General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Wrong Thinker
Asmongold Clips
comments

Comments by "Wrong Thinker" (@wrongthinker843) on "Most Controversial Clip on the Internet Right Now" video.

@ChristopherGray00 So do we treat schizo people by telling them the voices they hear are real and they should listen closer?
1700
@kekelapp0r I accept that they're deluded, sure.
139
@siniister710 "Leave the kids alone" is intolerance? Sounds like a Freudian slip.
105
@Hecarim420 Probably because it's a bunch of self-contradictory nonsense, yeah.
44
There is a "vocal" minority behind all this, one that you can't be allowed to criticize ever.
44
It is in a world of corpofascist lies.
44
@oceandrop7666 The truth is that stuff your delusions.
40
@Mark-vr7pt Sex change is not a thing, it's just genital mutilation.
40
@bebinsect Stop being predators, then we can talk.
32
@jackwood1142 Not illegal yet. Which is also a fairly good sign that it is true, when the state wants to shut you up.
29
 @PSYMEDIC We were letting them be. Clearly that was a mistake.
25
@wesleyleigh4063 What part of parading naked around playgrounds is "minding your own business" again?
20
Big ep stein island fans
18
@v8matey No such thing as "hate speech", just speech those in power hate.
18
@johnjohn2570 I guess only biologists backed by politicians and corporations count?
18
@SaHaRaSquad Over 3000 people arrested, in 2021, in UK, over social media posts/likes.
17
@jazzyzjas9701 What's the difference?
17
@BrCaBe Some BS about "hate speech", I mean a cursory search will tell you about people being arrested for it.
14
@Hecarim420 Sorry, I couldn't quite catch that past all the crying.
12
@johnark4723 Except it isn't flawed at all.
10
 @NovelPhoinixTheSecond No, groomer.
10
@kekelapp0r Okay, who are they to invalidate my feelings?
9
The irony of my response about media control being shadowed.
9
@Hecarim420 "REEEE I'm right side of history" Like literally 100% of people who have ever made that claim, no. Cry about it.
9
@kekelapp0r There is no assumption of lies, just the fact of it.
8
@ShrimpEmporium Well considering you're not completely silent 100% of the time, you're clearly a hypocrite
8
It doesn't, but it sure helps big pharma bottom line when they have to cash out for drugs to maintain a basic quality of life after the fact.
7
@ogrimbothesour2976 Careful not believing everything the corporate hegemony tells you to
7
The problem is grooming and mutilation.
7
Nope, just you.
6
@teevee3407 "Ideas are more powerful than weapons. We don't let our enemies have weapons, so why would we allow them ideas?" - Stalin
6
@SiMeGamer John Money would be very proud.
5
I'm not going to play with your imaginary friends either. Cry about it.
5
@kekelapp0r In your ideology, yes.
5
"As the self-proclaimed right side of history I will assert what others think to justify putting them in camps"
5
@tribeval Your birth was, clearly.
5
Something to do with pattern recognition.
5
When you keep declaring enemies, you end up with a lot. Also when you keep creeping on kids tbh.
5
"People"
5
@teo9787 Yes, it is. Because assuming this "different gender" exists and there is a "feeling" of it, you couldn't know it.
5
@johnark4723 It's funny, you make a perfectly reasonable point and then call it stupid because muh feefees.
4
That's how grooming works. Force beliefs on kids.
4
They don't, the nosy juice does. And fabricates all this in tactics outlined by Bezmenov.
4
@michellepainter9057 Well, when ~10% does ~78%...
4
@MoreEvilThanYahweh Or I'm going to turn your accusations into honesty. Your choice.
4
@MoreEvilThanYahweh Don't care.
4
@Ecliptor. Found the oxygen thief
4
@riccardo1796 Not even close.
4
What middle ages stuff do you mean?
3
An empire doesn't collapse overnight.
3
Funny how you hated Islam for genital mutilation as a punishment, but now promote it for kids because corporations said so.
3
If you want to be accepted, behave. Don't go to playgrounds with your BDSM polyamorous friends.
2
@CaptainStardust1988 Then calm down.
