Youtube comments of Cheezymuffin (@Cheezymuffin.).
-
147000
-
5600
-
2200
-
2000
-
2000
-
1800
-
1300
-
688
-
381
-
286
-
256
-
247
-
242
-
199
-
196
-
147
-
133
-
124
-
107
-
81
-
65
-
63
-
62
-
57
-
54
-
53
-
51
-
47
-
41
-
38
-
32
-
30
-
29
-
27
-
26
-
Tanks, especially modern ones, are very expensive and hard to produce. So in peace time or against 3th world countries, you don't need a full armor division. Because there isn't really a well equiped, well trained and battle hardened enemy right now, that will fight ferociously.
Ofcourse, when war does come around the corner, every modern country has plans for a war economy, where massive amounts of militairy equipment can be produced in a short amount of time.
But to be really honest, I absolutely dread the idea of a total war in this day and age... and so does every country. Only a country with a giant militairy, a economic and social instability, and that is in striking distance of weaker, but by NATO guaranteed neighbours posts any treath, as they might take the risk of all out war to save their nation by robbing their neighbours...
But I mean, what is the chance of such a country existing in our time right?... oh wait... we're boned
26
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
20
-
as a dutch person we learn briefly anout this war in school.
Officialy it was called a politonele actie, basically just "Police business"
but even in school we where teached, "yeah it was basically a war"
I, as a firm believer in freedom and the right to a own country, believe by heart that it is a good thing that colonialism is no more.
However I can slightly sympathise with my ancestors, I mean, the netherlands where under german occupation from may 1940 to the end of the war in europe
Completely wrecking the home country.
and the dutch people in Indonesia, where interned into camps by the japanese,
After this straining war the dutch never wanted to participate in, their biggest cash cow declared independence.
I might in that situation also have shouted for war to make sure that the netherlands could recover from the second world war.
Doesn't help that dutch people fleeing indonesia bring back the stories about being chased out and having people being murdered.
Again, not supporting colonialism, but I am at least capable of understanding the mindset of the people.
20
-
19
-
19
-
17
-
17
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@joshnic6639 it's called supply and demand, more specialized jobs are harder to find people for and often more important, and they earn more, (engineers, doctors, etc) but also jobs that are only achieved by a relative few (politicians, actors, etc) and of course people who are capable of dealing with a lot of responsibility (CEOs, directors, etc).
It's not perfect, but it's much better than what you describe. because in your system, someone or some small group needs to decide what is "important"
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
even eerlijk zijn, als je vragen probeert te beantwoorden en je krijgt "journalisten" die buiten hun beurt spreken, en andere journalisten buiten hun beurt laten spreken (als die tweede journalist gewoon was gaan praten dan was haar beurt niet overgeslagen) en ze zich niet kunnen gedragen om dat je niet de antwoorden geeft die ze willen dat je geeft, en dan ook nog proberen te zeggen dat je een racist bent, omdat je zegt wat je all jaren zegt, maar nu is de journalist toevallig Aziatisch, dan zou je ook weglopen.
Tump probeerde gewoon door te gaan met de volgende vragen, maar ze wilde het gewoon niet loslaten, haar fout, niet Trump.
Is Trump antwoord goed? ehhhh... nee niet echt, hij ontwijkt de vraag dus heeft of geen goed antwoord of heeft wel een goed reden maar wil dat niet zeggen.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
"Dit is de stem voor het niet-instemmen voor een geleidelijke overgang, maar voor actie"
Ah ja, want het gaat echt goed wanneer je met een revolutie sociale problemen op probeert te lossen.
Ik bedoel dat heeft nog nooit voor problemen gezocht.
Dat broed zeker geen extremisme.
Nee ga lekker door, komt vast goed.
Gesproken door iemand die echt begrijpt hoe mensen werken, en wat de langdurige implicaties zijn van het forceren van regels die mensen dwingen anders te denken.
/sarcasme off
okay het hele probleem met die gedachte is dat:
1. mensen vinden het niet zo tof als de staat bepaald wat ze moeten denken. en je krijgt dan 2 extreme groepen. De slaven van de overheid, die geïndoctrineerd zijn tot het punt waar ze niet voor hunzelf kunnen denken, en daartegenover staat een groep mensen die zich van hun vrijheid beroofd voelen, en zich uiteindelijk bewapenen om dat terug te nemen.
de VS is een perfect voorbeeld hiervan op dit moment.
2. zelfs wanneer je die actie doordrukt, en iedereen zich gedraagt, zal er een grote groep zijn die het alleen maar zegt en niet gelooft, en waarschijnlijk zich er gewoon nog meer tegen verzet
(bijv: zouden ze zwarte piet afschaffen met een wet, dan voorspel ik dat er meer zwarte pieten zullen zijn dan ooit tevoren)
.
Echte verandering komt door het individu, niet door een boze massa.
