Youtube hearted comments of TassieLorenzo (@TassieLorenzo).

  1. 50
  2. 30
  3. 10
  4. 10
  5. 8
  6. 5
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. Nice review but I struggle to find this car all that interesting (granted, it is nowhere near as vulgar as the big SUV AMGs like the GLS63 AMG!). I noticed that L'Argus had, I think, the standard A45 on the Nurburgring and were struggling with the car having somewhat soft suspension (for the category) with a lot of understeer that rolls into weird torque vectoring oversteer under throttle (the Mk8 VW Golf R behaved similarly, while they may seem to handle OK in isolation just compare to L'Argus' laps with the old Civic Type R or Megane RS Trophy -- those appear to handle *so much* better & be more planted than the AMG or Golf IMO, giving so much more driver confidence), I take it the stiffer setting of the 45S model fixes that? :) Edit - I went back and checked, L'Argus did indeed have the S model as it turned out, interesting. I'm not sure that cars like this (or the Golf R or Audi S3 or the new AWD M135i) are necessarily designed for people who care about corners (as the Civic & Megane are, within the constraints of also being a practical shopping hatchback), as opposed to those who care more about a badge, gadgets and being fast in a straight line TBH. [Hence explaining the suspensions tuned more for comfort than outright handling precision (not to mention automatic-only in some cases).] Bizarrely, the new more reserved 2023 Honda Civic Type R is somehow less tacky than this IMO, especially the interior, the interior is positively conservative by comparison to all the bling in the Mercedes! It might just be me, but I just can't find the A45 more interesting than a Megane RS or Civic Type R.
    2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. That's a slightly non-Concours example Matt! A bit of a contrast to the mint example in the Honda heritage collection. It's not too bad if looked at from the distance of the exterior filming though. πŸ™‚ Is that a RenaultSport metal gearknob instead of a Honda one? The standard radio replaced with a double DIN fascia but a single DIN radio? Carbon-fibre effect bonnet? Those Rage 19" alloys are not good IMO, they take the ride from bad to abominable (I put 17" wheels on mine instead). Someone has turned the cluster dimmer down (the dial on the left of the rev counter), the speedo & rev counter is not supposed to be that dim (it defaults to dim after changing or disconnecting the battery for some reason)! Thanks for the review! The sort of front cupholders are under that sliding cover on the centre console. Re: how low the car is... It's quite low as standard, but there are lowering springs available to lower it another 15mm (which I don't know why you'd ever fit, but people do). I don't agree that Honda ought to have gone turbo on this car! Still being NA is what makes it special and fun. Perhaps it could have had the K24 for more torque (and slightly lower revs) though, the Civic Si got a K24 from 2012-2015. This example car could be the basis for a cheap 750 Motor Club racing car perhaps? Despite not being very fast, the FN2 is a popular choice for a club racing car because it is fairly reliable and there are a lot of parts available (750MC is great because they use a power-to-weight formula, which allow for all kinds of cars to enter and have a chance, by adjusting power output and ballast to fit into different classes -- would great to see more Rovers and MG Rovers out there!). πŸ™‚
    1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1