2
@grueti21 Another word that rhymes with "few"
2
@adrashmadra7149 That's cool, ask how your mother feels about it.
2
I'm sure the extreme profitability of needing medicine for the rest of their lives has nothing to do with it being promoted. Just like lobotomy.
2
Everyone should read deeper into it. Where all these crazy ideas come from. What Bezmenov had to say about it.
2
@Ecliptor. Okay bootleg human
2
@That-guy-there1 "why dont we try to see the good that came from this movement" We do. We worked very hard to find it. Still can't. Lots of harm though.
2
There's also some crimes stats about them people should know. Specifically toward kids.
2
@That-guy-there1 Actually, that's exactly how you treat depression. Not by telling people they actually are worthless and should unalive.
2
@rcsverige "Academia" also uses terms like "birthing person" and can't answer what a woman is.
2
 @SkillzthatKillz2011 Yes, your insertion of religion was a red herring. Thanks for confirming you never deserved the benefit of the doubt.
2
@mongoose890 Yeah, we absolutely were.
2
@whenpigsfly8178 Witches aren't real. If you mean "witch hunts" the common perception of them is based 97% on fiction.
1
Who cares.
1
@CaptainStardust1988 Nah, mald about it.
1
@CaptainStardust1988 "waah I win I win"
1
@SargentD4 I agree. Child molesters get no mercy.
1
@SaHaRaSquad In 2021, UK arrested over 3000 people for online "hate speech". But hey, keep up the gaslighting, it will totally make people kinder to you.
1
@SargentD4 We can't revert to something that never happened, but otherwise I agree 1000%.
1
@SaHaRaSquad When you support ideological totalitarianism, don't be surprised when people treat you like it.
1
@johnark4723 I hope you can keep your smugness when the people you demonize make an honest man out of you.
1
@Goddess-zq2th I'm sure you'll keep that attitude when people stop giving you the benefit of doubt.
1
@Goddess-zq2th Did you think I mistook you for someone worth the oxygen?
1
@Goddess-zq2th You're a funny little creature. Not intentionally of course.
1
@veritas4698 Those are different categories.
1
Who died and made you king of speech police?
1
And by "scientific" you mean experiments done by a few child molesters whose victims later unalived themselves.
1
So companies are right?
1
Because of the unmentionable minority that controls the media.
1
@wesleyleigh4063 What part of shaking your genitals at a playground is "minding your own business"?
1
@Kapiolla27 Because the "bad sheep" are 100% of your community.
1
@KreepKarnage I'm sure copying words you don't understand will protect you, pdfile.
1
@Kapiolla27 "REEE people who won't let me molest kids are literally Hitler" Weird hill to die on. Not that it matters which one you pick.
1
@KreepKarnage Methinks the pdfile defender doth protest too much, and again using words it doesn't understand.
1
@Kapiolla27 He also breathed oxygen, so if you do you're his biggest fan, clearly. Oh wait, no, you don't know what "logic" actually means.
1
@KreepKarnage I'm sure pretending you're not your mother's biggest regret will help a lot when the percussive maintenance time comes.
1
@Kapiolla27 "REEE pointing out my trash non-logic is trolling" Nah. Keep throwing buzzwords at me though, v e r m i n.
1
@kekelapp0r Best for producing lots of woodchipper lube, sure.
1
@ShrimpEmporium Funny how "the science™" speaks in favor of making big pharma an incredible amount of money by mutilating people. But I'm sure there couldn't possibly be any relation.
1
@ShrimpEmporium Funny how "the science" speaks in favor of making big pharma a ton of money while billionaires speak of the need to reduce human population. Total cohencidence, I'm sure.
1
@ShrimpEmporium Science owned by billionaires and politicians, sure. Don't worry, you won't be able to memoryhole this in 10 years. You will be held responsible. If you don't solve yourself before then of course, 42% and rising. 👍
1
@ShrimpEmporium Sure, but only the scientists promoted by politicians and corporations count. Cohencidentally.
1
@ShrimpEmporium Sure. Of course, only those promoted by politicians and corporations are "real scientists" and all the rest are conspiracy theorists.
1
@ShrimpEmporium Right, but of course, only the ones backed by politicians/corporations count as "real".
