Comments by "RPKD" (@RPKD88) on "CNN" channel.

That's fucked up and if you liked it you should be ashamed of yourselves.
6
Ahahah it's unfortunate of you think Johnnie is that brilliant.
5
@joel6672 Doesn't matter. People need to have ethics.
5
People out here defending Johnnie Cochran and his cheap dirty tricks to win this case smh. If he had to use those tactics he wasn't that great after all and definitely not the best. The whole argument that that was his job so he HAD to use those methods is piss poor.
4
@thetheoristtranscriptions lmaooo calling anyone else pathetic doesn't sound good coming from you dumbass 😂😂😂 get a life dude who tf wants to visit serbia ahaha
4
Johnnie wasn't great. It wasn't because of the defense being stronger, it's simply because of racial tension.
3
fought**
3
@danielf1676 you're fucking stupid. How can you be so sure of that? Have you studied the case?
3
@deletdis6173 you stfu dumbass troll 😂
3
Not really.
2
That's gross.
2
wtf?
2
Nah that's quite arguable.
2
@risingsun4 How so?
2
@risingsun4 Right but in his case there were several pieces of strong evidence that pointed to him doing it. Not so innocent.
2
@risingsun4 Why is that not the point? That's not important? & yes a lot of innocent people do go to jail because the justice system is fucked up BUT in his case he got away with it. & the race card was used heavily. 🤦🏽‍♀️
2
@risingsun4 Actually you're missing the point. You're forgetting that he was aquitted so idk why you're getting defensive? The point is that there was evidence proving that he was guilty + for some fkn reason he decided to write a book on how he would have done it if he had. & he got away with it plain and simple. The justice system is faulty. The same justic system you say throws innocent people in jail. You're only seeing one side to this interestingly lol.
2
@risingsun4 You're so fucking stupid man. Damn. & how you keep liking your comment for validation that you're right lmao.
2
@southside4182 If you have the same mentality as Rising Sun, you must not be super bright either. 🤷🏽‍♀️ Looks like they got another person for validation lmao.
2
@dragonflarefrog1424 He literally wrote a book on how the murder would look like if he did it. Are you seriously justifying that shit? No one said he didn't deserve a trial.
2
@dragonflarefrog1424 During that era, perhaps yes nothing was done wrong. But in hindsight, it was wrong. I agree with you that the prosecutors did some dumb shit, well Darden did anyway. He botched it.
2
@BrotherMax6 ethics denies equal representation? How does that make sense?
2
@BrotherMax6 you do realize that ethics would INCLUDE equal representation too? You're making an argument which doesn't exist. Try again. And this "perfect world" you speak of is IRL.
2
@BrotherMax6 lol you do realize that ethics can INCLUDE equal representation right? You're making an argument which doesn't exist. And this world you speak of is IRL lmao.
2
@BrotherMax6 Actually, defense lawyers often take cases because they're confident that their client is innocent. If they think they are guilty and still take on their case that IS unethical. Equal representation isn't as important as justice being served. People like you are the reason why others have stopped believing in the justice system.
2
@MossGheeto you're a moron. 🤡
2
it's funny so whatever 😂😂😂
2
@santangelogaia19 He isn't that charismatic lmao
2
this is so hilarious, not sure why people are taking it so seriously 😂😂😂 damn y'all need to loosen up
2
@Dre_Pay Makes him manipulative*. I guess our definition of what constitutes "great" differs vastly.
1
@Dre_Pay Regardless, it's quite unfortunate. Makes you less trusting of the justice system...
1
+Russell Westbrook go make yourself a sandwich.
1
+Russell Westbrook The commenting to sexist men like you? Such a fool.
1
Actually they DIDN'T blow it. They tried their best but everyone made it a fkn race issue. And the defense were using cheap and dirty tricks and that's how they won. If you think that's "better lawyers and better forensics" than shame on you.
1
@roc7880 how tf were they guna win when it became a racially motivated case? It has nothing to with the defense being great, they really weren't - it was that political and racial tension of the time that helped them. And the prosecutors had all the evidence and presented it well, unfortunately the jury was too stupid because again RACE. & btw the media treated the prosecutors terribly. Also which "decent DA" are you talking about?
1
@roc7880 You know all the technical forensic aspects? How? Were you involved with the case? Lol. & if you don't see how big of a role race played in the case, than no amount of explaining will make you understand. Are you aware that the gloves not fitting could be due to various factors? I'm sorry but you're not as knowledgeable about the case as you think you are. & how can you be certain that in your hypothetical situation the jury would still vote innocent/the outcome would be the same? Although it's argumentum ad populum, most people think he's guilty now - if you don't that's your opinion.
1
@Jesse Patrick Ukonga maybe take your own advice.
1
No.
1
Rated 10 for stupidity.
1
 @alberteinstein8862 is the man going to hold the baby in her womb for 9 months? Go through labour pain? Post partum depression?
1
I think you just hate women David lmao.
1
@alberteinstein8862 I guess it's also a woman's fault when they get raped too because too bad she's a woman. Dumbass
1
Lmfao Indians eat processed food too😂😂
1
Hahaha you're joking, right? 😂
1
Wow I feel sorry for u
1
@santangelogaia19 You know the lawyers on the other side, the prosecutors were pretty damn brilliant too. But they messed up badly with the glove request. The female prosecutor was intelligent.
1
This woman is using "science" to justify that other women should give birth to babies that were born out of rape and incest. Fuck your faith if you can't protect women's bodies and only gaf about some baby that you have no relationship with. Weirdo.
1
@hristo5689 ahhh the incels are everywhere.
1