Comments by "Kim O\x27Brien" (@kimobrien.) on "ReasonTV" channel.

  1. 16
  2. 10
  3. 7
  4. 6
  5. 6
  6. 5
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. The human species is collectivist by nature. You don't see any libertarians going out in the jungle and living like male orangutans swinging from tree to tree eating low hanging fruit do you?.Each individual is somewhat different do to sexual reproduction, the division of labor and where and when they lived. What distinguishes man from animal is the use of labor to make a life for ourselves and our species. For to enable the creation of all culture Science, Art and even Religion man must first be able to eat drink and have shelter. The change from the animalist life and the primitive communism of the hunter gathers to the agricultural peoples required the creation of a small ruling class to make decisions on how to use the surplus agriculture created and defend it from war by war. They abolished cannibalism and replaced it with slavery. The agricultural peoples created the domestic animals and domestic plants out of the nature itself. One half of the plant food we eat today was created by the Native Americans. So when some says they created a new GMO well you can say that Native peoples created Corn and Potatoes. The problem with the neoliberal theories of private individuals doing the work of the gods in their individual pursuit of profits is that it is completely historically inaccurate. The Internet, GPS and even the moon landing were all developed and paid for with tax money allocated for the cold war with the Soviet Union. With the loss of the monopoly on the atom bomb which itself required a vast government paid for and directed industrial complex money would pore into education, universities and industry like water to gain a first strike capability in an insane arms race right up to Reagan's presidency and the implosion of the Soviet Union.
    2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163.  @Artcore103  The weakness in capitalism is that the capitalist seek to make profits and that does not necessarily coincide with the creation of value. The capitalist are the involuntary promoters of modern industry. In doing so capital becomes ever more concentrated and monopolistic. Capitalism generates no wealth in and of itself which why all the modern capitalist economists must deny that the profits are created by labor. This is why the must mystify the creation of wealth. All the early classical economist including adam smith agreed with the labor theory of value. All this talk of how the government is interfering with the smart bosses is just so much nonsense designed to mystify how value is created. Anyone can play the role of the bosses fighting to make the biggest profits with the other industries. What they can't do escape the decline of industry when you run out of markets for products you can't sell at a profit and the international competition between the bosses of different capitalist seeking to make profits for their ruling class. You can't escape the creation of crisis and the drive to make the biggest profits until you end up in a situation like what the world economic forum cries about. All people like you talk about is how we need to give another bunch of capitalist the new opportunity to do the same thing those who proceed them did. How does going bankrupt help when you create an economic crisis like 2008? Sure lets all lock the doors send everyone home and wait for federal judges to decide whose fault the crisis was. Bezos took advantage of the possibility to centralise the search for products beginning with books using internet communications and computer technology. His ability to act as a middleman of gigantic proportions was made possible by the falling costs of computer technology. People such as yourself as easily mystified by numbers and machines.
    1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209.  @willo1345  The US has always used immigration from Cuba as a weapon against the revolution. It's just part of their overall strategy to create hunger and desperation in Cuba. You realize they find dead bodies in the US Rio Grande/ Mexican Rio Bravo river and in the Texas desert and along with the rest of the US Mexican border. Life is not easy in for those who live in poverty. Cuba cannot be allowed to succeed because it will encourage others to follow. What follows is an official declassified US State Department document. Memorandum From the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs (Mallory) to the Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs (Rubottom)1 Washington, April 6, 1960. SUBJECT The Decline and Fall of Castro Salient considerations respecting the life of the present Government of Cuba are: 1.The majority of Cubans support Castro (the lowest estimate I have seen is 50 percent). 2.There is no effective political opposition. 3.Fidel Castro and other members of the Cuban Government espouse or condone communist influence. 4.Communist influence is pervading the Government and the body politic at an amazingly fast rate. 5.Militant opposition to Castro from without Cuba would only serve his and the communist cause. 6.The only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship. If the above are accepted or cannot be successfully countered, it follows that every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba. If such a policy is adopted, it should be the result of a positive decision which would call forth a line of action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government. The principal item in our economic quiver would be flexible authority in the sugar legislation. This needs to be sought urgently. All other avenues should likewise be explored. But first, a decision is [Page 886]necessary as to the line of our conduct. Would you wish to have such a proposal prepared for the Secretary?2
