Comments by "Michele Lyn" (@HRPFayetteville) on "Austin American-Statesman" channel.

  1. I mean, really, this guy just might as well say I didn't believe Nate, I didn't waste my time. That's all I'm gonna say that's all you need to know and then shut up because that's what this boils down to I didn't care to inquire, I didn't believe him I didn't like the guy don't care didn't do my. You just say that people will have a lot more respect for you.
    13
  2. Such a liar pants on fire 🔥 and his fake.crying 😢
    10
  3. I'm sorry, but when you retain a lawyer, you typically have to pay an upfront retainer fee that they feed off of and use up, and then you get invoiced after that. And you pay as you get your invoices. These people don't even know how much this guy is. Charging per hour. How could you retain a lawyer and not discuss payment of any kind at all? Not even a retainer fee, not even a 100 bucks. 200 bucks, come on, give me a break. And this is a criminal defense lawyer on top of it, so everybody who retains him has to be hired. Or he has to do the work pro Bono and that has to be noted. On court documents that it's probono because lawyers get credit for that. Yeah, used to work for a lawyer. This Attorney General lawyer should all be disbarred and not able to practice law ever again.
    7
  4. Wow can't believe he's still lying after all the allegations were proven false How is this not slander a defamation????
    7
  5. The question everybody should ask is why didn't they just comply with the foya request? The FBI didn't respond to the request in the due time. And then the egg gave him 10 more days. In that department, which was inappropriate, the whole thing was inappropriate. That they've done to this guy, Nate, that's clear. They work for the Attorney General. The Attorney General doesn't work for them. The Attorney General works for the public. And why would you just not satisfy this guy's issue instead of putting him off? Delaying him acting crazy, you are the ones acting crazy. Cause you don't want to deal with his issue. S, you don't want to prove him wrong. Why is that most of the time you bring something to the Ag? They figure it out, they give you a reason that satisfies you and you go away even if you're still mad, you still see that okay? They did follow the procedures. They did do everything they were supposed to do. So why didn't they just do that and could have avoided all of this?
    6
  6. Notice how they all keep using the term good Faith, good Faith, red flag, red flag. You wouldn't keep saying good, say that Attorney General's got a bunch of Sabotage is in his mix this whole thing is falling apart
    5
  7. The house didn't follow theor own rules
    2
  8. Except there was no gain 😂😂😂😂
    2
  9. Well, the senate should have the right to send an appeachment back to the house. If it's not done correctly, it doesn't make sense for the senate to do a whole trial. When all this should have been done in the House of Representatives.
    2
  10. This is almost like Donald Trump and his impeachment over his phone call. What's the lenski all over again? Remember all the lies I got caught in. And all the mind reading. They thought they were doing against Donald Trump. The people who worked at the ukrainian embassy
    1
  11. What evidence??????
    1
  12. How can you be Ace o of the bank? Who legally is going has to give all these loans out? Who legally is ordered to stop mortgages? If the people say they can't pay stop paying rent. Cause there was a rent moratorium and foreclosure moratorium. How can you not know all this as the CEO of a bank? That's crazy. I mean, you all should have a meeting and went through. The whole thing, are you kidding
    1
  13. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  14. Wow, one hundred years, it just proves that they're going after people and not actual bad actors
    1