Youtube comments of Abella Seksa (@abellaseksa8513).
-
70
-
48
-
21
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
***** for these islanders of less than 50.000 people its a big problem for them that so many online jump to conclusions and judge them based on misinformation. It´s good that you stop up for a second, think, and do some research.
The fact is these pilot whales die quickly. Not as fast as a bullet to the head, but almost.
While many locals there help with the slaughter the kill it self is only allowed to be done by a hand few locals that have the propper skills to make the killing as fast as possible.
This is done via a one cut move, a handful length away from the blowhole, and all the way in and down, in one move. This cuts the vital spinal cord and the main artery there, and causes a so massive and sudden bloodpressure drop that the animal dies within a second by making it braindead. That is fast by any standard.
The big animal may still move after this, but so does a headless chicken. Even our industrialized pigs, who hang up after they also been brainkilled via a stumpgun, and than slized up can jingle and move, eventhough most would describe them as being dead. This is all nerves that cause the animal to keep moving. Anyone lived near nature and been in a slaughterhouse knows this.
After the big pilot whales is braindead they may cut it some more, to make it bleed out faster. Its also part of our modern industrialized slaughter process, that after what ever method used to brainkill the animal, to than cut it open some more, to let the blood bleed out faster. This is done both for preserving taste (slow bleeding gives a bad aftertaste in the meat) and to make it easier to move the animal body when less blood is in it.
After all this, first than the big braindead and bleed out animal is dragged on land to be cut into smaller pieces and than the meat is handed to the locals. Freely.
These methods are not that much different from what happens to our pigs and alike. But one of the differences is our industrialized food production hides their bloody killing in huge slaughter houses and few to no shoppers in the local supermarkert has really a clue about the origin of their own meat, and therefor easily jump to conclusions and bash these islanders when they so openly do their slaughering out in the open nature where everyone can see how a killing never is a pretty sight.
Most city people today have simply just lost touch with nature and how and where food comes from.
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
+Jaryn Arvid No. They speak faroese on the Faroe Islands. Their language, together with the icelandic language, are some of the closed you can get to the original "viking" language, which was what everyone spoke in the Nordic region some 1000-1200 years ago. While Faroese and Icelandic have almost not changed, the other regions (Norway, Sweden, Denmark) and their language have evolved alot and today Danish can be said to be the one of the old languages who has moved the furthest away from the old language.
The people of the Faroe Islands and Iceland are able to read old "viking" books and messages carved in stones 1000s years ago, because their today's language is close to the old viking language, but the other countries, especially the danes have a really hard time understanding the language of their ancestors.
United Nations has one stated a language has to have alerts a few hundred thousands citizens using it as a main language for it to be sustainable and not die out, but Iceland with 300.000 citizens speaking their own language and the Faroe Islands with less than 50.000 citizens have counterproven that estimation, as their languiage is strong:
They have numerous newspapers on those isles, 5 radio stations and are the country in the world that publishes the most books (all in Faroese) than any other country in the world (compared to the size of the country) so the language is still strong and doing well - and yes, it is not Danish.
Even though those isles belong to the Kingdom of Denmark they do not see them selfs as Danish and they would get very insulted if you thought of them as Danish.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
+Nipah Auauau United States; UK, Scotland, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, Bahrain, Mexico, Qatar, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Egypt, Belize, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are all countries on the top list of the most obese nations in the world. The Faroe Islands are not even among the top 150.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Fulmar IS a sustainable source of food. It is NOT endangered.
The dark meat is tasty, although very fatty.
The northern fulmar is estimated to have between 15,000,000 and 30,000,000 mature individuals, that occupy an occurrence range of 28,400,000 km2 (11,000,000 sq mi) and their population is on the rise, hence it is listed with the IUCN as Least Concern = Not endangered. Source: BirdLife International (2009): The BirdLife checklist of the birds of the world, with conservation status and taxonomic sources.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
info145 I am surprised of how a person can have so much to say about a topic without having a clue about what he/she is talking about.
You talk about whales and whales being endangered in the same ways has newspapers for decades have repeaded the misleading statement that "whales are endangered" without realizing that whales is not one specie but a group of over 100 different species where most of these species have never been endangered.
