Comments by "Matjaž Čeh" (@manipulativer) on "Veritasium" channel.

  1.  @TheCBC1984  rephrasing: have transparency: conspiracies are uncovered. -- like bill and schwab financing event 201 where they simulate covid 19 before it happened and they talked about missinformation rather than procuring useless masks and such. And instead of building more hospitals, governments were spending billions to media for propaganda purposes.
    9
  2. I actually had a correct understanding of the night vision thing. What started me on the right path was old movies where when they open the goggles a solenoid whine is heard
    3
  3. pyramids are older than 13000 years.
    2
  4.  @K4TORG412  what about energy of gravity? Like shiny metal has a high inductance so when the droplets fall with the right hand rule gravitational spin it's being absorbed by the coil, creating a coherent electric vibration, that causes "gravity" to go from a spinning out phase to a over-spin picking up lateral gravitational pull. When the "gravity-electric" field, stored on the surface of the coils and 2 balls get's discharged, the gravitational spins get annuled
    2
  5.  @pointlessphantomyt1823  ye but how did the charge come by, if there is no current in the drops. It actually is relation with ether that transforms the downward fall to a "spin" and the spin giving "negative charges" .. the other "spin" becomes "positive charge". smth like that
    2
  6.  @pointlessphantomyt1823  Ok ill be more human to you; I realy like that you try to understand how stuff works, but i found out that schools and scientists have it wrong. We use destructive energy as electricity instead of good electricity, with natural flow and this can be achieved with Aether or Ether that has been pushed asaide with lies. Good luck young man
    2
  7.  @philindeblanc  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XgokPQUelA
    2
  8.  @hughleyton693  electrons moving is an effect of electric fields, and they always go against them. Hence the photoelectric effect once the frequency becomes such to create a surface tension/electric field
    2
  9. ye but the problem is that we are not told about the aether and it works against atomic clocks as shown in the sagnac experiment or many other silenced experiments.
    1
  10. Eric P. Dollard says the same thing about internal combustion engines.
    1
  11. "that might seem crazy"... cause it is. special relativity and einstein were put by the media to instill lies in people. than they "battle" quantum physics which is wrong also... That speed causes time to slow down is bogus lies perhaps based on cesium decay. electrons dont flow, electricity is literaly magnetism in motion based on the potential difference and it needs a medium that conducts heat well... And at high frequencys you can notice that more as skin effect as the magnetism has no time to get "absorbed" and it battles the sorrounding Aether... There is no logic in science... all dogma and lies.
    1
  12. Cant wait when they will remove this alber shillstain out of books - or at least the truth.
    1
  13. Wrong. they are equivalent not equal. You must expell energy to cause g with a rocket propulsion
    1
  14. and gravity is a force as proven by cavendish. spacetime can not curve cause space has no propreties.
    1
  15.  @pointlessphantomyt1823  Now explain the same thing but with ether and instead of charge the spin
    1
  16.  @pointlessphantomyt1823  If i had someone come and tell me some truths that are not well known i would be happy. Guess your just a shill or AI
    1
  17.  Dave Smith  WELL IT AINT PASSIVE IF IT PRODUCES ELECTRICITY. AND THE FACT THAT THEY ARETHAN ATTRACTED TO THE COILS IS AGAINANACTIVEEFFECT.
    1
  18.  @philindeblanc  SORRY WRONG LINK this is the one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP76H-8SeV0
    1
  19.  @dirkgently120  well entirely passive does not explain how potential energy gets transformed to electricity. Noone explained this in schools
    1
  20. van der waal is just a weak version of casimir effect. It has nothing to do with neutral atoms but everything to do with missing ether and thus a stiction force/more pressure from other parts.
    1
  21. so this proves the Aether? no? still not convinced?
    1
  22.  @MikeRosoftJH  I think you are wrong but i have no means or knowledge to explain it to you. But all i can say is that this thing about one at a time is a bit strange... like its ok if you shoot atoms that you get interference as atoms outter shell is literaly in touch with the Aether... It might as well be a mathematical construct that is proposed as real as the nonsesne of a equation giving a + and - corealitng to us living in at least 2 universes and other bulcrap they spit out.
    1
  23.  @MikeRosoftJH  Also a recent information about a mathematic guy who told me that all of those quantum mumbo jumbo formulas or whatever work on the presumption that they are in a medium. i didn't understand it very well but it is another point toward the false science we are being presented. Also the speed of light when measured varried by a few m/s and they decided its a constant with no backround explanations what-so-ever... it's endless. Nassim Haramein speaks of Aether, Nikola Tesla spoke of Aether only einstein didnt and he was promoted by the media. Nassim Haramein also speaks of the cenzure happening where they dont publish his stuff etc wake up dud
    1
  24.  @MikeRosoftJH  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2SevH886Rc well well well.... what do we have here ;)
    1
  25. imagine not being able to split a cookie 1/3 ways
    1
  26. VERITASIUM i summon you! Make a video of what falls faster in a vacoom, feather or a magnet? or to make it more logical 1kg of iron or 1kg of a strong magnet? or 1kg of lodestone vs 1kg piezo-crystal
    1
  27. A photon was never proven to be a particle flying from light source either. :))
    1
  28. the fact that the weight shifts necessitates for the wheel to work on the sorounding space.
    1
  29. If you eat good foods and when we clean the planet of toxic waiste, those fungus will be your friends; not something you want to get rid of.