1
@ShrimpEmporium Funny how only "scientists" towing the political line count.
1
@FabStriker27 Ok Lysenko
1
@BananaWasTaken Science doesn't say anything. It's a concept. Trying to twist it for political ends just proves it's 100% false.
1
@michellepainter9057 Yeah, pretty crazy, they only make up 78% of kid diddling.
1
And you seem to be missing a brain, but that's still not normal.
1
Well there's also addiction and stockholm syndrome to consider.
1
@bebinsect You think the disapproval of child molesters concerns me?
1
@Kapita_Lismus Of course not. Why would I do something so easy on them when I have construction tools at home.
1
@xZero9Ox > brag about teaching kids about trans > "REEE it's not happening" Sure, and you will not meet with any unfortunate accidents involving percussion.
1
Cute excuse to creep on women
1
@otto7588 Stop inventing nonsense to justify your worthless existence and do something with your life.
1
@deucesbye It is the truth. Yes, I am seriously saying this during child molester month. I don't care about your moral posturing.
1
@gedachtdaran No, 1 out of 10000 isn't "most".
1
@dang476 Stop hiding behind the false idea of you protecting children from parents and just come out and say you are a molester.
1
@wesleyleigh4063 What?
1
Sounds like rookie numbers
1
@ThatReviewerGamer Absolutely. 100% is the goal here.
1
Always has been.
1
@_Travey Forced to not molest kids, the horror!
1
@crankheart Waaah I can't molest kids I'm so opressed :(((
1
With a lot of pedophilia
1
@BananaWasTaken Yes, the majority of people always rejected pdfiles. What's shocking there?
1
@BananaWasTaken Child molesters exist, but they shouldn't. I support their right to push up daisies.
1
@NovelPhoinixTheSecond "Why would you teach your kids morals instead of sex" So they don't turn into a pdfile like you.
1
Humans don't become hermaphrodites. If not treated immediately after birth, you end up with two sets of vestigial organs and a plethora of health issues.
1
@seigeengine Oh no, the child molesters don't approve of me, oh no!
1
@HDGaminTutorials Yes, sadly, child molesters still exist
1
@redaderoua8816 No, the voices are not real. There is no "transition", it's mutilation that must be treated with expensive medicine for the rest of their lives. I'm sure big pharma appreciates you carrying water for them though.
1
@handswater No, there cannot. But you should trust the one saying you can fly.
1
@Wate It's the best way to make big pharma a lot of money, who cares what harm they do, amirite
1
@SkillzthatKillz2011 Yeah, how dare they pray to anyone but your corpomasta.
1
@SkillzthatKillz2011 The profits and mutilations sure are real.
1
@ZivineYT Attention disorder? You mean kids being kids but God forbid big pharma doesn't overmedicate them to make money?
1
@matt46O Imaging lying to protect big pharma abusing people. You go girl. But also notice how the method is to externalize and separate the voices from oneself. Not accept them as ultimate truth. That awkward moment when your fabricated evidence just proves my point.
1
@SkillzthatKillz2011 Aww, trying to shift the subject? What an obedient house serf for big pharma you are.
1
@rcsverige Nah. Now stop ruining the rest of your mother's life.
1
@rcsverige Fascist bait name always applies.
1
@rcsverige Nah. John Money - the child molester who mutilated and drove kids to suicide - did his "research" in the 1950s. Go do something with your life instead of convincing yourself you're not mother's biggest regret.
1
@rcsverige Sure, humans are complex. But you don't qualify, hence the impotent rage of a parasite.
1
@IceedPro Fascist bait always fits. Respect is earned. And certainly not by creeping on kids.
1
@LetTheCycle_BeDiscontinued You're gonna have your mind blown when you discover the concept of "synonyms".
1
@SkillzthatKillz2011 Nice red herring buddy. Your corporate masta approves.
1
@SkillzthatKillz2011 Red herring is trying to change the subject, parrotboy. Mentioning corporations is very relevant to big pharma's abuse of patients. Try harder.
1
@SkillzthatKillz2011 We can't. Keep up the desperate reaching.
