Comments by "z08840" (@z08840) on "Rebel HQ" channel.

  1. I didn't get - god doesn't like taxes - what happened to "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's"
    6
  2. foxnews mentioned trump on this list also
    5
  3. Donald "Stinky" Trump
    5
  4.  @audiovice2718  apparently it's you who are coping - I'm just stating facts.
    2
  5. well... if you made masculinity toxic then why are you complaining on them making Disney toxic? Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi?
    2
  6. systemic racism doesn't exist BLM is a terrorist organization
    1
  7.  @nsbd90now  tried what?
    1
  8.  @novuspatriarch  I'm absolutely right.
    1
  9.  @nsbd90now  and what is embarrassing in stating facts?
    1
  10.  @bazzfromthebackground3696  actual fact is that there is no institutionalized racism in US. Actual fact that BLM sides with hamas. What's "hand picked" here? And which "actual facts" you talking about which allegedly "don't agree" with me?
    1
  11.  @novuspatriarch  BLM supports hamas - a terrorist group - it makes BLM terrorist organization. "black people are 4 times more likely to be pulled over by the police" - show me policy requiring to pull over black ppl or requiring to don't pull over white ppl. You have no idea what "systemic" means, have you?
    1
  12.  @audiovice2718  I don't distract anyone from anything - just stating facts. You genuinely don't understand what "systemic" means.
    1
  13.  @novuspatriarch  so, october 7th was "just defending itself"? perfectly lined up with your terroristic nature. Q.E.D.
    1
  14.  @novuspatriarch  "is defined as policies and practices" - yup, show me policies. There is non.
    1
  15.  @novuspatriarch  you don't know what policy is? google meaning and show me these policies.
    1
  16.  @audiovice2718  novuspatriarch prety much gave us a definition above - "systemic" means laws or policies made by government - there is no racist laws or policies in US - which means there is no systemic racism in US. L for Logic.
    1
  17.  @novuspatriarch  show me policies. Government policies are written - it should be easy to dig it up if such policies existed. But they do not - it's why you can't show me any.
    1
  18.  @novuspatriarch  practice must be underlined by policy - it's what makes it institutionalized - individual can practice some behavior - it doesn't make it institutionalized.
    1
  19.  @novuspatriarch  you only proved you don't understand english.
    1
  20.  @WingoTribe704  BLM is supporting hamas - terrorist group - it makes BLM a terrorist organization.
    1
  21.  @novuspatriarch  I know "gerrymandering" isn't a law. Probably you need to familiarize yourself what is law also.
    1
  22.  @novuspatriarch  you need to show racist policies to make your case. Until then my statement - systemic racism doesn't exist in US - stands still.
    1
  23.  @novuspatriarch  "gerrymandering and redlining" are not policies - familiarize yourself what policy is.
    1
  24.  @novuspatriarch  "your evil self" - and it says a "person" who called October 7th - "just defending itself" what an irony
    1
  25.  @novuspatriarch  no, they are not. Cope all you like. It's not the policy - learn what government policy is.
    1
  26.  @novuspatriarch  "that's not what law of the land is. That means a law that was never actually voted on but is adhered to anyway" - omg c'mon you can't be that stupid, can you?
    1
  27.  @novuspatriarch  yeaaah... apparently "funny" replaces your brain...
    1
  28.  @novuspatriarch  "The phrase law of the land is a legal term, equivalent to the Latin lex terrae, or legem terrae in the accusative case.[1] It refers to all of the laws in force within a country or region,[2][3][4][5] including statute law and case-made law.["
    1
  29.  @novuspatriarch  I'm not a racist at all.
    1
  30.  @novuspatriarch  I just gave you an excerpt what law of the land means - "gerrymandering" is not such law.
    1
  31.  @novuspatriarch  yeaaah... apparently "funny" and "hahahaha" replaces your brain...
    1
  32.  @novuspatriarch  ...particularly, for law to be "in force" it must be written - because of vagueness doctrine implied by due process clause of the Constitution. So, if you can't show it written - it's not a "law of the land"
    1
  33.  @novuspatriarch  again - for the law to be a law it MUST be written. Show me written racist law in US. Until then my statement - systemic racism doesn't exist in US - stand still.
    1
  34.  @novuspatriarch  "minimum sentencing laws" - so, show me such law where sentencing depends on race. There is non. Your claim is false.
    1
  35.  @nsbd90now  BLM supports hamas - a terrorist group - it makes BLM terrorist organization.
    1
  36.  @novuspatriarch  but it's not what "systemic" means - "systemic" requires written laws and policies - and there is non.
    1
  37.  @audiovice2718  I didn't find any substance regarding the issue in your rant.
    1
  38.  @novuspatriarch  ad hominem doesn't do any good to your cause - because it's not an argument, you know...
    1
  39.  @novuspatriarch  and it's funny, you know - audiovice2718 just said that we are "losing respect from the younger generation" - and you - "Adults are talking" - could you please decide among your flock already which ad hominem to use on me 😂
    1
  40.  @audiovice2718  I have no ideology besides truth - if you can call it an ideology. BTW you apparently put me on ignore list - apparently to make me not to see your comments apparently to claim a victory. Funny. But I see your comments in incognito mode - you need to wait couple days so I stop looking in incognito mode - then you will be able to make your final "victorious" comment 🙂
    1
  41.  @novuspatriarch  "You have insulted me multiple times" - also you need to look what argumentum ad hominem means. You have a very sloppy mental facility.
    1
  42.  @novuspatriarch  well, if I ignore this non-argument - we would left with another non-argument - appeal to consequences logical fallacy. For some reason you've decided that I protect something which is racist - when I only argue for truth - I'm not saying that there is no racism at all in US - I'm only saying that it's not institutionalized .
    1
  43.  @novuspatriarch  I don't see audiovice2718 comments on my signed-in page, but I see it in incognito mode. And I suppose you see these comments. I made a reasonable conclusion.
    1
  44.  @novuspatriarch  so, I "wanted some sort of victory" and made audiovice2718 comments magically disappear somehow? 😂 omg "cause I have stomped you" - actually I have stomped you with facts - your only answers were logical fallacies
    1
  45.  @novuspatriarch  "Something doesn't have to be specifically targeting minorities to solely be used to target minorities" - but to be "systemic" it must be exactly that specific - if it's not - then it's non "systemic" - i.e. literally written in the law. So, there is no systemic racism in US - it's the truth.
    1
  46.  @novuspatriarch  "you have only denied the facts I brought" - the only fact which can prove systemic racism - is a law with distinction on race - you didn't bring any such fact.
    1
  47.  @novuspatriarch  oh c'mon - I just brought you all definitions clearly showing what systemic does mean - systemic means policies- policies mean laws and regulations - which means must be written. "It means that thr racism is enforced by the system" - and how it's enforced? not written law is not enforceable - I already said above - because of vagueness doctrine implied by due process clause of the Constitution.
    1
  48.  @novuspatriarch  oh, I just realized - did you confuse "systemic" with "systematic"? 😆
    1
  49.  @novuspatriarch  "how they enforce it" - it's not what "enforce" means - "Law enforcement is the activity of some members of government who act in an organized manner to enforce the law by discovering, deterring, rehabilitating, or punishing people who violate the rules and norms governing that society."
    1
  50.  @novuspatriarch  to enforce the law literally means to make you follow the law and punish you if you don't - i.e. you need a law to begin with which you want to enforce - so, which law contains a race distinction? or which law requires anybody to "gerrymandering red lining" on the basis of race? non
    1