Comments by "John Burns" (@johnburns4017) on "Is Everton's 10 point penalty 'harsh and excessive'? | Soccer Saturday" video.

  1. All for a £19 million indiscretion in the commission's eyes. 1) The reality is that it is less than Haaland's wages per ann. A whole bunch of Premier players earn around that figure. 2) The government scuppered a sponsorship deal because a Russian is involved. 3) Penalised on Interest on the new stadium! That was deemed normal expenditure for Liverpool FC.
    1
  2. City & Chelsea are irrelevant in this ruling.
    1
  3.  @Pumpenhousen  The findings were that there was no sporting advantage. So Leicester, Burnley and Leeds were not affected.
    1
  4.  @Pumpenhousen  1) They lost big time on Sigurdson who developed mental problems. 2) They lost big time on HMG scuppering a deal with USM. 3) Interest on the new stadium was normal expenditure for LFC, but not for Everton. 4) £19m they said. The reality is that it is same as the annual wages of a raft of Prem' players. 20 points deduction for the wages of one player these days?
    1
  5.  @ec7001  pure opinion.
    1
  6.  @ec7001  True. Chelsea are under investigation. May take some time.
    1