Comments by "Matjaž Čeh" (@manipulativer) on "The kg is dead, long live the kg" video.

instead of focusing on the gravitational pull, they focus on the force exerted by it and name it kg. On the moon a kilogram is no longer a kilogram is it?
1
@SneeuwPoesjes ye but it does not exert "1kg" of force on the moon, so it would be better to use other units. Also it would be wise to finily connect electricity, gravity and Aether and come with true understanding of the wheelworks of Nature and not those assumption and observational equations.
1
@SneeuwPoesjes well you corrected me good. I give you credit about that. Since you are so knowledgable can you explain to me 1 thing. They used michelson and morley experiemnt to disprove the existance of the Ether.... but how come they use the same concept to detect gravitational waves at LIGO? And about mass and weight and neutons i know about is just that i am looking furter and seeking a way to see the wheelworks of Nature better... And mass as in atomic mass makes sense that it has a weight based on the gravity and such i get that... BUT I am still having trouble corelating Ether with magnetism or Ether with gravity via electricity and the electric universe is all logical and easy to corelate while the lies we get told are hard to imagine.
1
@SneeuwPoesjes Thanks for the response. The biggest problem for me to understand about these waves and analogy about "trampoline" being 2 dimensional. So does it has a up and down position? It makes no sense and since we are spinning around the sun at 90 degree and the sun is spining and rotating 90degree toward a black hole you find that it's similar to electro-magnetism, where 90degree is the "displacement" of magnetism or in other words amperes are 90 degrees of with volts. And the space time theory sounds and looks like it works but for me its all backwards... what if time is a property of mass and not space? you see where i am going? Aabout the electric universe i think it depends on how you look at it, if you compare their prediction about comets being exact and the predictions of nasa being wrong and the explanation of nasa not making sense while the electric universe did make sense makes you think about what else is nasa cappable of lying like they know the answer to you know? Like i know that Earth is a spheroid, but arguing about relativity and quantum physics when ether physics works is non-sense. Also Nassim Haramein who is a well know physicist also speaks about the cenzure and about aether. So... again... if they used michelson mourly experiment to disprove ether, what are they using the same setup for if there is no medium in which gravity could propagate? Like they can say about matter defforming or whatever but i don't believe that and perhaps is possible to find out for certain is just that i work on gut feelings and in my view they pumped up "gravitational waves" and forgot about ether as sience is ultimately dogma, where you need to go through the lies others went and agree to those lies to get a phd and continue lying if you want to get paid.
1
@FrostDirt Yo, can you explain Sagnac Interferometer experiment?
1