    1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285.  @kwannp6141  End the US Blockade of Cuba!!! 499. Memorandum From the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs (Mallory) to the Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs (Rubottom)1 Washington , April 6, 1960. SUBJECT The Decline and Fall of Castro Salient considerations respecting the life of the present Government of Cuba are: 1. The majority of Cubans support Castro (the lowest estimate I have seen is 50 percent). 2. There is no effective political opposition. 3. Fidel Castro and other members of the Cuban Government espouse or condone communist influence. 4. Communist influence is pervading the Government and the body politic at an amazingly fast rate. 5. Militant opposition to Castro from without Cuba would only serve his and the communist cause. 6. The only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship. If the above are accepted or cannot be successfully countered, it follows that every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba. If such a policy is adopted, it should be the result of a positive decision which would call forth a line of action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government. The principal item in our economic quiver would be flexible authority in the sugar legislation. This needs to be sought urgently. All other avenues should likewise be explored. But first, a decision is [Page 886]necessary as to the line of our conduct. Would you wish to have such a proposal prepared for the Secretary?2
    1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291.  @Kitkat-986  Bosses compete for capital investment based upon rate of return. That's out of our control. You like to move as much labor into fly by night contracting and away from the actual industrial capital. Capitalism works to replace higher paid skilled labor with machines and unskilled labor. That's why "getting a skill" is not a real solution. The problem this also poses is the one of a declining rate of return on capital investment since labor is the source of profit while capital value rises and the labor time to produce goes down. These slumping profit rates in highly capitalised industries discourage profit driven needed investment. We can't fix a fact of life under capitalism. Second your politicians write these greed and not in my backyard regulations then enforce them with your cops. You don't want to spend any tax money building housing because it would interfere in the Real Estate Tycoons ability to profit. What was it 2.3 Trillion for that exercise in "Nation Building War" in Afghanistan. How many trillions do you plan on spending to maintain a nuclear posture? Milton Freedman and others like Thomas Sowell have been telling you what you want to believe about your system for years and now much like the lies told by the Stalinists the chickens have come home to roost. Instead of the "Ownership Society" you have a "Debtors Society" instead of instead of a rising tide lifting all boats the tide went out and beached all the small craft. Instead of a "New World Order" where the rule of law replaces the rule of the jungle you have a "New World Disorder" Where other players see a "rule based order" as a "fixed game". People like college degreed real estate lawyers and professional babysitters in social work have been crying about the pay of electricians and plumbers for since Genesis. Wages not keeping up with inflation is what happens when you disconnect the value of currency with either labor time or a commodity like gold that can be relatively stable in the labor cost of production. You have a system that all but lets you print free money for loans to the biggest banks in the country. So instead of issuing the old fashion wage cut you have the inflatable currency that raises the value of property vs wages.
    1
  292.  @Kitkat-986  When they build new machinery or set up a new assembly line its always done with the object of using less skill and less labor time to produce. The idea that they will hire more skilled workers overall just isn't true. They'd had backhoes for at least 50 years now machine operation like a backhoe is like driving a car you learn the basics and the rest is practice.They don't pay the backhoe operator ten times the wage because the wage payment is based upon the cost to reproduce the workers labor for the next pay period. The 10 guys you say would dig the same hole in the same time would each need to be paid the cost of their time to reproduce their labor for the pay period. The bosses pay you the wages to reproduce your labor power for the next pay period. They can make a profit by you creating more value than your wages paid. The backhoe contractor could not change more than the price the hand shoveler did. Over time the price he can change sinks towards the actual cost. Painting and plastering is a better example because the skill and time needed to pain with a brush and put plaster on lathe has been replaced with spray/roller and sheet rock. They got rid of lots of draftsmen, clerical workers telephone operators replacing them with computers. Lots of machine shop equipment is computer controlled. They have gotten rid of as many things that will need repair or regular replacement as possible. If they decide they need a lot people (labor shortage) with a certain skill for a new factory the bosses get the government to run a training program. The investors want the highest rate of profit (profits/capital invested). They invest both in fixed capital (machinery, tools) that depreciates over time and circulating capital (wages, material and rents) that returns directly after the product is sold.
