Comments by "leapdrive" (@leapdrive) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. BigZebra, that’s precisely why Quantum Mechanics is spooky and weird. It doesn’t take into account your work load. Trying to incorporate your work load, long coffee time, chit chat, rest room stops and other random elements would be hard to be put in a wave function.
    3
  2. String theorists are Particle Physicists who said, “While they’re all confused, we can throw in our String Theory which they can’t dispute or disapprove.” This was decided while they were eating stringed noodles and the thought had occurred to them.
    3
  3. A spooky thread! 😮
    3
  4. The reason is really simple- feminist women acting like men cause men to lose interest. So the left blames men for losing testosterone. The feminists supposedly win again! Yey!
    2
  5. Supersymmetry is just a word the Particle Physicists use to mean “we’re confused.” Standard Model is another word they use to mean “we’re more confused than ever.” Their Hedron Collider should have been spent in making a ginormous doughnut and could have been appreciated more by the children of Europe.
    2
  6. Jettison it to space and toward the sun. The sun is the biggest incinerator there is. SpaceX will gladly do it for a small fee.
    2
  7. But, the delta S of the universe is a + or > 0. In order than a delta S to be zero the universe has to be dead, at absolute zero temperature or non-existent. Perhaps your equation: delta S = 0 of the universe is meant to test us?
    2
  8. Another group of scientists who have gone off the deep end - neuroscientists. If they can’t make useful formulas, then confuse the hell out of them.
    2
  9.  @richardchapman1592  , all those labels made up by modern psychologists are a result of their pseudo-sciences just like the scores of gender names whose list are still open for growth. Leave me out of this types of discussions.
    1
  10. Quantum Mechanics is nothing but a study of Stephen King’s Langoliers. When you’re not looking the Langoliers do not have to build the view, but when they know you’re going to look, they will build the view for you. So with Quantum Mechanics, each particle will have its own Langolier to move it to a specified construct.
    1
  11.  𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐬𝐀𝐩𝐩 me +𝟏𝟖𝟑𝟐𝟐𝟖𝟎𝟕𝟒𝟎𝟏  , and this is how the pervs in Hollywood jumped started the feminist movement- with a song: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Doz5w2W-jAY
    1
  12. It doesn’t matter what interferences a wave or continuous waves go up against (double slit being just one example): it is the behavior of wave or waves against any kind of interferences that is describes as wave function. And since this wave function is a probability description, we cannot be certain where our oscillating particle is or where it will end up. What we can only know is the particle’s limits in space it will be. So in layman’s terms: X(r) = here, here, here or there but not over there, over there and over there. The Schroginer’s Equation can be simplified as: Kenetic Energy X(r) + Potential Energy X(r) = Total Energy X(r); X(r) (Kenetic Energy + Potential Energy) = X(r) Total Energy, where X(r) describes the wave function or the probability limits of a particle or particles as in the particle shots at a certain velocity, double slot interference up to the particle termination point or points.
    1
  13.  @Lucius_Chiaraviglio  , that’s what we already use in today’s computers (0,1). It’s called the binary system where a group combination of 0s and 1s is a datum.
    1
  14. It’s the same with Astrophysicists who keep asking for bigger and bigger telescopes in the sky see the beginnings of the universe while we taxpayers keep paying tens of billions for everyone of them. Or Particle Physicists who keep building bigger particle colliders to study those subatomic particles but keep finding more questions than answers. These are projects that never end because we don’t find the answers- only more questions. Those who question the studies and those who question the “golden boy” of Physics- Einstein and his ludicrous Special theory of Relativity might pay a price of being denied research grants, a cushy job at a university or publication of ones research papers. The Physics field like most fields, are monitored, and if one is deemed to go against the designated tide, one is ostracized. How ludicrous can one be, theorizing growth of a passenger (mass) to infinity at light speed? The equation is obviously in error. Now we see galaxies red shifted to faster than light speed. Now the field of physicists claim that perhaps space itself is growing outwards (black energy) and not the galaxies itself. So we go from one ludicrous theory to the next just so we can keep the first theory whole. So the Special Theory of Relativity starts with an assumption that light speed is a universal constant, and is a rule arbitrarily imposed by Einstein. His equation starts from an example moving train relative to the observer. But the observer only picks up information of the train based on what he sees which are the photons at light speed going into his eyes. That’s his established constant. But if I can get information based on the speed of thought via angels giving me thought messages at the speed of thought, Einstein’s equation falls apart. Yes, reality is based on actions happening at real time, not based on old news which is the slow light speed. Everything we see is always the past no matter how close the the action is to you. So using light speed as universal constant is as inane as using a slow walking messenger boy giving you information.
    1