Comments by "buddermonger2000" (@buddermonger2000) on "The New York Times" channel.

@angrydingus5256 "People are chasing him down in the street" I think that proves the point. They're not running away... they're chasing him down. He saw the kid shoot two guys who were ASSAULTING HIM. Also no he didn't see him shoot two guys btw he saw him point the gun at one guy, that guy move back with his hands up, then ANOTHER guy try to assault him at which point he fired, and THEN draw.
13
Idiots. Complete numbskulls all of them. All of this was just pointless. Complete mob for no reason beyond anger. Vandalizing and fighting. And for what? Ended up causing people to die who had no reason to. I also feel bad for the others in the crowd in the early stages who had no idea what was going on being pushed by the crowd and seeing open doors and roads having no idea what came before them because of the sea of people getting caught up in this as a result. What did they know? Idiots who led other idiots into crime and breaking random things. And then they call themselves "patriots" after. Would be laughable if it wasn't for how terrible they are.
2
@Youngblood457 Nah the issue is that the democrats weren't even really that in the first place. It was a select group called the Dixiecrats. So it was pretty much a given once they dropped their power. And also much of The republican states are out to the Midwest. In fact most of the Democrat states are simply republican states with big cities. So nothing really changed lol.
2
@Youngblood457 Radical Republicans were the ones who ended slavery lol.
1
@frustratedmillennialz Bro not at all. You think anyone from the 1800s or even 1950s would align with today's social values of the democrats?
1
@Youngblood457 Not the case lol. Popular narrative but not actually true
1
@Youngblood457 also these videos can give you some context https://youtu.be/UiprVX4os2Y https://youtu.be/2RBFOTdY1yY https://youtu.be/qOgdjoMtscU Second one isn't that great on opinions but gives some extra context third one is retreading the same facts but good to nail it home
1
Well that's just the standard NYT
1
White power symbols? Lol wow 5 minutes in and it's already terrible. I don't even know who the oathkeepers are and I'm pretty sure y'all smeared them because you claimed that they claimed they had those orders without letting them say such themselves.
1
@Iepicfailmmorpg The reason I said that is because the "white power" signs are just the OK symbol and it's stupid to think it is. I then spoke about them because they already smeared the Proud Boys who are led by a black Cuban. So they missed out on letting the groups there speak for themselves and have already mischaracterized one that I DO know. If at any point they brought up information to back up the simple claim of "Trump's orders" I wouldn't have said this. But they haven't. So if they already don't show that research (like a 5 second snippet) and just make an allegation, why should I believe that their "research" is actually such.
1