Comments by "Jim" (@Jim_7284) on "BREAKING NEWS: TOMMY ROBINSON'S FRIEND GIVES A NEW JAIL UPDATE AT HMP WOODHILL" video.

  1. It's a shame Tommy couldn't provide proof in court😅
    11
  2.  @wordwordful  totally different.. Assange had proof...Tommy couldn't provide any😅
    6
  3.  @dionyssiacat6941  so why couldn't he present those "facts" to the courts? Tommy decided not to provide any reliable evidence to the courts but decided to make a video instead 👍 Ok mate, Sounds legit👍
    5
  4.  @Binky2266  I suggest seeking professional help if you think the courts don't take reliable evidence seriously👍
    4
  5.  @sandrawhelan9159  shame Tommy couldn't give any evidence of his truth to the courts.... Probably better to just make a video instead anyway 😅
    4
  6. @Uratube25  yeah I know....he couldn't provide any reputable evidence to the courts👍 But looks good when he makes a video🙌 some people don't need reliable evidence to make judgements and are easily led😅 Along as it looks good on a video, Tommy will be able to gather some money so it's all good and I imagine mission accomplished for Tommy
    3
  7.  @George-if1bf  sadly hearsay doesn't count as evidence... Shame Tommy doesn't have any evidence to back his claims up😅
    3
  8.  @Azrael1BC  so contempt of court is now a civil matter? Who told you that? Tommy?
    3
  9. @keithwilliams1243  what's your point? You go to jail for contempt of court, criminal or civil court, it doesn't matter
    3
  10. @keithwilliams1243  you can't use hearsay in court mate ... courts require facts👍 Sadly Tommy runs off hearsay👍 Who supports "your lot"?...not many👍 on the niche of society 😅
    3
  11.  @the2379  thats the point pal...No reliable evidence that could stand up in a proper legitimate court... But looks good in a video👍
    3
  12.  @bluedot188  he did attend court mate, so you saying when he lost his liability case that it actually never happened and it's all being made up? Why couldn't Tommy provide reliable evidence? And only decided to make a video?
    2
  13.  @derekibison6644  is Neil a new name that Tommy is living under? Who's Neil?
    2
  14. @julieemery8963  who told you that? Let me guess? ..Tommy told you? Sounds legit, I believe you now 🙌
    2
  15.  @julieemery8963  misinformation? That's pretty rich coming from a Tommy fan😅
    2
  16. @spiderknight9893  1. I'm not a judge... And i personally can't make a judgement based on one video, from one side of the story ... 2.And that's before a legit judge has deemed Tommy's evidence as hearsay 3.Just because Tommy packaged it up all nice into a video, doesn't change the reliability of his evidence... Most importantly.....4. I am not a trained judge and have not trained to think analytically outside of emotion...have you?
    2
  17.  @Adam-n8y  are you talking about the kid who took him to court? And now in jail for? It's a shame Tommy couldn't provide reliable evidence when that child took him to court....
    2
  18.  @johnalcuk  so you don't think contempt of court is against the law? Someone sounds switched on 🤣
    2
  19.  @tonylyons7711  Tommy never talks about the Christians...why did the archbishop resign again?
    2
  20.  @dianeharris4319  you can be jailed for contempt of court... doesn't matter if it's a civil or criminal case👍 Maybe use Google? Before you come across as thick?
    1
  21.  @paulconey252  🤣 Your grammar is* not the best👍 Lollll
    1
  22.  @derekibison6644  thanks for the confirmation 😅 lol
    1
  23.  @julieemery8963  I think you need professional help if you think the courts won't accept reliable evidence.... Shame Tommy couldn't provide any and just used hearsay as evidence... Next you will tell me the world I run by lizards 😅
    1
  24. ​@dionyssiacat6941lolll you had time to watch a biased "documentary"... But I bet you didn't read the court proceedings...how do I know? Your not reading 50 pages🤣 His video has clearly been debunked 👍...but you don't care about facts
    1
  25.  @cathywood2519  shame Tommy couldn't provide evidence for his claims... Better to just make a video that goes against your conviction banning you from spreading hearsay about children 👍 Top bloke 🙌
    1
  26.  @spiderknight9893 we "should" live in a world where grown men like Tommy "shouldn't" have bullied that child without reliable evidence 👍 Poor Tommy..bless him cotton socks....