Ik bedoel, ben je ooit van mening verandert door dat een of ander persoon tegen je liep te schreeuwen dat je fout zit? Misschien je een eikel of maloot te noemen? Of omdat een of andere koekwous je dom noemt?
nee.
Wanneer je denkt aan alle momenten dat je mening is verandert, komt het door het praten en jezelf openstellen aan andermans mening. Beide kanten moeten dit doen, en beide kanten lopen de kans dat ze van mening veranderen, of het eens zijn dat ze het niet eens zijn. Zolang mensen niet in staat zijn deze mindset te hebben, en gewoon fucking te praten, zal er geen godganze moer veranderen.
En soms moet je gewoon de verandering zelf zijn. Hou je bijvoorbeeld niet van Piet? Ga dan gewoon als regenboog piet, en zeg niks slechts over de mensen die als zwarte piet gaan. Nogmaals, mensen die zich boos verzetten tegen wat jij doet zien er slecht uit. Veel mensen vinden die zwarte pieten demonstraties achterlijk, maar ik kan met zekerheid zeggen, dat als er in plaats van anti-zwarte pieten demonstraties, anti-blauwe pieten demonstraties waren, dat diezelfde groep mensen dat ook achterlijk zou vinden.
.
Maar ga je gang, en zet Rapper Typhoon op een podium om te laten zien hoe "connected" je bent tot de zwarte community.
Want zoals we weten zijn alle zwarte mensen rappers.
.
Pfeew, lekker even mijn frustraties uit mijn systeem, doe ermee wat je wilt.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
mmmh, the brain spike and the placements of the knives to open up the artery could perhaps be done using a machine.
but the spine destruction is a harder step, and probably have to be done manualy.
if this method can create longer lasting fish, it will probably get a comfortable place in the market, so I am kinda curious to see if a machine could be made to make the process quicker and cheaper.
I don't know if the spide destruction step can be skipped for a result in between ikejime and normal, but if that is the case, it wouldn't be weird to perhaps see this way used more often, as having to trow away less fish might turn out to save profit.
but mass yeeting fish into a room filled with ice is quicker... and requires no machines...
the insentive does lie with the fishing companies, cause they will need to advertize it to the businesses that sell the fish to the consumers...
I don't know how large the amount of fish is, that those fish shops have to trow away, but if it is a decent amount, they probably would want to have fish that last longer.
This would however drive down the demand for fish, meaning that fish populations would face less overfishing.
But this in turn would result in loss of jobs in the fishing business.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
also, the panzer 1 was mostly used as a training vehicle, but was clearly designed as a combat vehicle. The panzer 1's armor is a nickel allow, meaning it is strong and expensive. A vehicle designed for training, wouldn't have that.
Keep in mind that a tank armed with only machine guns is not a dumb idea, as a machine gun is all you need against infantery (the main target) the panzer 2's main arnament according to the manuals, was the machine gun, while the 20mm gun was only added to provide a Anti-tank capability. Of course the 20mm had some HE shells, which the crew demanded more off as it was really usefull against infantery.
Of course, the production of these 2 vehicles created the basis for a tank industry.
The panzer 3 was not designed to be a universal tank, it was designed to take on tanks, and was only armed with a 37mm because the 50mm gun wasn't available yet. It was spposed to protect the panzer 4 against enemy armor, the panzer 4 being the support tank, taking out pilboxes and entrenched enemies. Of course, we all know the panzer 4 was upgunned to take out the russian heavy tanks, altough the need for bigger guns was first sparked by the encounter of the Char B1 and Matilda in france. This encounter also sparked the need for a propper heavy tank, which would become the tiger 1.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
People that bash the P-47 because of video games, haven't played any video games.
The cockpit is clear, the controls are smooth, the ammo is plenty and the guns are precise and hard hitting.
You can put the thing on any target and blast is with ease.
Yeah a BF-109 can do fancy tricks, but it is also much harder to control, and the cockpit is small and obstructed by metal parts on the corners and sides, and putting the damn thing on target is a nightmare.
I found that a hard hitting, fast, sturdy, and easy to fly, land, and take off plane is much more worth than fancy tricks, that offer mixed resulsts at best.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I hate: blacks, whites, hispanic, asian, men, woman, gays, LGBT, feminist, and everyone else, including myself. I don't give a shit about your anything. fuck everyone. true equality
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@heatherfossis2093 first off. Yes, in the past women where kept from getting into those positions, but we moved on from that with women now holding all kinds of positions in the goverment, and they have proven to be able to get far. With in 2016, polls expecting a woman to win... of course those polls turned out to be shit but hey she ran.
And yes it is not that different from comming out and saying "listen people, I will make damn sure my VP will be a straight white man" which everybody would find racist and sexist, and the media wouldn't shut up about it.
