Comments by "buddermonger2000" (@buddermonger2000) on "Why United States Won't Win World War 3" video.

@SaadBinAlamgir3345 They simply left because they didn't care to continue the occupation. Government had no support. It's nothing like a conventional war.
5
Bruh the submarines are working unimpeded how are they not just mercing almost any combat ships? Surface fleets aren't necessary to just completely sink ships. If you want true control they're very important and even more so for actual power projection, however if you're trying to deny control and sink transports they're more effective than any surface fleet. Also completely ignored India which is part of the anti-chinese alliance. Japan just completely decided to give up. I agree with the other comments this is a best-case scenario.
2
@CM-wr6zn Not always. And honestly superior training has trounced numbers in many instances. Especially when you can execute defeat in detail of enemies via encirclements. Also worth noting that at this point you can levy your industry a lot harder than your manpower. French took over the continent and 6 coalitions almost entirely by artillery and encirclements and that was in the early 19th century. Big guns do a lot of damage. British took over India via drill (even though they did also use guns).
2
@bhgtree "I play both sides so I always come up on top"
2
Tbh China is investing in Africa for the same reason.
1
@hughmungus2760 Who did that?
1
@Ethan99752 Tbh the Americans were the closest to doing so but leaving 0 support for the army which was trained basically doomed them.
1