    1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312.  @BobDingus-bh3pd Nor does it mean the exaggeration of individual interests like the goal of trying to turn everything into individual private property when even the capitalist have and act with collective interests. Many corporations have multiple owners. Just as we have class and individual interest so do they. Their small group needs to keep their crisis wracked system from getting out of control which history shows them unable to do. The set up the Federal Reserve after a private banking crisis that required JP Morgan to bail others out. The Federal Reserve is a privately owned federally chartered Bank. The Paris commune was the first workers state. It was produced by the Franco Prussia war. It lasted about 70 days before the workers were slaughtered by counter revolutionary forces. The capitalist need an ever growing state to arbitrate every dispute and grievance in their favor. The favor of an ever shrinking minority. Their sole concern is profits as seen in accounting books. It's relatively easy to show that the profit is just surplus value produced by labor in an industrial company. The taxes collected by the capitalist for their government are also part of the system that recognizes that all things can not simple be turned into commodities and sold in a market. If your going to use the police and army its been decided that its much better to put a democratic facade on their actions. As for things like education and healthcare the capitalist view those not as something upon which humanity builds and creates for itself but things to be monopolized and minimized into the hands of a few since their are either an overhead cost or an indirect drag on profits though taxes. Then you have a combination of the bank, the landlord and the government all demanding that tribute be paid for housing and farmland regardless of income to them as if we were still serfs from the middle ages.
    1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395.  @IIBloodXLustII  The US does everything possible to defeat the Cuban revolution. This has always been US policy. The US claims the right to decide what it wants for Cuba. Memorandum From the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs (Mallory) to the Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs (Rubottom)1 Washington, April 6, 1960. SUBJECT The Decline and Fall of Castro Salient considerations respecting the life of the present Government of Cuba are: 1.The majority of Cubans support Castro (the lowest estimate I have seen is 50 percent). 2.There is no effective political opposition. 3.Fidel Castro and other members of the Cuban Government espouse or condone communist influence. 4.Communist influence is pervading the Government and the body politic at an amazingly fast rate. 5.Militant opposition to Castro from without Cuba would only serve his and the communist cause. 6.The only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship. If the above are accepted or cannot be successfully countered, it follows that every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba. If such a policy is adopted, it should be the result of a positive decision which would call forth a line of action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government. The principal item in our economic quiver would be flexible authority in the sugar legislation. This needs to be sought urgently. All other avenues should likewise be explored. But first, a decision is [Page 886]necessary as to the line of our conduct. Would you wish to have such a proposal prepared for the Secretary?2 https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1958-60v06/d499
    1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. Reesel4D If you believe what is most important is the state and not the political economics of a society than that is a non Marxist view. The state is determined by the needs of the ruling class (capitalist, feudal, slavocracy or workers) not the other way around. If you want to convict me of being a Marxist well then I plead guilty. The first part of a socialist revolution is when the workers gain political power. The next part is to nationalize and abolish private ownership of Industrial property. In the Cuban revolution no one was told they couldn't continue as an administrator. What they were told is they could no longer use their position to exploit others. The Cuban revolution also broke up the old plantations and made land available to all who wanted to work it. So far every socialist revolution after the workers gain political power has then faced counterrevolutionary violence from both internal and external enemies. If the workers and small farmers through their revolutionary party and governmental organization are to retain and hold power they have had to destroy the old state power, establish a new state power and create a revolutionary armed forces to defend the revolutionary power from external invasion. Will all socialist revolutions go on to become bureaucratic nightmares and then go back to capitalism because the rich run the world? The Cuban's have already answered that question and like Fidel said there will be a revolution in the United States before there will be a counter revolution in Cuba.