1
@IceedPro Exactly. Which is why no volume of buzzword will stop me from seeing your rotten character.
1
@IceedPro Nah, cope harder.
1
@xaviersandoval1765 Yeah, I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact "transitioned" people are forced to buy expensive medicine for the rest of their lives to maintain a basic quality of life.
1
@xaviersandoval1765 What's staggering is that you would support malpractice for a chance to feel like a good person instead of, I don't know, not being an oxygen thief. And shifting the costs from the people scammed to the whole population is not a solution, it will give the corrupt corporations even more money.
1
@KitsuneShapeShifter Food and firemen aren't abstract ideas, brainlet.
1
They can feel however they want, they don't get to control how I feel about them. End of.
1
Pretend to have become*
1
@AliothAncalagon How about you do something worth feeling good about.
1
@incomprehensible3945 Congratulations on the crowning achievement of your life, being a mild annoyance to a stranger on the internet.
1
@cronst6352 Have you tried not molesting kids?
1
@AliothAncalagon Imagine calling sexual abuse of children "freedom".
1
@AliothAncalagon Ah, the NPC trying to copy words it doesn't understand to sound smart. A classic.
1
@AliothAncalagon You mean you tried twisting sexual abuse into "freedom", v e r m i n.
1
@AliothAncalagon You know, you have a point. It's merely freedom to stop pdfs from wasting perfectly good oxygen.
1
@AliothAncalagon I made it pretty clear: making sure pdfs stop stealing oxygen.
1
@AliothAncalagon 10% do 78% No, that's the hill for pest control.
1
@AliothAncalagon Funny how there was no confusion or curiosity about the "random" "made up" numbers, just immediate desperation to discredit. It's almost like you know exactly which datatable about crime relating to kids from BoJS these numbers belong to.
1
@AliothAncalagon Numbers so "made up" you're desperate to discredit them. Too bad they come from BSJ and relate to a certain kind of illegal activity toward children by demographics.
1
@AliothAncalagon Bureau of justice statistics. Non-heterosexual people, estimated ~10% of the US population, commit ~78% of sexual acts toward children. But the satanists trying to slander priests is nothing new.
1
@AliothAncalagon Of course groomer corpo removes facts. US Bureau of justice statistics. Datatable on certain "activities" pertaining to people under the age of 18, listed out by sexuality.
1
@AliothAncalagon Your corpomasta really hates truth. Let's try again. B u r e a u - o f - J u s t i c e - S t a t i s t i c s Datable on "activities" involving people under the legal age of consent, listed out by s e x u a l preference.
1
@AliothAncalagon Bureau of Justice Statistics.
1
@AliothAncalagon Datatable on s*x crimes involving children.
1
@AliothAncalagon Specifically listed out by sexuality.
1
@AliothAncalagon Ah, so it's the specific type of activity that triggers the censors. Guess you can't speak out against diddling kids on YT because so many of their execs are on the lolita express list.
1
@AliothAncalagon Of course the groomercorp is triggered by those facts. But hey, keep deflecting. You're doing well at erasing my doubt that maybe not 100% of you 10% are in on it.
1
@AliothAncalagon Yeah, garbage also says 13/56 isn't real. And that's good. Pdfs should get a taste of justice from people.
1
@AliothAncalagon Calling out your lies is hardly "dodging facts". Your desperate mental gymnastics to protect the lolita express kind of crowd makes my argument all by itself.
1
 @AliothAncalagon According to you, but reality doesn't care if you deny it. But hey, keep convincing me that you unequivocally support child molesters, that'll help your case for sure.
1
@AliothAncalagon You do realize that things exist regardless of you admitting it or not, right? Then again, I'm talking to something that proudly supports CSAM, so maybe you literally are that deranged.
1
@AliothAncalagon According to the proud CSAM supporter, sure. But who cares what things like that say.
1
@AliothAncalagon Reality doesn't really care about you denying it. The only ideologue here is the CSAM defender.