Now the only thing I don't agree with you with is that no one cared women where blocked from positions of power. If that was the case, then nothing would have changed. People did care. Thats where feminism came from... before it was hijackt by female supremacists.
So yeah I 100% agree with you, it is stupid to only select a candidate based on race and sex.
It would be even more stupid for a party that claims to be inclusive, and claims to absolutely not select people based on those superficial attributes, to exclaim they are going to select a VP, that must fit a certain race and sex.
1
-
@heatherfossis2093 no I am sorry but please understand. The people you are talking about are the exception. Not the rule nowadays.
Please don't think that everyone around you is a evil racist and sexist monster, most people are not.
But the most ridiculous ones nowadays are used as strawmen. To point at the other political site and go "see!? They are evil"
I mean, there are democrats out there saying black people are not smart enough to have a ID and therevore showing a ID for voting is racism. Does that mean every democrat think in that belittling and racist of black people? No, I certainly hope they don't.
Sure there may be some doctors that think that really backwards way, but those are a small minority of doctors that probably will lose their medical lisense if they purposely mallpractise on a poc.
And putting people in power based on race or sex alone is wrong. And I thought a person who seems so heavily focused on rooting out racism would understand that. The only way to get rid of racism is to not focus on race anymore.
Honestly, I think it is wrong to praise for example Obama for being the "first black president". That is what he is most known for. His most notable part of his presidency, has been reduced to "being black"
Now if we didn't focus on race so much, he might have been known for something else.
Trump is going to be remembered for destroying the polls, and pissing of the media.
Actions, he is going to be judged on his actions. Obama doesn't get that privilege because everyone is so focused on the fucking amount of melamine in his skin.
And I expect the same for the first female president.
She is going to be known as the "first female president"
And thats it. Thats going to be the first thing you find looking up her name. You find her sex in the title, like that somehow mattered to her performance as a president
I am sick and tired of people, who out of good intentions, are willing to differentiate between black and white people, and men and women, and then go like "oh but it isn't racism/sexism because we differentiate the black people/ women in a positive way"
No it is still racism and sexism to differentiate between them, and treat there accomplishments differently, based on there race or sex.
If you let a student into a university with a lower score, because he is black, that is racist. Even if it where to help him. Because you treath him different based on race.
And if you think, that being against positive discrimination is racist or sexist, then yes, everyone around you is a racist and sexist. Because the fast majority of people believe race or sex shouldn't matter, and for every example of a bad person you give, there are far more people out there trying to do the right thing.
Stop thinking everyone is against you, and you are living in a evil dystopia, you are not. Most people are actually rather nice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
immage if one day we could strip planets made of metals to make giant space ships, which we could use to farm the water of the water planet and then deposit it on planets we deem fit to house live, we could make the planet spin creating a magnetic field and then we would wait for everything to set, before we set foot on a new world
a prosses lasting thousands of years, in which the generation that started it will never see the resulst.
a prosess where even the farming of water from the water planet will last hundreds of years
complete cultures will form on the mothership, maybe even wars will break out, countries might form on the ship, but that wouldn't matter, because a lot would be automated
and eventually the ship will send the message the planet is ready, and a few thousand people will go down to colonize the planet, letting on it humans, livestock, and other animals like insects
the planet will already be overgrown by plants launched from the ship decenia ago.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As a dutch person myself, I think it is great that our state acknowledges the past and tries to make aments.
However, as a individual, I will never apologize for something I personaly haven't done.
I will also look with pride at how our small nation managed to make such a massive impact in the world, be it trough conquest, trade, or progressive stances.
Ignoring the past is bad, and so is cherry picking the things you like or dislike from it. But I refuse to be made to feel ashamed of my country and it's history.
My culture, my country, and it's history is something I cherrish, and think that shouldn't be shamed.
I know the past, and how our country's hands are by no means clean. However this is the case for litteraly every society on earth. I choose to accept it, acknowledge it, and not be ashamed of it.
The very fact that our country acknowledges the past, and chooses to right the wrongs, is just more reason to be proud of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Although I might be biased as a dutch person, I think the Netherlands is the greatest place to live on earth.
The temperature is good, not too hot nor too cold
The cities are clean and easy to traverse
The cities are also very quiet due to special asphalt, smart road design and low traffic volume
Crime is low
90% of the population speaks English, so you don't need to speak dutch in order to communicate
The air is clean
The people are friendly
The bike livestyle is perfect to keep fit.
The food is... okay the food is kinda lacking, but the prices in the supermarket aren't bad and the food quality is really high. so you can make any dish you want.
The only problem right now is the housing market being wack, with people struggling to find homes
Oh but don't worry about homeless people, they are very rare, and the state is actually obliged to find people housing. So if you see a homeless person, they are homeless by choice.
Jup, I think the Netherlands just about made the perfect society. We even have the best cheese.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1