    1
  412. The United States has had two revolutions. The first overthrew British colonial rule and established a national federal republican state. The second constitution of 1789 with its first ten amendments (Bill of Rights) also left intact slavery within individual states and the Bill of Rights was deemed binding upon the Federal government only before the civil war. The second revolution (the civil war 1861-1865) abolished slavery and added the civil war amendments that made slavery illegal (except as punishment for a crime), guaranteed voting rights for the former slaves, established due process of law for all under US jurisdiction, and made anyone born here and under US jurisdiction automatically citizens. Now all those rights look very good on paper but someone has always had to fight to keep those rights intact against a government that would like to ride roughshod over them. The alien and sedition act, the criminal syndicalism laws, the palmer raids, the smith (gag) act, the communist control act, the conitel programs, the attorney generals list and more are examples of government thought control laws and suppression of free speech and association. Now the battle between Stalin and Trotsky may have seemed irrelevant in the last years of the Eastern Bloc and China but the American Trotskyists have been much more relevant in the United States. Our political continuity goes back to before WW1 and the founding of the 2nd International. We have never had to go underground due to death squads, stalinism or fascism like the colonial world and Europe. While the Stalinist dominated the radicalization of the 1930's we pulled off the Minneapolis General Strike of 1934 which opened the road to creating the Teamster's Union the largest union in the United States today. Starting with the Cuban revolution and the Fair Play for Cuba Committee the Stalinists have never been able to keep us (Socialist Workers Party) out of any significant struggle in the United States. The days when they could raise and pass motions to eject the counter revolutionary Trotskyists and expel their members for talking to us are long gone. Today our movement publishes books on a wide range of subjects and a weekly newspaper. While the CPUSA is limited to a web page and recruitment based on nostalgia history rewritten to make themselves look good.
    1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544.  @Barskor1  Capitalism is a social system where most production takes place in factories that are owned by capitalist. The stock market quickly corrupts any Democratic Republic. Cuban medical solitary is not only for Cubans but other people who live in third world nations who revive medical brigades of Cuban Doctors. 10,000 foreign medical students are studying in Havana at no direct cost to the student. The Cuban medical system is based on healthcare in the neighborhoods and towns where a Doctor is responsible for healthcare delivery to everyone in the neighborhood. Like the free educational system the US seeks to destroy it. The US has been calling Cuba a Dictatorship despite the fact that it has always know that to be untrue. 499. Memorandum From the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs (Mallory) to the Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs (Rubottom)1 Washington, April 6, 1960. SUBJECT The Decline and Fall of Castro Salient considerations respecting the life of the present Government of Cuba are: 1. The majority of Cubans support Castro (the lowest estimate I have seen is 50 percent). 2. There is no effective political opposition. 3. Fidel Castro and other members of the Cuban Government espouse or condone communist influence. 4. Communist influence is pervading the Government and the body politic at an amazingly fast rate. 5. Militant opposition to Castro from without Cuba would only serve his and the communist cause. 6. The only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship. If the above are accepted or cannot be successfully countered, it follows that every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba. If such a policy is adopted, it should be the result of a positive decision which would call forth a line of action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government. The principal item in our economic quiver would be flexible authority in the sugar legislation. This needs to be sought urgently. All other avenues should likewise be explored. But first, a decision is [Page 886]necessary as to the line of our conduct. Would you wish to have such a proposal prepared for the Secretary
    1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. That's the best you can do is hit us with a few quotes you can't even trace back to the original person who said them? How about, "What's the matter are you afraid of a few Chinese Laundrymen?" General MacArthur during the Korean War. How about Richard Nixon coming on TV and saying "..I'm not a crook..." Fiat currency? Nixon closed the window for foreign gold exchange because France wanted gold for dollars. They've had 40 years to go back to the gold standard. It's the natural greed of the capitalists and the way their system works that guarantees financial collapse not any one particular policy. Capitalism without cronyism? Impossible because that's always been the way capitalism has always worked going back to the Union Pacific railroad charter. Clinton took away welfare AFDC and created TANF in the first attack on the Social Security Act of 1935. The guarantee of public housing is gone replaced with a complicated system that makes sense only to those with investment money. You broke our unions so instead of 30% of workers belonging to unions it's now about 6%. The promise of private pensions to the more skilled and unionized workers is in the trash. Wages have been stagnate while productivity and profits have sorred. You let us borrow with easy money saying we didn't need higher wages just good credit before 2008 now we are lucky to get a loan for anything. We paid for Social Security and medicare for our old age and the disabled and you want that back also. If anyone got a free lunch its was from the 'No Bankers Left Behind' policy of Obama.
    1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1