The reality is that some of the large species have been over hunted in the old days, but the majority of whale species are actually classified as being small in size but not in numbers, and among the whale species that are not endangered, never been, and are classified by UICN and more as being "most likely to remain so".
There is a reason no whaling expert takes Sea Shepherd or its supporters serious when you over and over again proof how loosely you take facts, numbers and reality.
There are also bird species that are and/or have been endangered, but you do not hear the common man or newspapers state that birds, as in All Birds, are endangered, because that not in link with reality. But most people are clueless about whales and repeat a propaganda that has never been insync with real facts and reality.
Yes, there have been, and still are whale species that are endangered and need protection, but to mix that talk with talk about a specie that is not, never been, and is classified as being most likely never endangered, is stupid and only shows lack of respect for reality.
Cut the crap and stick to facts. Other wise no well informed people will ever take you or Sea Shepherd serious.
If you haven´t figured out why so many people think you and SS are stupid, than look for how losely you trow around with numbers and misleading facts.
1
-
info145 You obviously do not like facts. I did not say that there are not endangered animals. What I did was to point out that you walk over very loosely over the therm "Whales", where you claim whales, as in all whales, are endangered, Which is misleading, and actually wrong. The definition of what is a whale covers almost 100 species and while some of them are endangered (I never said the opposite) the fact remains that many of them, the majority actually, are not endangered. That is a simple fact.
Saying that does not mean I am not aware or concerned about the state of whales and especially those that are endangered, but I am sick and tired of these numbnuts that keep repeating the misleading headlines that "whales", as in "all whales" are endangered, since that is simply not true. Birds, as in all bird species, are not endangered just because a few of the species are. But you who so many times made it so obvious you do not care about facts is most likely gonna continue your misleading propaganda. That seems to be the spirit of any Sea Shepherd supporter: to mislead.
1
-
1
-
FaQZhePowlice The bird he takes is young, true. But he and the other few islanders, only take a few hundred out of millions of birds, and they only take the birds that can not fly - which are birds to fat and who will die shortly after by nature if they can not fly, the others manage to fly and excape waves and the other birds who will kill them.
Why would you claim it is only about time till there will be no pilot whales? Have you even taken your time to do actual research?
Are you aware of the fact that pilot whales are the best documented wild life animal on the planet with statistics ranging back over 500 years? There simply is not a better documented wildlife animal on the planet.
According to the experts and scientists within this field (NAMMCI, NGS, UICN) the pilot whale is not endangered, never been endangered and is classified as being "most likely to remain so".
To many people have been brainwashed by the past ages of over simplified headliens of "whales endangered" without understanding the complexity of the fact that there actually are almost 100 different whale species, of which some need protection, but where a majority are classiefied as not endangered, and among those who never ever ever been endangered and never ever been any where close to being endangered and still is classiefied as most likely to remain so is the pilot whale.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
mack man Read this: Our Excessive Fear of Mercury. Where It Comes From. What It (The Fear) Does to Us: http://bigthink.com/risk-reason-and-reality/our-excessive-fear-of-mercury-where-it-comes-from-what-it-the-fear-does-to-us
"This is no love letter to mercury. It does have human health effects, and impacts on wildlife. It is a neurotoxin, and worthy of concern. BUT the qualifications about just how neurotoxic it is, and to which subpopulations, are rarely included in news stories that simply declare mercury to be dangerous, a black-and-white description that serves the public poorly. It serves environmental scientists well, however, since these are people dedicated, honorably, to raising concern about such threats. They describe the risk to journalists in dramatic and simplified ways, often leaving out these mitigating distinctions, and the journalists repeat those simplistic, dramatic, attention-getting descriptions, and society ends up with less than the whole picture — creating fears that exceed the actual threat"
According to the study, which played a key role in establishing the regulation of mercury (and helped inform the EPA’s cost-benefit analysis), less than one IQ point per kid, so subtle that it couldn’t be detected in any one child. As the authors noted, “Clinical examination and neurophysiological testing did not reveal any clear-cut mercury-related abnormalities
In other words the mercury situation is being abused to mislead the masses and you are helping in that misleading process.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1