1
@AliothAncalagon See, the problem is that you're just not very smart. When I "made up" the "random" numbers and you immediately tried to discredit them instead of being even remotely confused, like you knew exactly what they were. When I mistyped the agency as "BSJ" and you tried to use that for deflection even though the rest of my post regarding what it does should have made it clear. When you claimed to be the authority because you "read every report of the last year" in apparently less than 3 hours, even though it would have been thousands of pages. When you claimed the "category doesn't exist", which is blatantly untrue, of course crimes against children are tracked. And hilariously enough, you followed that one up with a claim that would only prove the sexuality metric does exist. Then you tried the "my claim about subject A proves your evidence for subject B doesn't exist" which is utter nonsense, of course, even if your claim was true. Nobody with an IQ above a chair is impressed with your logical fallacies.
1
@AliothAncalagon See, the problem is that you're just not very smart. When I "made up" the "random" numbers and you immediately tried to discredit them instead of being even remotely confused about the meaning or origin. When I mistyped the agency as "BSJ" you tried to use that for deflection even though I mentioned what it does. When I spelled it out you immediately claimed to be the authority because you "read every report of the last year", which would have been thousands of pages, in under 3 hours. You also claimed the "category doesn't exist" which is absurd of course, there's a publicly available registry of offenders. And hilariously enough, you followed that one up with a claim that would only prove the sexuality metric does exist. Then you tried the "my claim about subject B proves your evidence for subject A doesn't exist" which is utter nonsense, of course, even if your claim was true. The only person who may be impressed with all this is yourself.
1
@AliothAncalagon I mean, I believe one of those claims. You sound smart enough to dedicate yourself to "debate" with people pranking you. I told you where to look. You denied the category existed and then immediately claimed it says something that promotes your narrative. Like I said. Not very smart at all.
1
@AliothAncalagon "This category doesn't exist but it says what I want" Yeah, sure. I already addressed your nonsense. Repeating it doesn't make it true, Goebbels. The prank part was referring to flat earthers. Apparently even context is beyond your mental grasp.
1
@AliothAncalagon So you claim that they track sexuality for robbery but don't track it for SA where it's actually relevant? As I keep saying, evidence doesn't care that Moe Lester claims it doesn't exist.
1
@AliothAncalagon See, it would be a problem if anything of what you said was remotely true. But your best argument is trying to copy me.
1
@AliothAncalagon No, I deny your lies about the source. You said sexuality is tracked for violent crime... except the one type where it's a key motivator. Now it's scientific fact that CSAM proponents are mentally deficient, but come on.
1
@AliothAncalagon No, I deny your lies about it. You claimed sexuality is tracked for v10lent cr1me... except the types where it's a key factor. Like, come on.
1
@AliothAncalagon My point was your lies are pathetically stupid, Moe Lester.
1
@AliothAncalagon No, your lies are just laughably moronic. But hey, it's well-known that CSAM enjoyers are deficient.
1
@AliothAncalagon Nah, your lies are laughably pathetic. Though very typical for pdfs.
1
@jdools4744 No
1
@jdools4744 Keep your mind reading delusions in check, corpomeat
1
@jdools4744 Why does every fascist think it can read minds?
1
@jdools4744 Be more afraid, fashie
1
@jdools4744 Keep living in fear, fashie
1
@jdools4744 No, you can't read minds.
1
@jdools4744 Uh-huh. You ever consider not running defense for fascists kid?
1
@mongoose890 Yeah, we were. Until they decided to bring their "bedroom" to the nearby playground.
1
@mongoose890 Sadly it was, otherwise the freaks would be extinct.
1
@mongoose890 Sadly it was, we allowed PDFs to keep stealing oxygen.
1
@rhettman519 No, facts.
1
@rhettman519 Yes, science before you let politicians decide which one is real.
1
@rhettman519 So, you used to examine science on the basis of evidence, until politicians told you that wasn't allowed? Okay droney. Also go actually do something with your life so you don't have to make up nonsense to justify your existence.
1
@rhettman519 So you used to look at evidence until politicians started calling you names for it? Ok
1
@rhettman519 Calling out a lie is no strawman. Do something with your life and you won't need nonsense to feel "valid" using up oxygen.
1
@rhettman519 I will consider facts, and nothing else. If you're gonna pretend like politicians didn't start slandering people who don't agree with corporate profits, we have nothing to discuss.
1