Very true. Frank has no idea how to defend. A point a game is somthing for the likes of Everton. He has no idea how to implement a dogs of war strategy.
    1
  18. If Everton get beat against Man U, Lampard has to go. The board have no choice.
    1
  19.  @jamiewilliams685  No. The players were demotivated under growling Benitez. They have by far the most talented squad in the lower half of the table. Everton's board were relying on a new younger manager to motivate the players.
    1
  20. Two were not penalties. One was questionable but could go anyway.
    1
  21. @peopletalkuttergarbage His arm was being moved towards his body.
    1
  22. Is this karma over Everton being involved in the City of Liverpool losing its World Heritage status?
    1
  23. They do not actually.
    1
  24.  @edwardkelly3280  That is different to top 6. Everton have drawn against Spurs, Man U and Chelsea, and won against Arsenal. Not good at all. Lost 4 to the top 6.
    1
  25.  @jackthelad9703  Idiot, facts are wonderful things. Trying looking at some. This is the season that matters - because this is the one the team is playing in.
    1
  26. You would say that.
    1
  27. City & Chelsea are irrelevant in this ruling.
    1
  28.  @Pumpenhousen  The findings were that there was no sporting advantage. So Leicester, Burnley and Leeds were not affected.
    1
  29.  @Pumpenhousen  1) They lost big time on Sigurdson who developed mental problems. 2) They lost big time on HMG scuppering a deal with USM. 3) Interest on the new stadium was normal expenditure for LFC, but not for Everton. 4) £19m they said. The reality is that it is same as the annual wages of a raft of Prem' players. 20 points deduction for the wages of one player these days?
    1
  30.  @ec7001  pure opinion.
    1
  31.  @ec7001  True. Chelsea are under investigation. May take some time.
    1