Comments by "z08840" (@z08840) on "Republicans tender new CCTV footage to Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee" video.

@Hannah-zm9vc "He said 250,000 fake votes for biden" - it is kinda suspicious that he knows for whom these votes were, isn't it? :)
4
@kevinbarry4325 yeah... so many brainwashed by clown trump idiots...
3
@Hannah-zm9vc you said "He said 250,000 fake votes for biden", and now you are saying that he didn't know it.... now this is even more suspicious :)
1
@NateHaselton by the left and by clown trump...
1
@imodifyification how do we know, that politifact is lying, but trumpists - don't? any justification?
1
@imodifyification the question was - how do we know, that politifact is lying, but trumpists - don't? any justification? - you are not answering the question... that is sad... maybe you just don't understand question? double sad...
1
@u.s.a.7164 I watched the video. They said they hide nothing. They said that ballots in containers were ballots from mail and were extracted and put in containers and sealed when there were observers. They said that nobody forced anybody to leave. They said that there was an officially assigned observer present. Now back to the question - why we should believe trampists but not officials?
1
@MyMason100 I watched the video. They said they hide nothing. They said that ballots in containers were ballots from mail and were extracted and put in containers and sealed when there were observers. They said that nobody forced anybody to leave. They said that there was an officially assigned observer present. Now back to the question - why we should believe trampists but not officials?
1
@jeremiahfyan I watched the video. They said they hide nothing. They said that ballots in containers were ballots from mail and were extracted and put in containers and sealed when there were observers. They said that nobody forced anybody to leave. They said that there was an officially assigned observer present. Now back to the question - why we should believe trampists but not officials?
1
@jeremiahfyan "So video evidence isnt enough when someone says something different happened in the video?" - officials' explanation says nothing different, you are lying.
1
@jeremiahfyan so said "the media" provided a link to official's explanation. I completely understand both view points. For now, one who is looking foolish is you - by resorting to ad hominem on me instead answering relevant questions.
1
@jeremiahfyan "Because your questions are meaningless" - saying so doesn't make it so. Dismissed. "The video is right in front of you" - explanation by officials right in front of you - the question was why we should believe explanations from trampists and not to explanations from officials? "Im foolish for watching the video" - I didn't say this, you are lying. "taking 2nd hand sources as your evidence" - officials are 1st hand source. Trampists are second. Again, question is - why we should believe explanations from trampists and not to explanations from officials? you have no answer other than attacking me personally. Shame on you.
1