    1
  27. @spiderknight9893  yeah I imagine Tommy made it look pretty convincing in his video... But I imagine it's pretty easy to play anything out as convincingly if you try hard enough😅 Are you one of the people that think the courts were out to get him? Because I'm a man that thinks courts take reliable evidence seriously...And recommend professional help for anyone that thinks differently. The world is not run by lizards 😅
    1
  28. @spiderknight9893  did Andrew and Jimmy go to court in the uk and have UK judges look at any evidence? Wasn't Andrews case a civil court in the USA? And he settled out of court? And Jimmy never had a court date, let alone a judge look at his case... So unsure what you mean? And think your making up stuff that never happened 😅 If I'm wrong please enlighten me on the UK court and dates they attended, kind regards.
    1
  29. @spiderknight9893  judges look at reliable evidence, sadly hearsay can't be used in court.... If Tommy had genuine evidence they would have taken him seriously....and personally think people need professional help if they think they wouldn't have😅
    1
  30. @spiderknight9893  my point was clear and simple. If a judge in a court of law sees reliable evidence, the judge will allow you to use that evidence in your defense... But a judge won't allow "hearsay" to be used in your defense. Anyone who thinks differently IMO genuinely needs professional help👍
    1
  31. @spiderknight9893  its pretty simple IMO, I walk you through my opinion. 1.Tommy couldn't provide evidence of his claims to justify his bullying of a child. 2.He was ordered to stop bullying that child by a court. 3.Tommy chose to ignore that court order. 4.Breaking that order was contempt of court and is a criminal offence. 5.Tommy went to jail for "said" criminal offence. 6.If you think he's in jail because he made the gov look bad, I personally think you need professional help👍 We are all entitled to our opinions, I just wonder where you got your opinion? One video?.... Do you know what "analytical" means?
    1
  32.  @michaeljohnston-ul1vi  filmed what? Filmed who? Is there any way to independently check? Couldn't it literally be anyone in the video?
    1
  33. @spiderknight9893  you change like the wind...Why would I listen😅 I made simple points, you seem to be clutching at straws trying to dodge simple points.... Read our convo 👍 it's actually pretty funny🤣 Yes I know the video wasn't used as evidence,you already said this🙄, But Tommy made a video with the same evidence as he used in court, what's new in the video? What is independently checkable from his video? Or do we just take Tommy's word for it? I think you need to Google what an "analytical" judgement means👍
    1
  34. @Lancashirewoodcraft  guy bullies a child, can't prove his claims in court so decides to make a video about it all 🤣 What a guy.... Then everyone complains why isn't he in a cat D....ps. they don't put violent offenders in cat Ds, Tommy has a history most seem to forget....
    1
  35.  @jamesanglim2256  yeah real men don't need evidence....hear say will do🙌
    1
  36. @jamesanglim2256  Tommy couldn't supply reliable evidence to a court of law... But his evidence looks good on a video he made I suppose 🙌 I suppose you think the courts ignore evidence if it's reliable? And the world is run by lizards? Are you one of those kind of people?
    1
  37.  @jamesanglim2256  apologies for saying it how it actually is ... Tommy fans ain't fans of facts, my apologies mate.
    1
  38. @jamesanglim2256  some people have low criteria for what they call "facts" I suppose... As I take it your talking about Tommys documentary that couldn't be deemed more than hearsay in a court? If so I will apologise now as my criteria for a "fact" is a little higher.
    1
  39. ​ @PricelessJesus tell me you haven't read the court proceedings without telling ne haven't? Oh.....you already did that🤣 Can you read 50 pages clearly debunking Tommy's lies?
    1
  40. @derekibison6644  you sound so rational and analytical in your thoughts and beliefs 🙌 What a guy🙌 lol
    1
  41. @keithwilliams1243  indeed 👍 You can be jailed for contempt of court from criminal or civil court, what is your point?
    1
  42.  @keithwilliams1243  you said Tommy went to jail for contempt of court for a civil case... suggesting he shouldn't go to jail for that... Obviously he should... So you don't think court orders should be followed through if you break it?
    1
  43. ​​ @garyedmunds4285 I bet you didn't even bother to read the court proceedings? You only want to hear what you want😅 Tommy film is clearly debunked if you're capable of reading 50 pages? Let's face it, you're not reading that
    1
  44. I take it you're not capable of reading the court proceedings? Tommy witnesses couldn't keep their story straight 🤣 Complete hearsay lol
    1
  45.  @johnalcuk  yet Tommy was the one who broke the law😅 Do you not want a lawful society?
    1
  46. Tommy's lies have clearly been debunked as lies.... Did you read the court proceedings?... probably best you don't cause your hero is clearly a crook with no evidence apart from hearsay👍 All witnesses couldn't keep their "story straight 🤣
    1
  47.  @PricelessJesus  but what doesn't Tommy talk about Christians and the things they do? Arch bishop resigned today..why?
    1
  48. Did you read the court proceedings? Tommy is clearly debunked in that...but you don't want to see facts...just emotions
    1