    1
  30. prove me wrong please, but the simple problem is that statistics have no time component and here the time implementation is miss-informing. Similary to how einsteins thought experiments are useless If you are walking in the middle of the road until a car comes by chance you are always bound by time
    1
  31. This video is not enjoyable cause we dont know what that was said is hypothesis, theory or fact.
    1
  32. Yo dumbo, check "Sagnac Interferometer" and you will see how full of lies those scientists are
    1
  33. This is so similar to todays corona scam. people getting bribed to be silent, people getting bribed to write covid etc.
    1
  34. The best way to learn is to be thought HOW to think not WHAT to think. Universe is an easy thing to understand, yet they shove poisonous silicon down our throats and call it progress. ZOMBIES
    1
  35. At 8min mark you liken the rocket accelerating at 9,8m/s to Earth gravity and this is super false as with time the rocket would have to reach infinity where Earth doesn't.
    1
  36. at 12:45 you are wrong. Since the cable was already on a positive pressure the changing magnetic field pushed into negative and thus it makes the appearance that its the electric field who makes a magnet, but its always magnetic inertia. edit: perhaps it really is the degenerate gas in coper conductors reacting to the changing magnetic field and thus a current is facilitated by it; although its still a simulation
    1
  37. The graphics looked suspiciously similar to michelson morely experiment. Also this is an Aether peturbator meter.... there is no such thing as gravity waves lol
    1
  38.  @mikewade777  it was proven. there is no such thing as your critical inteligence, only factual mounthbreathing 1 liers
    1
  39. Disliked; NASA should be using against-gravity electricity not this propeled low efficiency none-sense. Although it has a harmonic propel it still pushes air instead of ether
    1
  40. The flower of life at 12:20 you showing us the ALPHA?
    1
  41. Superposition is wrong physics. Shrodinger was joking as to how absurd superposition is when he talked about his cat... he was an etherist. The thing is the superposition arises from a photon being 1 second worth of light instead of taking cycles into account. Even though cycles are a fundamental unit we dont have it in SI units and this is on purpose to screw with your logic and to make it absurd to understand. IDK how fast the clock speed of a quantum computer is, but supposedly it works near terahertz regions hence; so it 1 0 1 1 01 010 10---- but so fast they can lie about this superposition avoiding logic.
    1
  42. Put 2 clocks in center of a 1km diameter circle. move them both half a km away. <- genious Also the result if done like that would vary in corelation to the position north-south-east-west by a fraction.
    1
  43. instead of focusing on the gravitational pull, they focus on the force exerted by it and name it kg. On the moon a kilogram is no longer a kilogram is it?
    1
  44.  @SneeuwPoesjes  ye but it does not exert "1kg" of force on the moon, so it would be better to use other units. Also it would be wise to finily connect electricity, gravity and Aether and come with true understanding of the wheelworks of Nature and not those assumption and observational equations.
    1
  45.  @SneeuwPoesjes  well you corrected me good. I give you credit about that. Since you are so knowledgable can you explain to me 1 thing. They used michelson and morley experiemnt to disprove the existance of the Ether.... but how come they use the same concept to detect gravitational waves at LIGO? And about mass and weight and neutons i know about is just that i am looking furter and seeking a way to see the wheelworks of Nature better... And mass as in atomic mass makes sense that it has a weight based on the gravity and such i get that... BUT I am still having trouble corelating Ether with magnetism or Ether with gravity via electricity and the electric universe is all logical and easy to corelate while the lies we get told are hard to imagine.
    1
  46.  @SneeuwPoesjes  Thanks for the response. The biggest problem for me to understand about these waves and analogy about "trampoline" being 2 dimensional. So does it has a up and down position? It makes no sense and since we are spinning around the sun at 90 degree and the sun is spining and rotating 90degree toward a black hole you find that it's similar to electro-magnetism, where 90degree is the "displacement" of magnetism or in other words amperes are 90 degrees of with volts. And the space time theory sounds and looks like it works but for me its all backwards... what if time is a property of mass and not space? you see where i am going? Aabout the electric universe i think it depends on how you look at it, if you compare their prediction about comets being exact and the predictions of nasa being wrong and the explanation of nasa not making sense while the electric universe did make sense makes you think about what else is nasa cappable of lying like they know the answer to you know? Like i know that Earth is a spheroid, but arguing about relativity and quantum physics when ether physics works is non-sense. Also Nassim Haramein who is a well know physicist also speaks about the cenzure and about aether. So... again... if they used michelson mourly experiment to disprove ether, what are they using the same setup for if there is no medium in which gravity could propagate? Like they can say about matter defforming or whatever but i don't believe that and perhaps is possible to find out for certain is just that i work on gut feelings and in my view they pumped up "gravitational waves" and forgot about ether as sience is ultimately dogma, where you need to go through the lies others went and agree to those lies to get a phd and continue lying if you want to get paid.
    1
  47.  @FrostDirt  Yo, can you explain Sagnac Interferometer experiment?
    1
  48. hmmm... interesting... sometimes it feels like my voice on 9gag got a lot of traction. 1 maybe 2 things worth mentioning: The first person to invent AND operator was Tesla with his boat
    1
  49.  @hughleyton693  yes skin effect is driving ac, hence why you get interference on long lan cables when lighting strikes. Cause there is a medium, ether and the waves colide with matter exchanging energy as in skin effect. You must unlearn school as its propaganda
    1
  50.  @hughleyton693  the video link i show you is the fact that there is no electrons holding charge in a cap. I mean, you probably a shill, disinformant who hates the fact that people woken up to the electron being mostly a scam so you need to lie so you get small kids to fondle
    1